<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
		>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: How Big Is Big?</title>
	<atom:link href="http://blog.michellemoquin.net/?feed=rss2&#038;p=12536" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://blog.michellemoquin.net/?p=12536</link>
	<description>Creative Discussions, Inspiring Thoughts, Fun Adventures, Love &#38; Laughter, Peaceful Travel, Hip Fashions, Cool People, Gastronomic Pleasures,  Exotic Indulgences, Groovy Music, and more!</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Wed, 09 Nov 2016 11:26:52 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
	<generator>https://wordpress.org/?v=3.6.1</generator>
	<item>
		<title>By: Wilma</title>
		<link>http://blog.michellemoquin.net/?p=12536#comment-20784</link>
		<dc:creator>Wilma</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 29 Jun 2011 22:49:33 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://blog.michellemoquin.com/?p=12536#comment-20784</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[Just as Robert and Alycedale said forgiving the assholes just gives them a second shot at killing you. 

This woman was a fool. If I were on the jury I would not give her $25million. She was on notice after first time and she allowed him to give her a second dose.

Wilma]]></description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Just as Robert and Alycedale said forgiving the assholes just gives them a second shot at killing you. </p>
<p>This woman was a fool. If I were on the jury I would not give her $25million. She was on notice after first time and she allowed him to give her a second dose.</p>
<p>Wilma</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Zen Lill</title>
		<link>http://blog.michellemoquin.net/?p=12536#comment-20772</link>
		<dc:creator>Zen Lill</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 29 Jun 2011 15:11:49 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://blog.michellemoquin.com/?p=12536#comment-20772</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[NIcely said, Robert. There&#039;s nothing confrontational about condom usage. And you are correct, it is not a gender issue, just use them. 

I have been wondering though why people are not discussing their non-negotiables about stepping out and whatever else might cause  a definite break up of a relationship/marriage early on...why do this after 5, 10, 15 years...just so I&#039;m not taken out of context...I mean, why not discuss before bedding a first time, after agreed exclusivity, etc...that would seem to have laid the groundwork for NOT doing it or how it should be reported to sig other asap right from the get go, no? 

- ZL]]></description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>NIcely said, Robert. There&#8217;s nothing confrontational about condom usage. And you are correct, it is not a gender issue, just use them. </p>
<p>I have been wondering though why people are not discussing their non-negotiables about stepping out and whatever else might cause  a definite break up of a relationship/marriage early on&#8230;why do this after 5, 10, 15 years&#8230;just so I&#8217;m not taken out of context&#8230;I mean, why not discuss before bedding a first time, after agreed exclusivity, etc&#8230;that would seem to have laid the groundwork for NOT doing it or how it should be reported to sig other asap right from the get go, no? </p>
<p>- ZL</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Robert</title>
		<link>http://blog.michellemoquin.net/?p=12536#comment-20771</link>
		<dc:creator>Robert</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 29 Jun 2011 12:28:13 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://blog.michellemoquin.com/?p=12536#comment-20771</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[It is a scientific fact that if one of the two people in a monogamous relationship is having sex without a condom with another person(s), then he or she is exposing the unknowing partner to all the sexually transmitted diseases that unprotected sex brings.

The enormity of what the unsuspecting partner is being exposed to depends on how many sex partners the third party has had unprotected sex with. However many that may be, the unsuspecting partner may as well have had unprotected sex with all of them too because that partner can be infected with whatever STD they are passing around. 

DULCE, the question you should be asking yourself is what does that say about how he feels about, you, the other women he has sexual contact with, and himself in that order?

A guy who goes around having sex without a condom when he has an unsuspecting woman partner doesn&#039;t deserve any consideration what so ever. Only a woman who is a fool would give him a second chance. 

Putting that another way, if he took a shot at you with a loaded gun, would you find a reason to give him a second shot? There is no reason to believe that he would not cheat without a condom again, if you gave him a second chance, if you must error, why not error in your own interest. 

Men who decide to satisfy their needs of the moment at the expense of their significant other&#039;s safety or life will NEVER put her needs before his.  If the woman finds out and takes him back, he will then NEVER respect her intelligence, common sense, or ability to see through his lies.  

So Dulce, if you can be content with being with a man who will NEVER respect you because he believes that he conned you into giving him a second chance and who will continue to cheat because he sees no reason not to, then give him a second chance to infect you.

Robert

P.S. Believing he did it because he was horny(didn&#039;t have sex for a few months) is a pathetic attempt at self blame by an emotionally weak woman. No man would give his woman that out.  

With good reason, unless we humans have become dogs in heat, our commitment to our significant other should be enough to give us the strength to resist the temptation to have sex without a condom. 

PPS. The definition of a person who believes bringing up the use of a condom is &quot;a source of confrontation&quot; is a SLUT. The gender of the slut doesn&#039;t matter. The person that would have sex with a person who allow them to have sex with them without a condom is a TRAMP, again the gender of the person is irrelevant. 

Hence, if you are lucky enough to discover your significant other is a SLUT or TRAMP, before your are infected with a disease that could kill you, my advice is to RUN not walk from him or her as soon as it is to your advantage.  

All forgiveness will get you is a second exposure to the same sexual infections he exposes himself to after he engages in unprotected sex.]]></description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>It is a scientific fact that if one of the two people in a monogamous relationship is having sex without a condom with another person(s), then he or she is exposing the unknowing partner to all the sexually transmitted diseases that unprotected sex brings.</p>
<p>The enormity of what the unsuspecting partner is being exposed to depends on how many sex partners the third party has had unprotected sex with. However many that may be, the unsuspecting partner may as well have had unprotected sex with all of them too because that partner can be infected with whatever STD they are passing around. </p>
<p>DULCE, the question you should be asking yourself is what does that say about how he feels about, you, the other women he has sexual contact with, and himself in that order?</p>
<p>A guy who goes around having sex without a condom when he has an unsuspecting woman partner doesn&#8217;t deserve any consideration what so ever. Only a woman who is a fool would give him a second chance. </p>
<p>Putting that another way, if he took a shot at you with a loaded gun, would you find a reason to give him a second shot? There is no reason to believe that he would not cheat without a condom again, if you gave him a second chance, if you must error, why not error in your own interest. </p>
<p>Men who decide to satisfy their needs of the moment at the expense of their significant other&#8217;s safety or life will NEVER put her needs before his.  If the woman finds out and takes him back, he will then NEVER respect her intelligence, common sense, or ability to see through his lies.  </p>
<p>So Dulce, if you can be content with being with a man who will NEVER respect you because he believes that he conned you into giving him a second chance and who will continue to cheat because he sees no reason not to, then give him a second chance to infect you.</p>
<p>Robert</p>
<p>P.S. Believing he did it because he was horny(didn&#8217;t have sex for a few months) is a pathetic attempt at self blame by an emotionally weak woman. No man would give his woman that out.  </p>
<p>With good reason, unless we humans have become dogs in heat, our commitment to our significant other should be enough to give us the strength to resist the temptation to have sex without a condom. </p>
<p>PPS. The definition of a person who believes bringing up the use of a condom is &#8220;a source of confrontation&#8221; is a SLUT. The gender of the slut doesn&#8217;t matter. The person that would have sex with a person who allow them to have sex with them without a condom is a TRAMP, again the gender of the person is irrelevant. </p>
<p>Hence, if you are lucky enough to discover your significant other is a SLUT or TRAMP, before your are infected with a disease that could kill you, my advice is to RUN not walk from him or her as soon as it is to your advantage.  </p>
<p>All forgiveness will get you is a second exposure to the same sexual infections he exposes himself to after he engages in unprotected sex.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Zen Lill</title>
		<link>http://blog.michellemoquin.net/?p=12536#comment-20765</link>
		<dc:creator>Zen Lill</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 28 Jun 2011 20:51:13 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://blog.michellemoquin.com/?p=12536#comment-20765</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[Thanks, Christine, I am going to work on my delivery...though some could work on their receiving? We all have lessons to learn while here.]]></description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Thanks, Christine, I am going to work on my delivery&#8230;though some could work on their receiving? We all have lessons to learn while here.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Christine</title>
		<link>http://blog.michellemoquin.net/?p=12536#comment-20764</link>
		<dc:creator>Christine</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 28 Jun 2011 20:32:11 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://blog.michellemoquin.com/?p=12536#comment-20764</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[Zen Lill, I think your words have been misunderstood by many. It is all in how the &quot;delivery&quot; was understood.  Please continue to post, I&#039;m interested in what you have to say, too.]]></description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Zen Lill, I think your words have been misunderstood by many. It is all in how the &#8220;delivery&#8221; was understood.  Please continue to post, I&#8217;m interested in what you have to say, too.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>
