God, I am so tired too of white men trying to rewrite history. Just how is this “clear-sighted conservative historian, Dr. Brion McClanahan” supposed to set the record straight?

I mean the founding fathers were white, yes? They were sexist unless there is another definition for men who discriminate against women, yes? And the founding fathers did give the rights to WHITE MEN only, they did not include white women.

My issue is with the white women who get behind the white men promoting this shit. C’mon you are already considered the dumbest female group on the planet. Do you have to continue to confirm it by swallowing this “historian’s” lying sack of shit.

This is the time when we start referring to conservative historians as mystorians, meaning – MY story of how history happened.

That would explain how he will tell us that the founder fathers who owned slaves were not slave holders. But they did own slaves, Yes.

Oh and how about his story about how the founders risked their lives, fortunes, and sacred honor for the cause of liberty?

If I may first address that thrown in for general acceptance “sacred honor.” They may have some claim to honor, but “scared,” they were white, sexist, money grubbing, slave owners for God’s sake.

How the fuck does that translate into “sacred honor.” Could someone please bring a motherfucker to the table with clean hands before we start handing out the “scared honor” titles?

Those founding fathers did risk the lives, fortunes and honor of OTHERS in the battle with the British for the control of little fiefdoms for themselves. But it was not about establishing the United States.

Forget about political correctness, how about a little historical accuracy? The USA is a Federation. For those of you who are unfamiliar with the difference between a Federation and what the founding fathers were attempting to found which was a CONFEDERATION.

A FEDERATION is a group of states with a central government but independence in internal affairs.

That is not what the founding fathers had in mine when they penned the constitution. They were about a confederation. You need to understand the difference to understand the true motives of the “foundering fathers.”

Because if you understand the meaning of a Confederation which is an organization that consists of a number of parties or groups united in an alliance or league, then it may dawn on you that the United States as we know it today had a different set of founding fathers.

The others being lauded were a bunch of clever opportunists bent on carving out individual little independent organization, fiefdoms for personal profit and aggrandizement.

“Personal Aggrandizement is a tradition held in high esteem by most of the bankers and financiers in a the USA today.

Hence one of the reasons to continue this charade to make those men more that what they were. Greed becomes your new “Classic,” if one can maintain it against all legal attempts to stop you before you die.

But the “founding fathers” did not want a group of states with a central government. The wanted independent states they could rule in as kings. The only connection they wanted with the other states was to have a united means of defending themselves against a common enemy, something on the order of NATO.

So yes those white, sexist, slaving holding self aggrandizing bastards were the founding fathers of the NATO of the 13 colonies. But they were at best the accidental starters of what is today the Federated states of American that we know as the United States of America.

That is not politically correct it is historically correct. I defy any of the historical scholars to refute my claim with their extensive historical credentials and thereby supposed superior knowledge on the subject matter.

These United States of America were formed in the most part in defiance of most of the original founding fathers.

Alycedale

Tom Brokaw labeled the World War II generation the “Greatest Generation” — but he was wrong.

That honor belongs to the Founders — the men who pledged their lives, fortunes, and sacred honor for the cause of liberty, and who established the United States.

This was a generation without equality, and it deserves to be rescued from the politically correct textbooks, teachers, and professors who want to dismiss the Founders as a cadre of dead, white, sexist, slave-holding males.

Now, a clear-sighted conservative historian, Dr. Brion McClanahan, sets the record straight and revives the true history of these great men. In The Politically Incorrect Guide™ to the Founding Fathers, he profiles all the leading Founders (and some unjustly neglected ones), debunks false attacks on their reputations, and shows how they have better answers to today’s problems than our current politicians do.

CLICK HERE to learn more — and to get your FREE copy of The Politically Incorrect Guide™ to the Founding Fathers today.

Your friend,

Thomas S. Winter
Editor in Chief, Human Events
========================
That racism neurosis is rapidly heading into the psychosis stage.

Claire

Julianne Holt-Lunstad, PhD

Social isolation can be as harmful to health as smoking and alcoholism… and is worse for health than obesity or lack of exercise.

In a review of 148 studies, people with strong social ties had a 50% higher chance of survival than people with weak social connections.

Self-defense: Seek out company as much as possible—especially if you live alone.

Bottom Line/Personal interviewed Julianne Holt-Lunstad, PhD, associate professor of psychology, Brigham Young University, Provo, Utah, and lead author of an analysis of 148 studies, including 308,849 participants, published in PLoS Medicine

Phone hacking: ministers meet Rupert Murdoch’s News Corp every three days
A member of the Cabinet has met executives from Rupert Murdoch’s empire once every three days on average since the Coalition was formed.

Our Prime Minister, David Cameron, has just been a regular ass kisser. -

More than a quarter of the meetings were with David Cameron, while a further 17 meetings each were held with George Osborne, the Chancellor, and Dr Liam Fox, the Defence Secretary.

Mr Osborne’s meetings included a dinner in New York with Mr Murdoch, the chairman of News Corporation, on December 17 – two weeks before the media regulator was due to rule on the company’s bid for full share ownership of BSkyB.
———————
Murdoch figures that if he lies low. The noise will die down and he can return to business as usual.

Bab

Tell a joke:
Q: What’s the difference between Obama’s cabinet and a penitentiary?

A: One is filled with blackmailers, tax-evaders, and threats to society. The other’s for housing prisoners.

———————————-
The neat way they put the “black” in really titillates the boys suffering the serious bouts of racial neurosis. Giggles all around.