<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
		>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: Giant Hogweed: A Horticulture Horror Pt 2</title>
	<atom:link href="http://blog.michellemoquin.net/?feed=rss2&#038;p=13088" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://blog.michellemoquin.net/?p=13088</link>
	<description>Creative Discussions, Inspiring Thoughts, Fun Adventures, Love &#38; Laughter, Peaceful Travel, Hip Fashions, Cool People, Gastronomic Pleasures,  Exotic Indulgences, Groovy Music, and more!</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Wed, 09 Nov 2016 11:26:52 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
	<generator>https://wordpress.org/?v=3.6.1</generator>
	<item>
		<title>By: Human Events &#38; the Rebuttal</title>
		<link>http://blog.michellemoquin.net/?p=13088#comment-22373</link>
		<dc:creator>Human Events &#38; the Rebuttal</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sun, 21 Aug 2011 03:57:00 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://blog.michellemoquin.com/?p=13088#comment-22373</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[229	
No.  229 of 365

Pick a fight with a liberal on:

GREAT PRESIDENTS.

How come libtard sleaze buckets like JFK and meddling early socialists like Woodrow Wilson and FDR tend to figure so high in the list of great presidents? 

The truly great presidents are the ones who interfered as little as possible, leaving America&#039;s natural capitalist instincts free to pursue prosperity and liberty. 

It&#039;s presidents like Republicans Warren Harding (who got the United States swiftly out of a post-World War I depression) and Calvin Coolidge we should really celebrate: 

on their watch taxes fell, wages increased, working hours declined, and the United States enjoyed one of its greatest-ever booms. FDR, on the other hand, just made the Great Depression worse.
=======REBUTTAL======


These guys want to continue to not regulate business because for the little bribes they get from those businesses. The insane part is that for the few millions they are getting they are willing to allow those business: 1. to steal the jobs of the American people and export them overseas; 2. to poison our food and water supply; 3. to destroy our environment; 4. concoct fraudulent schemes to loot the Treasury and 5. to pay almost no taxes forcing the middle class to shoulder the burden. 

Of course the republicans would admire  presidents that were in bed with big business. 

Harding and Coolidge were involved in the Tea Pot Dome, the Veterans Bureau and the Office of Alien Property Custodian scandals.  

Senate investigators discovered a remarkable pattern of ineptitude and corruption revolving around their Attorney General Daugherty.

The only great booms were for the pockets of their rich friends like Henry Ford, Harry F. Sinclair, and Edward Doheny. 

Robert]]></description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>229<br />
No.  229 of 365</p>
<p>Pick a fight with a liberal on:</p>
<p>GREAT PRESIDENTS.</p>
<p>How come libtard sleaze buckets like JFK and meddling early socialists like Woodrow Wilson and FDR tend to figure so high in the list of great presidents? </p>
<p>The truly great presidents are the ones who interfered as little as possible, leaving America&#8217;s natural capitalist instincts free to pursue prosperity and liberty. </p>
<p>It&#8217;s presidents like Republicans Warren Harding (who got the United States swiftly out of a post-World War I depression) and Calvin Coolidge we should really celebrate: </p>
<p>on their watch taxes fell, wages increased, working hours declined, and the United States enjoyed one of its greatest-ever booms. FDR, on the other hand, just made the Great Depression worse.<br />
=======REBUTTAL======</p>
<p>These guys want to continue to not regulate business because for the little bribes they get from those businesses. The insane part is that for the few millions they are getting they are willing to allow those business: 1. to steal the jobs of the American people and export them overseas; 2. to poison our food and water supply; 3. to destroy our environment; 4. concoct fraudulent schemes to loot the Treasury and 5. to pay almost no taxes forcing the middle class to shoulder the burden. </p>
<p>Of course the republicans would admire  presidents that were in bed with big business. </p>
<p>Harding and Coolidge were involved in the Tea Pot Dome, the Veterans Bureau and the Office of Alien Property Custodian scandals.  </p>
<p>Senate investigators discovered a remarkable pattern of ineptitude and corruption revolving around their Attorney General Daugherty.</p>
<p>The only great booms were for the pockets of their rich friends like Henry Ford, Harry F. Sinclair, and Edward Doheny. </p>
<p>Robert</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Cynthia</title>
		<link>http://blog.michellemoquin.net/?p=13088#comment-22370</link>
		<dc:creator>Cynthia</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sun, 21 Aug 2011 03:11:39 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://blog.michellemoquin.com/?p=13088#comment-22370</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[Michelle, I couldn&#039;t get in to reply to your article on cigarette ads. It is about time! The republicans will everything in their power to have them removed you can bet on that.

Cynthia]]></description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Michelle, I couldn&#8217;t get in to reply to your article on cigarette ads. It is about time! The republicans will everything in their power to have them removed you can bet on that.</p>
<p>Cynthia</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Delores</title>
		<link>http://blog.michellemoquin.net/?p=13088#comment-22369</link>
		<dc:creator>Delores</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sun, 21 Aug 2011 02:32:53 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://blog.michellemoquin.com/?p=13088#comment-22369</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[Alice, I have a different take from Alycedale. The sexual experiences that were the most satisfying to me emotionally were with the people who weren&#039;t afraid to be open with the sexual feelings. 

They were  with people I never would have had a long-term relationship with, but I enjoyed them because they allowed themselves to be totally with me; they didn&#039;t try to mask or disguise themselves in any way. 

I&#039;ve had very good relationships with men who were&#039;t particularly skilled or experienced sexually, but had the confidence and trust to be themselves. 

Some guys can come on really macho, and say. &quot;Let&#039;s do this and let&#039;s do that&quot; and they&#039;ve got great skill, but because they&#039;re not giving anything other than performance, Its not satisfying.]]></description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Alice, I have a different take from Alycedale. The sexual experiences that were the most satisfying to me emotionally were with the people who weren&#8217;t afraid to be open with the sexual feelings. </p>
<p>They were  with people I never would have had a long-term relationship with, but I enjoyed them because they allowed themselves to be totally with me; they didn&#8217;t try to mask or disguise themselves in any way. </p>
<p>I&#8217;ve had very good relationships with men who were&#8217;t particularly skilled or experienced sexually, but had the confidence and trust to be themselves. </p>
<p>Some guys can come on really macho, and say. &#8220;Let&#8217;s do this and let&#8217;s do that&#8221; and they&#8217;ve got great skill, but because they&#8217;re not giving anything other than performance, Its not satisfying.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Gretta</title>
		<link>http://blog.michellemoquin.net/?p=13088#comment-22368</link>
		<dc:creator>Gretta</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sun, 21 Aug 2011 02:26:57 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://blog.michellemoquin.com/?p=13088#comment-22368</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[I basically enjoy having sex, but I&#039;m somewhat inhibited when my partner&#039;s inhibited. The more spontaneous they are and able to express their sexuality and not be inhibited, the more I&#039;m able to respond.

Gretta]]></description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I basically enjoy having sex, but I&#8217;m somewhat inhibited when my partner&#8217;s inhibited. The more spontaneous they are and able to express their sexuality and not be inhibited, the more I&#8217;m able to respond.</p>
<p>Gretta</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Alycedale</title>
		<link>http://blog.michellemoquin.net/?p=13088#comment-22367</link>
		<dc:creator>Alycedale</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sun, 21 Aug 2011 02:23:50 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://blog.michellemoquin.com/?p=13088#comment-22367</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[Alice:

The most important factor for me is that he is GOOD! GOOD means that he can go on forever, that he doesn&#039;t come fast, that he can hold off coming and just really stay there and fuck and stop and fuck again. 

Alycedale]]></description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Alice:</p>
<p>The most important factor for me is that he is GOOD! GOOD means that he can go on forever, that he doesn&#8217;t come fast, that he can hold off coming and just really stay there and fuck and stop and fuck again. </p>
<p>Alycedale</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>
