<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
		>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: Personhood Amendment Rejected</title>
	<atom:link href="http://blog.michellemoquin.net/?feed=rss2&#038;p=13988" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://blog.michellemoquin.net/?p=13988</link>
	<description>Creative Discussions, Inspiring Thoughts, Fun Adventures, Love &#38; Laughter, Peaceful Travel, Hip Fashions, Cool People, Gastronomic Pleasures,  Exotic Indulgences, Groovy Music, and more!</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Wed, 09 Nov 2016 11:26:52 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
	<generator>https://wordpress.org/?v=3.6.1</generator>
	<item>
		<title>By: health benefits of cherries</title>
		<link>http://blog.michellemoquin.net/?p=13988#comment-36655</link>
		<dc:creator>health benefits of cherries</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 17 Nov 2011 13:08:00 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://blog.michellemoquin.com/?p=13988#comment-36655</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[&lt;strong&gt;health benefits of cherries...&lt;/strong&gt;

[...]Michelle Moquin&#039;s &quot;A day in the life of&#8230;&quot; &#187; Blog Archive &#187; Personhood Amendment Rejected[...]...]]></description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p><strong>health benefits of cherries&#8230;</strong></p>
<p>[...]Michelle Moquin&#039;s &quot;A day in the life of&#8230;&quot; &raquo; Blog Archive &raquo; Personhood Amendment Rejected[...]&#8230;</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Daniel</title>
		<link>http://blog.michellemoquin.net/?p=13988#comment-33393</link>
		<dc:creator>Daniel</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 10 Nov 2011 16:00:26 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://blog.michellemoquin.com/?p=13988#comment-33393</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[I read that article too. It began with &quot;There is one line amid the 23-page grand jury presentment that marks the depth of the alleged depravity in the Penn State scandal. As a father of three sons, it makes me sick to read.
----------------
&quot;When I got to the part where author said &quot;I am trying to be fair to the man. For all I know there is some plausible explanation not revealed in the grand jury report. If so, it&#039;s unlikely we&#039;ll hear it soon.&quot;
-----------------------

I too thought, this is white boy mentality. They can always give each other deference in any situation.  What I would like to ask the arthur is &quot;Just which one of your three boys would it have been okay for Mr McQueary to standby and allow a grown man to rape in the ass? 

Which one would it have been okay for Mr. McQueary to not shout &quot;Get off that kid you sick fuck?&quot; 

Which one of your three boys would it have been okay for Mr. McQueary to have not stood by and made sure the kid was okay?

Which one of your three boys would it have Okay for Mr. Queary not to have called the police and say &quot;I have just witnessed the rape of a minor?&quot;

Yes, you are the typical white boy. You create those &quot;gray&quot; areas for other white boys to be given a pass where OTWs would have been held to a different standard. 

You would have been the first to scream that there is NO excuse for Mr. McQueary&#039;s behavior.  But you and the likes of you get to pass the buck to Coach Paterno. Who at best should have heard about it with the sounds of police sirens arresting the rapist Jerry Sandusky. 

Mike McQueary should be in jail as an accomplish after the fact. He witnessed a crime an covered it up. So how does the white boy&#039;s Just-Us Justice system handle that. 

They give McQueary a pass to go after Paterno. I&#039;m for that creep&#039;s firing also, but I&#039;m not white so I don&#039;t have a lost of common sense, when it comes to disgusting behavior by white boys.  Hence the first thought that comes to my mind is why wasn&#039;t McQueary charged with a crime of aiding and abetting Sandusky in raping that 10 year old boy?

ANSWER: Just-Us Justice

Daniel]]></description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I read that article too. It began with &#8220;There is one line amid the 23-page grand jury presentment that marks the depth of the alleged depravity in the Penn State scandal. As a father of three sons, it makes me sick to read.<br />
&#8212;&#8212;&#8212;&#8212;&#8212;-<br />
&#8220;When I got to the part where author said &#8220;I am trying to be fair to the man. For all I know there is some plausible explanation not revealed in the grand jury report. If so, it&#8217;s unlikely we&#8217;ll hear it soon.&#8221;<br />
&#8212;&#8212;&#8212;&#8212;&#8212;&#8212;&#8212;&#8211;</p>
<p>I too thought, this is white boy mentality. They can always give each other deference in any situation.  What I would like to ask the arthur is &#8220;Just which one of your three boys would it have been okay for Mr McQueary to standby and allow a grown man to rape in the ass? </p>
<p>Which one would it have been okay for Mr. McQueary to not shout &#8220;Get off that kid you sick fuck?&#8221; </p>
<p>Which one of your three boys would it have been okay for Mr. McQueary to have not stood by and made sure the kid was okay?</p>
<p>Which one of your three boys would it have Okay for Mr. Queary not to have called the police and say &#8220;I have just witnessed the rape of a minor?&#8221;</p>
<p>Yes, you are the typical white boy. You create those &#8220;gray&#8221; areas for other white boys to be given a pass where OTWs would have been held to a different standard. </p>
<p>You would have been the first to scream that there is NO excuse for Mr. McQueary&#8217;s behavior.  But you and the likes of you get to pass the buck to Coach Paterno. Who at best should have heard about it with the sounds of police sirens arresting the rapist Jerry Sandusky. </p>
<p>Mike McQueary should be in jail as an accomplish after the fact. He witnessed a crime an covered it up. So how does the white boy&#8217;s Just-Us Justice system handle that. </p>
<p>They give McQueary a pass to go after Paterno. I&#8217;m for that creep&#8217;s firing also, but I&#8217;m not white so I don&#8217;t have a lost of common sense, when it comes to disgusting behavior by white boys.  Hence the first thought that comes to my mind is why wasn&#8217;t McQueary charged with a crime of aiding and abetting Sandusky in raping that 10 year old boy?</p>
<p>ANSWER: Just-Us Justice</p>
<p>Daniel</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Lazaro</title>
		<link>http://blog.michellemoquin.net/?p=13988#comment-33375</link>
		<dc:creator>Lazaro</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 10 Nov 2011 15:32:22 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://blog.michellemoquin.com/?p=13988#comment-33375</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[Okay Mr. Anonymous #10 here is an excerpt from the Grand Jury report. You tell me what one should think of coach Paterno.
=========================

It was about 9:30 p.m. on March 1, 2002 -- the Friday before the beginning of spring break -- in the Lasch Football Building on the main campus.

And here is the line:

&quot;He saw a naked boy, Victim 2, whose age he estimated to be 10 years old, with his hands up against the wall, being subjected to anal intercourse by a naked [Jerry] Sandusky.&quot;

The &quot;he&quot; has been identified by the Harrisburg Patriot-News and other media outlets as Mike McQueary, then a graduate assistant and now an assistant coach at Penn State. Sandusky, of course, is the former Penn State football coach who has been charged with sexually assaulting eight boys over a decade.

So what did McQueary do in that moment? Did he shout? Did he pry the attacker off the young boy? Did he seek help from anyone who might have been nearby? Did he call the police?

The answer to all these questions is no, at least according to the grand jury report.
Instead, the 28-year-old called his father. And John McQueary told his son to call head football coach Joe Paterno. He did, the next day. And later that Saturday, the two met at Paterno&#039;s house. (I keep wondering where the 10-year-old was and what he was doing by then.)

What was said at the Saturday meeting?

According to the grand jury report, the graduate assistant told Paterno &quot;what he had seen.&quot; Before the grand jury, Paterno testified that he was told that Sandusky was seen &quot;fondling or doing something of a sexual nature to a young boy.&quot;

Regardless of what level of detail he was provided, in my opinion there is no exculpatory explanation to be offered on Paterno&#039;s behalf. Maybe that&#039;s why he released a statement last weekend when the story broke, before this week&#039;s events led to his firing:

As my grand jury testimony stated, I was informed in 2002 by an assistant coach that he had witnessed an incident in the shower of our locker-room facility. It was obvious that the witness was distraught over what he saw, but he at no time related to me the very specific actions contained in the grand jury report.

He continued: &quot;Regardless, it was clear that the witness saw something inappropriate involving Mr. Sandusky.&quot;

The day after his meeting with McQueary, Paterno hosted athletic director Tim Curley at his home and related that the graduate assistant &quot;had seen Jerry Sandusky in the Lasch Building showers fondling or doing something of a sexual nature to a young boy,&quot; according to the grand jury report.

So what happened to Sandusky? He was essentially put on double secret probation and prohibited from using the athletic facilities with young people.

All of which is why many have been appropriately asking of Paterno and Penn State president Graham Spanier: What did they know and when did they know it?

But I am fixated on an earlier point of the causal chain. I want to know why Mike McQueary did not take immediate action.

I am trying to be fair to the man. For all I know there is some plausible explanation not revealed in the grand jury report. If so, it&#039;s unlikely we&#039;ll hear it soon. His father was quoted in the Centre Daily Times as saying, &quot;The attorney general in Harrisburg told us, because we are witnesses, they told us not to make any comment whatsoever.&quot;

But without more details, the situation that Mike McQueary encountered on that Friday night in 2002 seems akin to a passerby who witnesses the rape of a woman in an alley and chooses to walk past.

The event he told the grand jury he witnessed was live and ongoing. If fact, he testified that he believed both Sandusky and the boy saw him when he witnessed the attack. I wonder what the young boy thought when McQueary did nothing. I wonder how that inaction may have scarred him.

It would seem that an adult bore silent witness to subjugation, manipulation, and coercion. And rather than take immediate action, he delayed, called a parent, and disregarded the immediate safety of a prepubescent boy.

Shame, shame, shame.
===========================
Sure, it the guilty are white, the deference term white&#039;s give their own is that bullshit you see above, &quot;I am trying to be fair to the man. For all I know there is some plausible explanation not revealed in the grand jury report. If so, it&#039;s unlikely we&#039;ll hear it soon.&quot; So he ends his critique with &quot;Shame, shame, shame.&quot;

If this was an OTW&#039;s behavior, that author would have been calling for blood. What the fuck was he asking us to believe when he intimated that there could have been a possible explanation for not reporting to the police a grown man fucking a 10 year old boy in the ass. 

Are we supposed to believe that that is an everyday sight for tiny dick white boys. Was the only cause for concern the fact that he was doing in the Lasch Football building?  These are some sick motherfuckers!

I mean both the perpetrator Jerry Sandusky and the witness Mike McQueary. McQueary should be locked up and the key thrown away. Sandusky may be a psychological sick pedophile who can&#039;t help himself. 

But that bastard McQueary is directly responsible for every child that suffered at McQeary&#039;s hands after he witnessed that assault and did not report it to the police. 

Wanna bet he did not stop the attack. Of course not he wanted to protect his job. Once again MONEY is the god of most white males. They are morally vacant. 

Their only connection to morality is the shit they try to force others to follow to satiate some sick neurotic need to control others.

Lazaro]]></description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Okay Mr. Anonymous #10 here is an excerpt from the Grand Jury report. You tell me what one should think of coach Paterno.<br />
=========================</p>
<p>It was about 9:30 p.m. on March 1, 2002 &#8212; the Friday before the beginning of spring break &#8212; in the Lasch Football Building on the main campus.</p>
<p>And here is the line:</p>
<p>&#8220;He saw a naked boy, Victim 2, whose age he estimated to be 10 years old, with his hands up against the wall, being subjected to anal intercourse by a naked [Jerry] Sandusky.&#8221;</p>
<p>The &#8220;he&#8221; has been identified by the Harrisburg Patriot-News and other media outlets as Mike McQueary, then a graduate assistant and now an assistant coach at Penn State. Sandusky, of course, is the former Penn State football coach who has been charged with sexually assaulting eight boys over a decade.</p>
<p>So what did McQueary do in that moment? Did he shout? Did he pry the attacker off the young boy? Did he seek help from anyone who might have been nearby? Did he call the police?</p>
<p>The answer to all these questions is no, at least according to the grand jury report.<br />
Instead, the 28-year-old called his father. And John McQueary told his son to call head football coach Joe Paterno. He did, the next day. And later that Saturday, the two met at Paterno&#8217;s house. (I keep wondering where the 10-year-old was and what he was doing by then.)</p>
<p>What was said at the Saturday meeting?</p>
<p>According to the grand jury report, the graduate assistant told Paterno &#8220;what he had seen.&#8221; Before the grand jury, Paterno testified that he was told that Sandusky was seen &#8220;fondling or doing something of a sexual nature to a young boy.&#8221;</p>
<p>Regardless of what level of detail he was provided, in my opinion there is no exculpatory explanation to be offered on Paterno&#8217;s behalf. Maybe that&#8217;s why he released a statement last weekend when the story broke, before this week&#8217;s events led to his firing:</p>
<p>As my grand jury testimony stated, I was informed in 2002 by an assistant coach that he had witnessed an incident in the shower of our locker-room facility. It was obvious that the witness was distraught over what he saw, but he at no time related to me the very specific actions contained in the grand jury report.</p>
<p>He continued: &#8220;Regardless, it was clear that the witness saw something inappropriate involving Mr. Sandusky.&#8221;</p>
<p>The day after his meeting with McQueary, Paterno hosted athletic director Tim Curley at his home and related that the graduate assistant &#8220;had seen Jerry Sandusky in the Lasch Building showers fondling or doing something of a sexual nature to a young boy,&#8221; according to the grand jury report.</p>
<p>So what happened to Sandusky? He was essentially put on double secret probation and prohibited from using the athletic facilities with young people.</p>
<p>All of which is why many have been appropriately asking of Paterno and Penn State president Graham Spanier: What did they know and when did they know it?</p>
<p>But I am fixated on an earlier point of the causal chain. I want to know why Mike McQueary did not take immediate action.</p>
<p>I am trying to be fair to the man. For all I know there is some plausible explanation not revealed in the grand jury report. If so, it&#8217;s unlikely we&#8217;ll hear it soon. His father was quoted in the Centre Daily Times as saying, &#8220;The attorney general in Harrisburg told us, because we are witnesses, they told us not to make any comment whatsoever.&#8221;</p>
<p>But without more details, the situation that Mike McQueary encountered on that Friday night in 2002 seems akin to a passerby who witnesses the rape of a woman in an alley and chooses to walk past.</p>
<p>The event he told the grand jury he witnessed was live and ongoing. If fact, he testified that he believed both Sandusky and the boy saw him when he witnessed the attack. I wonder what the young boy thought when McQueary did nothing. I wonder how that inaction may have scarred him.</p>
<p>It would seem that an adult bore silent witness to subjugation, manipulation, and coercion. And rather than take immediate action, he delayed, called a parent, and disregarded the immediate safety of a prepubescent boy.</p>
<p>Shame, shame, shame.<br />
===========================<br />
Sure, it the guilty are white, the deference term white&#8217;s give their own is that bullshit you see above, &#8220;I am trying to be fair to the man. For all I know there is some plausible explanation not revealed in the grand jury report. If so, it&#8217;s unlikely we&#8217;ll hear it soon.&#8221; So he ends his critique with &#8220;Shame, shame, shame.&#8221;</p>
<p>If this was an OTW&#8217;s behavior, that author would have been calling for blood. What the fuck was he asking us to believe when he intimated that there could have been a possible explanation for not reporting to the police a grown man fucking a 10 year old boy in the ass. </p>
<p>Are we supposed to believe that that is an everyday sight for tiny dick white boys. Was the only cause for concern the fact that he was doing in the Lasch Football building?  These are some sick motherfuckers!</p>
<p>I mean both the perpetrator Jerry Sandusky and the witness Mike McQueary. McQueary should be locked up and the key thrown away. Sandusky may be a psychological sick pedophile who can&#8217;t help himself. </p>
<p>But that bastard McQueary is directly responsible for every child that suffered at McQeary&#8217;s hands after he witnessed that assault and did not report it to the police. </p>
<p>Wanna bet he did not stop the attack. Of course not he wanted to protect his job. Once again MONEY is the god of most white males. They are morally vacant. </p>
<p>Their only connection to morality is the shit they try to force others to follow to satiate some sick neurotic need to control others.</p>
<p>Lazaro</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Harry Reid</title>
		<link>http://blog.michellemoquin.net/?p=13988#comment-33365</link>
		<dc:creator>Harry Reid</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 10 Nov 2011 15:11:50 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://blog.michellemoquin.com/?p=13988#comment-33365</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[Two years ago this month, I was down. And if Democrats like you had waited to get involved, I would have been out – and my extremist Tea Party opponent would be a U.S. senator today.

That’s the situation now. It might not be fair, but it is what it is: While Republicans have only 10 seats to defend, we have to defend 23 of our own seats against candidates every bit as extreme as the one I faced two years ago. And the firewall keeping us from Republican control of the Senate is only four seats high.

That means we have to fight uphill, defending every single one of those seats. And it means we can’t afford to wait until next year to fight back against the far right.]]></description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Two years ago this month, I was down. And if Democrats like you had waited to get involved, I would have been out – and my extremist Tea Party opponent would be a U.S. senator today.</p>
<p>That’s the situation now. It might not be fair, but it is what it is: While Republicans have only 10 seats to defend, we have to defend 23 of our own seats against candidates every bit as extreme as the one I faced two years ago. And the firewall keeping us from Republican control of the Senate is only four seats high.</p>
<p>That means we have to fight uphill, defending every single one of those seats. And it means we can’t afford to wait until next year to fight back against the far right.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Anonymous</title>
		<link>http://blog.michellemoquin.net/?p=13988#comment-33362</link>
		<dc:creator>Anonymous</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 10 Nov 2011 15:06:04 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://blog.michellemoquin.com/?p=13988#comment-33362</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[Fuck you spick.]]></description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Fuck you spick.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>
