Democrat Jackie Speier introduces military rape bill
Nov. 17, 2011 | By Kitty Felde | KPCC

A California congresswoman has launched a campaign to combat military rapes.

Democrat Jackie Speier has been making weekly speeches on the House floor, telling the stories of rape victims in the military. Now she’s introduced a bill that would take rape cases out of the usual military chain of command and transfer investigations, prosecutions, and victim care to an autonomous sexual assault office.

Speier says that when a Marine reported her superior officer had raped her, she was told to take an aspirin and go to bed. “That kind of advice might be good for a headache.

But when that’s a prescription by the military to one of its soldiers that has been a victim of an assault or a rape,” she says, “we’ve got a problem.”

The Department of Defense says there were 19,000 sexual assaults last year in the military. Fewer than 3 percent of the perpetrators were punished.

Speier says allowing assaults to go unpunished compromises the effectiveness of the military. “Members of military units survive on the code of watching out for each other.

When sexual assaults and rapes are hushed, ignored, or treated lightly, trust in a unit is compromised along with its collective readiness to engage the enemy,” Speier said.

Speier’s lined up more than three dozen co-sponsors for the bill. They don’t include the Republican head of the House Armed Services Committee, Buck McKeon of Santa Clarita.

His office says “it would be premature to comment” on the bill because it hasn’t been referred to the committee.

Also missing as a co-sponsor is Democrat Loretta Sanchez, who also sits on the Armed Services Committee.

Sanchez says sexual assault in the military is “deplorable,” but she doesn’t believe cases should be removed from the chain of command in the military.

She says it would “further take accountability away from the Commanders who should be held fully accountable for the safety and well-being of their units.”

===========================

We as women need to get behind this.

Alycedale

Al

Dear Fellow Conservative,

President Obama last week brandished new jobs numbers as proof that his policies were having an effect on the unemployment rate, which the report said declined to 8.3 percent in January.

The president is right about one thing: his big government agenda and class warfare tactics are having an effect — but it’s not the one he claims. In truth, last month’s drop in the unemployment statistic was due largely to the evaporation of 1.2 million people from the labor force number.

When people become so discouraged they stop actively looking for work, they are no longer counted as unemployed and the rate goes down even though Americans are hardly better off than they were before.

The rate went down in January because (apparently) 1.2 million people decided in a single month not to pursue work. This is the number, in effect, that President Obama is touting.

The January report caps an extraordinary decline in the participation rate that the Bureau of Labor Statistics (BLS) has been reporting under the Obama administration.

Since January 2009, the BLS said more than five million people have dropped out of the labor force — the greatest decline in American history and the lowest participation rate in more than three decades. Only about six in 10 adult American civilians are counted as part of the labor force.

A few more good jobs reports like this and we’ll have a three percent unemployment rate with nobody working.

The president assures us, however, the lower unemployment rate is actually evidence that his policies are successful.

Asked on Monday about the fact that unemployment had dropped in part because so many Americans left the labor force, unable to find jobs, White House Press Secretary Jay Carney said the decline in the participation rate could be an “economic positive” because some of it is “due to younger people getting more education.”

Carney also tried to blame the massive exodus on Americans getting older—which they must have done at record levels in January to account for 1.2 million people retiring at once.

Those are pretty glib and grasping explanations for the single largest exit from the labor force on record—especially since it’s more than four times the number who left the previous month.

In reality, almost half a million fewer Americans are employed today than when President Obama took office. The real unemployment rate, counting those who are unemployed, underemployed, or have looked for work in the past 12 months but since given up, is closer to 15 percent.

More Americans are relying on food stamps than ever before. Teenage unemployment during the Obama administration is the highest since records began in 1948, with almost one in four teenagers who wants to work today unable to find a job. 8.2 million Americans have only part-time employment either because they can’t find full-time work or because their hours have been cut back.

The president’s unrelenting assault on job creators has made a bad economy much worse.

In the middle of the worst economic conditions since the Great Depression, he rammed through Obamacare, spent almost a trillion dollars of “stimulus” indiscriminately, virtually took over the American auto industry, attempted to raise taxes on producers with carbon trading legislation, banned development of offshore oil and gas resources, passed the Dodd-Frank Act which crippled community banks, juiced up the regulatory powers of the EPA, FDA and other bureaucracies—and lately, has taken to demonizing job creators with class warfare rhetoric while offering policy platitudes that do nothing to solve our problems.

These are the things the president is trying to tell us are responsible for last month’s drop in the unemployment rate? Having driven five million people out of the labor force, maybe on second thought he’s right.

Your Friend,

Newt

Just think about it – if you are in a TOTALLY COLLAPSED, FAILED ECONOMY (collapse of the dollar, fed, etc…) – WTH is gold gonna do for you? You gonna go knock on the gates and sell it to the royalty?