<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
		>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: &#8220;Just Noticing&#8221;: Observations Of A Blogger</title>
	<atom:link href="http://blog.michellemoquin.net/?feed=rss2&#038;p=15799" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://blog.michellemoquin.net/?p=15799</link>
	<description>Creative Discussions, Inspiring Thoughts, Fun Adventures, Love &#38; Laughter, Peaceful Travel, Hip Fashions, Cool People, Gastronomic Pleasures,  Exotic Indulgences, Groovy Music, and more!</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Wed, 09 Nov 2016 11:26:52 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
	<generator>https://wordpress.org/?v=3.6.1</generator>
	<item>
		<title>By: mistress's bondage videos</title>
		<link>http://blog.michellemoquin.net/?p=15799#comment-123375</link>
		<dc:creator>mistress's bondage videos</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 23 Sep 2014 15:23:46 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://blog.michellemoquin.com/?p=15799#comment-123375</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[I am a bds junkie and I&#039;ve searched the entire net ffor some of the roughest 
extremme sex videos. All of the vids that I have run across 
have sucked. Finally, I logged into Mistress Ectasy&#039;s 
bdsm videos. Everybody who needs a fix of some of the most hardcore vids 
on the internet should check out  &lt;a href=&quot;http://www.www.mistressectasy.com&quot; rel=&quot;nofollow&quot;&gt;Mistress Ectasy&#039;s bondage stories videos&lt;/a&gt;.


Visit my web-site - &lt;a href=&quot;http://mistressecstasy.com/&quot; rel=&quot;nofollow&quot;&gt;mistress&#039;s bondage videos&lt;/a&gt;]]></description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I am a bds junkie and I&#8217;ve searched the entire net ffor some of the roughest<br />
extremme sex videos. All of the vids that I have run across<br />
have sucked. Finally, I logged into Mistress Ectasy&#8217;s<br />
bdsm videos. Everybody who needs a fix of some of the most hardcore vids<br />
on the internet should check out  <a href="http://www.www.mistressectasy.com" rel="nofollow">Mistress Ectasy&#8217;s bondage stories videos</a>.</p>
<p>Visit my web-site &#8211; <a href="http://mistressecstasy.com/" rel="nofollow">mistress&#8217;s bondage videos</a></p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Zen Lill</title>
		<link>http://blog.michellemoquin.net/?p=15799#comment-52063</link>
		<dc:creator>Zen Lill</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 22 May 2012 07:26:57 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://blog.michellemoquin.com/?p=15799#comment-52063</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[JS-1,
 some people have a hard time with the honesty required to really have an open relationship. It takes give and take on both sides, and is not for the jealous or insecure at all. More often than not, someone is at a disadvantage due to logistics (ex. canceling plans with the primary partner to go on a new date would/can get old or might bring up someone&#039;s baggage unexpectedly) 

or the honesty becomes an issue in these terms (how much does the other party want to know exactly, how much do you want to share exactly, etc...), it&#039;s complex in its very nature bc some people define &#039;honesty&#039; and disclosure differently than others and therein lies the rub. 

Players (most often male but not always) usually don&#039;t call what they do &#039;open relationships&#039; they just do it and apologize when called out bc most of the ones who claim &#039;open&#039; are not open, they like their cake and eat it, too, which is fine but they don&#039;t really  want their cakes out getting their own cake and eating it, too. 

Kind of unfair but I&#039;ll repeat - all&#039;s fair (kind of) in love, war and the boudoir, oui?

I prefer to stay teased, connected and enticed with one until...I&#039;m not...though things could change, I never say never, Anonz taught me that ; ) 

I enjoy some circular dating until agreements are made about who&#039;s doing what (or should I say: who&#039;s doing who? : ) most of the time this has been bc I like one more than others and I&#039;m too busy to date lesser men just for the heck of it bc the heart wants what the heart wants (and timing/logistics-wise) I&#039;d rather be with the emerging winner more...who knows if I&#039;ll ever be in a LONG term relationship again, but hmm, how long is that long in long term anyway? 

Luv, Zen Lill

PS need to reread Anonz&#039;s comment again, it&#039;s important and I&#039;ve been predicting an uprising/full blown chaos surrounding the eleventh hour lead up and outcome of the US Presidential race, I can feel it...]]></description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>JS-1,<br />
 some people have a hard time with the honesty required to really have an open relationship. It takes give and take on both sides, and is not for the jealous or insecure at all. More often than not, someone is at a disadvantage due to logistics (ex. canceling plans with the primary partner to go on a new date would/can get old or might bring up someone&#8217;s baggage unexpectedly) </p>
<p>or the honesty becomes an issue in these terms (how much does the other party want to know exactly, how much do you want to share exactly, etc&#8230;), it&#8217;s complex in its very nature bc some people define &#8216;honesty&#8217; and disclosure differently than others and therein lies the rub. </p>
<p>Players (most often male but not always) usually don&#8217;t call what they do &#8216;open relationships&#8217; they just do it and apologize when called out bc most of the ones who claim &#8216;open&#8217; are not open, they like their cake and eat it, too, which is fine but they don&#8217;t really  want their cakes out getting their own cake and eating it, too. </p>
<p>Kind of unfair but I&#8217;ll repeat &#8211; all&#8217;s fair (kind of) in love, war and the boudoir, oui?</p>
<p>I prefer to stay teased, connected and enticed with one until&#8230;I&#8217;m not&#8230;though things could change, I never say never, Anonz taught me that ; ) </p>
<p>I enjoy some circular dating until agreements are made about who&#8217;s doing what (or should I say: who&#8217;s doing who? : ) most of the time this has been bc I like one more than others and I&#8217;m too busy to date lesser men just for the heck of it bc the heart wants what the heart wants (and timing/logistics-wise) I&#8217;d rather be with the emerging winner more&#8230;who knows if I&#8217;ll ever be in a LONG term relationship again, but hmm, how long is that long in long term anyway? </p>
<p>Luv, Zen Lill</p>
<p>PS need to reread Anonz&#8217;s comment again, it&#8217;s important and I&#8217;ve been predicting an uprising/full blown chaos surrounding the eleventh hour lead up and outcome of the US Presidential race, I can feel it&#8230;</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: JS-1</title>
		<link>http://blog.michellemoquin.net/?p=15799#comment-52036</link>
		<dc:creator>JS-1</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 21 May 2012 17:17:22 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://blog.michellemoquin.com/?p=15799#comment-52036</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[It can be difficult to accept, but the plain fact of the matter is that, by and large, you just can&#039;t have it all. What you CAN have is honesty, both with yourself and with others.

If you say you want a monogomous relationship - why? 

Is it because you are desirous of a relationship in which you both are so &quot;in synch&quot; with one another that you wouldn&#039;t WANT to be with another person, or is it because you are afraid of being alone/left/compared with others, a.k.a. insecurity?

If you say you want an open relationship - why? 

Is it because your sex drive craves that kind of variety, even though you might be emotionally contented with one person, or it is because you really are NOT contented with the person you are with and need to vent your frustrations in a sexual release?

Most of us, if we are honest, will be able to see a bit of ourselves in each of these possibilities, but it can often be difficult to unravel our true reasons for wanting something. 

The trick is to be as aware of our motivations as possible - starting with ourselves and then expressing it to others. 

For some, monogamy really IS the preferred venue; for others, open relationships. The trick is to find others who are, for healthy reasons, on the same page as you -

 if you want an open relationship, then AVOID someone who wants monogamy - it will only lead to anger, resentment and the end of the relationship.]]></description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>It can be difficult to accept, but the plain fact of the matter is that, by and large, you just can&#8217;t have it all. What you CAN have is honesty, both with yourself and with others.</p>
<p>If you say you want a monogomous relationship &#8211; why? </p>
<p>Is it because you are desirous of a relationship in which you both are so &#8220;in synch&#8221; with one another that you wouldn&#8217;t WANT to be with another person, or is it because you are afraid of being alone/left/compared with others, a.k.a. insecurity?</p>
<p>If you say you want an open relationship &#8211; why? </p>
<p>Is it because your sex drive craves that kind of variety, even though you might be emotionally contented with one person, or it is because you really are NOT contented with the person you are with and need to vent your frustrations in a sexual release?</p>
<p>Most of us, if we are honest, will be able to see a bit of ourselves in each of these possibilities, but it can often be difficult to unravel our true reasons for wanting something. </p>
<p>The trick is to be as aware of our motivations as possible &#8211; starting with ourselves and then expressing it to others. </p>
<p>For some, monogamy really IS the preferred venue; for others, open relationships. The trick is to find others who are, for healthy reasons, on the same page as you -</p>
<p> if you want an open relationship, then AVOID someone who wants monogamy &#8211; it will only lead to anger, resentment and the end of the relationship.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Mikey's back</title>
		<link>http://blog.michellemoquin.net/?p=15799#comment-52035</link>
		<dc:creator>Mikey's back</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 21 May 2012 17:05:59 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://blog.michellemoquin.com/?p=15799#comment-52035</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[&quot;Jaczko and the pro-industry commissioners clashed over his opposition to using Nevada&#039;s Yucca Mountain as a depository for nuclear waste. 

The commissioners further accused him of heavy-handed leadership when he put the NRC on emergency footing following the Fukishima disaster in 2011. 

They argued that he was pushing forward too fast with costly new safety regulations.&quot;
=======================

Of course they would do whatever they could to oust a Commissioner who&#039;s trying to do the right thing. 

God forbid we should ensure that our current nuclear power plants are able to withstand earthquakes or request safety regulations. Remember Karen Silkwood? 

These are the same folks insisting that Mr. Jaczko &quot;was pushing forward too fast with costly new safety regs.&quot; Bunch of money hungry crooks who no more care about you and I than they do in ensuring USA nuclear plants are safe.]]></description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>&#8220;Jaczko and the pro-industry commissioners clashed over his opposition to using Nevada&#8217;s Yucca Mountain as a depository for nuclear waste. </p>
<p>The commissioners further accused him of heavy-handed leadership when he put the NRC on emergency footing following the Fukishima disaster in 2011. </p>
<p>They argued that he was pushing forward too fast with costly new safety regulations.&#8221;<br />
=======================</p>
<p>Of course they would do whatever they could to oust a Commissioner who&#8217;s trying to do the right thing. </p>
<p>God forbid we should ensure that our current nuclear power plants are able to withstand earthquakes or request safety regulations. Remember Karen Silkwood? </p>
<p>These are the same folks insisting that Mr. Jaczko &#8220;was pushing forward too fast with costly new safety regs.&#8221; Bunch of money hungry crooks who no more care about you and I than they do in ensuring USA nuclear plants are safe.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: KC</title>
		<link>http://blog.michellemoquin.net/?p=15799#comment-52034</link>
		<dc:creator>KC</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 21 May 2012 17:04:30 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://blog.michellemoquin.com/?p=15799#comment-52034</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[Maybe there&#039;s a reason that the government doesn&#039;t want that much regulation. If an accident happens, they can say that it was obviously somebody from Iran who sneaked in and did it and now we must retaliate.]]></description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Maybe there&#8217;s a reason that the government doesn&#8217;t want that much regulation. If an accident happens, they can say that it was obviously somebody from Iran who sneaked in and did it and now we must retaliate.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>
