<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
		>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: Cat Lovers&#8230;</title>
	<atom:link href="http://blog.michellemoquin.net/?feed=rss2&#038;p=16762" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://blog.michellemoquin.net/?p=16762</link>
	<description>Creative Discussions, Inspiring Thoughts, Fun Adventures, Love &#38; Laughter, Peaceful Travel, Hip Fashions, Cool People, Gastronomic Pleasures,  Exotic Indulgences, Groovy Music, and more!</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Wed, 09 Nov 2016 11:26:52 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
	<generator>https://wordpress.org/?v=3.6.1</generator>
	<item>
		<title>By: Alycedale</title>
		<link>http://blog.michellemoquin.net/?p=16762#comment-57720</link>
		<dc:creator>Alycedale</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 11 Sep 2012 04:55:13 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://blog.michellemoquin.com/?p=16762#comment-57720</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[I just finished watching Rachel Maddow interview Dan Rather concerning his view as to what is the state of the present election process. She won&#039;t say it because she knows that she would be tarred and feathered by the white boy controlled media, but I am certain she sees the idiot for what he is only slightly smarter that the other dumb white boys we have been told by other white boys how great they are or were(if the idiots are dead). 

He did his best to tell us how Clinton&#039;s speech was better than Obama&#039;s because ex President Clinton knows how to talk to the &quot;people.&quot; Here he was referring to whites and meaning &quot;the people.&quot; 

Like the rest of his ilk, he had no problem lumping the outright lies Romney was telling with the difference of interpretation Obama was referring to. 

Dan Rather is a typical white boy who has been given accolades by other white boys. 

Hence, he says he expected Paul Ryan to be cool under pressure. It took Rachael Maddow to point out the Dan Rather the error of his assumption. She told the white boy that she knew that Paul Ryan would not be &quot;cool under pressure,&quot; because he had never been exposed to the kind of media scrutiny that a bigger arena that the small town state of Wisconsin presented him with.

She concluded with the example that the fact that Ryan thought he could get away with lying about an easy checkable fact as the time in which he finished a marathon in was proof of that inexperience.  One would think that the &quot;great&quot; Dan Rather went away with a clue that he should have thought of that before he went on her show giving the kind of white boy deference to another white boy he gave to Ryan.

Yes, white boys, if women and OTWs had been given an opportunity to anchor those chairs that the Dan Rather and Walter Cronkites were given we might have real intellects to honor rather than the new &quot;icons&quot; we are told that we should revere. 

This is no small thing. Like the Office of the President and all the other offices, and positions that up to now only white boys were privileged to hold as the true Affirmative Action Beneficiaries, it is becoming apparent that they did not do a very good job. 

Certainly nowhere as good a job as they have at telling us how good a job they have done. 

Alycedale]]></description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I just finished watching Rachel Maddow interview Dan Rather concerning his view as to what is the state of the present election process. She won&#8217;t say it because she knows that she would be tarred and feathered by the white boy controlled media, but I am certain she sees the idiot for what he is only slightly smarter that the other dumb white boys we have been told by other white boys how great they are or were(if the idiots are dead). </p>
<p>He did his best to tell us how Clinton&#8217;s speech was better than Obama&#8217;s because ex President Clinton knows how to talk to the &#8220;people.&#8221; Here he was referring to whites and meaning &#8220;the people.&#8221; </p>
<p>Like the rest of his ilk, he had no problem lumping the outright lies Romney was telling with the difference of interpretation Obama was referring to. </p>
<p>Dan Rather is a typical white boy who has been given accolades by other white boys. </p>
<p>Hence, he says he expected Paul Ryan to be cool under pressure. It took Rachael Maddow to point out the Dan Rather the error of his assumption. She told the white boy that she knew that Paul Ryan would not be &#8220;cool under pressure,&#8221; because he had never been exposed to the kind of media scrutiny that a bigger arena that the small town state of Wisconsin presented him with.</p>
<p>She concluded with the example that the fact that Ryan thought he could get away with lying about an easy checkable fact as the time in which he finished a marathon in was proof of that inexperience.  One would think that the &#8220;great&#8221; Dan Rather went away with a clue that he should have thought of that before he went on her show giving the kind of white boy deference to another white boy he gave to Ryan.</p>
<p>Yes, white boys, if women and OTWs had been given an opportunity to anchor those chairs that the Dan Rather and Walter Cronkites were given we might have real intellects to honor rather than the new &#8220;icons&#8221; we are told that we should revere. </p>
<p>This is no small thing. Like the Office of the President and all the other offices, and positions that up to now only white boys were privileged to hold as the true Affirmative Action Beneficiaries, it is becoming apparent that they did not do a very good job. </p>
<p>Certainly nowhere as good a job as they have at telling us how good a job they have done. </p>
<p>Alycedale</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: KL</title>
		<link>http://blog.michellemoquin.net/?p=16762#comment-57719</link>
		<dc:creator>KL</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 11 Sep 2012 04:53:45 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://blog.michellemoquin.com/?p=16762#comment-57719</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[Right before our eyes.... in less than a month.... Ryan has become a Romney flip flopping twin]]></description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Right before our eyes&#8230;. in less than a month&#8230;. Ryan has become a Romney flip flopping twin</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Carlos</title>
		<link>http://blog.michellemoquin.net/?p=16762#comment-57718</link>
		<dc:creator>Carlos</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 11 Sep 2012 04:52:22 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://blog.michellemoquin.com/?p=16762#comment-57718</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[The question was &quot;So, you voted for defense spending cuts by $500 billion, and now you’re criticizing the president for those same defense cuts that you voted for and called a victory,&quot;

Ryan’s response “The goal was never that these defense cuts actually occur,&quot; whaaat? 

So, which Paul Ryan are you… the one who was for it, signed it and called it victory, or the one with Myth. Either way, how can one trust you to lead, if you don’t believe in yourself?]]></description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>The question was &#8220;So, you voted for defense spending cuts by $500 billion, and now you’re criticizing the president for those same defense cuts that you voted for and called a victory,&#8221;</p>
<p>Ryan’s response “The goal was never that these defense cuts actually occur,&#8221; whaaat? </p>
<p>So, which Paul Ryan are you… the one who was for it, signed it and called it victory, or the one with Myth. Either way, how can one trust you to lead, if you don’t believe in yourself?</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Debbie</title>
		<link>http://blog.michellemoquin.net/?p=16762#comment-57716</link>
		<dc:creator>Debbie</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 11 Sep 2012 04:49:02 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://blog.michellemoquin.com/?p=16762#comment-57716</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[SH, conservative/non racist oxymoron]]></description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>SH, conservative/non racist oxymoron</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: SH</title>
		<link>http://blog.michellemoquin.net/?p=16762#comment-57713</link>
		<dc:creator>SH</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 11 Sep 2012 03:07:44 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://blog.michellemoquin.com/?p=16762#comment-57713</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[Conservative/Obama oxymoron]]></description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Conservative/Obama oxymoron</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>
