I like that song too. It’s been a long time since I heard it. It’s nice to know I am always on your mind because being on your dick is a rarity lately.

I’m sorry if I upset you this evening. I was only having a little fun. I didn’t mean to hurt you.

I love you.

Yw

The State of Indiana in a 3-2 decision, Justice Steven David writing for the court said if a police officer wants to enter a home for any reason or no reason at all, a homeowner cannot do anything to block the officer’s entry.

Justice Robert Rucker, a Gary native, and Justice Brent Dickson, a Hobart native, dissented from the ruling, saying the court’s decision runs afoul of the Fourth Amendment of the U.S. Constitution.

“In my view the majority sweeps with far too broad a brush by essentially telling Indiana citizens that government agents may now enter their homes illegally — that is, without the necessity of a warrant, consent or exigent circumstances,” Rucker said. “I disagree.”

Dickson said, “The wholesale abrogation of the historic right of a person to reasonably resist unlawful police entry into his dwelling is unwarranted and unnecessarily broad.”

This is the second major Indiana Supreme Court ruling this week involving police entry into a home.

On Tuesday, the court said police serving a warrant may enter a home without knocking if officers decide circumstances justify it. Prior to that ruling, police serving a warrant would have to obtain a judge’s permission to enter without knocking.
====================================
Yet, all we hear is how Obama is trying to take over the country. Now you know why the Right is so interested in States Rights. They figure to control your rights by taking them away state by state.

Irene

States like Illinois have made it a felony to record a police officer doing his job.

White men will do anything to cover up their crimes. Witness all the anti vote laws. Everyone knows that they are written to suppress or prevent the OTW vote.

But only MSNBC will say that. The rest of white America will accuse you of playing the race card if you say what it really is.

Finally the Supreme Court reached its limit on what they will allow these bigots to do.

Robert, RT

The U.S. Supreme Court upheld a lower court’s ruling that found the Illinois anti-eavesdropping law a violation of free speech, reports the Chicago Tribune. The law, which has had several challenges to it since the ACLU filed suit in 2010 to block its enforcement, made it a crime to record law enforcement carrying out their duties in the public sphere and was punishable by a maximum of 15 years in prison. Just prior to the NATO summit in May, a federal appeals court banned police from enforcing it. The Illinois House amended the law after the summit to allow for audio recordings of law enforcement officials.

The Court refused to hear the case, Anita Alvarez v. ACLU of Illinois, which allows the ruling from the 7th Circuit Court of Appeals in May to stand. In the original decision, Judge Diane Sykes wrote:

“The Illinois eavesdropping statue restricts a medium of expression commonly used for the preservation and communication of information and ideas, thus triggering First Amendment scrutiny” and that the “statute restricts far more speech than necessary to protect legitimate privacy interests.”

Harvey Grossman, Legal Director for the ACLU of Illinois said in a statement:

We are pleased that the Supreme Court has refused to take this appeal. Now, we can focus on the on-going proceedings in the federal district court. We now hope to obtain a permanent injunction in this case, so that the ACLU’s program of monitoring police activity in public can move forward in the future without any threat of prosecution…

While a final ruling in this case will only address the work of the ACLU of Illinois to monitor police activity, we believe that it will have a ripple effect throughout the entire state.

We are hopeful that we are moving closer to a day when no one in Illinois will risk prosecution when they audio record public officials performing their duties.”