<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
		>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: Results of &#8220;The Fall&#8221;</title>
	<atom:link href="http://blog.michellemoquin.net/?feed=rss2&#038;p=17728" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://blog.michellemoquin.net/?p=17728</link>
	<description>Creative Discussions, Inspiring Thoughts, Fun Adventures, Love &#38; Laughter, Peaceful Travel, Hip Fashions, Cool People, Gastronomic Pleasures,  Exotic Indulgences, Groovy Music, and more!</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Wed, 09 Nov 2016 11:26:52 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
	<generator>https://wordpress.org/?v=3.6.1</generator>
	<item>
		<title>By: Safety Cone</title>
		<link>http://blog.michellemoquin.net/?p=17728#comment-79337</link>
		<dc:creator>Safety Cone</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 06 May 2013 13:56:50 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://blog.michellemoquin.com/?p=17728#comment-79337</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[Hi! I know this is kinda off topic but I was wondering 
which blog platform are you using for this site?
I&#039;m getting fed up of Wordpress because I&#039;ve had problems with hackers and I&#039;m looking at options for another platform. I would be fantastic if you could point me in the direction of a good platform.]]></description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Hi! I know this is kinda off topic but I was wondering<br />
which blog platform are you using for this site?<br />
I&#8217;m getting fed up of WordPress because I&#8217;ve had problems with hackers and I&#8217;m looking at options for another platform. I would be fantastic if you could point me in the direction of a good platform.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Patricia</title>
		<link>http://blog.michellemoquin.net/?p=17728#comment-69103</link>
		<dc:creator>Patricia</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 03 Jan 2013 06:07:03 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://blog.michellemoquin.com/?p=17728#comment-69103</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[Those of you up set about the President being told by the courts that he can continue to kill americans with drones and not have to tell anyone need to see the Rachel Maddow show tomorrow. 

She will have the architect of that policy and more, Jeh Johnson, the retiring attorney for General Counsel of the Department of Defense.]]></description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Those of you up set about the President being told by the courts that he can continue to kill americans with drones and not have to tell anyone need to see the Rachel Maddow show tomorrow. </p>
<p>She will have the architect of that policy and more, Jeh Johnson, the retiring attorney for General Counsel of the Department of Defense.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Joleen</title>
		<link>http://blog.michellemoquin.net/?p=17728#comment-69102</link>
		<dc:creator>Joleen</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 03 Jan 2013 05:51:14 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://blog.michellemoquin.com/?p=17728#comment-69102</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[Another example of republican hypocrisy.
===========================
A newsletter from Fox News&#039; Laura Ingraham blasted President Obama&#039;s recent meeting with MSNBC hosts — but seems to have forgotten one crucial element.

On Tuesday, Obama met with MSNBC&#039;s Rachel Maddow, Al Sharpton, Lawrence O&#039;Donnell and other &quot;influential progressives&quot; at the White House. Fox News hosts, including Ingraham, were up in arms about the invitation.

Ingraham&#039;s newsletter on Wednesday criticized the meeting, asking, &quot;Can anyone even imagine how the press would have reacted if Fox News hosts and conservative personalities had stopped by the Bush White House to discuss policy? They would have been rightly outraged.&quot;

As other organizations have pointed out, however, Ingraham and other conservative media personalities did in fact stop by the Bush White House. In October 2006, Ingraham and Sean Hannity among others met with President Bush. They sat down for an hour and a half, during which time they discussed the war in Iraq and immigration reform.

One of Ingraham&#039;s producers later defended the newsletter in an email to Media Matters. The producer said that the newsletter had been written by staffers, not Ingraham herself, and claimed that she met with President Bush under circumstances &quot;quite different&quot; than those of Obama&#039;s meeting on Monday.
==============================]]></description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Another example of republican hypocrisy.<br />
===========================<br />
A newsletter from Fox News&#8217; Laura Ingraham blasted President Obama&#8217;s recent meeting with MSNBC hosts — but seems to have forgotten one crucial element.</p>
<p>On Tuesday, Obama met with MSNBC&#8217;s Rachel Maddow, Al Sharpton, Lawrence O&#8217;Donnell and other &#8220;influential progressives&#8221; at the White House. Fox News hosts, including Ingraham, were up in arms about the invitation.</p>
<p>Ingraham&#8217;s newsletter on Wednesday criticized the meeting, asking, &#8220;Can anyone even imagine how the press would have reacted if Fox News hosts and conservative personalities had stopped by the Bush White House to discuss policy? They would have been rightly outraged.&#8221;</p>
<p>As other organizations have pointed out, however, Ingraham and other conservative media personalities did in fact stop by the Bush White House. In October 2006, Ingraham and Sean Hannity among others met with President Bush. They sat down for an hour and a half, during which time they discussed the war in Iraq and immigration reform.</p>
<p>One of Ingraham&#8217;s producers later defended the newsletter in an email to Media Matters. The producer said that the newsletter had been written by staffers, not Ingraham herself, and claimed that she met with President Bush under circumstances &#8220;quite different&#8221; than those of Obama&#8217;s meeting on Monday.<br />
==============================</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: JD</title>
		<link>http://blog.michellemoquin.net/?p=17728#comment-69100</link>
		<dc:creator>JD</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 03 Jan 2013 05:33:58 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://blog.michellemoquin.com/?p=17728#comment-69100</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[Obama is like a black, modern day version of &quot;The Fonze&quot;. Krugman looks like he still gets daily wedgies. Which one will be remembered as a wimp? Neither. Obama will be remembered as the black Fonzy president and Krugman won&#039;t be remembered at all.]]></description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Obama is like a black, modern day version of &#8220;The Fonze&#8221;. Krugman looks like he still gets daily wedgies. Which one will be remembered as a wimp? Neither. Obama will be remembered as the black Fonzy president and Krugman won&#8217;t be remembered at all.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Mike</title>
		<link>http://blog.michellemoquin.net/?p=17728#comment-69099</link>
		<dc:creator>Mike</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 03 Jan 2013 05:31:05 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://blog.michellemoquin.com/?p=17728#comment-69099</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[Obama will go down in history as the man who gave the order to kill America&#039;s #1 enemy and the #1 terrorist in the world. He will go down in history as a President that achieved things that others have been trying to achieve for decades. He will go down in history as one of the most accomplished Presidents in history.

Paul Krugman? All talk, no real responsibility.]]></description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Obama will go down in history as the man who gave the order to kill America&#8217;s #1 enemy and the #1 terrorist in the world. He will go down in history as a President that achieved things that others have been trying to achieve for decades. He will go down in history as one of the most accomplished Presidents in history.</p>
<p>Paul Krugman? All talk, no real responsibility.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>
