*& I’m outta here, there’s winter tennis to play!

How about if the ‘rapist’ no matter his color/creed gets a societal deterrent ahead of time so women stop getting raped by men to begin with, obviously the whole scenario is somewhat accepted so it’s dealing with them in what court, that’s it, that’s the best we can come up with?
How about in the court of step one, we ‘remove your testicles’ for forcing yourself on a female who has made it clear she does not want you or your advances.

Highly unlikely bc rape is about power not sex, not wanted or unwanted sexual advances (although there’s the date rape scene and that’s a similar but slightly different motive, these men have taken no as yes, yes as yes and maybe as yes and many women buy into this by playing it out, intentionally or unintentionally – as well).

So society has to see this and define this thing called ‘rape’ as the major violation that it is, no matter how they want to code it, ‘it’s not real rape unless x/y/z occurs’ no rape is rape=major crime on womenkind.

The problem is too many people do victim blaming to begin with, why was she ‘there’ and why was she dressed like that, etc…adding to the ‘she must’ve asked for it’ mentality of some males, who clearly see any woman who’s standing there as being put in the scene for them to abuse.

Oh, just wait until the feminine powers start to take hold in this upcoming time of change, it won’t be easy but men will change…they will have to. They can do it kicking and screaming or they can do it the easy way, but change is imminent.

There’s often cynicism here about men and I’ll only reiterate what Mischa always says ‘SOME men’ but if you’re one of the other men, the good men, well dudes it’s time to grow your pair a little more and speak up now and again because otherwise you are aiding and abetting the SOME men who are making you all look a little sketchy, untrustworthy (and at same time demanding trust from your woman), etc…

and PS to covert bad men, the wolves in sheeps clothing type – don’t expect total allegiance unless you are willing to give it, so if you’re busy acting like a barbarian while you’re not with your woman (ex. you’re busy at bars grabbing your local drink maker, etc…) than don’t expect that ‘your woman’ isn’t on to you, that’d be stupid on your part, (and sure as hell don’t be bitching when she dumps you).

Back to my point, arguing what court or who’s on the jury is moving way past the point: that point being, when the f**k did it start to become sort of ‘it’s just that way’ about so many rapes, it seems to have become rampant and much more violent, I don’t want retribution after that fact, I want the raping/violence to stop. full stop.

Liv, Zen Lill – sorry for ranting but the ‘court’ part is the bandaid, let’s deal with pre-crime, how do we go about exacting change on that???

Or a black man, should only be tried by blacks, white’s by white’s, Asian by Asian’s, Arabs by Arab’s, Columbian’s by Columbian’s, and Puerto Rican’s, by Puerto Rican’s.

Or Army veteran’s by Army veteran’s only, Navy veteran’s by Navy Veteran’s only and so on and so forth, for God’s sake, We All have the capacity to be fair-minded, and unbiased juror’s.

And using their illogical logic, it’d be impossible to prosecute Senator Chuck Grassley, because there are no other Chuck Grassley’s available, to fit into a fair-minded impartial Jurist’s Seat.

There is NOTHING FAIR, NOR IMPARTIAL about this ludicrous logic there Senator Chuck Grassley! Gees talking about speaking to hear ones own voice for Christ’s sakes.

We ALL have the capacity to be fair and impartial! Apparently what is missing, is the willingness to see that this is so.