http://www.hollywoodreporter.com/live-feed/bible-satan-obama-lookalikes-photo-429343

W/

They discriminate against every group imaginable. Of course, doing it against the OTWs(really love that designation) is normal we have been discriminating against them since the landing and we discovered the land occupied by the American Indian.

Actually we whites don’t get upset until we start turning all that hate against our own. Sure, some of the LGBT, are OTWs, but it is the whites of the group being discriminated against that we are really upset about.

Why whites write in seemingly incredulously that the Right and republicans could be that insensitive and cruel to others is beyond logic.

After all our race, the American White Man, has been discriminating since before the beginning of our nation. We hold the distinction as the longest running enslavers, and bigots of the modern era.

Discriminating comes so natural to the American white male that even our women find it acceptable. We find a reason to discriminate against anything we see a profit possibility in.

As politicians we seek to secure an election by appealing to the baser belief that the color of our skins makes us superior to others. That same arrogance assures us the color of our skins makes us the more moral of the races and that what we think is the correct moral choice is God’s also.

Why then should we be surprised when we become the targets of our fellow whites when they find reason to hate and despise us for not holding the same beliefs the “elite” of them do?

If we believe a woman should be equal in all ways, or that anyone is entitled to marry whom they choose, we should expect our brethren to fall upon us with venom and hate. As a race who used the law to enforce our will against various marriages for hundreds of years why the surprise that we would use the law to deny gays the right to their choice of marriage partners?

When we as a race have used the law to enforce our sexual desires upon the OTWs and to sterilize them or force them to accept any cockamamie idea we could think up, why are we now surprised when we turn that same bias towards those of us who want to practice abortion or birth control?

Those of us who find it so disturbing to be the object of that anger, vitriol, and enacted laws to insure their way, had no such disturbing feelings when we were doing it to the OTWs.

Ah, that old canard – if you do not object when they come for your neighbor, who will be there to object when they come for you – rises to bite us in the ass.

So, while we benignly looked the other way when those of our race gerrymandered the electorate to prevent the OTWs from having just representation, we are surprised to discover those same criminals now do the same to us.

Yes, while we looked the other way while we used the law and every dirty trick to prevent the OTWs from voting, we are now surprised to find them now doing the same thing to us, fellow whites.

Yes, while we were content to allow them to keep the bulk of the wealth to our race, now we have awaken to discover they have kept even more from the majority of us whites, too. So now there is almost no middle class(white america).

Yes, as white americans we were content to allow a portion of our race to ensure that we as a race had 95% of the pot. Now that they have taken 98% of that pot for 1% of our race, we cry FOUL!

Not because of what we have been doing to the OTWs of the country, but because now we too are among the victims of greed.

Ironic, you think?

A bacterium which causes a common sexually transmitted disease has been linked to an increased risk of cervical cancer.

Chlamydia trachomatis is the cause of more sexually transmitted diseases in the UK than any other organism.
In 1999 there were 24,311 known new infections in men and 32,544 in women.

However, in many cases the bacterium does not cause any symptoms, and so the actual number of people infected is likely to be up to 90% higher.

If untreated, Chlamydia can lead to sterility in women.
Now Finnish scientists have produced evidence that it might also trigger cervical cancer.

G strain

They found that women infected with a strain of the bacterium, known as serotype G, are nearly seven times more likely to develop cervical cancer.

Two other strains increased the risk of the disease by nearly four-fold and three-fold.
Women infected with more than one strain of Chlamydia were at an even higher risk.

The researchers were led by Dr Tarja Anttila from the National Public Health Institute in Oulu, Finland, and Dr Jorma Paavonen, from the University of Helsinki.

They analysed the results of blood tests taken from 530,000 women in Finland, Norway and Sweden.

They then focused on 128 women who developed severe cervical cancer at least 12 months after donating a sample.
It has long been known that cervical cancer is linked to sexually transmitted infection.

The primary agent involved is thought to be the human papillomavirus (HPV) which causes genital warts.
But the new findings suggest that Chlamydia also plays a significant role.

Britain, in common with other western countries, is undergoing a Chlamydia epidemic.
Infection rate soars

According to the Public Health Laboratory Service, the number of diagnosed infections has soared by 76% since 1995.

There was a 14% increase in infections between 1998 and 1999.
Infection rates in 1999 were highest in London, where they reached 155 per 100,000 men and 184 per 100,000 women. But doctors believe the number of known infections represent only about 10% of all cases.

For women, the long-term effects of Chlamydia infection can be severe, including pelvic inflammatory disease, ectopic pregnancy and infertility.

Dr Lesley Walker, director of cancer information at the Cancer Research Campaign, said: “Most current studies tend to suggest that sexually transmitted infections other than HPV are not linked with cervical cancer

“This report may mean that we need to revisit this area, and look very carefully to see if on-going Chlamydia infection has any influence on an individual’s ability to fight off HPV infection.”

A spokesman for the Public Health Laboratory Service (PHLS) said: “It is very important that people understand that Chlamydia is associated with all sorts of long term side effects.

“That is why using a condom, particularly with a new or casual sexual partner, is very important.”

Mike Catchpole, an expert in sexually transmitted diseases from the PHLS, said the findings strengthened the case for widespread screening for Chlamydia infection.

At present, only those patients who attend STD clinics are screened. However, the Department of Health is currently undertaking a pilot project offering screening to all patients who attend a GP surgery.

The research is published in the Journal of the American Medical Association.
———————————
Men don’t usually have any symptoms. Women just a little vagina irritation. If left untreated, the bacteria goes dormant but returns and causes cancer of the cervix for the woman.