<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
		>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: &#8220;Rape Insurance&#8221;&#8230;&#8221;Just In Case&#8230;</title>
	<atom:link href="http://blog.michellemoquin.net/?feed=rss2&#038;p=20652" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://blog.michellemoquin.net/?p=20652</link>
	<description>Creative Discussions, Inspiring Thoughts, Fun Adventures, Love &#38; Laughter, Peaceful Travel, Hip Fashions, Cool People, Gastronomic Pleasures,  Exotic Indulgences, Groovy Music, and more!</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Wed, 09 Nov 2016 11:26:52 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
	<generator>https://wordpress.org/?v=3.6.1</generator>
	<item>
		<title>By: Maple</title>
		<link>http://blog.michellemoquin.net/?p=20652#comment-109780</link>
		<dc:creator>Maple</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 14 Mar 2014 20:27:40 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://blog.michellemoquin.com/?p=20652#comment-109780</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[But they are willing to meddle and make their own changes as they see fit. How can this be? Why is it SOCIALISM when Obama wants everyone to have coverage, but it&#039;s not when they try to define the parameters of coverage? BS.

So yeah, I get that people disagree with abortion. Good, they never have to have one. But they have no right to tell someone else if they can have one, like you pointed out, would we be making this same argument about Vegans versus omnivores? Not likely.]]></description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>But they are willing to meddle and make their own changes as they see fit. How can this be? Why is it SOCIALISM when Obama wants everyone to have coverage, but it&#8217;s not when they try to define the parameters of coverage? BS.</p>
<p>So yeah, I get that people disagree with abortion. Good, they never have to have one. But they have no right to tell someone else if they can have one, like you pointed out, would we be making this same argument about Vegans versus omnivores? Not likely.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Maple</title>
		<link>http://blog.michellemoquin.net/?p=20652#comment-109779</link>
		<dc:creator>Maple</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 14 Mar 2014 20:26:19 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://blog.michellemoquin.com/?p=20652#comment-109779</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[Well right, it&#039;s a slippery slope. If we&#039;re going to pretend that unplanned pregnancies aren&#039;t a problem for all of us, what else can we pretend isn&#039;t a problem for all of us? 

Lung cancer because people smoke? Liver disease because people drink? Ingrown toenails because people wear high heels? The list is ENDLESS. It reaches to INFINITY for the ridiculous ways people can feign &quot;outrage&quot; against having to help shoulder the cost of health care.

This bill negates the point of healthcare, and the GOP are complete hypocrites. They are against obamacare because they don&#039;t think the government should meddle in a private sector industry (which would be health care). 

They call this &quot;socialism&quot; and manage to scare people because they don&#039;t have a clue what it&#039;s about.]]></description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Well right, it&#8217;s a slippery slope. If we&#8217;re going to pretend that unplanned pregnancies aren&#8217;t a problem for all of us, what else can we pretend isn&#8217;t a problem for all of us? </p>
<p>Lung cancer because people smoke? Liver disease because people drink? Ingrown toenails because people wear high heels? The list is ENDLESS. It reaches to INFINITY for the ridiculous ways people can feign &#8220;outrage&#8221; against having to help shoulder the cost of health care.</p>
<p>This bill negates the point of healthcare, and the GOP are complete hypocrites. They are against obamacare because they don&#8217;t think the government should meddle in a private sector industry (which would be health care). </p>
<p>They call this &#8220;socialism&#8221; and manage to scare people because they don&#8217;t have a clue what it&#8217;s about.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Jessica</title>
		<link>http://blog.michellemoquin.net/?p=20652#comment-109777</link>
		<dc:creator>Jessica</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 14 Mar 2014 20:25:06 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://blog.michellemoquin.com/?p=20652#comment-109777</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[yeah, I&#039;m from michigan but don&#039;t live there right now and I&#039;m all like aoihtgoewsdvhfuaiwejfialdfbnieowjfoajv about this]]></description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>yeah, I&#8217;m from michigan but don&#8217;t live there right now and I&#8217;m all like aoihtgoewsdvhfuaiwejfialdfbnieowjfoajv about this</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: India</title>
		<link>http://blog.michellemoquin.net/?p=20652#comment-109776</link>
		<dc:creator>India</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 14 Mar 2014 20:23:40 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://blog.michellemoquin.com/?p=20652#comment-109776</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[As a Michigan Democrat and one who works in politics here, I very much understand their using that tagline to grab attention and point out one of its largest absurdities. 

While you clearly understand the importance of this issue, a lot of people in Michigan didn&#039;t. Because of that ignorance, apathy and uncertainty, this bill received very little attention until the past week. 

Few people outside of the anti-reproductive rights groups saw this coming. Those groups are coming out swinging in my state and elsewhere, and they will do whatever it takes. If that tagline gets peoples&#039; attention, so be it.]]></description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>As a Michigan Democrat and one who works in politics here, I very much understand their using that tagline to grab attention and point out one of its largest absurdities. </p>
<p>While you clearly understand the importance of this issue, a lot of people in Michigan didn&#8217;t. Because of that ignorance, apathy and uncertainty, this bill received very little attention until the past week. </p>
<p>Few people outside of the anti-reproductive rights groups saw this coming. Those groups are coming out swinging in my state and elsewhere, and they will do whatever it takes. If that tagline gets peoples&#8217; attention, so be it.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Sally</title>
		<link>http://blog.michellemoquin.net/?p=20652#comment-109775</link>
		<dc:creator>Sally</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 14 Mar 2014 20:22:12 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://blog.michellemoquin.com/?p=20652#comment-109775</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[I agree Sarah#5. There&#039;s no need. We know what happens when abortions are made illegal or so costly that only a few women can afford them. 

The abortion rate doesn&#039;t decrease, but the number of women who are killed or seriously injured from botched procedures skyrockets. It&#039;s what happened here when it was illegal, and it&#039;s what happens in other countries where it&#039;s illegal or extremely expensive. 

Therefore, not insuring abortions puts women in danger. No need to bring rape or incest into it.]]></description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I agree Sarah#5. There&#8217;s no need. We know what happens when abortions are made illegal or so costly that only a few women can afford them. </p>
<p>The abortion rate doesn&#8217;t decrease, but the number of women who are killed or seriously injured from botched procedures skyrockets. It&#8217;s what happened here when it was illegal, and it&#8217;s what happens in other countries where it&#8217;s illegal or extremely expensive. </p>
<p>Therefore, not insuring abortions puts women in danger. No need to bring rape or incest into it.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>
