<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
		>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: Wonderful Women Of The World</title>
	<atom:link href="http://blog.michellemoquin.net/?feed=rss2&#038;p=22206" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://blog.michellemoquin.net/?p=22206</link>
	<description>Creative Discussions, Inspiring Thoughts, Fun Adventures, Love &#38; Laughter, Peaceful Travel, Hip Fashions, Cool People, Gastronomic Pleasures,  Exotic Indulgences, Groovy Music, and more!</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Wed, 09 Nov 2016 11:26:52 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
	<generator>https://wordpress.org/?v=3.6.1</generator>
	<item>
		<title>By: Michelle Moquin&#039;s &#34;A day in the life of&#8230;&#34; &#187; Blog Archive &#187; Ebola: The Messy Truth</title>
		<link>http://blog.michellemoquin.net/?p=22206#comment-124180</link>
		<dc:creator>Michelle Moquin&#039;s &#34;A day in the life of&#8230;&#34; &#187; Blog Archive &#187; Ebola: The Messy Truth</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 13 Oct 2014 17:59:16 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://blog.michellemoquin.net/?p=22206#comment-124180</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[[&#8230;] Mike, TM: Very interesting and illuminating. I have full confidence that you and Anonz know what you&#8217;re doing. It&#8217;s probably a very good thing that you revealed what you did. May you both be safe. [&#8230;]]]></description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>[&#8230;] Mike, TM: Very interesting and illuminating. I have full confidence that you and Anonz know what you&#8217;re doing. It&#8217;s probably a very good thing that you revealed what you did. May you both be safe. [&#8230;]</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Lill on Guam</title>
		<link>http://blog.michellemoquin.net/?p=22206#comment-124179</link>
		<dc:creator>Lill on Guam</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 13 Oct 2014 16:24:24 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://blog.michellemoquin.net/?p=22206#comment-124179</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[WOW! Women in charge! 

Article from KUAM NEWS at www.kuam.com:

Guam Guardsmen preparing for Afghanistan deployment
Posted: Oct 06, 2014 9:53 PM PDT
Updated: Oct 06, 2014 9:53 PM PDT
by Sabrina Salas Matanane

Guam - 25 Guam Air National Guardsmen and women are preparing to deploy to Afghanistan and Southwest Asia later this month. A ceremony was held at Adelup to bid farewell and god speed.

The airmen recently completed training in Texas and Nevada in preparation for the deployment during which they will be tasked with different security missions. 

According to Lt Colonel Audie Artero  the deployment is also unique in the fact that for the first time, each team is lead by a hard-charging female, Master Sgt. Katrina Blas and Master Sgt. Georgina Garrido. 
======================
You go girls!.]]></description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>WOW! Women in charge! </p>
<p>Article from KUAM NEWS at <a href="http://www.kuam.com" rel="nofollow">http://www.kuam.com</a>:</p>
<p>Guam Guardsmen preparing for Afghanistan deployment<br />
Posted: Oct 06, 2014 9:53 PM PDT<br />
Updated: Oct 06, 2014 9:53 PM PDT<br />
by Sabrina Salas Matanane</p>
<p>Guam &#8211; 25 Guam Air National Guardsmen and women are preparing to deploy to Afghanistan and Southwest Asia later this month. A ceremony was held at Adelup to bid farewell and god speed.</p>
<p>The airmen recently completed training in Texas and Nevada in preparation for the deployment during which they will be tasked with different security missions. </p>
<p>According to Lt Colonel Audie Artero  the deployment is also unique in the fact that for the first time, each team is lead by a hard-charging female, Master Sgt. Katrina Blas and Master Sgt. Georgina Garrido.<br />
======================<br />
You go girls!.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Karl</title>
		<link>http://blog.michellemoquin.net/?p=22206#comment-124178</link>
		<dc:creator>Karl</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 13 Oct 2014 16:22:47 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://blog.michellemoquin.net/?p=22206#comment-124178</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[Richard#27, I am a jew. We as a race are often accused by white males as the reason the America is doing so bad. I don&#039;t recall a single jewish POTUS or one in any other position that could effect that result. 

So in my humble opinion. Manny #16, you have a point.]]></description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Richard#27, I am a jew. We as a race are often accused by white males as the reason the America is doing so bad. I don&#8217;t recall a single jewish POTUS or one in any other position that could effect that result. </p>
<p>So in my humble opinion. Manny #16, you have a point.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Trey</title>
		<link>http://blog.michellemoquin.net/?p=22206#comment-124177</link>
		<dc:creator>Trey</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 13 Oct 2014 15:35:37 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://blog.michellemoquin.net/?p=22206#comment-124177</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[Hafa adai, Peter on Guam#17, I&#039;m liking it. The usual players are out in force trying to stop it. 
============================
Guam high court upholds marijuana bill; separate lawsuit still pending in federal court
 	 Published on Monday, October 13, 2014 00:00	 By Moneth G. Deposa - moneth@mvguam.com - Variety News Staff
Share on facebook Share on twitter Share on email Share on print More Sharing Services
0
HAGÅTÑA — The Supreme Court of Guam has reaffirmed its earlier findings on the legality of the medical marijuana referendum, holding that the legislation that authorizes the vote process is in compliance with both Guam law and the Organic Act.

In a 22-page opinion, the Supreme Court ruled that the “legislative submission” process set forth in the Guam Code Annotated is considered a “referendum” within the meaning of the Organic Act.

“In addition, we hold that P.L. 32-134 is a legislative submission within Title 3, Chapter 16 of GCA. This law applies with the requirements of 3 GCA (16102 and 16401) because it contains a duly adopted measure that presents voters with the question of whether the Act may be adopted or rejected,” the high court stated in its opinion.

The Guam Legislature passed the bill on Feb. 1. It lapsed into law and became P.L. 32-134, without the governor’s signature.

On May 14, the legislature filed a request for declaratory judgment from the Supreme Court. Since this filing, the legislature filed its opening briefs on June 11 and the Guam Election Commission on June 25. The legislature again replied to this GEC filing.

The legislature’s request for opinion focused on three issues: whether a legislative submission is considered a “referendum” pursuant to 48 USCA 422; whether Title 3 GCA, Chapter 16 permits legislative submissions in the manner created by P.L. 32-134; and third, whether GEC may decline to place a legislative submission on the ballot because it believes it to violate Guam law.

On Aug. 5, the high court issued a preliminary order on the issue and yesterday’s opinion reaffirmed this preliminary order.

The Supreme Court took a position on the first two questions raised by the legislature regarding the validity of P.L. 32-134 which directs the GEC to place the question on the ballot in the November general election.

“The court found that legislative submissions constitute ‘referenda’ within the meaning of the Organic Act, 48 U.S.C.A. §1422a(a), and are thus valid. Further, the court ruled that the proposed measure is ‘legislation’ submitted to voters within the meaning of ‘legislative submission,’ and constituted a ‘question presented’ or ‘measure’ properly adopted by the legislature under applicable local law,” stated the opinion.

The court, however, stated that it did not have jurisdiction under the declaratory judgment statute to review the third question presented, which involved whether the GEC had the authority to refuse to comply with P.L. 32-134 based on its perceived invalidity.

In this case between the legislature and GEC, lawyer Howard Trapp appeared in court as amicus curiae, but he was not allowed to participate in the case.

This prompted Trapp to challenge the referendum before the federal court, asking a writ of prohibition to stop the question from being decided by the voters.

In this civil suit, the GEC had responded last Oct. 7 seeking dismissal of the case. Trapp’s reply is due next week.
=========================
Come on people get out and vote.]]></description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Hafa adai, Peter on Guam#17, I&#8217;m liking it. The usual players are out in force trying to stop it.<br />
============================<br />
Guam high court upholds marijuana bill; separate lawsuit still pending in federal court<br />
 	 Published on Monday, October 13, 2014 00:00	 By Moneth G. Deposa &#8211; <a href="mailto:moneth@mvguam.com">moneth@mvguam.com</a> &#8211; Variety News Staff<br />
Share on facebook Share on twitter Share on email Share on print More Sharing Services<br />
0<br />
HAGÅTÑA — The Supreme Court of Guam has reaffirmed its earlier findings on the legality of the medical marijuana referendum, holding that the legislation that authorizes the vote process is in compliance with both Guam law and the Organic Act.</p>
<p>In a 22-page opinion, the Supreme Court ruled that the “legislative submission” process set forth in the Guam Code Annotated is considered a “referendum” within the meaning of the Organic Act.</p>
<p>“In addition, we hold that P.L. 32-134 is a legislative submission within Title 3, Chapter 16 of GCA. This law applies with the requirements of 3 GCA (16102 and 16401) because it contains a duly adopted measure that presents voters with the question of whether the Act may be adopted or rejected,” the high court stated in its opinion.</p>
<p>The Guam Legislature passed the bill on Feb. 1. It lapsed into law and became P.L. 32-134, without the governor’s signature.</p>
<p>On May 14, the legislature filed a request for declaratory judgment from the Supreme Court. Since this filing, the legislature filed its opening briefs on June 11 and the Guam Election Commission on June 25. The legislature again replied to this GEC filing.</p>
<p>The legislature’s request for opinion focused on three issues: whether a legislative submission is considered a “referendum” pursuant to 48 USCA 422; whether Title 3 GCA, Chapter 16 permits legislative submissions in the manner created by P.L. 32-134; and third, whether GEC may decline to place a legislative submission on the ballot because it believes it to violate Guam law.</p>
<p>On Aug. 5, the high court issued a preliminary order on the issue and yesterday’s opinion reaffirmed this preliminary order.</p>
<p>The Supreme Court took a position on the first two questions raised by the legislature regarding the validity of P.L. 32-134 which directs the GEC to place the question on the ballot in the November general election.</p>
<p>“The court found that legislative submissions constitute ‘referenda’ within the meaning of the Organic Act, 48 U.S.C.A. §1422a(a), and are thus valid. Further, the court ruled that the proposed measure is ‘legislation’ submitted to voters within the meaning of ‘legislative submission,’ and constituted a ‘question presented’ or ‘measure’ properly adopted by the legislature under applicable local law,” stated the opinion.</p>
<p>The court, however, stated that it did not have jurisdiction under the declaratory judgment statute to review the third question presented, which involved whether the GEC had the authority to refuse to comply with P.L. 32-134 based on its perceived invalidity.</p>
<p>In this case between the legislature and GEC, lawyer Howard Trapp appeared in court as amicus curiae, but he was not allowed to participate in the case.</p>
<p>This prompted Trapp to challenge the referendum before the federal court, asking a writ of prohibition to stop the question from being decided by the voters.</p>
<p>In this civil suit, the GEC had responded last Oct. 7 seeking dismissal of the case. Trapp’s reply is due next week.<br />
=========================<br />
Come on people get out and vote.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Richard</title>
		<link>http://blog.michellemoquin.net/?p=22206#comment-124176</link>
		<dc:creator>Richard</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 13 Oct 2014 15:32:16 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://blog.michellemoquin.net/?p=22206#comment-124176</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[Vivian#22, on the contrary, your man and the rest of his kind are the ONLY ones that deserve to be targeted. 

White men are prone to blaming everyone else for the state of this country despite the fact that they make up the overwhelming majority of legislative, judicial and executive positions in this country. 

They brag about how great they made this country. They should be made to take responsibility for the shit they do in the name of leadership.  

I for one agree 100% with Manny#16. I would bet that if terrorists came to this country and only targeted white males without harming anyone else, they would find a great deal of support for the rest of us. 

Something needs to be done before they destroy what is left of this country. If white females would vote with us we could reverse much of the damage white males have done. 

But as usual you just keep elected them and asking the rest of us to forgive them.  Those days are albeit too slowly for me coming to an end.]]></description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Vivian#22, on the contrary, your man and the rest of his kind are the ONLY ones that deserve to be targeted. </p>
<p>White men are prone to blaming everyone else for the state of this country despite the fact that they make up the overwhelming majority of legislative, judicial and executive positions in this country. </p>
<p>They brag about how great they made this country. They should be made to take responsibility for the shit they do in the name of leadership.  </p>
<p>I for one agree 100% with Manny#16. I would bet that if terrorists came to this country and only targeted white males without harming anyone else, they would find a great deal of support for the rest of us. </p>
<p>Something needs to be done before they destroy what is left of this country. If white females would vote with us we could reverse much of the damage white males have done. </p>
<p>But as usual you just keep elected them and asking the rest of us to forgive them.  Those days are albeit too slowly for me coming to an end.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>
