Sir

We have Anonz on scope. french, american, and spanish troops panicked somalian pirates into the area of the Sudan that Anonz and 19 of his men were bivouacked.

The confrontation between the pirates and Anonz resulted in a firefight that alerted the so called “off the shelf” force of the US black opts murders where he was. They sought to execute the order to kill him before he returns to American soil.

Anonz and his 19 men were squeezed between the Somalian border, advancing french, american, and spanish sea enforcers, escaping somalian pirates on the North. They were facing Chinese military disguised as advisers to the Sudanese on the West. They were targeted by US spy satellites on behalf of the black opts team who were advised to approach on the East. Their South flank was exposed to the group they were in practice to combat the marauding arabs authorized by the Sudanese government to exterminate all black Africans in the area.

Taking your orders as given we waited to see if Anonz was about to engage the arabs. The chinese tunnel explosives made our wait academic. The concussion effect killed 11 of Anonz’s men and gave the rest severe head traumas. Anonz suffered dislocation of his right clavicle while trying to drag out two of his men.

We have beamed them up and await your instructions.

Sir
Madaline

But what you wrote was WOW! Couldn’t find a way to argue with you even with an all day research on the google.

Howard

Just as interesting, since I do not believe in coincidences, a book literally fell off a shelf and into my hands yesterday, I wasn’t in the ‘self help’ or ‘relationship’ sections and the book was – ‘What Women Want Men to Know’ even though I didn’t want it, who in their right mind puts an ‘everyday miracle’ back on the shelf?

The weighty part was about womens’ DNA need for safety, emotional and physical, I’ll blog about it when I’ve separated the ‘wheat from the chaff’ or more to the point the ‘truth as opposed to my personal opinion’ I wouldn’t want too much of that getting in the way of a profound point, a point that hadn’t occurred to me (but I can be oblivious at times) and certainly would not occur to a man.

Ok, have to run now, Zen Lill

PS Mischa, call whenever, just wanted to wish you a happy new year with my voice instead of here, and maybe catch up on a few things blogging would not do justice : )

Given the circumstances with the Hamas, Taliban, Al Qaeda and even Evangelicals for a political example, will the plumage ever end. Is this a continuous never ending cyclical inherent feature programed into our cells?

It seems as though with this past political campaign and subsequent election of Obama there are large portions of the global society that have made great strides forward to which you have eluded to. Can education wean a society off the pattern?

I refer to something I wrote a few days back on my blog entitle “Dogs of War”, does education bring forth a homogenized style to any religion? Does dogma and religion stifle honest debate to an ever changing global society? Does the mix of politics and religion create a never ending global challenge to survival and peace?

But then, as Tony Montana said in the movie “Scarface”, “In this country, you gotta make the money first. Then when you get the money, you get the power. Then when you get the power, then you get the women.”

It seems the the new BioCam (AH’s designation) has viewed my contribution to your and Zen Lill’s column and found it wanting because of its length. I will attempt to curb my, as AH laughingly said, “long winded tendencies.”

We have been studying earth-like species through the known universe for about 11 thousand years according to the records available to me.

In order to encourage the formulation of civilizations we have when necessary implanted the seeds of myth. Usually these seeds are centered around religious concepts.

It seems that without our intervention something would have been invented anyway. It would spring from magic. Magic being the belief that what the species believes is impossible without some unknown mystical force’s input.

That cut down about 2 earlier pages.

Woman gave some of her equality to man because in order to form a civilization strength was required to control territory. As life usually began in areas were existence was confined to just finding food, the climate was very warm or hot.

All species of man began from one gene pool. That pool became diverse because of the requirements of isolation, geography, and climate.

Isolation usually started for two reasons – the short version (those interested in the can ask) albino births, beta males and female unions desiring to be alphas.

Geography’s and climate’s influence is based on nature trying to insure the survival of a species and the destruction of that species by coming up with something to successfully prey on it. We normally interfered with this process by supplanting the cattle species most desirable.

By encouraging civll societies the species would herd itself. Species became diverse in their personalities because of their environments. Those who remained in the warm climates or were isolated on islands, due to the breaking up of the continents, usually continued to share equality between the sexes.

Those that were forced into harsher environments, where the control of territory required physical conquest of the land, developed a lack of respect for the female contribution.

The albino populations that were forced into the most harsh regions were the most violent of the human species. They forced their women into sexual slavery immediately and barter their bodies for loyalty and property.

Since their land was difficult to work for food they evolved into natural predators of the human race. They preyed on each other and made armies that could prey on the humans who lived in lands that could be farmed. They either enslaved them or forced tribute from them for protection.

These human predators (HPs) had no emotional connection to the human species (HS). They were oblivious to their own females’ suffering, hence they were even less inclined to emote with the sufferings of the HS.

They were lucky( ask latter for the space definition of lucky) brevity requires I move on. The HPs were born in lands that had the natural materials that enabled one man to increase his manpower to two or more. Elements such as sulfur, iron, etc gave him a distinct advantage over the unlucky. Unlike the HS when a discovery was made the HPs looked first to see how it could be used to wage war.

Even building roads was a way to transport soldiers over trade to the HPs. The early romans build walls to keep out the barbarians, meaning the brits and the teuts(germans).

Once these HPs were loosed upon the world of the HS it became inevitable that the HS would cease to exist as they were known. To survive they had to adopt the ways of the HPs. They took on the acquiring of loyalty and property by bartering their females as one of the HPs successful ways of amassing a faithful army.

The enslavement and bartering of the female began in ernest. As a result the HS ceased to exist and the mixture of HPs and the HS began a new species called humans. Today’s human is a man dominated world.

Nature’s influence which encourages the male to instinctually seek out the female and the female to Instinctually seek the male with the best plumage was designed to insure that the alpha male begat from the alpha female.

Human man sought to circumvent his need to compete as the male wolf for the alpha female wolf and to eventually loose that position to the next most physically destined alpha male by establishing a permanent hold on the position. One that he could pass on to his generations.

The establishments of kings and gods to give those kings legitimacy were the vehicles of choice for those men. Religion provided the avenue for anything that logic would contest to be made law. If god said it was so, logic saying anything to the contrary would be blasphemy. So it is true today.

The humans now evolved into races that sought to have the exclusive right to all the females in the world. Feudal lords were given the right to have first intercourse with the peasant wives on their wedding night.

Skipping many more pages:

Love was never an issue as long as women were a means to acquiring property. When commerce and trade became a source of wealth outside of the ownership of real property, women who could not own property because of their sex could amass wealth.

A man usually had intercourse with his wife only for the purpose of begetting an heir or female child for barter. He had sex for pleasure with prostitutes or other men’s women. Hence the purpose of war was for rape and pillage. Rape was mentioned first because of its importance of showing that the victory over the other men was so complete that the victors could have their way with their women.

Women with wealth had to be reckoned with to acquire access to their wealth. They had to be wooed. Women demanded that a man appeal to their hearts. Hence love and the means to express it were born.

Form this early love came compassion from man for his fellow men. But this took centuries to come about.

I skip forward 7 pages now.

Today’s societies comprise societies that seek to keep women in their place and those that have lost the right (religiously) to claim that right. Most of the western societies have lost that right so that they now have to pretend that women are equal in their societies.

Some of the east and most of the mid-east continue to enslave and barter women as a religious right. Hence in those countries love is non existence. They are societies without compassion towards any race different from themselves. They will rape and pillage any whom they can. The only compassion they have is for the men of their societies. If you study the casualties of wars between the europeans the royal men seldom suffered mortal injuries. They were captured and ransomed instead. The women of these men were forced into pregnancies that were most often fatal and any abuse imaginable by their men.

Hence it is very difficult to find a way for other peoples or races to compromise with men whose religion says they own their females. Their idea of compromise is “you agree to what makes me happy and I’ll agree to not to try to kill you by any means possible.

That Dafne is why the muslims in the Gaza Strip and the West Bank will never have peace with Israel. The muslim men are only concerned about their issues, a compromise that would include issues by another party is inconsiderable in their psyche.

A group of men who can not see their own race of women as having the right to feelings will never see another race or religion as having that right. They may pretend to compromise until they feel strong enough to kill off those who disagree with their wants, but they will never accept the right of those who believe different from them to exist.

Hence, Israel is constantly making treaties until the muslims feel they are strong enough to kill off the jews. Then the muslims start another aggressive action, like the rocketing of jewish towns. This was the practice of the american white towards the american indian. He made treaties with them until he was strong enough to break them. He continued until the exterminated 12 million of them and imprisoned the rest in concentration camps called reservations.

Today the american white makes treaties with the OTWs in his midst until he feels that he can take it back vote wise. There is always the small fraction that looks for the race war so that it can be done the old way; by killing off the males and enslaving the women of the OTWs.

Truly the control their females for muslim men is everything. They would rather die as a race than allow western philosophy to force them to give their females equality. When you hear that the muslims believe they are in a “holy” war. They mean a war to keep control over the bodies of their women. It is as simple as that.

Many other “issues” will be alluded to. But to get to any other issue the issue of equality for their females must be suspended as if the muslim women’s issue is unimportant until the men’s issues are addressed. Women of the world should refuse to address what those men want until those men address the equality of their women.

It won’t happen anymore than the pope will be made to shut up about the “issues” of the world until he addresses the issue of equality of women into the priesthood. Women can never aspire to be apart of the hierarchy that determines their relationship with their god in Catholicism, and yet they continue to support the church as if that should not count.

Their argument is that there are other issues more important. Try to imply that those “other” issues must be men’s issues since the chief issue for catholics should be the equality of all catholics under the eyes of god. That would be logical, but religion disdains logic.

It must if it is to enforce a right that logic would not sustain.

95% of catholic women will ignore you or curse you if you insist that they consider the lack of equality of women in the catholic church. How do these women expect their female children to really believe that women are equal to men? Is it any wonder that most women instinctually give the control of the money and power they receive from out living their rich and power husbands right back to their male child?

Women as the other half of humanity need to look to themselves for salvation.

OTWs in America and white women could never tell their children convincingly or truthfully that they could be anything they set their minds to be until Obama became President of the United States of America. Now, America will never be the same. Leadership of the major corporations and philosophical positions will change considerably in the next 20 yeas because OTWs will aspire to hold those positions and they will demand to know why if they don’t get an equal shot at them.

Women will have an equal opportunity because of Obama’s election that white women would never have given the sex. It will be an OTW woman that will stand up to the pope and say no money to this church until we get equality. OTW men will do what white men have only winked at. They will support their women and withdraw support from the catholic church until a pope says women can be priests, bishops, cardinals and popes.

Most men understand muslims because they dream of the superior condition they have over their women. Racism is all about plumage. The fear that their women will choose another race of man. Men celebrate the differences of race because it is the plumage that they hold up to their woman. They need to indoctrinate the female with the concept that beauty begins with her race.

They try to flatter her with the concept that she is the most beautiful because of the racial features of her race. They perpetuate this myth while they daily admire and covet women of many different races. They tell the woman of their race this lie so that they will have the edge when she picks a man. If she believes the lie that her racial features makes her the most beautiful, it follows that she will believe that his racial features will be her choice of beauty.

Hence the blonde is held up as the icon of beauty. The hope being that the woman will find a pale dick the most attractive when it comes to plumage. Yes, the human male does nothing without being influenced by plumage.

Notice that the major news shows, or pundit purveyors are always dominated by men. In countries where there are significant numbers of one race, the men will be the dominant color of the male who is afraid that his plumage may be suspect to his females.

Opportunity to success is one of the most important aspects of plumage in the modern world. Access to the top of the leadership positions of those opportunities are usually reserved for the males of the dominant species. This includes to the education required to gain access. Why?

Education, access to equal academic and professional promotions are but different colored feathers that make up the male plumage. So what does the female see when each male spreads his feathers?

Physical strength, size, weight, money, access to opportunities to making money(several different colors), physical features, intelligence(projecting the other male’s race as dumb dulls or eliminates this color off feather entirely for that race), compassion, etc, etc.

Yes, the competition is about selection. It is instinctual in most cases, but it is still the primeval influence on man. Take Anonz, how much is too much money? If he is no longer influenced by the need to compete, he is still aware of the cultures that are still controlled by man’s desire to be at the top of the plumage selection.

So he must attempt to enter the fray equipped with the two major plumage feathers, money and power. It becomes like the conundrum, which came first the chicken or the egg? Does it really matter whether money brings power or power brings money? Both are needed to effect change.

Hence, he may have the woman he wishes to spend the rest of his life with but in order to change the world for her good he needs both. Where this change comes from is woman. More precisely LOVE. Woman connotes love. She needs it to survive.

Man is, as Madaline suspects, anti-social in that aspect. He can only learn the traits of love that the woman has innately. She feels the love he writes about. He has to imagine the emotion that she conjures up naturally.

So the suspect of the “Venus and Mars,” “Yin and yang,” etc, etc. Ahh the universe is random seeking order seeking randomness.

Must finish up to avoid being deselected.

Adam