The Fancy Bears managed to publish medical records of Simone Biles and the tennis star Serena Williams. These records indicated that the two stars tested positive for banned substances either in the run up to the Olympics or during the games.

Simone Biles, the champion gymnast tested positive for methylphenidate during the Rio Olympics. The tennis star, Serena Williams tested positive for prednisone in June. Regardless of these scandalous allegations the two stars have been cleared by the WADA.

WADA declared that the two were not in violation of doping regulations.

The Agency sometimes allows athletes to use banned substances when there is a confirmed therapeutic need. The 19 year champion gymnast uses the drug as medication for a condition known as Attention deficient Hyperactivity Disorder (ADHD) which she suffers from.

Serena used the anti inflammatory drug for six days in June.

The United States Anti Doping Agency (USADA) and WADA both confirmed that the drugs had no effects on the results of events the athletes competed in. The

Fancy Bears did however manage to discredit WADA by demonstrating that the organisation was failing to protect the confidential information of athletes. To this, the agency made a public apology to the athletes affected.

The Church has issued a statement encouraging people with knowledge of sexual abuse by clergy members to contact its abuse response co-ordinator.

This is after the passing of a bill lifting the statute of limitations for lawsuits against child sex abusers and private institutions that may have protected them.

Survivors Network of those Abused by Priests spokesperson, Joelle Casteix, said the law would give victims accountability.

But she said they should be wary of the church as it won’t want abuse exposed.

“Anytime anyone is abused do not call the Church, call law enforcement, because the Church will always try to protect themselves. Call the police, call a support group such as SNAP, call a lawyer. Don’t rely on the Church to do the right thing because they haven’t.”

Joelle Casteix also said the Church would throw a lot of money into fighting abuse cases.

Not one of these things that they are dregging up was known by the police when they killed him. So it’s all irrelevant unless you are attemtping to screw with the character of the victim.

Did they interview the exs of the cops that shot Mr. Scott to see what kind of backgrond they had? Do they dig into the backgrounds and publish negative information about people who aren’ killed by the politce? Not that I’ve seen. So why do it in this situation?