<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
		>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: Trump Praises The Clintons In An Uncovered Tape</title>
	<atom:link href="http://blog.michellemoquin.net/?feed=rss2&#038;p=24027" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://blog.michellemoquin.net/?p=24027</link>
	<description>Creative Discussions, Inspiring Thoughts, Fun Adventures, Love &#38; Laughter, Peaceful Travel, Hip Fashions, Cool People, Gastronomic Pleasures,  Exotic Indulgences, Groovy Music, and more!</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Wed, 09 Nov 2016 11:26:52 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
	<generator>https://wordpress.org/?v=3.6.1</generator>
	<item>
		<title>By: peruvian virgin hair</title>
		<link>http://blog.michellemoquin.net/?p=24027#comment-136658</link>
		<dc:creator>peruvian virgin hair</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sun, 06 Nov 2016 17:16:42 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://blog.michellemoquin.net/?p=24027#comment-136658</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[Irrrm a sucker for all of these peruvian virgin hair https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=k1oaz7n0ILk. My best just gripe is really because would probably get ruinned while it&#039;s raining. In addition to that they are simply so good!]]></description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Irrrm a sucker for all of these peruvian virgin hair <a href="https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=k1oaz7n0ILk" rel="nofollow">https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=k1oaz7n0ILk</a>. My best just gripe is really because would probably get ruinned while it&#8217;s raining. In addition to that they are simply so good!</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: fifa4joy</title>
		<link>http://blog.michellemoquin.net/?p=24027#comment-136320</link>
		<dc:creator>fifa4joy</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 01 Nov 2016 10:57:34 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://blog.michellemoquin.net/?p=24027#comment-136320</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[Nice web site you&#039;ve gotten there]]></description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Nice web site you&#8217;ve gotten there</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Sharnell</title>
		<link>http://blog.michellemoquin.net/?p=24027#comment-136065</link>
		<dc:creator>Sharnell</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 27 Oct 2016 14:54:49 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://blog.michellemoquin.net/?p=24027#comment-136065</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[SuzyQ#1:
The case, Republican National Committee vs. Democratic National Committee, dealt with a consent decree issued in 1982 that prevents the RNC from engaging in some voter fraud prevention efforts without prior court consent. 

It specifically said the RNC could not engage in ballot 
security efforts (later defined in 1987 as “ballot integrity, ballot security or other efforts to prevent or remedy vote fraud,” according to the U.S. Court of Appeals for the Third Circuit opinion), especially in areas where racial or ethnic makeup could be considered a reason for the activities.

A response to claims of voter intimidation in minority areas in the 1970s and early 1980s, the decree allowed the RNC to continue “normal poll watching” operations while barring activities that could be aimed at voter suppression, though the RNC complained to the courts that the distinction was unclear and difficult to follow. 

The decree effectively put the national party on the sidelines as concern about voter fraud became more and more pronounced in GOP ranks in recent years and as 
states passed a series of voter-identification measures.

In deciding the case, which stems from a 2008 lawsuit brought by the DNC, the district court clarified ballot security efforts as “any program aimed at combating voter fraud by preventing potential voters from registering to vote or casting a ballot,” and upheld the consent decree while adding a Dec. 1, 2017, expiration date.

If they decide to continue to keep voters from casting a ballot, like this ////// in Wi is doing the RNC will have that order extended until 2025. The DNC needs to bring this case up before the judges again to get this order extended. 

It would appear that the republicans haven&#039;t caught on yet that ALL people are allowed to vote. That includes Democratic leaning college students.]]></description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>SuzyQ#1:<br />
The case, Republican National Committee vs. Democratic National Committee, dealt with a consent decree issued in 1982 that prevents the RNC from engaging in some voter fraud prevention efforts without prior court consent. </p>
<p>It specifically said the RNC could not engage in ballot<br />
security efforts (later defined in 1987 as “ballot integrity, ballot security or other efforts to prevent or remedy vote fraud,” according to the U.S. Court of Appeals for the Third Circuit opinion), especially in areas where racial or ethnic makeup could be considered a reason for the activities.</p>
<p>A response to claims of voter intimidation in minority areas in the 1970s and early 1980s, the decree allowed the RNC to continue “normal poll watching” operations while barring activities that could be aimed at voter suppression, though the RNC complained to the courts that the distinction was unclear and difficult to follow. </p>
<p>The decree effectively put the national party on the sidelines as concern about voter fraud became more and more pronounced in GOP ranks in recent years and as<br />
states passed a series of voter-identification measures.</p>
<p>In deciding the case, which stems from a 2008 lawsuit brought by the DNC, the district court clarified ballot security efforts as “any program aimed at combating voter fraud by preventing potential voters from registering to vote or casting a ballot,” and upheld the consent decree while adding a Dec. 1, 2017, expiration date.</p>
<p>If they decide to continue to keep voters from casting a ballot, like this ////// in Wi is doing the RNC will have that order extended until 2025. The DNC needs to bring this case up before the judges again to get this order extended. </p>
<p>It would appear that the republicans haven&#8217;t caught on yet that ALL people are allowed to vote. That includes Democratic leaning college students.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Paul</title>
		<link>http://blog.michellemoquin.net/?p=24027#comment-136064</link>
		<dc:creator>Paul</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 27 Oct 2016 14:49:58 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://blog.michellemoquin.net/?p=24027#comment-136064</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[SuzyQ#1, It is the racist judges appointed by the republicans who keep these tactics by whites to maintain control of the political system that make this shit work. 

That&#039;s why they prevented Obama from naming many judges. In the beginning before they had complete control of the houses, they told Obama he had to continue the practice of naming judges as they had in the past. That meant allowing Senators of each state to have a say on who he nominated. 

But as soon as they took over the Senate, they changed the rules to prevent Obama from naming federal judges because they knew that is where the power is, control of the Justice in this country. 

Even if they get convicted, some federal judge will throw out the sentence. Check out the convictions of the most crooked POTUS administration in history. Most of those convicted had their sentence shortened or vacated by federal judges appointed by republicans.]]></description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>SuzyQ#1, It is the racist judges appointed by the republicans who keep these tactics by whites to maintain control of the political system that make this shit work. </p>
<p>That&#8217;s why they prevented Obama from naming many judges. In the beginning before they had complete control of the houses, they told Obama he had to continue the practice of naming judges as they had in the past. That meant allowing Senators of each state to have a say on who he nominated. </p>
<p>But as soon as they took over the Senate, they changed the rules to prevent Obama from naming federal judges because they knew that is where the power is, control of the Justice in this country. </p>
<p>Even if they get convicted, some federal judge will throw out the sentence. Check out the convictions of the most crooked POTUS administration in history. Most of those convicted had their sentence shortened or vacated by federal judges appointed by republicans.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Anonymous</title>
		<link>http://blog.michellemoquin.net/?p=24027#comment-136063</link>
		<dc:creator>Anonymous</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 27 Oct 2016 14:39:43 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://blog.michellemoquin.net/?p=24027#comment-136063</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[y&#039;all need to stop rigging trumps election by using trumps words against him. i mean, what&#039;s a man supposed to do when you bring up past remarks like this?
it&#039;s a conspiracy i tells ya!]]></description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>y&#8217;all need to stop rigging trumps election by using trumps words against him. i mean, what&#8217;s a man supposed to do when you bring up past remarks like this?<br />
it&#8217;s a conspiracy i tells ya!</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>
