<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
		>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: The Stolen Lives Of Little Women</title>
	<atom:link href="http://blog.michellemoquin.net/?feed=rss2&#038;p=2594" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://blog.michellemoquin.net/?p=2594</link>
	<description>Creative Discussions, Inspiring Thoughts, Fun Adventures, Love &#38; Laughter, Peaceful Travel, Hip Fashions, Cool People, Gastronomic Pleasures,  Exotic Indulgences, Groovy Music, and more!</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Wed, 09 Nov 2016 11:26:52 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
	<generator>https://wordpress.org/?v=3.6.1</generator>
	<item>
		<title>By: Stevie</title>
		<link>http://blog.michellemoquin.net/?p=2594#comment-3542</link>
		<dc:creator>Stevie</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 12 Feb 2009 07:30:20 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://blog.michellemoquin.com/?p=2594#comment-3542</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[Sevie

Please forgive me. I&#039;ve been trying to get in for about 30 minutes. I keep getting this is a duplicate statement. I am going to try to enter in your name.

So the Democrats finally managed to get 61 willing to vote yea. This pre-occupation with a filibuster-proof vote is ridiculous. There&#039;s no mention in the Constitution of the filibuster. It&#039;s merely a loophole in the Senate rules, and outside of &quot;Mr. Smith Goes to Washington&quot; it seldom accomplishes anything worthwhile. The Senate MUST enter the 21st Century, change the rules to eliminate the filibuster (the so-called nuclear option) and start getting legislation PASSED with a simple 51 votes. Enough is Enough!]]></description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Sevie</p>
<p>Please forgive me. I&#8217;ve been trying to get in for about 30 minutes. I keep getting this is a duplicate statement. I am going to try to enter in your name.</p>
<p>So the Democrats finally managed to get 61 willing to vote yea. This pre-occupation with a filibuster-proof vote is ridiculous. There&#8217;s no mention in the Constitution of the filibuster. It&#8217;s merely a loophole in the Senate rules, and outside of &#8220;Mr. Smith Goes to Washington&#8221; it seldom accomplishes anything worthwhile. The Senate MUST enter the 21st Century, change the rules to eliminate the filibuster (the so-called nuclear option) and start getting legislation PASSED with a simple 51 votes. Enough is Enough!</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Stevie</title>
		<link>http://blog.michellemoquin.net/?p=2594#comment-3541</link>
		<dc:creator>Stevie</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 12 Feb 2009 07:26:28 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://blog.michellemoquin.com/?p=2594#comment-3541</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[I didn&#039;t say that. Why not use your own name.

stevie]]></description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I didn&#8217;t say that. Why not use your own name.</p>
<p>stevie</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Stevie</title>
		<link>http://blog.michellemoquin.net/?p=2594#comment-3540</link>
		<dc:creator>Stevie</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 12 Feb 2009 07:16:24 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://blog.michellemoquin.com/?p=2594#comment-3540</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[The repugs were against adequate funding for education. Why? Maybe it&#039;s because they&#039;re scared sh**less that Americans will get a proper education and be able to better decide who to vote for in 2012. If they continue backing retards like Pallin, the US is in serious trouble. The pathetic lack of education in America is very evident when you have people refer to Pallin as intelligent. My lord, folks, she&#039;s as dumb as a doorknob. Then again, some support her because they&#039;re racists like her and will never get used to the idea of a black man in the White House. Their black hatred must be destroying their brain cells. He, he!]]></description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>The repugs were against adequate funding for education. Why? Maybe it&#8217;s because they&#8217;re scared sh**less that Americans will get a proper education and be able to better decide who to vote for in 2012. If they continue backing retards like Pallin, the US is in serious trouble. The pathetic lack of education in America is very evident when you have people refer to Pallin as intelligent. My lord, folks, she&#8217;s as dumb as a doorknob. Then again, some support her because they&#8217;re racists like her and will never get used to the idea of a black man in the White House. Their black hatred must be destroying their brain cells. He, he!</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Stevie</title>
		<link>http://blog.michellemoquin.net/?p=2594#comment-3539</link>
		<dc:creator>Stevie</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 12 Feb 2009 06:35:50 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://blog.michellemoquin.com/?p=2594#comment-3539</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[Damn can a girl get a word in. I been trying for almost an hour. Michelle I hope you get the entry part of your blog fixed. What&#039;s a girl got to do to get in?

Gina, you need a shrink. And you are going to need a lawyer if you keep trying to solicit murder on the web.  Why are you so jealous of your sister?  I told my mother about my having had an abortion. She told my father and he ordered her to disown me. 

My brother came to my support and they told him he was risking his immortal soul. But they did not disown him. What is the difference from having an abortion and in condoning others having an abortion, 

Well my sister who also took my side was disowned by both our parents. She said that she didn&#039;t know if she could have an abortion but that believed that I had the right to make my own decision as to what happens to my body. They told her that she was a demon and to never come to their home again. 

Stevie]]></description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Damn can a girl get a word in. I been trying for almost an hour. Michelle I hope you get the entry part of your blog fixed. What&#8217;s a girl got to do to get in?</p>
<p>Gina, you need a shrink. And you are going to need a lawyer if you keep trying to solicit murder on the web.  Why are you so jealous of your sister?  I told my mother about my having had an abortion. She told my father and he ordered her to disown me. </p>
<p>My brother came to my support and they told him he was risking his immortal soul. But they did not disown him. What is the difference from having an abortion and in condoning others having an abortion, </p>
<p>Well my sister who also took my side was disowned by both our parents. She said that she didn&#8217;t know if she could have an abortion but that believed that I had the right to make my own decision as to what happens to my body. They told her that she was a demon and to never come to their home again. </p>
<p>Stevie</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Anonymous</title>
		<link>http://blog.michellemoquin.net/?p=2594#comment-3537</link>
		<dc:creator>Anonymous</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 12 Feb 2009 06:16:36 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://blog.michellemoquin.com/?p=2594#comment-3537</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[The goal of bipartisanship is to get the ENTIRTY of Congress working toward a common goal of the the betterment of American, not Democrats working toward Democratic goals and Republicans working toward Republican goals. Isn&#039;t that why we elected them in the first place. Regarding Stimulus Packages, TARP, etc, no one can say for sure what will work and what will not. What bipartisanship can provide here is a balanced view and a wider range of approaches, some of which may work, some may not. On balance, tax cuts have not proven a great stimulus, except for a very small segment of the economy. Perhaps a different approach to tax cuts might involve payroll taxes, providing immediate relief to both employer and employee. A spirit of bipartisanship might eliminate some of the finger-pointing and counterproductive labeling. Barring that, screw the Republicans.]]></description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>The goal of bipartisanship is to get the ENTIRTY of Congress working toward a common goal of the the betterment of American, not Democrats working toward Democratic goals and Republicans working toward Republican goals. Isn&#8217;t that why we elected them in the first place. Regarding Stimulus Packages, TARP, etc, no one can say for sure what will work and what will not. What bipartisanship can provide here is a balanced view and a wider range of approaches, some of which may work, some may not. On balance, tax cuts have not proven a great stimulus, except for a very small segment of the economy. Perhaps a different approach to tax cuts might involve payroll taxes, providing immediate relief to both employer and employee. A spirit of bipartisanship might eliminate some of the finger-pointing and counterproductive labeling. Barring that, screw the Republicans.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>
