<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
		>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: Tired Of Being Fleeced? Be A Force &#8211; Participate!</title>
	<atom:link href="http://blog.michellemoquin.net/?feed=rss2&#038;p=2739" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://blog.michellemoquin.net/?p=2739</link>
	<description>Creative Discussions, Inspiring Thoughts, Fun Adventures, Love &#38; Laughter, Peaceful Travel, Hip Fashions, Cool People, Gastronomic Pleasures,  Exotic Indulgences, Groovy Music, and more!</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Wed, 09 Nov 2016 11:26:52 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
	<generator>https://wordpress.org/?v=3.6.1</generator>
	<item>
		<title>By: Doug</title>
		<link>http://blog.michellemoquin.net/?p=2739#comment-3781</link>
		<dc:creator>Doug</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 02 Mar 2009 04:28:37 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://blog.michellemoquin.com/?p=2739#comment-3781</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[AH,
Welcome back!  It is always a pleasure.  Michelle and I were looking at your portrait the other day...nice profile...

Anyway...I must agree.  Through the mess of entanglement of asset and expenditures, we are left with a literal mirage of paperwork with which very few people actually know how, if possible, to entangle these assets.  The idea of corporations planning on the strategic bailout and strategizing themselves accordingly and running things accordingly in order to capitalize on is something that I have thought about quite a bit.

There can be a veritable corporate metaphoric chess match associated with this kind of play.  Play and plan a move.  Anonz...?

It is quite interesting to see things as they transpire.  There is quite a board of players, and at times it actually seems a bit crowded.

Buffett even was played, or perhaps he has a great poker face...time will soon tell.  It feels as though he was &quot;got&quot; a bit...

Obama is in a position to make some good.  The people do need to give the guy a chance.  I mean, it&#039;s only been three weeks...

What a difference a day makes.

Be Well.]]></description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>AH,<br />
Welcome back!  It is always a pleasure.  Michelle and I were looking at your portrait the other day&#8230;nice profile&#8230;</p>
<p>Anyway&#8230;I must agree.  Through the mess of entanglement of asset and expenditures, we are left with a literal mirage of paperwork with which very few people actually know how, if possible, to entangle these assets.  The idea of corporations planning on the strategic bailout and strategizing themselves accordingly and running things accordingly in order to capitalize on is something that I have thought about quite a bit.</p>
<p>There can be a veritable corporate metaphoric chess match associated with this kind of play.  Play and plan a move.  Anonz&#8230;?</p>
<p>It is quite interesting to see things as they transpire.  There is quite a board of players, and at times it actually seems a bit crowded.</p>
<p>Buffett even was played, or perhaps he has a great poker face&#8230;time will soon tell.  It feels as though he was &#8220;got&#8221; a bit&#8230;</p>
<p>Obama is in a position to make some good.  The people do need to give the guy a chance.  I mean, it&#8217;s only been three weeks&#8230;</p>
<p>What a difference a day makes.</p>
<p>Be Well.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Marc</title>
		<link>http://blog.michellemoquin.net/?p=2739#comment-3779</link>
		<dc:creator>Marc</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 02 Mar 2009 00:47:45 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://blog.michellemoquin.com/?p=2739#comment-3779</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[Money, money everywhere and none to loan.]]></description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Money, money everywhere and none to loan.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Anonymous</title>
		<link>http://blog.michellemoquin.net/?p=2739#comment-3778</link>
		<dc:creator>Anonymous</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 02 Mar 2009 00:44:51 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://blog.michellemoquin.com/?p=2739#comment-3778</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[Listening to Limblaugh, as much as my stomach/mind allows, I hear two recurring messages:

1. &quot;Do NOT Tax 5% richest because we are the hard working productive people of America creating Wealth so taxing Rich will drive them away! That&#039;s wealth redistribution!

Ans: 8 Years of wealth redistribution to Wealthy has created bigger mansions with $100 million European paintings. These Wealthy Manufactured $600 Trillion of Toxic Paper while skimming the Banks&quot; $Trillions into Executives&#039; pockets for more paintings/bathrooms, nearly ruining our Economy!

Middle Class Americans win on productivity/hard work on production lines, providing services, harvesting crops, helping sick and elderly, and educating our children. These actions enhanced the QUALITY OF LIFE of Americas unlike &quot;FAKE AAA Rated Toxic Paper&quot; and the &quot;SURE FAIL TRICK and TRAP Mortgages&quot; of Wall Street productivity.

2. &quot;Liberals think they are emotional/compassionate but they can NOT think Clearly so they want to fund the single mothers and unproductive people to ruin America!

Ans: Unlike the strict Ideological thinking of Conservatives, Liberals have the ability and desire to do mental trade-offs between Government/Industry and between Productivity/Fake Productivity, Between serving RICH Elites/Creating a High Quality of Life for all Americans. The Richest 1% or 2% may pay 3% to 5% more taxes to enrich Lives of all Americans. If it were not for Americans the Rich would not have massive numbers of $Billionaires and $Hundred-Millionaires. Helping Americans survive/produce benefits the Rich.]]></description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Listening to Limblaugh, as much as my stomach/mind allows, I hear two recurring messages:</p>
<p>1. &#8220;Do NOT Tax 5% richest because we are the hard working productive people of America creating Wealth so taxing Rich will drive them away! That&#8217;s wealth redistribution!</p>
<p>Ans: 8 Years of wealth redistribution to Wealthy has created bigger mansions with $100 million European paintings. These Wealthy Manufactured $600 Trillion of Toxic Paper while skimming the Banks&#8221; $Trillions into Executives&#8217; pockets for more paintings/bathrooms, nearly ruining our Economy!</p>
<p>Middle Class Americans win on productivity/hard work on production lines, providing services, harvesting crops, helping sick and elderly, and educating our children. These actions enhanced the QUALITY OF LIFE of Americas unlike &#8220;FAKE AAA Rated Toxic Paper&#8221; and the &#8220;SURE FAIL TRICK and TRAP Mortgages&#8221; of Wall Street productivity.</p>
<p>2. &#8220;Liberals think they are emotional/compassionate but they can NOT think Clearly so they want to fund the single mothers and unproductive people to ruin America!</p>
<p>Ans: Unlike the strict Ideological thinking of Conservatives, Liberals have the ability and desire to do mental trade-offs between Government/Industry and between Productivity/Fake Productivity, Between serving RICH Elites/Creating a High Quality of Life for all Americans. The Richest 1% or 2% may pay 3% to 5% more taxes to enrich Lives of all Americans. If it were not for Americans the Rich would not have massive numbers of $Billionaires and $Hundred-Millionaires. Helping Americans survive/produce benefits the Rich.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Timothy</title>
		<link>http://blog.michellemoquin.net/?p=2739#comment-3777</link>
		<dc:creator>Timothy</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 02 Mar 2009 00:42:16 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://blog.michellemoquin.com/?p=2739#comment-3777</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[No it is allowed because of GOP deregulation. It is legal usury that should be criminal. 

Timothy]]></description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>No it is allowed because of GOP deregulation. It is legal usury that should be criminal. </p>
<p>Timothy</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Anonymous</title>
		<link>http://blog.michellemoquin.net/?p=2739#comment-3776</link>
		<dc:creator>Anonymous</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 02 Mar 2009 00:40:16 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://blog.michellemoquin.com/?p=2739#comment-3776</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[Prime is at 0.25%. This is usury.]]></description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Prime is at 0.25%. This is usury.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>
