<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
		>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: New Tax Scam: &#8220;Forewarned Is Forearmed&#8221;</title>
	<atom:link href="http://blog.michellemoquin.net/?feed=rss2&#038;p=5399" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://blog.michellemoquin.net/?p=5399</link>
	<description>Creative Discussions, Inspiring Thoughts, Fun Adventures, Love &#38; Laughter, Peaceful Travel, Hip Fashions, Cool People, Gastronomic Pleasures,  Exotic Indulgences, Groovy Music, and more!</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Wed, 09 Nov 2016 11:26:52 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
	<generator>https://wordpress.org/?v=3.6.1</generator>
	<item>
		<title>By: HOWIE</title>
		<link>http://blog.michellemoquin.net/?p=5399#comment-8377</link>
		<dc:creator>HOWIE</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sun, 15 Nov 2009 21:32:03 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://blog.michellemoquin.com/?p=5399#comment-8377</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[Ruth, not that it matters, but we have 2 computers. I have one and Al has 1. We are room mates and good friends. We discuss some things as conversation, but we do not take turns blogging. I blog when I feel like asking or ansewering a comment and Al does the same.

We do not even know when we each blog because we are on our computers often and usually do not even see our comments until we view the blog.

One of us might mention if we have read something interesting, but that is where it ends. We disagree often just as we agree often, but we find out buy reading the blog just like anyone else.

The blog is not our lives -- rather it is a place to comment on things -- It can be a place to vent or a place to agree with somone&#039;s comment. It is a blog and that is all for me. I have met some interesting characters on Michelle&#039;s blog and enjoy that aspect as well as her Posts.

It is something to do for a half hour daily, and I usuallly enjoy it. That is my opinion of our blog relationship. Al will have to write his.

HOWIE]]></description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Ruth, not that it matters, but we have 2 computers. I have one and Al has 1. We are room mates and good friends. We discuss some things as conversation, but we do not take turns blogging. I blog when I feel like asking or ansewering a comment and Al does the same.</p>
<p>We do not even know when we each blog because we are on our computers often and usually do not even see our comments until we view the blog.</p>
<p>One of us might mention if we have read something interesting, but that is where it ends. We disagree often just as we agree often, but we find out buy reading the blog just like anyone else.</p>
<p>The blog is not our lives &#8212; rather it is a place to comment on things &#8212; It can be a place to vent or a place to agree with somone&#8217;s comment. It is a blog and that is all for me. I have met some interesting characters on Michelle&#8217;s blog and enjoy that aspect as well as her Posts.</p>
<p>It is something to do for a half hour daily, and I usuallly enjoy it. That is my opinion of our blog relationship. Al will have to write his.</p>
<p>HOWIE</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Llana</title>
		<link>http://blog.michellemoquin.net/?p=5399#comment-8376</link>
		<dc:creator>Llana</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sun, 15 Nov 2009 18:56:59 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://blog.michellemoquin.com/?p=5399#comment-8376</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[As a person trying to quit smoking, I naturally latched on to this article.
------------------------------------------------------
Smoking bans pay dividends 

If you want to be healthier, quit smoking. Few people, even many smokers, would deny that at this point. 

Now let&#039;s get a little more controversial here: If you want your whole community to get a health boost, then ban those cancer sticks in every public place you can. 

I know that&#039;s not a popular move among smokers -- they already feel like a persecuted minority. But you just need to look at the numbers to see what a difference it makes. 

One study finds that U.S., Canadian and European cities that impose smoking bans have 17 percent fewer heart attacks over the course of the first year of the ban, as compared to cities that don&#039;t curb cigarettes. 

Fantastic, right? But it gets better... 

Those numbers continue to decline by between 26 and 36 percent over three years, according to studies published in Circulation: Journal of the American Heart Association and the Journal of the American College of Cardiology. 

Researchers believe that a nationwide smoking ban in public places and offices would prevent up to 225,000 of our 1.26 million annual heart attacks. 

These benefits extend to smokers and nonsmokers alike. Remember, of the 440,000 U.S. deaths linked to smoking every year, 38,000 are due to secondhand smoke -- many from heart attacks. 

Now, some people still argue over this, in part because many smokers want to believe that they&#039;re hurting only themselves. But the truth is cigarette smoke causes blood vessels to constrict and leads to blood clots in both the smoker and the guy standing next to him. 

These changes can take place in as little as 20 minutes of exposure to cigarette smoke... and that&#039;s why nonsmokers who live or work with smokers have a 30 percent higher risk of heart attack than nonsmokers who live and work with other nonsmokers. 

The science is clear on this -- secondhand smoke is not a myth. It&#039;s a fact, and that&#039;s why public smoking bans are leading to such dramatic health improvements. 

And if they get a few smokers to finally throw up their hands in frustration and quit for good, so much the better. Smoking is hands-down one of the worst things you can voluntarily do to yourself, and a terrible habit to subject your friends and loved ones to. 

The risks of smoking are well known and well documented. Tobacco is addictive, and the addicts suffer from everything ranging from that persistent smoker&#039;s cough and diminished lung capacity right up to lung cancer, heart disease, hypertension and early death. 

Smoking has even been linked to knee osteoarthritis. 

And with apologies to all my friends who love their cigarettes, smokers always smell like smokers. So in addition to being a health hazard, smoking is also a social one.
----------------------------------------------------------

If only it had started sooner

Llana]]></description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>As a person trying to quit smoking, I naturally latched on to this article.<br />
&#8212;&#8212;&#8212;&#8212;&#8212;&#8212;&#8212;&#8212;&#8212;&#8212;&#8212;&#8212;&#8212;&#8212;&#8212;&#8212;&#8212;&#8212;<br />
Smoking bans pay dividends </p>
<p>If you want to be healthier, quit smoking. Few people, even many smokers, would deny that at this point. </p>
<p>Now let&#8217;s get a little more controversial here: If you want your whole community to get a health boost, then ban those cancer sticks in every public place you can. </p>
<p>I know that&#8217;s not a popular move among smokers &#8212; they already feel like a persecuted minority. But you just need to look at the numbers to see what a difference it makes. </p>
<p>One study finds that U.S., Canadian and European cities that impose smoking bans have 17 percent fewer heart attacks over the course of the first year of the ban, as compared to cities that don&#8217;t curb cigarettes. </p>
<p>Fantastic, right? But it gets better&#8230; </p>
<p>Those numbers continue to decline by between 26 and 36 percent over three years, according to studies published in Circulation: Journal of the American Heart Association and the Journal of the American College of Cardiology. </p>
<p>Researchers believe that a nationwide smoking ban in public places and offices would prevent up to 225,000 of our 1.26 million annual heart attacks. </p>
<p>These benefits extend to smokers and nonsmokers alike. Remember, of the 440,000 U.S. deaths linked to smoking every year, 38,000 are due to secondhand smoke &#8212; many from heart attacks. </p>
<p>Now, some people still argue over this, in part because many smokers want to believe that they&#8217;re hurting only themselves. But the truth is cigarette smoke causes blood vessels to constrict and leads to blood clots in both the smoker and the guy standing next to him. </p>
<p>These changes can take place in as little as 20 minutes of exposure to cigarette smoke&#8230; and that&#8217;s why nonsmokers who live or work with smokers have a 30 percent higher risk of heart attack than nonsmokers who live and work with other nonsmokers. </p>
<p>The science is clear on this &#8212; secondhand smoke is not a myth. It&#8217;s a fact, and that&#8217;s why public smoking bans are leading to such dramatic health improvements. </p>
<p>And if they get a few smokers to finally throw up their hands in frustration and quit for good, so much the better. Smoking is hands-down one of the worst things you can voluntarily do to yourself, and a terrible habit to subject your friends and loved ones to. </p>
<p>The risks of smoking are well known and well documented. Tobacco is addictive, and the addicts suffer from everything ranging from that persistent smoker&#8217;s cough and diminished lung capacity right up to lung cancer, heart disease, hypertension and early death. </p>
<p>Smoking has even been linked to knee osteoarthritis. </p>
<p>And with apologies to all my friends who love their cigarettes, smokers always smell like smokers. So in addition to being a health hazard, smoking is also a social one.<br />
&#8212;&#8212;&#8212;&#8212;&#8212;&#8212;&#8212;&#8212;&#8212;&#8212;&#8212;&#8212;&#8212;&#8212;&#8212;&#8212;&#8212;&#8212;&#8212;-</p>
<p>If only it had started sooner</p>
<p>Llana</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Brenda</title>
		<link>http://blog.michellemoquin.net/?p=5399#comment-8375</link>
		<dc:creator>Brenda</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sun, 15 Nov 2009 18:54:16 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://blog.michellemoquin.com/?p=5399#comment-8375</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[Anonz 

Are you and Zen Lill still an item? I am 27 and I have been a fan of yours for almost a year. I will be in Baghdad December 3rd for a documentary I am doing.  I would be honored to meet you. If you do not wish your identity revealed. I will do whatever you ask. 

If you are interested I will blog my particulars anytime you wish.

Brenda]]></description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Anonz </p>
<p>Are you and Zen Lill still an item? I am 27 and I have been a fan of yours for almost a year. I will be in Baghdad December 3rd for a documentary I am doing.  I would be honored to meet you. If you do not wish your identity revealed. I will do whatever you ask. </p>
<p>If you are interested I will blog my particulars anytime you wish.</p>
<p>Brenda</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Johnston</title>
		<link>http://blog.michellemoquin.net/?p=5399#comment-8374</link>
		<dc:creator>Johnston</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sun, 15 Nov 2009 18:48:05 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://blog.michellemoquin.com/?p=5399#comment-8374</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[I took Kent advice and joined the Newt show. It is very interesting the bullshit they spout. It is a wonder that people are so gullible that they swallow their crap on a daily basis.]]></description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I took Kent advice and joined the Newt show. It is very interesting the bullshit they spout. It is a wonder that people are so gullible that they swallow their crap on a daily basis.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Fariba</title>
		<link>http://blog.michellemoquin.net/?p=5399#comment-8373</link>
		<dc:creator>Fariba</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sun, 15 Nov 2009 18:45:43 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://blog.michellemoquin.com/?p=5399#comment-8373</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[Michelle

We have been promised a massive earthquake by Madaline. Does this mean that she will cover the other areas we requested a natural disaster to occur in to give us cover will happen. She said that she has to clear some thing with you first.

Fariba]]></description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Michelle</p>
<p>We have been promised a massive earthquake by Madaline. Does this mean that she will cover the other areas we requested a natural disaster to occur in to give us cover will happen. She said that she has to clear some thing with you first.</p>
<p>Fariba</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>
