<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
		>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: We went to &#8216;Indulgence&#8217; and did I indulge.</title>
	<atom:link href="http://blog.michellemoquin.net/?feed=rss2&#038;p=728" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://blog.michellemoquin.net/?p=728</link>
	<description>Creative Discussions, Inspiring Thoughts, Fun Adventures, Love &#38; Laughter, Peaceful Travel, Hip Fashions, Cool People, Gastronomic Pleasures,  Exotic Indulgences, Groovy Music, and more!</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Wed, 09 Nov 2016 11:26:52 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
	<generator>https://wordpress.org/?v=3.6.1</generator>
	<item>
		<title>By: Zen Lill</title>
		<link>http://blog.michellemoquin.net/?p=728#comment-2099</link>
		<dc:creator>Zen Lill</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 12 Sep 2008 15:52:07 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://michellemoquin.wordpress.com/?p=991#comment-2099</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[OK, are there 2-3 different anon&#039;s out there? Whatever...it&#039;d be nice to have an identifier of some kind, you know, anonA, anonB, hahaha...

anyway, enough about Palin, check it out: http://www.lilliandevin.com/ &#039;Obama taking care of biz - lipstick on a pig biz&#039; - oh and her &#039;interview&#039; this am was kind of pathetic, I almost feel sorry for her, she&#039;s clearly a mega-amateur, the body language of defensiveness was tough to watch, that&#039;s just my opinion. anon from Alaska, I&#039;m sure she&#039;s a nice person but that&#039;s not a qualifier for possible commander in chief, neither is governor w/pop less than 1/4 of NYC, sorry and that&#039;s not a knock to small town living, not at all.

Ciao, have a Zen morning, ZL]]></description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>OK, are there 2-3 different anon&#8217;s out there? Whatever&#8230;it&#8217;d be nice to have an identifier of some kind, you know, anonA, anonB, hahaha&#8230;</p>
<p>anyway, enough about Palin, check it out: <a href="http://www.lilliandevin.com/" rel="nofollow">http://www.lilliandevin.com/</a> &#8216;Obama taking care of biz &#8211; lipstick on a pig biz&#8217; &#8211; oh and her &#8216;interview&#8217; this am was kind of pathetic, I almost feel sorry for her, she&#8217;s clearly a mega-amateur, the body language of defensiveness was tough to watch, that&#8217;s just my opinion. anon from Alaska, I&#8217;m sure she&#8217;s a nice person but that&#8217;s not a qualifier for possible commander in chief, neither is governor w/pop less than 1/4 of NYC, sorry and that&#8217;s not a knock to small town living, not at all.</p>
<p>Ciao, have a Zen morning, ZL</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Anon</title>
		<link>http://blog.michellemoquin.net/?p=728#comment-2098</link>
		<dc:creator>Anon</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 12 Sep 2008 09:35:32 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://michellemoquin.wordpress.com/?p=991#comment-2098</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[I am so tired of hearing about Senator Palin.They say that the Republican Party will not let this person do interviews. They don&#039;t have to. CNN is giving this person a platform which is allowing this fiasco to continue. I cannot turn to CNN without seeing how great Palin is, What Palin did today, Where Palin is going tomorrow, How many White Women are flocking to Palin Camp. No one is debating that Palin is a Woman nor are we doubting that she is a Barracuda (Her own words). What we all are disturbed about is if something happens to McCain this Woman will be in Charge of AMERICA. Please stop saying that White men will not support Obama. If this is true then GOD BLESS AMERICA because we are headed for disaster if we continue this nonsense surrounding Palin and get her and McCain into the White House. Has anyone noticed that on the Republican Campaign Trail, McCain is no longer speaking. Palin is doing all the talking.]]></description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I am so tired of hearing about Senator Palin.They say that the Republican Party will not let this person do interviews. They don&#8217;t have to. CNN is giving this person a platform which is allowing this fiasco to continue. I cannot turn to CNN without seeing how great Palin is, What Palin did today, Where Palin is going tomorrow, How many White Women are flocking to Palin Camp. No one is debating that Palin is a Woman nor are we doubting that she is a Barracuda (Her own words). What we all are disturbed about is if something happens to McCain this Woman will be in Charge of AMERICA. Please stop saying that White men will not support Obama. If this is true then GOD BLESS AMERICA because we are headed for disaster if we continue this nonsense surrounding Palin and get her and McCain into the White House. Has anyone noticed that on the Republican Campaign Trail, McCain is no longer speaking. Palin is doing all the talking.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Anon</title>
		<link>http://blog.michellemoquin.net/?p=728#comment-2097</link>
		<dc:creator>Anon</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 12 Sep 2008 09:32:49 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://michellemoquin.wordpress.com/?p=991#comment-2097</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[Seriously…Palin is as prepared to run the second highest (and quite possibly the highet office - if it comes to that) in the land as I am to be mayor of my metropolis! Come on folks…for her to agree to the position means she is not strong enough to say &quot;sorry I&#039;m not the right person for the job&quot;. BAD ON HER.]]></description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Seriously…Palin is as prepared to run the second highest (and quite possibly the highet office &#8211; if it comes to that) in the land as I am to be mayor of my metropolis! Come on folks…for her to agree to the position means she is not strong enough to say &#8220;sorry I&#8217;m not the right person for the job&#8221;. BAD ON HER.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Health Info</title>
		<link>http://blog.michellemoquin.net/?p=728#comment-2096</link>
		<dc:creator>Health Info</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 12 Sep 2008 09:31:19 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://michellemoquin.wordpress.com/?p=991#comment-2096</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[OVARY REMOVAL LINKED TO DEMENTIA

Oophorectomy, the surgical removal of the ovaries, has several known effects on a woman&#039;s physical health as well as, researchers have just discovered, her mind. A new study found that women whose ovaries are removed before menopause face a greater risk of dementia -- adding to the mounting evidence that estrogen, a hormone produced by the ovaries, plays a vital role in protecting not only a woman&#039;s body but also her brain functioning well beyond her reproductive years.
At the Mayo Clinic in Rochester, researchers identified a group of 1,489 women who had undergone an oophorectomy within a 38-year period and matched this group with 1,472 women whose ovaries were not removed in that time period. The researchers interviewed either the women or their caregivers (if the women were deceased or unable to report reliably) in both groups and compared prevalence of cognitive impairment, or dementia. Having bilateral (both ovaries) oophorectomy before age 49 was linked with a significant increase in risk of cognitive impairment or dementia. However, women who had both their ovaries removed and were then treated with estrogen until at least age 50 did not have any increased risk.
I spoke with Lynne T. Shuster, MD, women&#039;s health specialist at the Mayo Clinic. She said the increased risk of dementia for women who had both ovaries removed before age 49 was 70% greater... and grew higher the younger the patient was at removal. Meanwhile, the risk of dementia for women who had both ovaries removed and didn&#039;t take estrogen before age 50 was 89% greater than in those whose ovaries were intact.
&quot;This study should give doctors and patients pause to think further about whether or not a woman&#039;s ovaries should be taken out if it&#039;s not absolutely necessary for cancer treatment or prevention in those at high risk,&quot; she said.
ESTROGEN SUPPLEMENTATION
&quot;Even after natural menopause, the ovaries have important functions,&quot; noted Dr. Shuster. While they no longer produce estrogen, the ovaries continue to pump out testosterone after menopause, which affects sexual function, bone and muscle strength, mood and energy level. &quot;We advise a woman who has had her ovaries removed at a young age to take estrogen, if possible, at least until the age of natural menopause,&quot; she said. &quot;We also believe there is a critical age window for neuroprotection -- meaning estrogen therapy needs to be started soon after ovary removal in order to benefit brain function. If it&#039;s started years later, there may be more risks than benefits.&quot;
If you are under 50 and considering oophorectomy, educate yourself about how the procedure may affect you in the short-term, as well as the long-term. Be sure to discuss with your physician or a menopause specialist whether or not oophorectomy and estrogen replacement is an appropriate and safe option for you.

Source(s): ??Lynne T. Shuster, MD, is an internal medicine and women&#039;s health specialist and director of the Women&#039;s Health Clinic for menopause and sexual medicine at the Mayo Clinic in Rochester, Minnesota. She is an investigator on pending clinical studies related to cognition and early menopause in women.]]></description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>OVARY REMOVAL LINKED TO DEMENTIA</p>
<p>Oophorectomy, the surgical removal of the ovaries, has several known effects on a woman&#8217;s physical health as well as, researchers have just discovered, her mind. A new study found that women whose ovaries are removed before menopause face a greater risk of dementia &#8212; adding to the mounting evidence that estrogen, a hormone produced by the ovaries, plays a vital role in protecting not only a woman&#8217;s body but also her brain functioning well beyond her reproductive years.<br />
At the Mayo Clinic in Rochester, researchers identified a group of 1,489 women who had undergone an oophorectomy within a 38-year period and matched this group with 1,472 women whose ovaries were not removed in that time period. The researchers interviewed either the women or their caregivers (if the women were deceased or unable to report reliably) in both groups and compared prevalence of cognitive impairment, or dementia. Having bilateral (both ovaries) oophorectomy before age 49 was linked with a significant increase in risk of cognitive impairment or dementia. However, women who had both their ovaries removed and were then treated with estrogen until at least age 50 did not have any increased risk.<br />
I spoke with Lynne T. Shuster, MD, women&#8217;s health specialist at the Mayo Clinic. She said the increased risk of dementia for women who had both ovaries removed before age 49 was 70% greater&#8230; and grew higher the younger the patient was at removal. Meanwhile, the risk of dementia for women who had both ovaries removed and didn&#8217;t take estrogen before age 50 was 89% greater than in those whose ovaries were intact.<br />
&#8220;This study should give doctors and patients pause to think further about whether or not a woman&#8217;s ovaries should be taken out if it&#8217;s not absolutely necessary for cancer treatment or prevention in those at high risk,&#8221; she said.<br />
ESTROGEN SUPPLEMENTATION<br />
&#8220;Even after natural menopause, the ovaries have important functions,&#8221; noted Dr. Shuster. While they no longer produce estrogen, the ovaries continue to pump out testosterone after menopause, which affects sexual function, bone and muscle strength, mood and energy level. &#8220;We advise a woman who has had her ovaries removed at a young age to take estrogen, if possible, at least until the age of natural menopause,&#8221; she said. &#8220;We also believe there is a critical age window for neuroprotection &#8212; meaning estrogen therapy needs to be started soon after ovary removal in order to benefit brain function. If it&#8217;s started years later, there may be more risks than benefits.&#8221;<br />
If you are under 50 and considering oophorectomy, educate yourself about how the procedure may affect you in the short-term, as well as the long-term. Be sure to discuss with your physician or a menopause specialist whether or not oophorectomy and estrogen replacement is an appropriate and safe option for you.</p>
<p>Source(s): ??Lynne T. Shuster, MD, is an internal medicine and women&#8217;s health specialist and director of the Women&#8217;s Health Clinic for menopause and sexual medicine at the Mayo Clinic in Rochester, Minnesota. She is an investigator on pending clinical studies related to cognition and early menopause in women.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: anon</title>
		<link>http://blog.michellemoquin.net/?p=728#comment-2095</link>
		<dc:creator>anon</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 12 Sep 2008 08:58:38 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://michellemoquin.wordpress.com/?p=991#comment-2095</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[&quot;McCain is the only one with enough guts to take out our enemies in North Korea, Iran, Iraq, Pakistan, Saudi Arabia.

With the no abortion policy and a draft, we will have enough solders to continue God&#039;s war for our country.&quot;

I laughed.

(1) You left Afghanistan, where, you know, the people who actually attacked us seven years ago today are/were, out of your comment.

(2) So, basically, what you&#039;re saying is that without legalized abortions, we&#039;ll have more young, inglorious bastards to send to war? Nice!]]></description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>&#8220;McCain is the only one with enough guts to take out our enemies in North Korea, Iran, Iraq, Pakistan, Saudi Arabia.</p>
<p>With the no abortion policy and a draft, we will have enough solders to continue God&#8217;s war for our country.&#8221;</p>
<p>I laughed.</p>
<p>(1) You left Afghanistan, where, you know, the people who actually attacked us seven years ago today are/were, out of your comment.</p>
<p>(2) So, basically, what you&#8217;re saying is that without legalized abortions, we&#8217;ll have more young, inglorious bastards to send to war? Nice!</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>
