<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
		>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: Flying High</title>
	<atom:link href="http://blog.michellemoquin.net/?feed=rss2&#038;p=8666" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://blog.michellemoquin.net/?p=8666</link>
	<description>Creative Discussions, Inspiring Thoughts, Fun Adventures, Love &#38; Laughter, Peaceful Travel, Hip Fashions, Cool People, Gastronomic Pleasures,  Exotic Indulgences, Groovy Music, and more!</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Wed, 09 Nov 2016 11:26:52 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
	<generator>https://wordpress.org/?v=3.6.1</generator>
	<item>
		<title>By: Anonymous</title>
		<link>http://blog.michellemoquin.net/?p=8666#comment-13141</link>
		<dc:creator>Anonymous</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 17 Aug 2010 04:01:30 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://blog.michellemoquin.com/?p=8666#comment-13141</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[Robert, I&#039;ve taken to calling SP &#039;she who shall not be named&#039; Harry Potter reference bc I cannot and will nor have a serious political discussion with her, she of the box  of rocks intellect, as a real topic. Should she get voted into anything here, I will be making a long sojourn to Bhutan and Bali amongst other places of interest to me. I cannot bear the thought of how much stupidity it would take to vote her into doing anything meaningful at all. 

Terrance, that is a hilarious blonde joke and no offense taken. My friends always laugh at me, they claim that it&#039;s crazy how intelligent I can be and then also how incredibly gullible I can be, it&#039;s always over inconsequential goofy stuff so who cares...when it matters I can get quite serious and passionate (fiery) on a given subject, I call it &#039;goin&#039; Italian&#039; (no offense to any italian out there who is not ocassionally a hot head, yeah not many of them, huh?)

Luv, Zen Lill]]></description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Robert, I&#8217;ve taken to calling SP &#8216;she who shall not be named&#8217; Harry Potter reference bc I cannot and will nor have a serious political discussion with her, she of the box  of rocks intellect, as a real topic. Should she get voted into anything here, I will be making a long sojourn to Bhutan and Bali amongst other places of interest to me. I cannot bear the thought of how much stupidity it would take to vote her into doing anything meaningful at all. </p>
<p>Terrance, that is a hilarious blonde joke and no offense taken. My friends always laugh at me, they claim that it&#8217;s crazy how intelligent I can be and then also how incredibly gullible I can be, it&#8217;s always over inconsequential goofy stuff so who cares&#8230;when it matters I can get quite serious and passionate (fiery) on a given subject, I call it &#8216;goin&#8217; Italian&#8217; (no offense to any italian out there who is not ocassionally a hot head, yeah not many of them, huh?)</p>
<p>Luv, Zen Lill</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Terrance</title>
		<link>http://blog.michellemoquin.net/?p=8666#comment-13139</link>
		<dc:creator>Terrance</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 17 Aug 2010 01:39:24 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://blog.michellemoquin.com/?p=8666#comment-13139</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[Gosh, Linda

I bet you are a blond. No offense meant to you Zen Lill.

This may make my point if you can under stand it. 
+++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++



 Three blondes were all applying for the last available position on theTexas  Highway Patrol. 

The detective conducting the interview looked at the 
three of them and said, &quot;So y&#039;all want to be cops, huh?&quot; 

The blondes all nodded. 

The detective got up, opened a file drawer, and pulled out a folder.
 
Sitting back down, he opened it, pulled out a picture, and said, &quot;To be a detective, you have to be able to detect. 

You must be able to notice things such as distinguishing 
features and oddities like scars and so forth.&quot; 

So saying, he stuck the photo in the face of the first blonde and withdrew it after about two seconds. 

&quot;Now,&quot; he said, &quot;did you notice any distinguishing features about this man?&quot; 

The blonde immediately said, &quot;Yes, I did. He has only one eye!&quot; 

The detective shook his head and said, &quot;Of course he has only one eye in this picture! 

It&#039;s a profile of his face!   You&#039;re dismissed!&quot; 

The first blonde hung her head and walked out of the office. 

The detective then turned to the second blonde, stuck the photo in her face for two seconds, pulled it back, and said, &quot;What about you? 

Notice anything unusual or Outstanding about this man?&quot;

&quot;Yes! He only has one ear!&quot; 

The detective put his head in his hands and exclaimed, &quot;Didn&#039;t you hear what I just told the other lady? 

This is a profile of the man&#039;s face! Of course you can 
only see one ear!   You&#039;re excused too!&quot; 

The second blonde sheepishly walked out of the office. 

The detective turned his attention to the third and last blonde and said, &quot;This is probably a waste of time, but....&quot;  

He flashed the photo in her face for a couple of seconds and withdrew it, saying, &quot;All right, did you notice anything distinguishing or unusual about this man?&quot; 

The blonde said, &quot;I sure did. This man wears contact lenses.&quot; 

The detective frowned, took another look at the picture, and began looking at some of the papers in the 
folder. 

He looked up at the blonde with a puzzled expression and said, &quot;You&#039;re absolutely right! 

His bio says he wears contacts! How in the world 
could you tell that by looking at his picture?&quot; 

The blonde rolled her eyes and said &quot;Well, Hellooooooooooooo! With only one eye and one ear, he certainly can&#039;t wear glasses.&quot;

 
========================================

Terance]]></description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Gosh, Linda</p>
<p>I bet you are a blond. No offense meant to you Zen Lill.</p>
<p>This may make my point if you can under stand it.<br />
+++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++</p>
<p> Three blondes were all applying for the last available position on theTexas  Highway Patrol. </p>
<p>The detective conducting the interview looked at the<br />
three of them and said, &#8220;So y&#8217;all want to be cops, huh?&#8221; </p>
<p>The blondes all nodded. </p>
<p>The detective got up, opened a file drawer, and pulled out a folder.</p>
<p>Sitting back down, he opened it, pulled out a picture, and said, &#8220;To be a detective, you have to be able to detect. </p>
<p>You must be able to notice things such as distinguishing<br />
features and oddities like scars and so forth.&#8221; </p>
<p>So saying, he stuck the photo in the face of the first blonde and withdrew it after about two seconds. </p>
<p>&#8220;Now,&#8221; he said, &#8220;did you notice any distinguishing features about this man?&#8221; </p>
<p>The blonde immediately said, &#8220;Yes, I did. He has only one eye!&#8221; </p>
<p>The detective shook his head and said, &#8220;Of course he has only one eye in this picture! </p>
<p>It&#8217;s a profile of his face!   You&#8217;re dismissed!&#8221; </p>
<p>The first blonde hung her head and walked out of the office. </p>
<p>The detective then turned to the second blonde, stuck the photo in her face for two seconds, pulled it back, and said, &#8220;What about you? </p>
<p>Notice anything unusual or Outstanding about this man?&#8221;</p>
<p>&#8220;Yes! He only has one ear!&#8221; </p>
<p>The detective put his head in his hands and exclaimed, &#8220;Didn&#8217;t you hear what I just told the other lady? </p>
<p>This is a profile of the man&#8217;s face! Of course you can<br />
only see one ear!   You&#8217;re excused too!&#8221; </p>
<p>The second blonde sheepishly walked out of the office. </p>
<p>The detective turned his attention to the third and last blonde and said, &#8220;This is probably a waste of time, but&#8230;.&#8221;  </p>
<p>He flashed the photo in her face for a couple of seconds and withdrew it, saying, &#8220;All right, did you notice anything distinguishing or unusual about this man?&#8221; </p>
<p>The blonde said, &#8220;I sure did. This man wears contact lenses.&#8221; </p>
<p>The detective frowned, took another look at the picture, and began looking at some of the papers in the<br />
folder. </p>
<p>He looked up at the blonde with a puzzled expression and said, &#8220;You&#8217;re absolutely right! </p>
<p>His bio says he wears contacts! How in the world<br />
could you tell that by looking at his picture?&#8221; </p>
<p>The blonde rolled her eyes and said &#8220;Well, Hellooooooooooooo! With only one eye and one ear, he certainly can&#8217;t wear glasses.&#8221;</p>
<p>========================================</p>
<p>Terance</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Nicole</title>
		<link>http://blog.michellemoquin.net/?p=8666#comment-13138</link>
		<dc:creator>Nicole</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 16 Aug 2010 22:32:48 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://blog.michellemoquin.com/?p=8666#comment-13138</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[George whatever you do DON&#039;T fall out of character. We love to hate you here. 

You are our resident bigot. 

Actually I hate the stupid cows like Linda who encourage the likes of you. 

Nicole.]]></description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>George whatever you do DON&#8217;T fall out of character. We love to hate you here. </p>
<p>You are our resident bigot. </p>
<p>Actually I hate the stupid cows like Linda who encourage the likes of you. </p>
<p>Nicole.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Robert</title>
		<link>http://blog.michellemoquin.net/?p=8666#comment-13137</link>
		<dc:creator>Robert</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 16 Aug 2010 22:26:38 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://blog.michellemoquin.com/?p=8666#comment-13137</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[I know that I rant a lot. But I just saw Cnn (they deserve small n&#039;s) a few minutes ago. 

They were featuring that Newt Gingrich(like getting rich at any cost) as a spokes person for whether Muslims should be allowed to built a mosque in Manhattan.

No one is asking if the South should be allowed to fly the confederate flag over the capital of states that have citizens that that flag represents their enslavement.

 Why because whites don&#039;t see the feelings of anyone else as important. I digress.

The white moderator ventured to add as weight to Newt&#039;s opinion that they should consider the quote of that other airhead Sara Palin. 

Again whites force the rest of us to accept that airhead as someone who&#039;s opinion matters because she is and they are white.  

NO other reason any sane person would care what that dumb as the proverbial box of rocks idiot thinks.  Again I digress. 

The quote from that idiot says everything about the difference between &quot;jUSTICE,&quot; and what OTWs experience in this country which is white (justUs) Justice. 

Sara Palin is quoted as saying - yes, it is true that the muslims, as American citizens, have the right to build where they please, but the question she put to President Obama is SHOULD they have that right?


That is the epitome of the difference between the white justice system and a true system of  justice.

 Whereas true justice doesn&#039;t guarantee you JUSTICE every time. It guarantees you the right to an equal opportunity to attaining truth JUSTICE, every time. 

White justice is based on the premise that although JUSTICE  is about the &quot;right &quot;you have to equal JUSTICE, they, the white race, have the right to decide if you SHOULD have that right. 

Hence whites see nothing wrong with the assumption by Sara Palin or any other white person posing the question on any given occasion - sure he/she has the right to expect equality but &quot;SHOULD&quot; he/she get that right or equality?

That is the what you hear in cop trials when you hear do you believe your lying eyes or what the cop says happened.

It boils down to just because you expect that JUSTICE will give you an arena where you have an equal opportunity at receiving Justice, &quot;&quot;SHOULD&quot; you receive that equal opportunity or JUSTICE. 

Here for whites the paramount issue is not Justice, but &quot;SHOULD&quot; you(an OTW) have that right.

  Simply put every white has the right to expect an arena where he/she can get an opportunity at receiving JUSTICE. 

But if you are not white, then the issue is yes, under our constitution and justice system the opportunity exist, but &quot;SHOULD&quot; you as an OTW have that right. 

43 other white presidents have answered the question succinctly. NO!  And provided or did nothing to remove AFFIRMATIVE ACTION(S) that insured that result. 

This black President says YES!

That is something whites can not abide, so they must take their country back. It is as simple as that.

 AFFIRMATIVE ACTION 

affirmative action
noun
an action or policy favoring those who tend to suffer from discrimination, esp. in relation to employment or education; positive discrimination.

remove the &quot;those who tend to suffer from discrimination&quot; part of that definition as it is an inspired form of obfuscation by the white boy to disguise his benefitting from AFFIRMATIVE ACTION from the onset of the writing of the Constitution. 

Hence the true meaning of the term AFFIRMATION ACTION IS - an action or policy favoring those who tend to be of the same race and gender as those in power.  White males; Negative discrimination
=====================

So where are the pundits that can refute that white males have benefited from government actions and policies that have favored white males since the beginning of the US Constitution simply because they were or are white males?

Hence, the origins of &quot;Just Us&quot; Justice.  Whites reflectively accept that the American Justice System is just for them. 

Thus, they have very little problem with politicians and pundits uttering statements that deprive OTWs of receiving the kind of  JUSTICE the Federal, State, or local Constitutions guarantee them. 

Nothing personal, it is merely white Justice spelled justus.

Robert]]></description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I know that I rant a lot. But I just saw Cnn (they deserve small n&#8217;s) a few minutes ago. </p>
<p>They were featuring that Newt Gingrich(like getting rich at any cost) as a spokes person for whether Muslims should be allowed to built a mosque in Manhattan.</p>
<p>No one is asking if the South should be allowed to fly the confederate flag over the capital of states that have citizens that that flag represents their enslavement.</p>
<p> Why because whites don&#8217;t see the feelings of anyone else as important. I digress.</p>
<p>The white moderator ventured to add as weight to Newt&#8217;s opinion that they should consider the quote of that other airhead Sara Palin. </p>
<p>Again whites force the rest of us to accept that airhead as someone who&#8217;s opinion matters because she is and they are white.  </p>
<p>NO other reason any sane person would care what that dumb as the proverbial box of rocks idiot thinks.  Again I digress. </p>
<p>The quote from that idiot says everything about the difference between &#8220;jUSTICE,&#8221; and what OTWs experience in this country which is white (justUs) Justice. </p>
<p>Sara Palin is quoted as saying &#8211; yes, it is true that the muslims, as American citizens, have the right to build where they please, but the question she put to President Obama is SHOULD they have that right?</p>
<p>That is the epitome of the difference between the white justice system and a true system of  justice.</p>
<p> Whereas true justice doesn&#8217;t guarantee you JUSTICE every time. It guarantees you the right to an equal opportunity to attaining truth JUSTICE, every time. </p>
<p>White justice is based on the premise that although JUSTICE  is about the &#8220;right &#8220;you have to equal JUSTICE, they, the white race, have the right to decide if you SHOULD have that right. </p>
<p>Hence whites see nothing wrong with the assumption by Sara Palin or any other white person posing the question on any given occasion &#8211; sure he/she has the right to expect equality but &#8220;SHOULD&#8221; he/she get that right or equality?</p>
<p>That is the what you hear in cop trials when you hear do you believe your lying eyes or what the cop says happened.</p>
<p>It boils down to just because you expect that JUSTICE will give you an arena where you have an equal opportunity at receiving Justice, &#8220;&#8221;SHOULD&#8221; you receive that equal opportunity or JUSTICE. </p>
<p>Here for whites the paramount issue is not Justice, but &#8220;SHOULD&#8221; you(an OTW) have that right.</p>
<p>  Simply put every white has the right to expect an arena where he/she can get an opportunity at receiving JUSTICE. </p>
<p>But if you are not white, then the issue is yes, under our constitution and justice system the opportunity exist, but &#8220;SHOULD&#8221; you as an OTW have that right. </p>
<p>43 other white presidents have answered the question succinctly. NO!  And provided or did nothing to remove AFFIRMATIVE ACTION(S) that insured that result. </p>
<p>This black President says YES!</p>
<p>That is something whites can not abide, so they must take their country back. It is as simple as that.</p>
<p> AFFIRMATIVE ACTION </p>
<p>affirmative action<br />
noun<br />
an action or policy favoring those who tend to suffer from discrimination, esp. in relation to employment or education; positive discrimination.</p>
<p>remove the &#8220;those who tend to suffer from discrimination&#8221; part of that definition as it is an inspired form of obfuscation by the white boy to disguise his benefitting from AFFIRMATIVE ACTION from the onset of the writing of the Constitution. </p>
<p>Hence the true meaning of the term AFFIRMATION ACTION IS &#8211; an action or policy favoring those who tend to be of the same race and gender as those in power.  White males; Negative discrimination<br />
=====================</p>
<p>So where are the pundits that can refute that white males have benefited from government actions and policies that have favored white males since the beginning of the US Constitution simply because they were or are white males?</p>
<p>Hence, the origins of &#8220;Just Us&#8221; Justice.  Whites reflectively accept that the American Justice System is just for them. </p>
<p>Thus, they have very little problem with politicians and pundits uttering statements that deprive OTWs of receiving the kind of  JUSTICE the Federal, State, or local Constitutions guarantee them. </p>
<p>Nothing personal, it is merely white Justice spelled justus.</p>
<p>Robert</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Zen Lill</title>
		<link>http://blog.michellemoquin.net/?p=8666#comment-13136</link>
		<dc:creator>Zen Lill</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 16 Aug 2010 19:50:43 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://blog.michellemoquin.com/?p=8666#comment-13136</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[Xur, thank you, Ok so the TAO finally gives an explanation I understand re: importance of the Marianna Trench, it also explains why Guamanians Anna and Peter were drawn to blog post here, at least that explains it to me...though I completely forgte why the TAO chose MM blog to post on, it&#039;s been over two years now...so, thank you again for the info...so are we to expect more earthquakes on Guam or everywhere or anything else humans might chalk up to Mother Nature?

It seems the males around here get a little uppity when things don&#039;t work staright away, I have often had to search youtube for the videos posted here, my iPhone doesn&#039;t always cooperate but would I ever dream of making it Mischa&#039;s problem? Hell no...sheesh, can&#039;t you just take initative and go find the fucking thing if you want to see it so bad? Stoip acting like children...although that&#039;s disparaging to children : ) 

Mischa, come to LA...this weekend? Need your advice on a few things but it needs to be in person : ) Come on it&#039;ll be fun, please?

Caio, Luv, Zen Lill]]></description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Xur, thank you, Ok so the TAO finally gives an explanation I understand re: importance of the Marianna Trench, it also explains why Guamanians Anna and Peter were drawn to blog post here, at least that explains it to me&#8230;though I completely forgte why the TAO chose MM blog to post on, it&#8217;s been over two years now&#8230;so, thank you again for the info&#8230;so are we to expect more earthquakes on Guam or everywhere or anything else humans might chalk up to Mother Nature?</p>
<p>It seems the males around here get a little uppity when things don&#8217;t work staright away, I have often had to search youtube for the videos posted here, my iPhone doesn&#8217;t always cooperate but would I ever dream of making it Mischa&#8217;s problem? Hell no&#8230;sheesh, can&#8217;t you just take initative and go find the fucking thing if you want to see it so bad? Stoip acting like children&#8230;although that&#8217;s disparaging to children : ) </p>
<p>Mischa, come to LA&#8230;this weekend? Need your advice on a few things but it needs to be in person : ) Come on it&#8217;ll be fun, please?</p>
<p>Caio, Luv, Zen Lill</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>
