<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
		>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: Ever Have A Good Feeling About Something?</title>
	<atom:link href="http://blog.michellemoquin.net/?feed=rss2&#038;p=9690" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://blog.michellemoquin.net/?p=9690</link>
	<description>Creative Discussions, Inspiring Thoughts, Fun Adventures, Love &#38; Laughter, Peaceful Travel, Hip Fashions, Cool People, Gastronomic Pleasures,  Exotic Indulgences, Groovy Music, and more!</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Wed, 09 Nov 2016 11:26:52 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
	<generator>https://wordpress.org/?v=3.6.1</generator>
	<item>
		<title>By: Jennifer</title>
		<link>http://blog.michellemoquin.net/?p=9690#comment-14749</link>
		<dc:creator>Jennifer</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 16 Nov 2010 11:59:22 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://blog.michellemoquin.com/?p=9690#comment-14749</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[Meds Lois MEDS!

They do help. As for being a catholic. I&#039;m one too. But I refuse to contribute to the support of the church. It is a male promoting establishment. 

God doesn&#039;t have a sex you moron. She/he doesn&#039;t behave as us humans, hence the term God.

Jennifer]]></description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Meds Lois MEDS!</p>
<p>They do help. As for being a catholic. I&#8217;m one too. But I refuse to contribute to the support of the church. It is a male promoting establishment. </p>
<p>God doesn&#8217;t have a sex you moron. She/he doesn&#8217;t behave as us humans, hence the term God.</p>
<p>Jennifer</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Lois</title>
		<link>http://blog.michellemoquin.net/?p=9690#comment-14748</link>
		<dc:creator>Lois</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 16 Nov 2010 11:53:02 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://blog.michellemoquin.com/?p=9690#comment-14748</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[I believe in God and I am proud to be a Catholic. God is a man. Get over it you men-hating dykes.]]></description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I believe in God and I am proud to be a Catholic. God is a man. Get over it you men-hating dykes.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Peter</title>
		<link>http://blog.michellemoquin.net/?p=9690#comment-14747</link>
		<dc:creator>Peter</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 16 Nov 2010 11:51:05 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://blog.michellemoquin.com/?p=9690#comment-14747</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[Good for you Anna. I was checking Michelle&#039;s blog and notice that you got in. So I decided to try again. 

Hafa adai.

How about those gas prices on Guam we are not paying. $3.80 per gallon for regular gas. They are soaking us in preparation for the onslaught of military and their entourage. 

Read it and weep.
_______________________
Gas Prices Up to $3.80 a Gallon for Regular Unleaded
- All three of the island&#039;s fuel suppliers have raised their price per gallon for regular unleaded to $3.80 cents a gallon; or, as their signs say, $3.79 9/10th.
Mobil, Shell and 76 all raised prices by 5-cents overnight.
The price for premium and diesel also jumped by 5 cents a gallon.
The 3 major fuel suppliers typically raise or lower prices in lock-step with each other, and they never announce price changes ahead of time or explain after a price rise.
Crude prices have been gradually rising in recent months and on Monday, December crude futures on the Singapore exchange where Guam buys its gasoline were trading at $85.30 cents a barrel.
_________________________________________
There&#039;s no collusion here folks. All three of the island&#039;s suppliers just woke up with the idea to raise the price of their gas to $3.80 cents. 

That&#039;s the howlie&#039;s concept of capitalism. 
 ]]></description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Good for you Anna. I was checking Michelle&#8217;s blog and notice that you got in. So I decided to try again. </p>
<p>Hafa adai.</p>
<p>How about those gas prices on Guam we are not paying. $3.80 per gallon for regular gas. They are soaking us in preparation for the onslaught of military and their entourage. </p>
<p>Read it and weep.<br />
_______________________<br />
Gas Prices Up to $3.80 a Gallon for Regular Unleaded<br />
- All three of the island&#8217;s fuel suppliers have raised their price per gallon for regular unleaded to $3.80 cents a gallon; or, as their signs say, $3.79 9/10th.<br />
Mobil, Shell and 76 all raised prices by 5-cents overnight.<br />
The price for premium and diesel also jumped by 5 cents a gallon.<br />
The 3 major fuel suppliers typically raise or lower prices in lock-step with each other, and they never announce price changes ahead of time or explain after a price rise.<br />
Crude prices have been gradually rising in recent months and on Monday, December crude futures on the Singapore exchange where Guam buys its gasoline were trading at $85.30 cents a barrel.<br />
_________________________________________<br />
There&#8217;s no collusion here folks. All three of the island&#8217;s suppliers just woke up with the idea to raise the price of their gas to $3.80 cents. </p>
<p>That&#8217;s the howlie&#8217;s concept of capitalism.<br />
 </p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Cutter</title>
		<link>http://blog.michellemoquin.net/?p=9690#comment-14746</link>
		<dc:creator>Cutter</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 16 Nov 2010 11:49:45 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://blog.michellemoquin.com/?p=9690#comment-14746</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[Why do women want to abort their babies. Does it really matter who knocked them up. God gave the baby for a reason. 

I say make it criminal for the killers to help those stupid women to abort. 

Cutter]]></description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Why do women want to abort their babies. Does it really matter who knocked them up. God gave the baby for a reason. </p>
<p>I say make it criminal for the killers to help those stupid women to abort. </p>
<p>Cutter</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Anna of Guam</title>
		<link>http://blog.michellemoquin.net/?p=9690#comment-14745</link>
		<dc:creator>Anna of Guam</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 16 Nov 2010 11:23:41 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://blog.michellemoquin.com/?p=9690#comment-14745</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[Michelle:

You are so right about men. We need blogs like your to keep women informed and to allow us to gain strength from each other. 

Here is another attempt by men to control the bodies of women. Notice that the restriction is not in contention only the -how soon can we force them to do what we want. 

+++++++++++++++++++++++

AG: Informed Consent On Abortion Bill Would Pass Constitutional Muster, But Clarifications Recommended


Last Updated on Monday, 15 November 2010 17:04
Written by Kevin Kerrigan
Monday, 15 November 2010 14:45
Guam News	 - Guam News


Guam - The week before the November election, the Guam Attorney General advised Senator Frank Aguon Jr. that a controversial Bill requiring a woman seeking an abortion be counseled beforehand &quot;would withstand a constitutional challenge.&quot;  However, the AG recommended that the Legislature &quot;may want to consider clarifying part of the Bill.&quot;

That same week before the general election, the Esperansa project called a news conference to criticize Aguon, and other lawmakers, for what the Esperansa Project charged was stalling on the bill.

Read the AG&#039;s opinion on the constitutionality of the original Bill 54
Today [Monday] Senator Aguon, who Chairs the Committee on Health, released both the AG&#039;s opinion and a revised bill clarifying the original measure, as recommended by the AG.

Read the revised substitute version of Bill 54

In the AG&#039;s opinion, Deputy Attorney General Patrick Mason writes:

“Although not necessarily constitutionally fatal, a question of vagueness does arise in Section 3218.1 (b)(8) which states: 

 A physician shall not require or obtain payment for a service provided to a patient who has inquired about an abortion or scheduled an abortion until the expiration of the twenty-four (24) hour reflection period required  Subsection (b)(1) , (2) and (4),” the opinion written by Deputy Attorney General J. Patrick Mason stated.  (Please see attached AGO’s opinion)

Senator Aguon is quoted in his release as saying that “Now that we have received the necessary opinion of the Attorney General Office, it will allow us to move forward.

 This legal guidance will be helped [sic] to lawmakers once the question of constitutionality is raised during the deliberation of Bill 54 before the Legislative body.”

The original Bill, introduced in February of 2009, would have required:

*that a woman give written consent to the procedure

*that the woman wait 24 hours before having an abortion

*that the physician give specific information to the woman seeking the abortion, such as printed material and an informational video that describes the unborn child and a list of agencies that offers alternative to abortion.

* and that the physician may not charge for the first visit from a woman seeking an abortion.
================================
This is sick in so many ways

Anna]]></description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Michelle:</p>
<p>You are so right about men. We need blogs like your to keep women informed and to allow us to gain strength from each other. </p>
<p>Here is another attempt by men to control the bodies of women. Notice that the restriction is not in contention only the -how soon can we force them to do what we want. </p>
<p>+++++++++++++++++++++++</p>
<p>AG: Informed Consent On Abortion Bill Would Pass Constitutional Muster, But Clarifications Recommended</p>
<p>Last Updated on Monday, 15 November 2010 17:04<br />
Written by Kevin Kerrigan<br />
Monday, 15 November 2010 14:45<br />
Guam News	 &#8211; Guam News</p>
<p>Guam &#8211; The week before the November election, the Guam Attorney General advised Senator Frank Aguon Jr. that a controversial Bill requiring a woman seeking an abortion be counseled beforehand &#8220;would withstand a constitutional challenge.&#8221;  However, the AG recommended that the Legislature &#8220;may want to consider clarifying part of the Bill.&#8221;</p>
<p>That same week before the general election, the Esperansa project called a news conference to criticize Aguon, and other lawmakers, for what the Esperansa Project charged was stalling on the bill.</p>
<p>Read the AG&#8217;s opinion on the constitutionality of the original Bill 54<br />
Today [Monday] Senator Aguon, who Chairs the Committee on Health, released both the AG&#8217;s opinion and a revised bill clarifying the original measure, as recommended by the AG.</p>
<p>Read the revised substitute version of Bill 54</p>
<p>In the AG&#8217;s opinion, Deputy Attorney General Patrick Mason writes:</p>
<p>“Although not necessarily constitutionally fatal, a question of vagueness does arise in Section 3218.1 (b)(8) which states: </p>
<p> A physician shall not require or obtain payment for a service provided to a patient who has inquired about an abortion or scheduled an abortion until the expiration of the twenty-four (24) hour reflection period required  Subsection (b)(1) , (2) and (4),” the opinion written by Deputy Attorney General J. Patrick Mason stated.  (Please see attached AGO’s opinion)</p>
<p>Senator Aguon is quoted in his release as saying that “Now that we have received the necessary opinion of the Attorney General Office, it will allow us to move forward.</p>
<p> This legal guidance will be helped [sic] to lawmakers once the question of constitutionality is raised during the deliberation of Bill 54 before the Legislative body.”</p>
<p>The original Bill, introduced in February of 2009, would have required:</p>
<p>*that a woman give written consent to the procedure</p>
<p>*that the woman wait 24 hours before having an abortion</p>
<p>*that the physician give specific information to the woman seeking the abortion, such as printed material and an informational video that describes the unborn child and a list of agencies that offers alternative to abortion.</p>
<p>* and that the physician may not charge for the first visit from a woman seeking an abortion.<br />
================================<br />
This is sick in so many ways</p>
<p>Anna</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>
