Michelle Moquin's "A day in the life of…"

Creative Discussions, Inspiring Thoughts, Fun Adventures, Love & Laughter, Peaceful Travel, Hip Fashions, Cool People, Gastronomic Pleasures, Exotic Indulgences, Groovy Music, and more!

  • Hello!

    Welcome To My OUR Blog!


    Michelle Moquin's Facebook profile "Click here" to go to my FaceBook profile. Visit me!
  • Copyright Protected

    Protected by Copyscape Plagiarism Checker
  • Let Michelle Style YOU!

    I am a "Specialist in Styles" Personal Stylist. Check out my Style website to see how I can help you discover, define, and refine your unique style.
  • © Copyright 2008-2023

    All content on this site are property of Michelle Moquin © copyright 2008-2023. All material posted on my blog becomes the sole property of my blog. If you want to reserve any proprietary rights don't post it to my blog.
  • In Pursuit Of…

    Custom Search
  • Madaline Speaks

    For those of you interested in reading an Earthling Girl's Guide to a better Government, and a Greener world, check out the blog:
  • Contact Your Representatives and Senators Here!

    To send letters to your representatives about any issue of interest, Click here


    To send letters to your Senators about any issue of interest, Click here


    Get involved - Write your letters today!
  • On The Issues

    Don't be uninformed! Click here to see how every political leader on every issue voted.
  • Don’t Believe The Lies – Get The Facts

    FactCheck.org is a nonpartisan, nonprofit “consumer advocate” for voters that aims to reduce the level of deception and confusion in U.S. politics. They monitor the factual accuracy of what is said by major U.S. political players in the form of TV ads, debates, speeches, interviews and news releases. Their goal is to apply the best practices of both journalism and scholarship, and to increase public knowledge and understanding.

    Click here to get the facts.

    Pulitzer Prize Winner Politifact.com is another trusted site to get the facts. Click here to get the facts.

  • Who’s Paying Who?

    On The Issues is a nonpartisan guide to money's influence on U.S. elections and public policy.
  • Blog Rules of Conduct

    Rule #1: "The aliens can not reveal anything about anyone’s life that would not be known without the use of our technology. The exception being that if a reader has a question about his or her health and the assistance of alien technology would be necessary to answer that question.”

    Rule #2: "Aliens will not threaten humans and Humans will not threaten aliens."

    Rule #3:

    Posting Comments:

    When posting a comment in regards to any past or archived article, please reference the title and date of the article and post your comment on the present day to keep the conversation contemporary.

    NOTE: You do not need to add your e-mail address when posting a comment. Your real name, an alias, a moniker, initials...whatever ...even simply "anonymous" is all you need to add in the fields in order to post a comment.

    Thank you.

  • *********

    Yellow Pages for San Francisco, CA
  • Meta

  • Looking For A Personal Stylist?

    Michelle has designed and styled for the stars! She can be your "Specialist in Styles" Personal Stylist too. Check out Michelle's style website
  • Recent Posts

  • Michelle’s E-mail:

    E-mail me! ~~~~~~~~~~~~~~
  • Care To Twitter? Come Tweet Me!

  • Disclaimer: Adult Blog

    I DO NOT CENSOR COMMENTS POSTED TO THIS BLOG: Therefore this blog is not for the faint hearted, thin skinned, easily offended or the appointed people's moralist. If you feel that you may fit in any of those categories, please DO NOT read my blog or its comments. There are plenty of blogs that will fit your needs, find one. This warning also applies to those who post comments who would find it unpleasant or mentally injurious to receive an opposing opinion via a raw to vulgar delivery. I DO NOT censor comments posted here. If you post a comment, you are on notice that you may receive a comment in language or opinion that you will not approve of or that you feel is offensive. If that would bother you, DO NOT post on my blog.

    27Mar2011
  • Medical Disclaimer:

    I am not a doctor nor am I medically trained in any field. No one on this website is claiming to be a medical physician or claiming to be medically trained in any field. However, anyone can blog information about health articles, folk remedies, possible cures, possible treatments, etc that they have heard of on my blog. Please see your physician or a health care professional before heeding or using any medical information given on this blog. It is not intended to replace any medical advice given to you by your licensed medical professional. This blog is simply providing a medium for discussion on all matters concerning life. All opinions given are the sole responsibility of the person giving them. This blog does not make any claim to their truthfulness, honesty, or factuality because of their presence on my blog. Again, Please consult a health care professional before heeding any health information given here.

    27Mar2011
  • Legal Disclaimer:

    Michelle Moquin's "A Day In The Life Of..." publishes the opinions of expert authorities in many fields. But the use of these opinions is no substitute for legal, accounting, investment, medical and other professional services to suit your specific personal needs. Always consult a competent professional for answers to your specific questions.

    27Mar2011
  • Fair Use Notice Disclaimer

    This web site may contain copyrighted material the use of which has not always been specifically authorized by the copyright owner. We are making such material available in our efforts to advance the understanding of humanity's problems and hopefully to help find solutions for those problems. We believe this constitutes a 'fair use' of any such copyrighted material as provided for in section 107 of the US Copyright Law. In accordance with Title 17 U.S.C. Section 107, the material on this site is distributed without profit to those who have expressed a prior interest in receiving the included information for research and educational purposes. A click on a hyperlink is a request for information. However, if you wish to use copyrighted material from this site for purposes of your own that go beyond 'fair use', you must obtain permission from me. You can read more about "fair use' and US Copyright Law"at the"Legal Information Institute of Cornell Law School." This notice was modified from a similar notice at "Common Dreams."

Archive for the 'Political Powwow' Category

bye-bye Beck

Posted by Michelle Moquin on 12th April 2011


Bookmark and Share

On my way to see a client the other morning, I was listening to NPR. The discussion was Glenn Beck. Kudos to those who organized a high successful advertiser boycott of Beck’s program, and are partially if not majorly responsible for Beck leaving.

It May Take 27 Years to Undo the Damage Glenn Beck Caused in 27 Months

It seems like yesterday that Glenn Beck was the king of all right-wing media — maybe because it was yesterday, practically. It was just last summer, after all, that Beck graced — OK, maybe that’s not the right word – the cover of the New York Times Magazine and made national headlines with that big rally on the Lincoln Memorial, a molecule in the giant shadow cast there by Martin Luther King, That was supposed to be the zenith, but I could tell it was the beginning of the end, that Beck was flailing about in search of the next new thing. I saw the vacant stares when Beck proclaimed that his much hyped event had “nothing to do with politics, everything to do with God.”

There were maybe 100,000 of them, lining the woody banks of the Reflecting Pool, arms folded, watching the planes descend into Reagan National as their leader struggled to hold their attention. Beck was already bleeding TV viewers — losing more than a third of his audience — and soon came the stunning news that he was getting yanked from the radio airwaves in Philadelphia and New York.

And now it’s (sort of) over, just like that. Beck’s descent was so steep and so fast that yesterday’s news that his main platform, his nightly show on Fox News Channel, will end this year, probably this summer, wasn’t even that shocking. Beck, whose shtick always remained rooted in his past as a “Morning Zoo” shock jock of the ’80s and ’90s, could never recreate the “shock” of taking on Barack Obama in early 2009 when that backlash was looking for a spiritual guru. Night after night, his rants grew more frenetic –insulting all of Reform Judaism one night, outlining a conspiracy to create a Muslim “caliphate” the next, or calling trains yet another government plot to control your life.

The crazier that Beck got, the more viewers and advertisers he drove away, until eventually it was too much for his beleaguered bosses at FNC, who may have lost as much as $40 million on the whole fiasco. Liberals, especially those who organized a high successful advertiser boycott of Beck’s program, celebrated the news as a victory against political hate speech.

But I think that progressives might want to hold off on that victory lap — unless it’s to get in better shape for the long battle ahead.

Because the truth is that Beck’s ouster isn’t really the end of the nightmare, but just the beginning of the end. Over the last 27 months, Beck — and let’s be clear that he had a lot of help from the likes of Rush Limbaugh and Sarah Palin and Sean Hannity and Rand Paul and all the folks in the Tea Party Movement — managed to do incalculable harm to the American body politic, that Beck was exactly like Tom and Daisy Buchanan in The Great Gatsby who “smashed up things and creatures and then retreated back into their money or their vast carelessness..”

You’ll probably hear a lot about how Beck coarsened the political debate and how his words may or may not have incited violence, but I think the wreckage is a lot more substantive, to actual policies that affect Americans every day. You see, there was a reason that Beck was so fond of a political theory called the Overton Window — so enamored, in fact, that he made it the title of his (officially) fictional “thriller” novel last summer. The Overton Window is a notion that you can radically move the parameters of political debate by pushing talk to the outer limits, so that ideas that were once deemed as extreme suddenly appeared to be normal.

Ironically, no one mastered the use of the Overton Window better than Beck. With all the focus on the leading edge of Beck’s craziness — the “caliphate” stuff, the flirtation with “the FEMA camps,” or President Obama’s “deep-seated hatred” of white people — it’s easy to forget how he rationalized once out-there ideas to millions of American conservatives, and how those ideas became ingrained in the Republican agenda that has thwarted progressivism from virtually the day Obama took office.

Let’s take the example of climate change. There was a time when mainstream Republicans like John McCain, Lindsey Graham and Tim Pawlenty thought that man-made climate change was a real problem and that government had a role in fixing it. Then Beck and friends on Fox News Channel and talk radio in went to work. Beck’s role in all this is remarkably cynical, as he told USA Today Weekend that he personally believed in climate change — “you’d have to be an idiot not to notice the temperature change,” he said — but said the complete opposite on the air. “Americans know this global warming thing is a scam,” he proclaimed on the radio.

In 2007, 62 percent of Republicans believed in man-made climate change, but by late last year 53 percent of GOP voters said there is no evidence for it. In Delaware, a band of Beck aficionados called the Delaware 9-12 Patriots played a key role in ending the Senate ambitions and political career of moderate Republican Mike Castle, largely because Castle had voted for the anti-global warming plan known as “cap and trade.”

Do you think other Republicans took notice of Castle’s fate? Last month, the House Energy and Commerce Committee was asked to accept an amendment to a bill confirming that man made climate change is real. The vote among the GOP majority was unanimous – 31 votes against global warming.

But then, Beck has the GOP going off the rails on a crazy train, literally. In other industrialized capitals from Paris and Beijing, high-speed rail is seen as a futuristic way to grow the economy with the kind of a zeal that a very different America once held for its space program. But now the political tide has turned against high-speed rail, with talk radio leading the charge characterized scheduled train service as a form of totalitarianized mind control. Earlier this year, Beck summed up the far-right mantra on trains earlier this year when he said: “The trains run on time and there’s a schedule — and you’ll obey us and go where we want.” It would be laughable — except it came just as newly elected Tea-Party-darling governors Scott Walker in Wisconsin, John Kasich in Ohio and Rick Scott in Florida killed high-speed rail projects that would have brought federal dollars, and more importantly jobs, to residents of their recession-battered states.

You could go on and on – the talk-radio jihad against big government that has put gutless Democrats so on the defensive that they no longer fight to protect vital programs but only over whether to agree to “steep” spending cuts or “draconian” ones, or the fear-mongering on terrorism and Gitmo that made quivering congressmen afraid to house terror suspects in our maximum security prisons. Don’t think that Beck’s nightly burst of insanity didn’t have a lot to do with these things, because they did.

Don’t believe me? Then ask a fellow in South Carolina named Bob Inglis who was a Republican congressman until he told his constituents to “turn off Glenn Beck,” and lost a primary to an upstart who got 71 percent of the vote. Why do you think the Republicans in Washington remain in lock step, even as 90 percent of what they stay in lock step for is bat-guano crazy.

When people look back on this peculiar time in American history and talk about Glenn Beck, and they will, I’m sure there’ll be a lot about all the wacky stuff — the apocalyptic hyping of “God, gold and guns” and the way out conspiracy theories, the leading edge of the buzzsaw and he moved the Overton Window to the far right corner of our national house divided. I’m more worried about the rising temperatures and sea levels, the falling behind other developing nations like China on everything from infrastructure to alternative energy to education, the repeated blows to America’s civil liberties and the destruction of a social safety net it took 75 years to build.

The solutions to these problems are out there, but they are stymied by a two-year explosion of madness, the right-wing backlash, which I reported on my book that is called “The Backlash,” and it was Glenn Beck that lit the fuse. Yes, his reign on the Fox News Channel may last little more than 27 months. But it may take the rest of us 27 years — or more — to undo all of the damage.

**********

Readers: Got something to say…this is the place to say it. Blog me.

Peace & Love: “Live it, Give it”

Lastly, greed over a great story is surfacing from my ‘loyal’(?) readers. With all this back and forth about who owns what, that appears on my blog, let me reiterate that all material posted on my blog becomes the sole property of my blog. If you want to reserve any proprietary rights don’t post it to my blog. I will prominently display this caveat on my blog from now on to remind those who may have forgotten this notice.

Gratefully your blog host,

michelle

Aka BABE: We all know what this means by now :)

If you love my blog and my writes, please make a donation via PayPal, credit card, or e-check, please click the ‘Donate’ button below. (Please only donations from those readers within the United States. – International readers please see my ‘Donate’ page)

Or if you would like to send a check via snail mail, please make checks payable to “Michelle Moquin”, and send to:

Michelle Moquin PO Box 29235 San Francisco, Ca. 94129

Thank you for your loyal support!

For archives dated before January 17, 2008 click on my Blogroll:

or click here: “A Day in the life of…”

All content on this site are property of Michelle Moquin © copyright 2010

" Politics, god, Life, News, Music, Family, Personal, Travel, Random, Photography, Religion, Aliens, Art, Entertainment, Food, Books, Thoughts, Media, Culture, Love, Sex, Poetry, Prose, Friends, Technology, Humor, Health, Writing, Events, Movies, Sports, Video, Christianity, Atheist, Blogging, History, Work, Education, Business, Fashion, Barack Obama, People, Internet, Relationships, Faith, Photos, Videos, Hillary Clinton, School, Reviews, God, TV, Philosophy, Fun, Science, Environment, Design, The Page, Rants, Pictures, Church, Blog, Nature, Marketing, Television, Democrats, Parenting, Miscellaneous, Current Events, Film, Spirituality, Obama, Musings, Home, Human Rights, Society, Comedy, Me, Random Thoughts, Research, Government, Election 2008, Baseball, Opinion, Recipes, Children, Iraq, Funny, Women, Economics, America, Misc, Commentary, John McCain, Reflections, All, Celebrities, Inspiration, Lifestyle, Theology, Linux, Kids, Games, World, India, Literature, China, Ramblings, Fitness, Money, Review, War, Articles, Economy, Journal, Quotes, NBA, Crime, Anime, Islam, 2008, Stories, Prayer, Diary, Jesus, Buddha, Muslim, Israel, Europe, Links, Marriage, Fiction, American Idol, Software, Leadership, Pop culture, Rants, Video Games, Republicans, Updates, Political, Football, Healing, Blogs, Shopping, USA, Class, Matrix, Course, Work, Web 2.0, My Life, Psychology, Gay, Happiness, Advertising, Field Hockey, Hip-hop, sex, fucking, ass, Soccer, sox"

Posted in Political Powwow | 53 Comments »

Liberty, Mississippi: An oxymoron, for many

Posted by Michelle Moquin on 11th April 2011


Bookmark and Share

Good morning everyone.

I saw this last might on 60 Minutes and it seemed apropos to post it this morning in light of the discussions happening here. For those of you who enjoy reading I posted the text. For those of you who prefer visuals or sound so that you can continue to listen while making your breakfast or lunch, click here for the video.

Cold case: The murder of Louis Allen

Steve Kroft investigates the civil rights era killing of Louis Allen in a Mississippi town

(CBS News) Five years ago, the FBI announced that it was reopening more than 100 unsolved murder cases from the civil rights era of the 1950s and 60s. The goal of the “Cold Case Initiative” was to try and mete out justice in what seemed to be racially motivated killings that were never prosecuted.

Not many 50-year-old cold cases ever get solved – memories fade, evidence is lost, witnesses and suspects die or disappear. But that’s not the case in the death of Louis allen, a mostly forgotten, but historically significant murder that helped bring thousands of white college students to Mississippi in the Freedom Summer of 1964.

Reporting on an unsolved murder
Forty seven years after the murder of Louis Allen, “60 Minutes” goes to Liberty, Miss. in search of his killer.

The murder is still unsolved, but the case has never quite gone away, because the chief suspect is very much alive and walking the streets of a town called Liberty.

Liberty, Miss. is a small rural logging town not far from the Louisiana border. The FBI believes that some people there have been keeping a dark secret for nearly 50 years, from one of the ugliest periods in the state’s history.

It was a time when civil rights activists were beaten and arrested, when state, and local politics were controlled by all-white citizens’ councils, and when people like Louis Allen were murdered in cold blood and without redress.

Cynthia Deitle, a 15-year veteran of the FBI’s civil rights division, was, until a few weeks ago, in charge of the Cold Case Initiative. She keeps a photo of Allen on her desk.

Asked why, she told “60 Minutes” correspondent Steve Kroft, “The case bothers me. I feel like we failed, and not just the FBI, but law enforcement.”

Of the 100 unsolved racially motivated murders she has been charged with investigating, none has been more promising or frustrating than Allen’s.

“Somebody knows something. Some husband came home with bloody clothing. Someone got drunk in a bar and said what he was doing last night. Someone knows something,” Deitle said.

But in the early 1960s, people in and around Liberty knew to keep their mouths shut. A violent chapter of the Ku Klux Klan used cross burnings, abductions and murder to enforce the doctrine of white supremacy and to intimidate the black population, most of which lived in shacks with no electricity or plumbing, and were not allowed to vote.

Civil rights leaders like Robert Moses, who came south to help them register, were frequently the target of violence.

“Liberty was not a place that I liked to go,” Moses remembered.

Asked why, he told Kroft, “Because it was a place where you weren’t safe if you were doing voter registration work.”

It was in Liberty that Moses met Louis Allen, a rough-hewn World War II veteran who walked proud and was not afraid to stand up for himself. He ran a small timber business, was one of the few blacks in Liberty to own his own land, and always wore a hat, which he considered a sign of self-respect.

He was not the type to seek out trouble – Robert Moses says it found him.

“He was at the wrong place at the wrong time. He saw something that happened and he was deeply disturbed and affected by that. And so he had a basic life decision to make,” Moses explained.

On Sept. 25, 1961, Allen was walking past an old cotton gin when he saw something that likely got him killed.

Allen witnessed a powerful state legislator by the name of E.H. Hurst shoot and kill an unarmed black man named Herbert Lee. Allen told his friends and family that he and other eyewitnesses had been pressured into lying about the shooting, and to saying that it was self-defense. Later, Allen decided that he needed to tell the truth.

One of the people Allen told it to was Julian Bond, who was trying to register black voters in Mississippi for the Student Nonviolent Coordinating Committee. He would later become a legendary civil rights leader.

“This was not a self-defense action by the state representative. This was out and out murder. That’s all it was. But Louis Allen agreed to lie about that,” Bond said.

Asked why he thinks Allen lied about it, Bond said, “He lied because he was in fear of his life. If he had implicated a powerful white man in a murder of a black man, that he was risking his life.”

“Did you encourage him to tell the truth?” Kroft asked.

“I tried to encourage him to tell the truth, but you know, it was like saying, ‘Why don’t you volunteer to be killed?’” Bond replied.

But Allen’s wife would later testify that “his conscience was clipping him” and he decided to tell FBI agents and the U.S. Commission on Civil Rights what really happened at the cotton gin. A document from FBI files says, “Allen changed his story” and “expressed fear that he might be killed.”

He asked for protection, but none was provided. Almost immediately, word began circulating in Liberty that Allen was prepared to change his testimony.

“He was threatened as a result of the fact that he was going to change his statement and that he did change his statement,” Deitle said.

She said the FBI was notified of those threats.

Asked if the bureau did anything, Deitle said, “Yes. We referred that to local law enforcement authorities.”

“It’s certainly possible to conclude that local law enforcement people were the ones behind the threats?” Kroft asked.

“There is a theory out there that that speaks to that. Yes,” she replied.

In fact, it has been the prevailing theory for some time, although the FBI cannot officially confirm it. There is a 1961 reference in the FBI file to a report that “Allen was to be killed and the local sheriff was involved in the plot to kill him.”

And “60 Minutes” found a 1962 letter from Robert Moses to Assistant Attorney General John Doar, alleging the same thing: “They’re after him in Amite [County],” it says, and makes reference to “a plot by the sheriff and seven other men.”

“He was afraid of the sheriff’s department,” Kroft remarked.

“I think he was, yes,” Deitle said.

“And I think he was afraid of the Klan, although they seemed to be sort of the same thing in Liberty at this time,” Kroft remarked.

“I’m not sure I can say that,” she replied.

Julian Bond was less circumspect: “The law enforcement, you suspected they were members. If you wanted to be a mayor, a city councilman, a county commissioner, the sheriff, if you wanted to be on the legislature, you had to have some connection with the Klan.”

And in the Amite County Sheriff’s Department, the person with the best connection was Deputy Sheriff Daniel Jones. His father was the “Exalted Cyclops” of the local Klan, and Jones himself, according to an FBI document “60 Minutes” found, was suspected of being a Klan member.

Jones, who is alive and still resides in Liberty, was recently visited by FBI agents who wanted him to take a lie detector test.

“What was he like?” Kroft asked Louis Allen’s son, Hank.

“Well, mean,” he replied.

Hank Allen was 17 years old when his father was killed and he remembers Jones as his main tormentor. He says he watched Jones harass and repeatedly arrest his father on trumped-up charges, and one night beat him outside their home.

“And he had handcuffed him, told him he was under arrest. So Daddy asked for his hat. Told Daddy, ‘No, you can’t go get your hat.’ Daddy said, ‘Well, my son is on the porch, can he bring me my hat?’ He drawed back, he took a flashlight, and he struck my daddy, and broke his jawbone. Handcuffed,” Hank Allen told Kroft.

When he got out of jail, Louis Allen did something that was unheard of for a black man in Mississippi: he went to the FBI and lodged a complaint against Deputy Sheriff Jones and testified before a federal grand jury.

The case was thrown out, and the situation in Liberty continued to deteriorate.

“They stopped sellin’ Daddy gas in the town. They stopped buyin’ his logs. They just more or less just tried to black ball him,” Hank Allen remembered.

“It got to the point, the harassment and just him not being able to survive in Liberty that he decided to leave and to go work in another state. And it’s the night before he is due to leave that he is killed,” Cynthia Deitle explained.

Allen was ambushed on a cold night in January 1964, after getting out of his truck to open the cattle gate that led to his property. His son, Hank, was the one who found him.

“I didn’t know why he would park the truck in the middle of the driveway and leave it like that. And I climbed up in the truck. The headlights was real dim. And when I went to step down out the truck, I stepped on something. And that’s when I stepped on my daddy’s hand. He was lying up under the truck,” Hank Allen remembered.

He was killed with two blasts of deer shot to the head. The investigating officer was none other than the newly-elected sheriff, Daniel Jones, who Hank said made it clear to the family, why his father had been murdered.

“He told my mom that if Louis had just shut his mouth, that he wouldn’t be layin’ there on the ground. He wouldn’t be dead,” Hank Allen said.

Asked if he thinks Sheriff Jones did it, Hank Allen told Kroft, “Yes, indeed. By all means. If he didn’t do it, he was the entrepreneur of it.”

Jones told the newspapers he was unable to find a single clue.

“How would you characterize the investigation that Sheriff Jones conducted?” Kroft asked Deitle.

“He did not develop any fingerprints, any physical evidence and he never developed any suspects,” she replied.

“Not a great investigation,” Kroft remarked.

“Probably could have done more,” she replied.

And the same might be said about the FBI at the time: it had limited jurisdiction over civil rights murders and little inclination to investigate them. In fact, it’s not clear that anyone investigated Allen’s murder until 1994, when Plater Robinson, a historian at the Southern Institute at Tulane University, began digging into it.

“From day one in Liberty, people told me that Daniel Jones and a colored man killed Louis Allen,” Robinson said.

Robinson has spent 17 years combing through archives and tracking down people to interview. One of them was an elderly preacher named Alfred Knox. Knox told Robinson in a 1998 tape-recorded conversation that his son-in-law, Archie Weatherspoon, was with Sheriff Daniel Jones when Allen was murdered.
“My son-in-law went with him,” Knox said in the recorded interview.

“To kill Louis Allen?” Robinson asked.

“To kill Louis Allen,” Knox said. “He didn’t know where he was goin’ till he got in the car. And he said ‘Would you pull the trigger? Would you shoot him?’ He said, ‘No, I ain’t gonna do it.’ That what my son-in-law said. ‘I ain’t gonna shoot him. You come out here to kill him, you kill him.’ So he killed him.”

Both Knox and his son-in-law took their stories to the grave. But Robinson says the answer to who killed Allen can still be found in Liberty. “A lot of people are dead. But there are still a number of significant people still alive,” he told Kroft.

“Like who, besides Sheriff Jones?” Kroft asked.

“Well, Charles Ravencraft, he lives down the road. And he’s quite healthy,” Robinson said.

We found Ravencraft at the Liberty Drug Store presiding over a coffee klatch of old-timers, some of whom were around when Allen was murdered.

“People in this area, they just don’t do much talking,” Ravencraft told Kroft.

For years, Ravencraft was sergeant-at-arms of the Mississippi legislature. And at the time of Allen’s murder, he was vice president of the “Americans for the Preservation of the White Race” in Liberty, a front group for the Ku Klux Klan.

Asked if the Klan was present in the area, Ravencraft told Kroft, “Sure. They were here.”

“Were any of you guys in it?” Kroft asked.

‘It wouldn’t have been a Klan if you don’t tell everybody what your business was,” Ravencraft said.

Ravencraft indicated that he hadn’t lost much sleep over Allen’s murder, and told us he had no idea who killed him. “No I don’t. He lived a lot longer than I thought he’d a lived. That’s the kinda fella he was, he was a little overbearing. I don’t think that civil rights had anything to do with it,” he told Kroft.

Winbourne Sullivan wasn’t around when Allen was killed, but he ran the Liberty Drug Store for 36 years. “I think there are people who know what happened and who did it, but they’re not willin’ to talk about it. And they won’t talk about it. You’ll never find out,” he said.

They told us they don’t see much of former Sheriff Daniel Jones these days. He spends most of his time on his property, just off the state highway.

We decided to approach him with our cameras concealed, on the off-chance he might give something up. After waiting for a half-an-hour on the porch, he rolled up in an all-terrain vehicle with his wife.

“My name is Steve Kroft. We’re from ’60 Minutes’ in New York. We’re down here working on a story, on an old case of yours, and was wondering if you’d have some time to talk to us about?” Kroft asked.

“No, sir, I don’t believe so,” Jones replied.

“You don’t think so?” Kroft asked.

“No, sir,” Jones said.

“The Louis Allen case?” Kroft asked.

“Yeah, I know what you’re talking about,” Jones replied.

ones was polite and cordial, said he didn’t want to talk, but he kept on talking.
“There was some bad blood between you and Louis, right?” Kroft asked.

“There was not no bad blood between us. Apparently, I’m talking more than I need to, but the truth sometimes has a way of slipping out if you try to keep it covered up,” Jones said.

When asked if he was in the Klan, Jones told Kroft, “Well, I won’t answer that. I take the Fifth on that. “

Jones confirmed that the FBI had already been there asking some of the same questions.

“I told you I don’t care to discuss it, and you just keep coming with your educated approach,” Jones told Kroft.

“No, it’s not my educated approach. Look, you haven’t told me to get off your property. Just answer me one last question,” Kroft said.

“Okay, be sure it’s the last one,” Jones said.

“Can you look me in the eye and say you weren’t involved in it?” Kroft asked.

“No sir, I wasn’t involved in it,” Jones said.

“Well, you know, sheriff, you could clear this up with a lie detector test,” Kroft pointed out.

“Well, then it ain’t gonna get cleared up,” Jones said.

“The theory that Sheriff Jones killed Louis Allen has been in the public domain for quite some time. The FBI would be remiss in our duties if we did not pursue that theory,” Cynthia Deitle told Kroft.

And it’s still just a theory – a circumstantial case based on motive, suspicions, hearsay and the words of dead people. There’s no forensic evidence, no murder weapon, no eyewitnesses and only one FBI agent working the case, part-time.

At a town hall meeting in nearby Baton Rouge, Deitle tried to shake out some new leads and enlist journalists, activists and students to help the FBI solve the murder. But there were some in the audience who still mistrust the FBI and think the “Cold Case Initiative” is little more than public relations.

“There’s been nothin’ did. There’s been not one arrest, there’s been all kind of investigations made. And I hate to say things like this. Because the FBI is the only help I got,” Hank Allen told the crowd.

Asked if the FBI should be doing more, Julian Bond told Kroft, “Of course they should be doing more. You know, thank God for these people who are doing it. But we can’t turn law enforcement over to journalists. We can’t turn it over to academics. We can’t depend on some guy at Tulane to tell us who’s killing people in Mississippi. Come on!”

“Why are you relying on reporters and professors? This is the most powerful law enforcement agency in the country. You have subpoena power,” Kroft pointed out.

“We do. We have resources that we could bring to bear on any case,” Deitle said.

“Why don’t you bring ‘em?” Kroft asked.

“They have been. But I’ve learned in these cases that a witness, a family member may be more comfortable talking to you then she would be talking to me,” she replied.

For Hank Allen, the time to solve his father’s killing was 47 years ago.

He believes the people who know what happened – black and white – would rather forget it now and that the wall of silence and the passage of time have granted immunity to those he thinks are responsible.

“Here’s a guy, goes on livin’ his normal life, enjoyin’ life. But they feel as though we’re doin’ somethin’ wrong by sayin’ somethin’ about the murder. In other words, ‘You should be quiet about that. That was in the past.’ Well, it’s still in my present, and in my future. I have to look at this every day,” he told Kroft.

Got a tip or information about the Louis Allen case or any other civil rights era cold case? Send us an e-mail at 60m@cbsnews.com.

**********

Readers: As I read this story all can think is this is just a day in the life of a black person living in Liberty, Mississippi at a time when a black person had no rights. Liberty, Mississippi – so much for being free.

This particular man feared for his life, just because he saw someone kill a man and wanted to do the right thing, when everyone else wanted him to shut up and forget it.

And when it was known that he was planning on doing the right thing, he feared for his life; and no one protected him. There was even a plot to kill him…to silence him, all for wanting to tell the truth.

He was harrassed, arrested on trumped-up charges, and beaten.  And when he went to the FBI and lodged a complaint against the perpetrator and testified before a federal grand jury, they threw the case out. It got so bad that he even had to leave the town he lived in to get work to support his family.

This is just one story of one black man. Murder or not, many others could tell a similar story of their lives being threatened, harassed and living in fear on a daily basis. And it is probably more typical for that time than we’d like to think, or for some, than they’d like to remember.

And for some, as noted in the story, they simply have the privilege to live their lives, as if nothing happened, as if they did nothing wrong.

The last paragraph says it all and is so worth repeating:

“Here’s a guy, goes on livin’ his normal life, enjoyin’ life. But they feel as though we’re doin’ somethin’ wrong by sayin’ somethin’ about the murder. In other words, ‘You should be quiet about that. That was in the past.’ Well, it’s still in my present, and in my future. I have to look at this every day,” he told Kroft.

No, many of us didn’t commit the atrocities that our ancestors did, but that is no excuse. Racism is still in the present, and sitting around on this present day and doing nothing about it, “looking the other way” as Paula pointed out, ignoring the racist remarks, and racist actions, and racist rules, and refusing to see how “justice” is really for “Just us”, is just as bad when you know it isn’t right.

Speaking of…

Paula: Wow. I wish that book had been introduced to me 20 years ago. I look forward to getting it. I would love to see the real portrait of AH. I have seen a few portraits of Alexander Dumas and there was only one that I found where he looked even close to being represented as the a black man that he is.

With respect to the rest of your write, I enjoyed your “two cents”. Keep it coming.

Lisa: Click here to buy the book.

Robert: Thanks for your addition to the topic. With respect to the “supreme court’: Noted and I agree. :)

Out of time. – the time is now yours. Blog me.

Lastly, greed over a great story is surfacing from my “loyal”(?) readers. With all this back and forth about who owns what, that appears on my blog, let me reiterate that all material posted on my blog becomes the sole property of my blog. If you want to reserve any proprietary rights don’t post it to my blog. I will prominently display this caveat on my blog from now on to remind those who may have forgotten this notice.

Gratefully your blog host,

michelle

Aka BABE: We all know what this means by now :)

If you love my blog and my writes, please make a donation via PayPal, credit card, or e-check, please click the “Donate” button below. (Please only donations from those readers within the United States. – International readers please see my “Donate” page)

Or if you would like to send a check via snail mail, please make checks payable to “Michelle Moquin”, and send to:

Michelle Moquin PO Box 29235 San Francisco, Ca. 94129

Thank you for your loyal support!

For archives dated before January 17, 2008 click on my Blogroll:

or click here: “A Day in the life of…”

All content on this site are property of Michelle Moquin © copyright 2008-2011

" Politics, god, Life, News, Music, Family, Personal, Travel, Random, Photography, Religion, Aliens, Art, Entertainment, Food, Books, Thoughts, Media, Culture, Love, Sex, Poetry, Prose, Friends, Technology, Humor, Health, Writing, Events, Movies, Sports, Video, Christianity, Atheist, Blogging, History, Work, Education, Business, Fashion, Barack Obama, People, Internet, Relationships, Faith, Photos, Videos, Hillary Clinton, School, Reviews, God, TV, Philosophy, Fun, Science, Environment, Design, The Page, Rants, Pictures, Church, Blog, Nature, Marketing, Television, Democrats, Parenting, Miscellaneous, Current Events, Film, Spirituality, Obama, Musings, Home, Human Rights, Society, Comedy, Me, Random Thoughts, Research, Government, Election 2008, Baseball, Opinion, Recipes, Children, Iraq, Funny, Women, Economics, America, Misc, Commentary, John McCain, Reflections, All, Celebrities, Inspiration, Lifestyle, Theology, Linux, Kids, Games, World, India, Literature, China, Ramblings, Fitness, Money, Review, War, Articles, Economy, Journal, Quotes, NBA, Crime, Anime, Islam, 2008, Stories, Prayer, Diary, Jesus, Buddha, Muslim, Israel, Europe, Links, Marriage, Fiction, American Idol, Software, Leadership, Pop culture, Rants, Video Games, Republicans, Updates, Political, Football, Healing, Blogs, Shopping, USA, Class, Matrix, Course, Work, Web 2.0, My Life, Psychology, Gay, Happiness, Advertising, Field Hockey, Hip-hop, sex, fucking, ass, Soccer, sox"

Posted in Health & Well Being, Human Rights and Equality, Political Powwow | 23 Comments »

the sick, corrupt, and dirty details of absolute power

Posted by Michelle Moquin on 9th April 2011


Bookmark and Share

Here’s what I promised.

Cruel but Not Unusual

Clarence Thomas writes one of the meanest Supreme Court decisions ever.

In 1985, John Thompson was convicted of murder in Louisiana. Having already been convicted in a separate armed robbery case, he opted not to testify on his own behalf in his murder trial. He was sentenced to death and spent 18 years in prison—14 of them isolated on death row—and watched as seven executions were planned for him. Several weeks before an execution scheduled for May 1999, Thompson’s private investigators learned that prosecutors had failed to turn over evidence that would have cleared him at his robbery trial. This evidence included the fact that the main informant against him had received a reward from the victim’s family, that the eyewitness identification done at the time described someone who looked nothing like him, and that a blood sample taken from the crime scene did not match Thompson’s blood type.

In 1963, in Brady v. Maryland, the Supreme Court held that prosecutors must turn over to the defense any evidence that would tend to prove a defendant’s innocence. Failure to do so is a violation of the defendant’s constitutional rights. Yet the four prosecutors in Thompson’s case managed to keep secret the fact that they had hidden exculpatory evidence for 20 years. Were it not for Thompson’s investigators, he would have been executed for a murder he did not commit.

Both of Thompson’s convictions were overturned. When he was retried on the murder charges, a jury acquitted him after 35 minutes. He sued the former Louisiana district attorney for Orleans Parish, Harry Connick Sr. (yes, his dad) for failing to train his prosecutors about their legal obligation to turn over exculpatory evidence to the defense. A jury awarded Thompson $14 million for this civil rights violation, one for every year he spent wrongfully incarcerated. The district court judge added another $1 million in attorneys’ fees. A panel of the 5th Circuit Court of Appeals upheld the verdict. An equally divided 5th Circuit, sitting en banc, affirmed again.

But this week, writing on behalf of the five conservatives on the Supreme Court and in his first majority opinion of the term, Justice Clarence Thomas tossed out the verdict, finding that the district attorney can’t be responsible for the single act of a lone prosecutor. The Thomas opinion is an extraordinary piece of workmanship, matched only by Justice Antonin Scalia’s concurring opinion, in which he takes a few extra whacks at Justice Ruth Bader Ginsburg’s dissent. (Ginsburg was so bothered by the majority decision that she read her dissent from the bench for the first time this term.) Both Thomas and Scalia have produced what can only be described as a master class in human apathy. Their disregard for the facts of Thompson’s thrashed life and near-death emerges as a moral flat line. Scalia opens his concurrence with a swipe at Ginsburg’s “lengthy excavation of the trial record” and states that “the question presented for our review is whether a municipality is liable for a single Brady violation by one of its prosecutors.” But only by willfully ignoring that entire trial record can he and Thomas reduce the entire constitutional question to a single misdeed by a single bad actor.

Both parties to this case have long agreed that an injustice had been done. Connick himself conceded that there had been a Brady violation, yet Scalia finds none. Everyone else concedes that egregious mistakes were made. Scalia struggles to rehabilitate them all.

One of the reasons the truth came to light after 20 years is that Gerry Deegan, a junior assistant D.A. on the Thompson case, confessed as he lay dying of cancer that he had withheld the crime lab test results and removed a blood sample from the evidence room. The prosecutor to whom Deegan confessed said nothing about this for five years. While Scalia pins the wrongdoing on a single “miscreant prosecutor,” Ginsburg correctly notes that “no fewer than five prosecutors” were involved in railroading Thompson. She adds that they “did so despite multiple opportunities, spanning nearly two decades, to set the record straight.” While Thomas states the question as having to do with a “singleBrady violation,” Ginsburg is quick to point out that there was far more than just a misplaced blood sample at issue: Thompson was turned in by someone seeking a reward, but prosecutors failed to turn over tapes of that conversation. The eyewitness identification of the killer didn’t match Thompson, but was never shared with defense counsel. The blood evidence was enough to prove a Brady violation, but it was the tip of the iceberg.

In the 10 years preceding Thompson’s trial, Thomas acknowledges, “Louisiana courts had overturned four convictions because of Brady violations by prosecutors in Connick’s office.” Yet somehow this doesn’t add up to a pattern of Brady violations in the office, because the evidence in those other cases wasn’t blood or crime lab evidence. Huh? He then inexplicably asserts that young prosecutors needn’t be trained on Brady violations because they learned everything in law school.

Scalia and Thomas are at pains to say that Connick was not aware of or responsible for his subordinates’ unconstitutional conduct, except—as Ginsburg points out—that Connick acknowledged that he misunderstood Brady,acknowledged that his prosecutors “were coming fresh out of law school,” acknowledged he didn’t know whether they had Brady training, and acknowledged that he himself had ‘stopped reading law books … and looking at opinions’ when he was first elected District Attorney in 1974.” And Connick also conceded that holding his underlings to the highest Brady standards would “make [his] job more difficult.” As Bennett Gershman and Joel Cohen point out, the jury had “considerable evidence that both Connick and prosecutors in his office were ignorant of the constitutional rules regarding disclosure of exculpatory evidence; they were ignorant of the rules regarding disclosure of scientific evidence; there was no training, or continuing education, and no procedures to monitor compliance with evidentiary requirements; prosecutors did not review police files; and shockingly, Connick himself had been indicted by federal prosecutors for suppressing a lab report of the kind hidden from Thompson.”

It’s not just that a jury, a judge, and the 5th Circuit Court of Appeals found that Connick knew his staff was undertrained and he failed to fix it. It’s that it’s almost impossible, on reviewing all of the evidence, to conclude anything else. Nobody is suggesting that the legal issue here is simple or that there aren’t meaningful consequences to creating liability for district attorneys who fail to train their subordinates in Brady compliance. But those aren’t the opinions that Thomas and Scalia produced. Their effort instead was to sift and resift the facts until the injury done to Thompson can be pinned on a single bad actor, acting in bad faith. It’s a long, sad, uphill trek.

Beyond that, there is no suggestion in either opinion that this is a hard question or a close call or even a hint of regret at their conclusion. There is only certainty that the jury, the appeals court, and above all Ginsburg got it completely wrong in believing that someone should be held responsible for the outrages suffered by John Thompson. If there is empathy for anyone in evidence here, it’s for the overworked and overzealous district attorneys.

It’s left to Ginsburg to acknowledge that the costs of immunizing Connick from any wrongdoing is as high as the cost of opening him to it: “The prosecutorial concealment Thompson encountered … is bound to be repeated unless municipal agencies bear responsibility—made tangible by §1983 liability—for adequately conveying what Brady requires and for monitoring staff compliance.” As Scott Lemieux points out, by all-but-immunizing Connick for the conduct of his subordinates, the court has created a perfect Catch-22, since the courts already give prosecutors absolute immunity for their actions as prosecutors (though they may still be liable for their conduct as administrators or investigators). By immunizing their bosses as well, the court has guaranteed that nobody can be held responsible for even the most shocking civil rights violations.

I don’t think that the failure at the court is one of empathy. I don’t ask that Thomas or Scalia shed a tear for an innocent man who almost went to his death because of deceptive prosecutors. And, frankly, Ginsburg’s dissent—while powerful—is no less Vulcan in tone than their opinions. But this case is of a piece with prior decisions in which Thomas and Scalia have staked out positions that revel in the hyper-technical and deliberately callous. It was, after all, Scalia who wrote in 2009 that “this court has never held that the Constitution forbids the execution of a convicted defendant who had a full and fair trial but is later able to convince a habeas court that he is ‘actually’ innocent.” It was Thomas who wrote that a prisoner who was slammed to a concrete floor and punched and kicked by a guard after asking for a grievance form had no constitutional claim.

The law awards no extra points for being pitiless and scornful. There is rarely a reason to be pitiless and scornful, certainly in a case of an innocent man who was nearly executed. It leads one to wonder whether Thomas and Scalia sometimes are just because they can be.

**********

And this is our Supreme Court “Just us” system. Comments? Thoughts? Rants? Blog me.

AH: Wow. Talk about a conspiracy. And the fact that so many people, not to mention countries, kept it a secret is astounding. I can see not much has changed. Your statement, “The fear was that if Lincoln could put the country back on its feet, he would run and be elected for even a third term,” proves that even back then those that oppose were willing to risk the loss of their country to be successful in their agenda. The racists opposed a black man as president then, just as they do today.

With respect to the rest of your chronicle, I was glued to my computer, hanging on every word. I am not shocked but I am left somewhat speechless. Amazing how our history books etc.,  reflect nothing like this.

As readers have said here before, history is told and depicted how people in power want us to remember it. It is not necessarily the truth. The truth that we are supposed to believe is all in the power of the hands of those who write the written word, and have the power to spread it widely.  Thank for sharing. I HOPE you, Bita and Adam are well.

Paula: Your comments were such an interesting addition to AH’s. Thanks for sharing too. However, it seems there are more than just “two” presidents with black ancestry. There is a little book by J.A. Rogers called “The Five Negro Presidents”, that has come across my plate.

Readers: I expected to hear more from you with respect to AH’s story. Here’s a excerpt from an article written about this little 18-page book mentioned above:

Obama Would Be the Sixth Black President, At Least!

About a year ago, a Rastafarian guy I worked with who had a lot of optimism about Obama and, to me, an unrealistic expectation that an Obama presidency would be “revolutionary,” made a statement that piqued my curiosity. In the middle of speaking on what was shaping up to be the Obama versus Hilary primary farce, he said:

“Of course, people talking about Barack being the first black president have it wrong. He’d be the sixth one, at least!”

I’d never heard such a thing before, and I’ve heard lots of things. I’ve even had, in past iterations of my personality, great pride in having heard and read about quite a few things most people of my age don’t know. But this was the first time I’d heard about other black presidents, so I asked him about it.

My Rasta colleague responded with surprise. “Really? I figured you knew about that? There have been a few presidents with black ancestry. Thomas Jefferson was one, I forget the others. Alexander Hamilton, one of the other Founding Fathers, was part black, too. You ever been to his house up in Harlem? Any way, The Five Black Presidents, I think that’s the book. You should track that down.”

Cut to earlier this week. I’m in Brooklyn to check out a viewing of John Carpenter’s They Live, and I stop into a bookstore in the neighborhood. I’m browsing around the shelves when I come across a thin pamphlet that sets me abuzz.

A tiny pink covered, zine-sized affair with a picture of Warren Harding on the front and, just below him, a well-dressed man with an Afro: The Five Negro Presidents U.S.A. by J.A. Rogers. (Rogers is himself, a fascinating man, a self-taught scholar born in Jamaica who interviewed Marcus Garvey and attended the coronation of Hailie Selassie during the course of his life.)

Also known by the name The Five Negro Presidents According to What White People Said They Were, the tiny book first came out in 1965, a year before Rogers, a fascinating, noble-minded autodidact, passed on.  It gives an account of four presidents, plus a fifth that Rogers does not name. The four presidents Rogers mentions are Warren Harding, Thomas Jefferson, Andrew Jackson, and Abraham Lincoln. All of these men were, while they were alive, suspected of having black ancestry, something that was publicized and/or used against them by political opponents in their lifetimes even if these events have been whitewashed (pun definitely intended) from the history most of us learned during our youthful schooling.

Interesting huh? To read the rest of the write, click here.

PEACE OUT.

Lastly, greed over a great story is surfacing from my “loyal”(?) readers. With all this back and forth about who owns what, that appears on my blog, let me reiterate that all material posted on my blog becomes the sole property of my blog. If you want to reserve any proprietary rights don’t post it to my blog. I will prominently display this caveat on my blog from now on to remind those who may have forgotten this notice.

Gratefully your blog host,

michelle

Aka BABE: We all know what this means by now :)

If you love my blog and my writes, please make a donation via PayPal, credit card, or e-check, please click the “Donate” button below. (Please only donations from those readers within the United States. – International readers please see my “Donate” page)

Or if you would like to send a check via snail mail, please make checks payable to “Michelle Moquin”, and send to:

Michelle Moquin PO Box 29235 San Francisco, Ca. 94129

Thank you for your loyal support!

For archives dated before January 17, 2008 click on my Blogroll:

or click here: “A Day in the life of…”

All content on this site are property of Michelle Moquin © copyright 2008-2011

" Politics, god, Life, News, Music, Family, Personal, Travel, Random, Photography, Religion, Aliens, Art, Entertainment, Food, Books, Thoughts, Media, Culture, Love, Sex, Poetry, Prose, Friends, Technology, Humor, Health, Writing, Events, Movies, Sports, Video, Christianity, Atheist, Blogging, History, Work, Education, Business, Fashion, Barack Obama, People, Internet, Relationships, Faith, Photos, Videos, Hillary Clinton, School, Reviews, God, TV, Philosophy, Fun, Science, Environment, Design, The Page, Rants, Pictures, Church, Blog, Nature, Marketing, Television, Democrats, Parenting, Miscellaneous, Current Events, Film, Spirituality, Obama, Musings, Home, Human Rights, Society, Comedy, Me, Random Thoughts, Research, Government, Election 2008, Baseball, Opinion, Recipes, Children, Iraq, Funny, Women, Economics, America, Misc, Commentary, John McCain, Reflections, All, Celebrities, Inspiration, Lifestyle, Theology, Linux, Kids, Games, World, India, Literature, China, Ramblings, Fitness, Money, Review, War, Articles, Economy, Journal, Quotes, NBA, Crime, Anime, Islam, 2008, Stories, Prayer, Diary, Jesus, Buddha, Muslim, Israel, Europe, Links, Marriage, Fiction, American Idol, Software, Leadership, Pop culture, Rants, Video Games, Republicans, Updates, Political, Football, Healing, Blogs, Shopping, USA, Class, Matrix, Course, Work, Web 2.0, My Life, Psychology, Gay, Happiness, Advertising, Field Hockey, Hip-hop, sex, fucking, ass, Soccer, sox"

Posted in Health & Well Being, Human Rights and Equality, Political Powwow | 15 Comments »

flap your lips friday

Posted by Michelle Moquin on 8th April 2011


Bookmark and Share

This article rides the vein, and I felt was the most apropos story of discussions that have been had on my blog in the past, and most recently.  Here is a conspiracy that has been kept secret…for 20 years…until now. It would be bad enough if the “conspiracy” was the meat of this story, but it is not. What is revealed is far far worse.

Presently, we have a sad, and sick justice system. It has been said here that “justice” really just means “just us”. “Who” the “us” is goes without saying.  This is one of the cruelest cases in the Supreme Court that has ever come across my plate.

The False Imprisonment Of John Thompson, (Connick v. Thompson)

New Orleans businessman Raymond Liuzza, Jr. was murdered in 1984. The homicide was observed by one witness who was able to provide a clear description of the perpetrator as African American, six feet tall, with closely cropped hair. Several weeks earlier an armed robbery had occurred. During the scuffle that ensued in the armed robbery, the perpetrator’s blood got on the pants of one of the victim’s. A swatch of clothing with the perpetrator’s blood was removed and sent to the New Orleans Police Lab for analysis.

Following the murder, an individual approached the family and offered to provide information on the murder in exchange for money. The conversation in which the so-called informant sought compensation for his assistance was recorded. He claimed to be able to provide an additional witness and the name of the murderer. Based on the informant’s interview, John Thompson was arrested for the Liuzza murder. When his picture appeared in the local media, the families of the juvenile victims of the armed robbery approached authorities claiming to identify Thompson as the robber.

Thompson was tried and convicted first on the armed robbery charge. He was sentenced to 49 ½ years without possibility of parole. At his murder trial he was inhibited from testifying in his own defense because the armed robbery conviction that would have been used to impeach his credibility and show a propensity for violence. Following his conviction for the Liuzza murder, prosecutors argued that the length of sentence in the armed robbery case left only the death penalty as a proper sentence for the murder. Thompson was sentenced to die.

Thompson would spend the next 18 years in prison, 14 of those years in isolation on death row. Appeal after appeal would be turned down as he protested his innocence, confined 23 ½ hours a day to an isolation cell. With appeals exhausted, his execution was scheduled for May 20, 1999. In late April of that year a defense investigator found an old microfiche file related to the armed robbery at the Police Crime Lab. It showed that the perpetrator of the armed robbery had Type B blood. Thompson’s blood is Type O.

Before proceeding to how prosecutors in this case abused their power to convict an innocent man, let’s take a minute to understand the law. The U. S. Constitution requires fair trials and due process. In Brady v. Maryland (1963), the U. S. Supreme Court determined that meeting those requirements demanded that prosecutors provide potentially exculpatory evidence in their possession to the defense. Exculpatory evidence is evidence that tends to prove a defendant’s innocence.

Back to the story. As the cases proceeded, the murder case was set to be tried first, with the armed robbery trial set to follow a few weeks later. The four prosecutors, including a senior Deputy District Attorney as special prosecutor, worked the cases. They successfully moved to have the trials reversed, trying the robbery case first. They would later admit that the purpose was twofold. First, a conviction for robbery would inhibit Thompson from exercising his constitutional right to testify in his own defense at the murder trial. Second they could use the robbery conviction to help achieve their goal of getting a death sentence in the murder trial.

Two days before the armed robbery trial, prosecutors received the results of the blood tests from the crime lab. By later admission of the District Attorney’s office, they intentionally withheld the crime lab report and did not turn it over to the defense despite the defense having officially requested, among other things, “all scientific test results.”

As the armed robbery trial began its first day, prosecutors removed all evidence in the case from the police property room and checked it into the court property room. Except for the blood stained swatch. The swatch was removed from the police property room, but never made it to the court property room. It has never been seen again.

As Thompson’s case moved to the murder trial, the prosecutors, robbery conviction in hand, failed to turn over the witness description of the murderer. You see, Thompson wasn’t six feet tall with close cropped hair. He was 5 foot 8 and wore his hair in a large Afro in 1984. Prosecutors also failed to turn over the audio tape of their “informant” showing that he was paid for his services. And that additional “witness” the informant led them to? He became the prosecution’s key witness. He was an African American, six feet tall, whose nickname was Kojak because of his close cropped hair.

Authorities also failed to produce a police report in which one of their witnesses gave statements to the police that contradicted their testimony at trial. They also coached witnesses, improper conduct by legal ethics standards, to work around evidence supporting Thompson’s innocence. In all, at least ten exculpatory exhibits were withheld from the defense.

No, that’s not all. In 1994, five years prior to Thompson’s scheduled execution, one of his prosecutors fell ill with terminal cancer. With just months left to live, and perhaps fearing for his eternal soul, he confessed to another former prosecutor who was not involved in the case that he had withheld the blood evidence. The confession was held secret for the next five years as Thompson languished on death row. It was not disclosed until after the investigator found the old microfiche of the lab results.

When all of what has just been related was brought before the Louisiana Court of Appeal, they vacated both convictions. It was the fifth case in ten years out of this prosecutor’s office to be overturned because of withholding exculpatory evidence from the defense. The armed robbery charges were dropped, but the prosecution decided to re-try the murder case. It took the jury just 35 minutes to find Thompson not guilty.

This case found its way to the U. S. Supreme Court all these years later because Thompson sued the District Attorney’s office for its misconduct. He received an award of $14 million from the jury. Yesterday the U. S. Supreme Court threw out the jury’s award ruling that Thompson had failed to prove a pattern of misconduct that required training to correct.  Full opinion.

Justice Clarence Thomas wrote the majority opinion in the 5-4 decision. He focused solely on the blood evidence, determining that this involved a rogue act, not a pattern of conduct that would put the office on notice of a need to train to avoid unconstitutional violations of citizen’s rights. But, if you want to know the whole story, you’ll need to read the dissent by Justice Ginsburg.

But, that’s not what this article is about. This piece is about issues the Supreme Court didn’t address.

The Appeals Process
For well over a decade there has been considerable pressure from those who favor capital punishment to shorten the appeals process in death penalty cases. They have argued for quicker “justice”, and they have been successful in cutting off parts of the appellate process at both the federal and state levels. New and tougher procedural requirements have also been added with the goal of shortening the appeals process.

If you fall into the camp of wanting to shorten the appeals process, please take a moment to reflect on the case of John Thompson. Were it not for the dedicated lawyers, paralegals and investigators who sought appeal after appeal he likely would have been executed before the misconduct of the prosecutors could have been discovered. Sometimes it takes years or decades to uncover the truth. Sometimes it is never uncovered. Please take a moment to think about the case of John Thompson the next time you are inclined to protest that the appeals process drags on too long and prolongs the “day of final justice” that you seek.

Official Misconduct
Not long ago I posted an article about police misconduct in the form of beating false confessions out of those in their custody. That too involved men accused of murder and included death penalties later vacated due to official misconduct. Those cases came out of Illinois which recently repealed the death penalty. This case comes from Louisiana. In the prior article, I noted that official abuse of power is not limited to one state, one police department or one prosecutor’s office.

Yesterday, the U. S. Supreme Court, by a 5-4 vote, opened a door prosecutors will be able to drive a truck through without having to worry about being held ultimately responsible for similar misconduct in the future.

Police and prosecutors have enormous power over those they arrest and prosecute. It is said that power corrupts and absolute power corrupts absolutely. Please take heed that this applies not only to foreign despots, but to those fallible humans who populate our own small and large centers of power. We complain bitterly when diplomatic immunity prevents the prosecution of foreign diplomats who commit crimes on our soil. That same outrage should rain down on those we trust with enforcing our laws and who abuse that trust with a silent immunity to hide behind. Yesterday’s Supreme Court decision will not help.

**********

Readers: This story initially brought tears to my eyes, and a sadness in my heart, but it was quickly followed by anger and disgust to my brow, and a fire in my belly. It is a continual fight for what is right.

Tomorrow: Stay tuned for the dirty details of today’s story.

It’s Friday…you know what to do. Blog me.

Anonymous: Thanks for your comment. This is what happens when people get lazy and don’t vote. A “no” vote is a “Republican” vote. We are learning our lesson the hard way.

Doug: I have always enjoyed your written words. And sung by you is even more special. Thank you.

Cali: You and me both.

Anonymous: That’s a strange comment. So…if you know something, tell.  As Jackie said, “Don’t eave us hanging”.

Haru: I HOPE that Japan learns something from it too. I HOPE that the entire world learns something from this. May peace and safety be with you and yours.

And that last sentiment goes out to everyone.

xoxo

Lastly, greed over a great story is surfacing from my “loyal”(?) readers. With all this back and forth about who owns what, that appears on my blog, let me reiterate that all material posted on my blog becomes the sole property of my blog. If you want to reserve any proprietary rights don’t post it to my blog. I will prominently display this caveat on my blog from now on to remind those who may have forgotten this notice.

Gratefully your blog host,

michelle

Aka BABE: We all know what this means by now :)

If you love my blog and my writes, please make a donation via PayPal, credit card, or e-check, please click the “Donate” button below. (Please only donations from those readers within the United States. – International readers please see my “Donate” page)

Or if you would like to send a check via snail mail, please make checks payable to “Michelle Moquin”, and send to:

Michelle Moquin PO Box 29235 San Francisco, Ca. 94129

Thank you for your loyal support!

For archives dated before January 17, 2008 click on my Blogroll:

or click here: “A Day in the life of…”

All content on this site are property of Michelle Moquin © copyright 2008-2011

" Politics, god, Life, News, Music, Family, Personal, Travel, Random, Photography, Religion, Aliens, Art, Entertainment, Food, Books, Thoughts, Media, Culture, Love, Sex, Poetry, Prose, Friends, Technology, Humor, Health, Writing, Events, Movies, Sports, Video, Christianity, Atheist, Blogging, History, Work, Education, Business, Fashion, Barack Obama, People, Internet, Relationships, Faith, Photos, Videos, Hillary Clinton, School, Reviews, God, TV, Philosophy, Fun, Science, Environment, Design, The Page, Rants, Pictures, Church, Blog, Nature, Marketing, Television, Democrats, Parenting, Miscellaneous, Current Events, Film, Spirituality, Obama, Musings, Home, Human Rights, Society, Comedy, Me, Random Thoughts, Research, Government, Election 2008, Baseball, Opinion, Recipes, Children, Iraq, Funny, Women, Economics, America, Misc, Commentary, John McCain, Reflections, All, Celebrities, Inspiration, Lifestyle, Theology, Linux, Kids, Games, World, India, Literature, China, Ramblings, Fitness, Money, Review, War, Articles, Economy, Journal, Quotes, NBA, Crime, Anime, Islam, 2008, Stories, Prayer, Diary, Jesus, Buddha, Muslim, Israel, Europe, Links, Marriage, Fiction, American Idol, Software, Leadership, Pop culture, Rants, Video Games, Republicans, Updates, Political, Football, Healing, Blogs, Shopping, USA, Class, Matrix, Course, Work, Web 2.0, My Life, Psychology, Gay, Happiness, Advertising, Field Hockey, Hip-hop, sex, fucking, ass, Soccer, sox"

Posted in Health & Well Being, Human Rights and Equality, Political Powwow | 11 Comments »

who owns your home (part 3)

Posted by Michelle Moquin on 6th April 2011


Bookmark and Share

Good morning!

Really, the question is, “Who owns your mortgage?” Once again, it seems the video may not be working, so click here.  I promise, that although it is the same topic, it is a different video from the last two days, and addresses some interesting points.  :) This one is from 60 Minutes Overtime:

Mortgage mess: Who really owns your mortgage?

Scott Pelley explains a bizarre aftershock of the U.S. financial collapse: An epidemic of forged and missing mortgage documents

Do you know who really owns your mortgage? As Scott Pelley reports on “60 Minutes” this week, that question has become a nightmare for many homeowners since the invention of mortgage-backed securities. Yes, those were the exotic investments that sparked the financial collapse in this country. And the’re still causing problems.

As it turns out, Wall Street cut corners when it bundled homeowners’ mortgages into securities that were traded from investor to investor. Now that banks are foreclosing on people, they’re finding that the legal documents behind many mortgages are missing. So, what do the banks do? As Pelley explains in this video, some companies appear to be resorting to forgery and phony paperwork in what looks like a nationwide epidemic.

Even if you’re not at risk of foreclosure, there could be legal ramifications for a homeowner if the chain of title has been lost. Watch the “60 Minutes” report and listen to Pelley’s discussion with “60 Minutes Overtime” editor Ann Silvio about the findings of his reporting team.

Watch Scott Pelley’s report.

Have you contacted your mortgage servicing company to find out whether your mortgage has been bundled and sold? Did you get a clear answer and a copy of your mortgage paperwork to back it up? Share your experience with other homeowners below.

*******

Readers: Although this is good stuff, don’t you love how Pelley and the interviewer Silvio say, “You don’t know whether to laugh or gasp in horror”? My guess is neither one of them is losing their home, because this is no laughing matter to those that are.

It still irritates the hell out of me that Pelley isn’t saying how criminal this is of our banks. He shows us that young kids were forging signatures, but why isn’t he telling us who the real criminals are? I’m not giving an out for these young forgers. Not at all. I think they should be arrested, and convicted. But it is the banks who started this – they are the fraudulent ones. Why isn’t he saying this?

Pelley explains in this video, some companies appear to be resorting to forgery and phony paperwork in what looks like a nationwide epidemic.

These companies are not appearing to be resorting to forgery etc – they are! This is very clear to me – why not say so?

And why is no lawyer taking this case and running with it?? This is racketeering big time and everyone is in collusion.

All I can say is, “Where is Keith when you need him?”

Scott: I was going to speak about the points you brought up this morning. My thoughts exactly. Conspiracies do exist all around us. And if so many of our American youth can keep a secret of this magnitude, how easily it would be to keep a secret of the assassination of a president, for instance as you noted,  when only a few people know. Evidently this proves it would not be difficult. Thanks for your comments.

Vivian: Me too. I am such a romantic. Beautiful poetry always moves me, especially when it’s coming from my man. Lately I miss his written words. Hint hint…

Speaking of hinting…I hinted the other day who the ruthless are. Even W63453e, didn’t have to spell out the name of the political party – we all know what he was talking about. And we all know who is behind big banks and big corps. More needs to be said here but I am done. Your turn. Blog me.

Oh, but before I sign off, I wanted to tell all of you Zen Lill fans that she has started her blog again! Yah! You now can read her interesting writes somewhere else besides here. :) And for those of you that love her exercise tips, you’ll find those and a lot more about how to balance your life by visiting her new site – Check it out and enjoy! http://getyourlifebalanced.com/

Peace Out.

Lastly, greed over a great story is surfacing from my “loyal”(?) readers. With all this back and forth about who owns what, that appears on my blog, let me reiterate that all material posted on my blog becomes the sole property of my blog. If you want to reserve any proprietary rights don’t post it to my blog. I will prominently display this caveat on my blog from now on to remind those who may have forgotten this notice.

Gratefully your blog host,

michelle

Aka BABE: We all know what this means by now :)

If you love my blog and my writes, please make a donation via PayPal, credit card, or e-check, please click the “Donate” button below. (Please only donations from those readers within the United States. – International readers please see my “Donate” page)

Or if you would like to send a check via snail mail, please make checks payable to “Michelle Moquin”, and send to:

Michelle Moquin PO Box 29235 San Francisco, Ca. 94129

Thank you for your loyal support!

For archives dated before January 17, 2008 click on my Blogroll:

or click here: “A Day in the life of…”

All content on this site are property of Michelle Moquin © copyright 2008-2011

" Politics, god, Life, News, Music, Family, Personal, Travel, Random, Photography, Religion, Aliens, Art, Entertainment, Food, Books, Thoughts, Media, Culture, Love, Sex, Poetry, Prose, Friends, Technology, Humor, Health, Writing, Events, Movies, Sports, Video, Christianity, Atheist, Blogging, History, Work, Education, Business, Fashion, Barack Obama, People, Internet, Relationships, Faith, Photos, Videos, Hillary Clinton, School, Reviews, God, TV, Philosophy, Fun, Science, Environment, Design, The Page, Rants, Pictures, Church, Blog, Nature, Marketing, Television, Democrats, Parenting, Miscellaneous, Current Events, Film, Spirituality, Obama, Musings, Home, Human Rights, Society, Comedy, Me, Random Thoughts, Research, Government, Election 2008, Baseball, Opinion, Recipes, Children, Iraq, Funny, Women, Economics, America, Misc, Commentary, John McCain, Reflections, All, Celebrities, Inspiration, Lifestyle, Theology, Linux, Kids, Games, World, India, Literature, China, Ramblings, Fitness, Money, Review, War, Articles, Economy, Journal, Quotes, NBA, Crime, Anime, Islam, 2008, Stories, Prayer, Diary, Jesus, Buddha, Muslim, Israel, Europe, Links, Marriage, Fiction, American Idol, Software, Leadership, Pop culture, Rants, Video Games, Republicans, Updates, Political, Football, Healing, Blogs, Shopping, USA, Class, Matrix, Course, Work, Web 2.0, My Life, Psychology, Gay, Happiness, Advertising, Field Hockey, Hip-hop, sex, fucking, ass, Soccer, sox"

Posted in Health & Well Being, Political Powwow | 10 Comments »