Tuesday Talk
Posted by Michelle Moquin on 7th February 2012
Good morning!
I’m not a big football fan, hence I didn’t have any desire to watch the Super Bowl. Grew up with too many Super Bowls messing with my birthday celebrations. :) So the only part of the game this past Sunday that I indulged in was the half time entertainment. It wasn’t until after the fact was I aware of the commercial with Clint Eastwood. Did you see?
Clint Eastwood On Chrysler Super Bowl Commercial: ‘I’m Not Politically Affiliated With Mr. Obama‘
After a day filled with chatter about the political implications of his “Halftime in America” Super Bowl commercial for Chrysler, acting legend Clint Eastwood moved to quell any speculation that he was making a pitch for President Obama’s economic policy.
“l am certainly not politically affiliated with Mr. Obama. It was meant to be a message about job growth and the spirit of America,” Eastwood, a libertarian and longtime Republican voter, said Monday evening on Fox News’ “The O’Reilly Factor” about the ad, which features him extolling the virtues of a revitalized Detroit. Chrysler was one of the companies saved in President Obama’s 2009 auto bailout, which Eastwood has publicly opposed. “I think all politicians will agree with it,” he continued. “I thought the spirit was OK.”
Eastwood, who said he was “not supporting any politician at this time,” also gave his blessing for either party to reference the spot, or at least its message.
“If Obama or any other politician wants to run with the spirit of that ad, go for it,” he said.
Earlier in the day, Fox News contributor Karl Rove criticized the ad for being “a sign of what happens when you have Chicago-style politics, and the President of the United States and his political minions are, in essence, using our tax dollars to buy corporate advertising.”
In response, Eastwood’s longtime manager Leonard Hirshan told NY Magazine that the ad was never intended to be political.
“I think that Rove and everybody, if they’re sensible, would wonder why a longtime Republican and Libertarian would do that,” he said. “Just think about that, how silly that is: It’s not like [the ad] was done by a left-winger, like Paul Newman in his day. It was done by a Republican, and he was doing it about America. There’s not anything political to do with it whatsoever. I don’t want him to do commercials, and as far as I’m concerned, it’s a PSA [public service announcement]. Period.”
*******
Readers: I loved it. Eastwood may not be “politically affiliated with Mr. Obama”, but it certainly doesn’t hurt that the commercial kicked Obama some kudos in a complimentary indirect kind of way. And Eastwood was against the auto bailouts.
Clint, said this to the L.A. Times in November 2011:
“But I’m a big hawk on cutting the deficit. I was against the stimulus thing too. We shouldn’t be bailing out the banks and car companies. If a CEO can’t figure out how to make his company profitable, then he shouldn’t be the CEO.”
And yet he starred in this Chrysler commercial. What are you thoughts? Blog me.
The forum is now open.
Lastly, greed over a great story is surfacing from my “loyal”(?) readers. With all this back and forth about who owns what, that appears on my blog, let me reiterate that all material posted on my blog becomes the sole property of my blog. If you want to reserve any proprietary rights don’t post it to my blog. I will prominently display this caveat on my blog from now on to remind those who may have forgotten this notice.
Gratefully your blog host,
michelle
Aka BABE: We all know what this means by now :)
If you love my blog and my writes, please make a donation via PayPal, credit card, or e-check, please click the “Donate” button below. (Please only donations from those readers within the United States. – International readers please see my “Donate” page)
Posted in Entertainment & Laughter, Health & Well Being, Political Powwow | 38 Comments »




