California Will Finally Ditch Racist, Sexist Welfare Rule
Posted by Michelle Moquin on 21st June 2016
Good Morning!
From Think Progress:
California Will Finally Ditch Racist, Sexist Welfare Rule
California state Sen. Holly Mitchell (D), who led the fight to repeal the state’s welfare family cap
For more than two decades, any poor mother enrolled in California’s cash welfare program was penalized for giving birth to a new baby. While she would get additional money to cover the children she had before enrollment, the state refused to give her more for the new child. Known as the Maximum Family Grant Rule (MFG), the state’s policy is one of many that were explicitly adopted after welfare was reformed in the mid-90s as an attempt to curb the family size of poor women, often women of color.
Now California is finally ditching the law.
Tucked into the state’s budget is a measure repealing the MFG rule, and Gov. Jerry Brown (D) has said he’ll support it. The budget passed off the floor of the state legislature late on Tuesday evening.
Once the policy is gone, 93,000 families will benefit from an extra $138 a month for each child that had previously been exempt, on average, according to an estimate from the state Department of Social Services. In total, the repeal is estimated to cost the state about $220 million more a year in welfare benefits, but lawmakers will eventually cover that cost through an account that doles out inflationary increases in welfare benefits.
“No child should be treated differently under the law simply because they were conceived and born while their parents were poor,” Jessica Bartholow, legislative advocate at Western Center for Law and Poverty who has been involved in the push to repeal the rule, told ThinkProgress in an email. “Now they won’t.”
California is just the seventh state to repeal a welfare family cap since they went into effect two decades ago in 22 states, joining Illinois, Maryland, Minnesota, Nebraska, Oklahoma, and Wyoming. Still, 12 other states give families no extra money if they have additional children while enrolled in welfare, while two others have flat caps that give families a set amount no matter the number of children they have and still two more reduce benefits for additional children. In 2012, 58,000 families’ welfare benefits were reduced by a family cap policy.
California’s is particularly egregious, however. It was explicitly adopted as an attempt to reduce the number of children born out of wedlock to women on welfare. At the time, then-state Assembly Speaker Curt Pringle (R) called giving families additional benefits for additional children “perverse” and said, “This practice usurps the role of husbands and drives men away from their families.” It also includes an exemption for children conceived due to rape, incest, or the failure of certain forms of birth control, requiring women who seek the exemption to share incredibly intimate details with a case worker — it’s the only state to require women to discuss birth control methods as part of enrolling in an entitlement program.
Despite California lawmakers’ intentions, there is no evidence that family cap laws have an impact on birth rates. The MFG rule also played on the false idea that “welfare queens” were having more children just to get more benefits. Yet people who are enrolled in welfare have the same size families as those who aren’t enrolled. Instead, there’s strong evidence that all family caps do is increase poverty.
*****
Julie: I can’t tell you how many times I say that exact thing. Men especially get perturbed because I’m referring to them. Obviously they aren’t that upset about me/us calling them out because it certainly isn’t stopping them from doing the sick things they do.
Like how a victim gets blamed when the perps get caught - all of a sudden they (The perp) are the ones suffering because the victim went to the police and pressed charges. It was their actions that got them into trouble not the victim who reported it. Yet the pity party continues – As usual, they get pissy when I/we bring it up, as if it’s my/our fault that what they do is broadcast all over this blog.
Oh…grow up, and take responsibility for your actions.
So, listen up men: I’ll/we’ll stop reporting all the disgusting things you do if you stop doing them. Deal? Do I hear a resounding “YES!” from the men? I didn’t think so. OK, I’ll/we’ll carry on then.
Tony: At one time I would’ve been surprised but after writing this blog for so long now, nothing surprises me. I’m still shocked but not surprised.
Nathan: You are a guy so I can see why you would say Bernie is the man. But being a woman, I’m not willing to go down that road this time. If you need my reasons why #I’mwithher, read this.
Scott: Thanks for bringing up fact checking. I think it is super important to see how politicians have voted on certain issues, etc. I have two great resources listed in the left column of the blog to fact check. Or click here and here. If anyone has another source, please post it.
I think this is a great place to end it.
Your turn.
Blog me.
Lastly, greed over a great story is surfacing from my “loyal”(?) readers. With all this back and forth about who owns what, that appears on my blog, let me reiterate that all material posted on my blog becomes the sole property of my blog. If you want to reserve any proprietary rights don’t post it to my blog. I will prominently display this caveat on my blog from now on to remind those who may have forgotten this notice.
Gratefully your blog host,
michelle
Aka BABE: We all know what this means by now :)
If you love my blog and my writes, please make a donation via PayPal, credit card, or e-check, please click the “Donate” button below. (Please only donations from those readers within the United States. – International readers please see my “Donate” page)
Or if you would like to send a check via snail mail, please make checks payable to “Michelle Moquin”, and send to:
Michelle Moquin PO Box 29235 San Francisco, Ca. 94129
Thank you for your loyal support!
All content on this site are property of Michelle Moquin © copyright 2008-2016
“Though she be but little, she be fierce.” – William Shakespeare Midsummer Night’s Dream
" Politics, god, Life, News, Music, Family, Personal, Travel, Random, Photography, Religion, Aliens, Art, Entertainment, Food, Books, Thoughts, Media, Culture, Love, Sex, Poetry, Prose, Friends, Technology, Humor, Health, Writing, Events, Movies, Sports, Video, Christianity, Atheist, Blogging, History, Work, Education, Business, Fashion, Barack Obama, People, Internet, Relationships, Faith, Photos, Videos, Hillary Clinton, School, Reviews, God, TV, Philosophy, Fun, Science, Environment, Design, The Page, Rants, Pictures, Church, Blog, Nature, Marketing, Television, Democrats, Parenting, Miscellaneous, Current Events, Film, Spirituality, Obama, Musings, Home, Human Rights, Society, Comedy, Me, Random Thoughts, Research, Government, Election 2008, Baseball, Opinion, Recipes, Children, Iraq, Funny, Women, Economics, America, Misc, Commentary, John McCain, Reflections, All, Celebrities, Inspiration, Lifestyle, Theology, Linux, Kids, Games, World, India, Literature, China, Ramblings, Fitness, Money, Review, War, Articles, Economy, Journal, Quotes, NBA, Crime, Anime, Islam, 2008, Stories, Prayer, Diary, Jesus, Buddha, Muslim, Israel, Europe, Links, Marriage, Fiction, American Idol, Software, Leadership, Pop culture, Rants, Video Games, Republicans, Updates, Political, Football, Healing, Blogs, Shopping, USA, Class, Matrix, Course, Work, Web 2.0, My Life, Psychology, Gay, Happiness, Advertising, Field Hockey, Hip-hop, sex, fucking, ass, Soccer, sox"
Posted in Health & Well Being, Human Rights and Equality, Love, Sex & Relationships, Political Powwow | 13 Comments »






