Michelle Moquin's "A day in the life of…"

Creative Discussions, Inspiring Thoughts, Fun Adventures, Love & Laughter, Peaceful Travel, Hip Fashions, Cool People, Gastronomic Pleasures, Exotic Indulgences, Groovy Music, and more!

  • Hello!

    Welcome To My OUR Blog!


    Michelle Moquin's Facebook profile "Click here" to go to my FaceBook profile. Visit me!
  • Copyright Protected

    Protected by Copyscape Plagiarism Checker
  • Let Michelle Style YOU!

    I am a "Specialist in Styles" Personal Stylist. Check out my Style website to see how I can help you discover, define, and refine your unique style.
  • © Copyright 2008-2023

    All content on this site are property of Michelle Moquin © copyright 2008-2023. All material posted on my blog becomes the sole property of my blog. If you want to reserve any proprietary rights don't post it to my blog.
  • In Pursuit Of…

    Custom Search
  • Madaline Speaks

    For those of you interested in reading an Earthling Girl's Guide to a better Government, and a Greener world, check out the blog:
  • Contact Your Representatives and Senators Here!

    To send letters to your representatives about any issue of interest, Click here


    To send letters to your Senators about any issue of interest, Click here


    Get involved - Write your letters today!
  • On The Issues

    Don't be uninformed! Click here to see how every political leader on every issue voted.
  • Don’t Believe The Lies – Get The Facts

    FactCheck.org is a nonpartisan, nonprofit “consumer advocate” for voters that aims to reduce the level of deception and confusion in U.S. politics. They monitor the factual accuracy of what is said by major U.S. political players in the form of TV ads, debates, speeches, interviews and news releases. Their goal is to apply the best practices of both journalism and scholarship, and to increase public knowledge and understanding.

    Click here to get the facts.

    Pulitzer Prize Winner Politifact.com is another trusted site to get the facts. Click here to get the facts.

  • Who’s Paying Who?

    On The Issues is a nonpartisan guide to money's influence on U.S. elections and public policy.
  • Blog Rules of Conduct

    Rule #1: "The aliens can not reveal anything about anyone’s life that would not be known without the use of our technology. The exception being that if a reader has a question about his or her health and the assistance of alien technology would be necessary to answer that question.”

    Rule #2: "Aliens will not threaten humans and Humans will not threaten aliens."

    Rule #3:

    Posting Comments:

    When posting a comment in regards to any past or archived article, please reference the title and date of the article and post your comment on the present day to keep the conversation contemporary.

    NOTE: You do not need to add your e-mail address when posting a comment. Your real name, an alias, a moniker, initials...whatever ...even simply "anonymous" is all you need to add in the fields in order to post a comment.

    Thank you.

  • *********

    Yellow Pages for San Francisco, CA
  • Meta

  • Looking For A Personal Stylist?

    Michelle has designed and styled for the stars! She can be your "Specialist in Styles" Personal Stylist too. Check out Michelle's style website
  • Recent Posts

  • Michelle’s E-mail:

    E-mail me! ~~~~~~~~~~~~~~
  • Care To Twitter? Come Tweet Me!

  • Disclaimer: Adult Blog

    I DO NOT CENSOR COMMENTS POSTED TO THIS BLOG: Therefore this blog is not for the faint hearted, thin skinned, easily offended or the appointed people's moralist. If you feel that you may fit in any of those categories, please DO NOT read my blog or its comments. There are plenty of blogs that will fit your needs, find one. This warning also applies to those who post comments who would find it unpleasant or mentally injurious to receive an opposing opinion via a raw to vulgar delivery. I DO NOT censor comments posted here. If you post a comment, you are on notice that you may receive a comment in language or opinion that you will not approve of or that you feel is offensive. If that would bother you, DO NOT post on my blog.

    27Mar2011
  • Medical Disclaimer:

    I am not a doctor nor am I medically trained in any field. No one on this website is claiming to be a medical physician or claiming to be medically trained in any field. However, anyone can blog information about health articles, folk remedies, possible cures, possible treatments, etc that they have heard of on my blog. Please see your physician or a health care professional before heeding or using any medical information given on this blog. It is not intended to replace any medical advice given to you by your licensed medical professional. This blog is simply providing a medium for discussion on all matters concerning life. All opinions given are the sole responsibility of the person giving them. This blog does not make any claim to their truthfulness, honesty, or factuality because of their presence on my blog. Again, Please consult a health care professional before heeding any health information given here.

    27Mar2011
  • Legal Disclaimer:

    Michelle Moquin's "A Day In The Life Of..." publishes the opinions of expert authorities in many fields. But the use of these opinions is no substitute for legal, accounting, investment, medical and other professional services to suit your specific personal needs. Always consult a competent professional for answers to your specific questions.

    27Mar2011
  • Fair Use Notice Disclaimer

    This web site may contain copyrighted material the use of which has not always been specifically authorized by the copyright owner. We are making such material available in our efforts to advance the understanding of humanity's problems and hopefully to help find solutions for those problems. We believe this constitutes a 'fair use' of any such copyrighted material as provided for in section 107 of the US Copyright Law. In accordance with Title 17 U.S.C. Section 107, the material on this site is distributed without profit to those who have expressed a prior interest in receiving the included information for research and educational purposes. A click on a hyperlink is a request for information. However, if you wish to use copyrighted material from this site for purposes of your own that go beyond 'fair use', you must obtain permission from me. You can read more about "fair use' and US Copyright Law"at the"Legal Information Institute of Cornell Law School." This notice was modified from a similar notice at "Common Dreams."

Obama Makes Historic Agreement With China

Posted by Michelle Moquin on November 13th, 2014


Bookmark and Share

Good morning!

Obama had another first and it is a biggie. Of course as usual, the radical right don’t want to give him credit, as if they could have done better.

From Think Progress:

The Progress Report Banner

A Historic Agreement

The U.S. And China Strike An Ambitious Deal To Cut Greenhouse Gas Emissions

In a surprising announcement last night, President Barack Obama and Chinese President Xi Jinping jointly revealed a broad agreement between the United States and China to curb the two countries’ carbon emissions. The agreement between the two nations, which are the two largest carbon emitters in the world, sends a clear signal to other countries that they must also get serious about addressing the man-made causes of climate change. It also directly undercuts an oft-repeated conservative argument against climate action: that the U.S. doesn’t need to act on climate because China hasn’t either.

What Is In The Deal?
The agreement marks the culmination of nine months of negotiations between the two countries, capped off in recent days by Obama’s visit to China. The pledge commits the U.S. to cut its emissions 26 to 28 percent below their 2005 levels by 2025. As for China, it is committing to peak its overall carbon dioxide emissions by 2030, and to get 20 percent of its energy from non-fossil-fuel sources by that same year.

Why Is It Important?
No effort to combat climate change could succeed without these two countries. The United States and China are not only the two largest emitters of carbon dioxide in the world, they make up more than 40 percent of total worldwide emissions:

Global Carbon Emissions from Fossil Fuels

GlobalGHGEmissionsByCountry

CREDIT: EPA

For the United States, the commitment to cut carbon emissions 26 to 28 percent by 2025 builds off the current target of a 17 percent reduction below the 2005 baseline by 2020. According to Climate Progress reporter Jeff Spross, “it could actually double the pace of emission cuts set by that initial goal — from 1.2 percent a year to as high as 2.8 percent per year.”

For China, meanwhile, this agreement is the first time it has made a serious commitment to address global warming by setting a goal for when its carbon emissions should stop growing. And its pledge to get 20 percent of its energy from clean sources by 2030 is enormous: it will require the country to generate 800-1,000 gigawatts of new carbon-free energy, the same amount as the total electricity the U.S. currently generates from all sources combined.

Climate Progress’s Joe Romm takes a deeper dive into the importance of the deal.

What Do People Think Of It?
Progressive and environmental groups agree that it is a critical step in efforts to combat man-made climate change. “This announcement is a game-changer,” said Melanie Hart, the Director for China Policy at the Center for American Progress. Jake Schmidt, director of the International Program at the Natural Resources Defense Council, emphasized China’s commitment: “You’re talking about 20 percent of a huge economy being based on non-carbon-dioxide emissions sources. That’s significant.”

Yet, it hasn’t taken long for Congressional Republicans to already start freaking out about the deal. Both Senate Minority Leader Mitch McConnell and House Speaker John Boehner blasted the deal as part of President Obama’s alleged “war on coal” that will hurt the economy. (In fact, the new deal won’t hurt the economy, as the GOP leaders suggest — and it may actually drive economic growth.) Sen. Jim Inhofe (R-OK), a climate denier who’s now set to become head of the Senate’s Environment and Public Works Committee, complained that China’s promise is “hollow and not believable.”

These are some of the same people, along with many other Republican members of Congress, who previously have pointed the finger at China’s inaction as an excuse for why the United States shouldn’t address climate change on its own. Now that China has made this commitment, they want to have it both ways. Their reactions are the ones that are “hollow and not believable” — as well as being deeply threatening to the health of future generations and the health of the planet.

BOTTOM LINE: The new climate agreement between the United States and China is a historic step that marks the first time that China, the world’s largest polluter, has agreed on targets to limit its greenhouse gas emissions. While climate deniers continue to search for ways to avoid taking action, this agreement solidifies America’s leadership on the issue and underscores the importance of the United States, China, and the rest of the world taking meaningful steps to slow climate change’s effects.

*G*O*B*A*M*A*

Readers: The repubs always want it both ways…really, they want whatever way is opposite of Obama.

Thoughts? Blog me.

Halina: I have blogged about the perps in Russia posing as “men;” they are much like many “men” here who think the same way. Be careful and watch your back.

Brittany: Girl you’ve got some balls and a good dose of mettle. Good for you for taking it all the way.

Hersilia: I was so sorry to read your story. You didn’t say much but enough for me to feel like I was there. I can only imagine how sick and upset you were. I HOPE you’re OK now.

Lidia: I’m so sorry what you experienced. Don’t feel ashamed and stupid. It was not your fault. You did so many right things – he was just one step ahead of you. Men like this have it all planned out. Sickening. And the gall that he still calls you after what he did. My best to you.

Gotta run. I’ll address the rest of you tomorrow.

Peace & Love…

Lastly, greed over a great story is surfacing from my “loyal”(?) readers. With all this back and forth about who owns what, that appears on my blog, let me reiterate that all material posted on my blog becomes the sole property of my blog. If you want to reserve any proprietary rights don’t post it to my blog. I will prominently display this caveat on my blog from now on to remind those who may have forgotten this notice.

Gratefully your blog host,

michelle

Aka BABE: We all know what this means by now :)

If you love my blog and my writes, please make a donation via PayPal, credit card, or e-check, please click the “Donate” button below. (Please only donations from those readers within the United States. – International readers please see my “Donate” page)

Or if you would like to send a check via snail mail, please make checks payable to “Michelle Moquin”, and send to:

Michelle Moquin PO Box 29235 San Francisco, Ca. 94129

Thank you for your loyal support!

All content on this site are property of Michelle Moquin © copyright 2008-2014

me

“Though she be but little, she be fierce.” – William Shakespeare Midsummer Night’s Dream 

" Politics, god, Life, News, Music, Family, Personal, Travel, Random, Photography, Religion, Aliens, Art, Entertainment, Food, Books, Thoughts, Media, Culture, Love, Sex, Poetry, Prose, Friends, Technology, Humor, Health, Writing, Events, Movies, Sports, Video, Christianity, Atheist, Blogging, History, Work, Education, Business, Fashion, Barack Obama, People, Internet, Relationships, Faith, Photos, Videos, Hillary Clinton, School, Reviews, God, TV, Philosophy, Fun, Science, Environment, Design, The Page, Rants, Pictures, Church, Blog, Nature, Marketing, Television, Democrats, Parenting, Miscellaneous, Current Events, Film, Spirituality, Obama, Musings, Home, Human Rights, Society, Comedy, Me, Random Thoughts, Research, Government, Election 2008, Baseball, Opinion, Recipes, Children, Iraq, Funny, Women, Economics, America, Misc, Commentary, John McCain, Reflections, All, Celebrities, Inspiration, Lifestyle, Theology, Linux, Kids, Games, World, India, Literature, China, Ramblings, Fitness, Money, Review, War, Articles, Economy, Journal, Quotes, NBA, Crime, Anime, Islam, 2008, Stories, Prayer, Diary, Jesus, Buddha, Muslim, Israel, Europe, Links, Marriage, Fiction, American Idol, Software, Leadership, Pop culture, Rants, Video Games, Republicans, Updates, Political, Football, Healing, Blogs, Shopping, USA, Class, Matrix, Course, Work, Web 2.0, My Life, Psychology, Gay, Happiness, Advertising, Field Hockey, Hip-hop, sex, fucking, ass, Soccer, sox"

Posted in Long Live Planet Earth!, Lying Sacks Of Shit, Political Powwow | 7 Comments »

Totaling Up The Numbers And What They Mean

Posted by Michelle Moquin on November 12th, 2014


Bookmark and Share

Good morning!

Juanita: I don’t think a lot of stuff is going to go anywhere with this new administration in control.

Alfreda: Your comments contained a lot of juicy stuff to think about. Your point about…”Millions more Democrats vote in elections, but the win goes to the right….” inspired me to post this write that I read.

From Think ProgressThis is interesting and shows that the repubs are not representative of the majority. It also shows that an organized criminal minority can control a disorganized majority. Something to think about…

What We Can Learn From The Voting Totals Of Every Senator In The Next Congress

Harry Reid

CREDIT: AP PHOTO/J. SCOTT APPLEWHITE

The English language lacks superlatives strong enough to describe how bad last night was for Democrats. Republicans captured a majority in the Senate. They reelected several controversial governors. And they achieved their second “wave” election in just three election cycles. And yet, when the new, GOP-controlled Senate opens its first session next January, it will be strikingly unrepresentative of the voters who elected its members. A ThinkProgress review of the electoral results from 2010, 2012 and 2014 Senate races reveals that millions more Americans actually cast a vote for a Democratic Senate candidate than voted for a Republican candidate during the three election cycles that built the incoming Senate.

For 2010 and 2012, we relied on official tallies of the total votes cast in all Senate races released by the Federal Elections Commission. Those results show that Republican Senate candidates outperformed Democrats by 2,733,121 votes in 2010, while Democrats outperformed Republicans by a much larger 10,867,709 votes in 2012.

As no final tallies are available for 2014, we calculated the total number of votes cast in the most recent election cycle by adding together the total number of votes cast for Republican Senate candidates and the total number cast for Democrats using numbers reported by Politico. This required us to make a few judgment calls. In Alabama, where Sen. Jeff Sessions (R) ran unopposed, we tallied no votes for either party. In Kansas, where incumbent Republican Pat Roberts faced two independent challengers, we tallied all of Roberts’ votes for the GOP and zero votes for the Democrats. In Oklahoma and South Carolina, where both Senate seats were up for election (one in a general election and one in a special election), we counted the results of both elections towards both parties’ totals. The result, as of 9 a.m. Wednesday morning, was a total of 22,524,388 votes cast for Republicans and 19,594,164. Thus, based on our preliminary figures, just under 3 million more Americans voted for a Republican Senate candidate in the 2014 cycle than voted for a Democrat.

When the results from all three elections are combined, a total of 5,204,364 more votes were cast for Democrats than Republicans. To put that number in perspective, that’s nearly a quarter of a million more votes than the gap between the number of voters who supported President Obama in 2012 and the number that backed Republican Mitt Romney.

One caveat is in order, because votes are still being counted in the 2014 cycle, it is likely that the final margins between Democrats and Republicans will shift once the final vote tallies are released. Nevertheless, because the gap between Democratic votes cast and Republican votes cast during the three elections is very large — more than 5 million — it is extraordinarily unlikely that the 2014 numbers will shift enough to give Republicans a lead. In 2012, for example, ThinkProgress conducted a similar preliminary review of the total votes cast for U.S. House members, and determined that Democrats received slightly over half-a-million votes than Republicans in our preliminary tally. When all the ballots were cast, the actual gap between Democratic and Republican House candidates was closer to 1.4 million. Given that the shift from our preliminary tally in 2012 to the final tallies was less than one million votes, the chance that Republicans will make up a 5 million vote gap once all the ballots are counted is very small.

There are several possible explanations for how Republicans could enjoy a majority in the Senate when their candidates significantly underperformed their Democratic counterparts. One is the fundamentally anti-democratic nature of the Senate itself. Under the Constitution, each state receives two senators, regardless of population, which means that Wyoming residents effectively have 66 times as much representation in the Senate as Californians. In 2012, for example, 7,864,624 Americans voted to return Sen. Dianne Feinstein (D-CA) to the Senate. At the exact same time, Sen. John Barrasso (R-WY) received just 185,250 to return him to the Senate. Yet Feinstein and Barrasso both get to cast exactly one vote in the Senate despite the fact that Feinstein represents far more people than Barrasso.

Another explanation is the fact that voter turnout in presidential elections is simply much higher than it is during midterm elections. Additionally, the 2014 electorate was older, whiter and richer than the voters who turned out in 2012 when President Obama was reelected. Many of the groups that are most likely to vote for Democrats simply did not turn out in 2010 and 2014, but the total pool of voters in these cycles was much smaller.

*****

Readers: In my opinion the last two paragraphs of the write says it all. If you’re familiar with the nature of the Senate, and the example of that was given of Sen. Dianne Feinstein (D-CA)/ Sen. John Barrasso (R-WY), you can see how more people can vote for a party but  that same party is not holding power. This never seemed right to me that they each have the same voting power.

With respect to the last paragraph, we all know that happened: The Dems didn’t show up.

Thoughts? Blog me. 

Social Butterfly: Nope, didn’t see it, but I am not surprised. The things that people do to each other make me want to change the definition of the word “humane.” Either that, or change the name of the beings that inhabit Earth, because many humans are far from humane.

Jorge: Is that you from years ago? Jorge H with Carla? I am probably mistaken since there are a few named “Jorge” who comment here.  Anywho Jorge, your comment is noted, I HOPE you’re wrong and I don’t want to wait around and see.  :)

Peace out peeps. 

Lastly, greed over a great story is surfacing from my “loyal”(?) readers. With all this back and forth about who owns what, that appears on my blog, let me reiterate that all material posted on my blog becomes the sole property of my blog. If you want to reserve any proprietary rights don’t post it to my blog. I will prominently display this caveat on my blog from now on to remind those who may have forgotten this notice.

Gratefully your blog host,

michelle

Aka BABE: We all know what this means by now :)

If you love my blog and my writes, please make a donation via PayPal, credit card, or e-check, please click the “Donate” button below. (Please only donations from those readers within the United States. – International readers please see my “Donate” page)

Or if you would like to send a check via snail mail, please make checks payable to “Michelle Moquin”, and send to:

Michelle Moquin PO Box 29235 San Francisco, Ca. 94129

Thank you for your loyal support!

All content on this site are property of Michelle Moquin © copyright 2008-2014

me

“Though she be but little, she be fierce.” – William Shakespeare Midsummer Night’s Dream 

" Politics, god, Life, News, Music, Family, Personal, Travel, Random, Photography, Religion, Aliens, Art, Entertainment, Food, Books, Thoughts, Media, Culture, Love, Sex, Poetry, Prose, Friends, Technology, Humor, Health, Writing, Events, Movies, Sports, Video, Christianity, Atheist, Blogging, History, Work, Education, Business, Fashion, Barack Obama, People, Internet, Relationships, Faith, Photos, Videos, Hillary Clinton, School, Reviews, God, TV, Philosophy, Fun, Science, Environment, Design, The Page, Rants, Pictures, Church, Blog, Nature, Marketing, Television, Democrats, Parenting, Miscellaneous, Current Events, Film, Spirituality, Obama, Musings, Home, Human Rights, Society, Comedy, Me, Random Thoughts, Research, Government, Election 2008, Baseball, Opinion, Recipes, Children, Iraq, Funny, Women, Economics, America, Misc, Commentary, John McCain, Reflections, All, Celebrities, Inspiration, Lifestyle, Theology, Linux, Kids, Games, World, India, Literature, China, Ramblings, Fitness, Money, Review, War, Articles, Economy, Journal, Quotes, NBA, Crime, Anime, Islam, 2008, Stories, Prayer, Diary, Jesus, Buddha, Muslim, Israel, Europe, Links, Marriage, Fiction, American Idol, Software, Leadership, Pop culture, Rants, Video Games, Republicans, Updates, Political, Football, Healing, Blogs, Shopping, USA, Class, Matrix, Course, Work, Web 2.0, My Life, Psychology, Gay, Happiness, Advertising, Field Hockey, Hip-hop, sex, fucking, ass, Soccer, sox"

Posted in Political Powwow | 9 Comments »

Choking Girls Around The World

Posted by Michelle Moquin on November 11th, 2014


Bookmark and Share

Good morning!

Ito: It is thoroughly disgusting. And even more sickening that he has sold out seminars all over the country and overseas teaching men to abuse women, by telling them to disregard a woman’s consent and take it – basically telling men that it is OK to rape. Can it get any worse for women? Unfortunately…the answer is yes.

This came across my plate the other day. This is in addition to what you posted.

From Think Progress:

‘Choking Girls All Around The World’ Seminar Ends In Australia Amid Protests

‘Choking Girls All Around The World’ Seminar Ends In Australia Amid Protests

Julien Blanc

CREDIT: TWITTER

Self-proclaimed “date coach” Julien Blanc has cancelled his seminar tour in Australia and left the country after officials revoked his visa in light of online protests that highlighted his longtime promotion of abusive behavior against women.

In recent months, Blanc, a representative of global dating help company Real Social Dynamics, attained a following of men desperate for companionship through his “Ph.D. in female attraction” program. The dating strategy Blanc touts in online videos and in-person sessions centered on the use of force and disregard of consent as a means of gaining a woman’s attention.

The Australia leg of Blanc’s world tour — which would have lasted until December — included a seminar on a boat in Melbourne. On Friday, Australian officials confirmed Blanc and his assistant’s overnight departure during a news conference.

“The matter was raised with us and we had it investigated and this fellow looked at,” Australian Immigration Minister Scott Morrison said, according to The Guardian. “This guy wasn’t putting forward political ideas, he was putting forward abuse that was derogatory to women and that’s just something, those are values abhorred in this country.”

Blanc took things further when he put his words into action through his social media campaign, #ChokingGirlsAllAroundTheWorld, a compilation of graphic photos that show him choking women. A viral YouTube video also follows Blanc as he wrings a Japanese woman’s neck and pushes it toward his pelvic area during a walk through the streets of Tokyo.

Experts say that the danger of what some may consider seemingly innocent act lies in a belief among some men that they are entitled to women’s bodies, as seen earlier this year when Elliot Rodger complained about women rejecting him in a video before killing six people, injuring 13, and taking his own life near the University of California, Santa Barbara campus.

In recent weeks, conversations about street harassment have increased, especially after the release of a YouTube video that captured a woman being harassed within a 10-hour span as she walked through the streets of New York City. Producers of the video said their project highlighted how catcalling threatens a woman’s safety and peace of mind. That’s not hard to believe. Attempts by women to avoid or confront their cat callers have ended violently, as seen in Detroit and New York earlier this year.

The nightmare for many women around the world goes beyond the streets and into the home. In its 2013 report, the World Health Organization (WHO) designated violence against women as a global health epidemic. It found that one in three women worldwide has experienced intimate partner or sexual violence and nearly 40 percent of murders of women were committed by intimate partners.

The same holds true domestically. In the United States, women represent 85 percent of domestic abuse victims. While nearly 7.8 million women have been raped at some point in their lives, the National Coalition Against Domestic Violence says that cases usually go unreported, due in part to the proximity of the assailant. The epidemic has touched women from all walks of life. Today, a college with 10,000 students could experience as many as 350 sexual assaultsannually, according to the National Institute of Justice, an umbrella organization of the U.S. Department of Justice.

Domestic violence also takes an emotional and financial toll on victims. WHO found that victims stood twice as likely to face depression and three times as likely to develop alcohol use disorders. A Centers for Disease Control and Prevention report showed that victims of intimate violence missed a total of 8 million work days annually. The U.S. health care system also doles $5.8 billion per year toward helping victims, nearly half of which goes to direct medical and mental health services.

It should be no surprise as to why members of anti-domestic violence groups have likened Blanc’s video — which has had more than 50,000 hits — to lessons on how to rape. D.C.-based columnist Jennifer Li has launched a Change.orgpetition telling hotels across the world to not let Blanc and Real Social Dynamics hosts seminars in their venues. In addition to Melbourne, venues in Brisbane, Austin, and Seattle, and online ticketing service Eventbrite have answered the call.

In a recent Independent article, Li issued a similar charge to venues in Japan ahead of Blanc’s tour in the country, scheduled to kick off in a matter of weeks.

“I really hope we can stop him before he starts assaulting the women there again,” Li said. “The only way to take someone like him down is by publicly shaming them. I know this is giving him more publicity, but I’m hoping it’s the type of publicity that will mean that shitbags like him aren’t able to find work.”

*****

Readers: Do click over the the Youtube video if you want to see this sicko in action, and the men that paid to learn from him.

Howie: No need to apologize. I was HOPEing the regulars would address it. I have enough on my plate already with this blog, I don’t need to answer what can be done by others. And I can see they already have. :) It really is quite laughable isn’t it? I think so! So go at it if you please! Thank you.

Happy Veteran’s Day. Thanks to all of you who have served in the armed forces!

Peace & Love…

Lastly, greed over a great story is surfacing from my “loyal”(?) readers. With all this back and forth about who owns what, that appears on my blog, let me reiterate that all material posted on my blog becomes the sole property of my blog. If you want to reserve any proprietary rights don’t post it to my blog. I will prominently display this caveat on my blog from now on to remind those who may have forgotten this notice.

Gratefully your blog host,

michelle

Aka BABE: We all know what this means by now :)

If you love my blog and my writes, please make a donation via PayPal, credit card, or e-check, please click the “Donate” button below. (Please only donations from those readers within the United States. – International readers please see my “Donate” page)

Or if you would like to send a check via snail mail, please make checks payable to “Michelle Moquin”, and send to:

Michelle Moquin PO Box 29235 San Francisco, Ca. 94129

Thank you for your loyal support!

All content on this site are property of Michelle Moquin © copyright 2008-2014

me

“Though she be but little, she be fierce.” – William Shakespeare Midsummer Night’s Dream 

" Politics, god, Life, News, Music, Family, Personal, Travel, Random, Photography, Religion, Aliens, Art, Entertainment, Food, Books, Thoughts, Media, Culture, Love, Sex, Poetry, Prose, Friends, Technology, Humor, Health, Writing, Events, Movies, Sports, Video, Christianity, Atheist, Blogging, History, Work, Education, Business, Fashion, Barack Obama, People, Internet, Relationships, Faith, Photos, Videos, Hillary Clinton, School, Reviews, God, TV, Philosophy, Fun, Science, Environment, Design, The Page, Rants, Pictures, Church, Blog, Nature, Marketing, Television, Democrats, Parenting, Miscellaneous, Current Events, Film, Spirituality, Obama, Musings, Home, Human Rights, Society, Comedy, Me, Random Thoughts, Research, Government, Election 2008, Baseball, Opinion, Recipes, Children, Iraq, Funny, Women, Economics, America, Misc, Commentary, John McCain, Reflections, All, Celebrities, Inspiration, Lifestyle, Theology, Linux, Kids, Games, World, India, Literature, China, Ramblings, Fitness, Money, Review, War, Articles, Economy, Journal, Quotes, NBA, Crime, Anime, Islam, 2008, Stories, Prayer, Diary, Jesus, Buddha, Muslim, Israel, Europe, Links, Marriage, Fiction, American Idol, Software, Leadership, Pop culture, Rants, Video Games, Republicans, Updates, Political, Football, Healing, Blogs, Shopping, USA, Class, Matrix, Course, Work, Web 2.0, My Life, Psychology, Gay, Happiness, Advertising, Field Hockey, Hip-hop, sex, fucking, ass, Soccer, sox"

Posted in Health & Well Being, Human Rights and Equality, Love, Sex & Relationships | 38 Comments »

Many Eugenics Victims Won’t Qualify For Restitution

Posted by Michelle Moquin on November 10th, 2014

Bookmark and Share

Good morning!

Jennie: It looks like you and a few of the other readers have lived this life.

Barbara: :) My pleasure.

Debra: Many of your people are still waiting to get their compensation from being victims of Eugenics. And many won’t qualify. This write is for you. It recently came across my plate. I guess it is no coincidence that you share the same name as the victim in this article.

From NPR:

Payments Start For N.C. Eugenics Victims, But Many Won’t Qualify

Debra Blackmon (left) was sterilized by court order in 1972, at age 14. With help from her niece, Latoya Adams (right), she's fighting to be included in the state's compensation program.

Debra Blackmon (left) was sterilized by court order in 1972, at age 14. With help from her niece, Latoya Adams (right), she’s fighting to be included in the state’s compensation program.

Debra Blackmon was about to turn 14 in January 1972, when two social workers came to her home.

Court and medical documents offer some details about what happened that day. Blackmon was “severely retarded,” they note, and had “psychic problems” that made her difficult to manage during menstruation.

Her parents were counseled during the visit, and it was deemed in Blackmon’s best interest that she be sterilized.

Blackmon is among the more than 7,000 people in North Carolina — many poor, many African-American, many disabled — who were sterilized between 1929 and 1976 in one of the country’s most aggressive eugenics programs.

North Carolina passed a law to compensate victims of the state-run program last year. This week, the state sent out the first checks to qualified applicants. But Blackmon, like many others who are fighting for restitution, is not among them.

Blackmon, now 56, has a hard time with the details of that day in 1972 — but she does remember a few things from her trip to Charlotte Memorial Hospital. “My daddy said, ‘Don’t hurt this baby.’ And he was crying,” she recalls.

Latoya Adams, Blackmon’s niece, grew up knowing her aunt had been sterilized. But, she says, “we didn’t find out until recently the extent — exactly what all they did to her.” After the compensation law passed, she went looking for documentation — and came back with a mother lode: a court order, names of social workers and the entire procedure, outlined from pre-op to discharge.

The doctor had labeled it a “eugenics sterilization.” And while it was it relief to have the information, she says, it was also remarkably sad.

“They were telling my grandparents that the surgery was going to be minimally invasive. They told them it would be a tubal ligation. And they [wound] up doing a full abdominal hysterectomy — on a 14-year-old,” Adams says.

With all this evidence, Adams and her family thought they had a case. They filed the paperwork, and waited to hear back. The news wasn’t good.

“The denial letter, the only thing it really stated was that there were no records found and that her case was not approved by the North Carolina Eugenics Board,” Adams says.

The problem lies in a technicality.

The new compensation law says, to be eligible, operations have to have occurred under the state’s Eugenics Board. As it turns out, the board very likely wasn’taware of all the sterilizations taking place. Judges and social service workers were greenlighting sterilizations, as well.

“That’s kind of become the fundamental problem here,” says Bob Bollinger, an attorney representing Blackmon and a few other people who say they are victims.

“You have some old dusty filing cabinet in Raleigh that’s full of Eugenics Board paperwork from decades ago, but yet you’ve got all these people who got sterilized involuntarily, where it was instigated at the local level and their paperwork didn’t wind up being preserved in the eugenics files in Raleigh — if it was ever there to begin with,” he says.

Graham Wilson, a spokesman for the North Carolina Industrial Commission, which decides who qualifies for compensation from the $10 million fund, says, “A lot of people may have had this done under the auspices of local county groups. They’re not qualified,” he says.

“They may think they’re qualified, and obviously they had this procedure done to them,” he says. “But if it was not done under the Eugenics Board of North Carolina, then they’re not qualified.”

Lawyers working with victims estimate hundreds of people — people like Blackmon — could fall into this category.

Blackmon’s operation was ordered by a judge who was part of the state court system. That judge cited a state law.

When asked if that, then, makes the state responsible, Wilson says, “That’s kind of hard to say. Again, it’s just an unfortunate part of our history. It’s just something that was done. So it’s kind of hard to say that the state would be responsible when it was just kind of an accepted practice.”

“It’s frustrating sometimes. It really is,” Blackmon says.

She’s not the only one frustrated. Her niece, Adams, says the denial feels like a double blow.

“Everything is there, but because you can’t find a piece of paper saying it got approved by the North Carolina board, you’re not gonna be compensated. I think it’s sad. I really think it’s sad. It’s like, you’ve hurt her once before, but then now I feel like you’re turning around and hurting her once again.”

There is an appeals process, and Adams and Blackmon are working through that right now. As for people who will be compensated, the first half of the money went out this week —220 checks for $20,000 each. The rest will be disbursed next summer, after the approval process is complete.

*****

Thoughts? Rants? Ideas? 

Helen: I hear ya sister. I am taking a back seat too. Unfortunately I can’t stop the blog, nor do I want to, but a bit of respite in the form of laying low on the rant side, is about all I can back off from presently.

Norma: I usually don’t say anything and let the regulars handle it. The only reason why I said something was because PrP and I posted the exact same thing.  I found the coincidence interesting and funny. (And not in a “haha” way. :)

Readers: I can see that some of you are ranting. Good for you – you have good reason. Get it out. Feels good huh?

Rant me!..er…I mean Blog me. The forum is open.

Peace out. 

Lastly, greed over a great story is surfacing from my “loyal”(?) readers. With all this back and forth about who owns what, that appears on my blog, let me reiterate that all material posted on my blog becomes the sole property of my blog. If you want to reserve any proprietary rights don’t post it to my blog. I will prominently display this caveat on my blog from now on to remind those who may have forgotten this notice.

Gratefully your blog host,

michelle

Aka BABE: We all know what this means by now :)

If you love my blog and my writes, please make a donation via PayPal, credit card, or e-check, please click the “Donate” button below. (Please only donations from those readers within the United States. – International readers please see my “Donate” page)

Or if you would like to send a check via snail mail, please make checks payable to “Michelle Moquin”, and send to:

Michelle Moquin PO Box 29235 San Francisco, Ca. 94129

Thank you for your loyal support!

All content on this site are property of Michelle Moquin © copyright 2008-2014

me

“Though she be but little, she be fierce.” – William Shakespeare Midsummer Night’s Dream 

" Politics, god, Life, News, Music, Family, Personal, Travel, Random, Photography, Religion, Aliens, Art, Entertainment, Food, Books, Thoughts, Media, Culture, Love, Sex, Poetry, Prose, Friends, Technology, Humor, Health, Writing, Events, Movies, Sports, Video, Christianity, Atheist, Blogging, History, Work, Education, Business, Fashion, Barack Obama, People, Internet, Relationships, Faith, Photos, Videos, Hillary Clinton, School, Reviews, God, TV, Philosophy, Fun, Science, Environment, Design, The Page, Rants, Pictures, Church, Blog, Nature, Marketing, Television, Democrats, Parenting, Miscellaneous, Current Events, Film, Spirituality, Obama, Musings, Home, Human Rights, Society, Comedy, Me, Random Thoughts, Research, Government, Election 2008, Baseball, Opinion, Recipes, Children, Iraq, Funny, Women, Economics, America, Misc, Commentary, John McCain, Reflections, All, Celebrities, Inspiration, Lifestyle, Theology, Linux, Kids, Games, World, India, Literature, China, Ramblings, Fitness, Money, Review, War, Articles, Economy, Journal, Quotes, NBA, Crime, Anime, Islam, 2008, Stories, Prayer, Diary, Jesus, Buddha, Muslim, Israel, Europe, Links, Marriage, Fiction, American Idol, Software, Leadership, Pop culture, Rants, Video Games, Republicans, Updates, Political, Football, Healing, Blogs, Shopping, USA, Class, Matrix, Course, Work, Web 2.0, My Life, Psychology, Gay, Happiness, Advertising, Field Hockey, Hip-hop, sex, fucking, ass, Soccer, sox"

Posted in Health & Well Being | 36 Comments »

“Sidewalk:” The Life Of A Woman

Posted by Michelle Moquin on November 8th, 2014


Bookmark and Share

Good morning!

An interesting look at the life of a woman through the eyes of an animator.

Meet The Animator Who Captured A Woman’s Entire Lifetime In A Four-Minute Short

Have you seen “Sidewalk” yet? It’s a four-minute animated short by Celia Bullwinkel. It tells a woman’s entire life just by following her as she walks down the street. Somehow it manages to encompass the excitement and heartache and unfairness of aging while female, like if “10 Hours Walking as a Woman In New York” was a cartoon, covered 100 years, and was set to a light, jazzy score. It is so elegant and sharp and real and clean, and I could keep going, but really, just watch it. I’ll wait:

 

 

The short has been making the festival rounds since April. Bullwinkel posted “Sidewalk” online on September 16; it’s been seen nearly 3 million times on her Vimeo and YouTube channels alone. To find out more about how this animated piece came to be, I gave Bullwinkel a call.

Where did the idea for “Sidewalk” come from?

It wasn’t a hard decision to know what medium I wanted to use, because I’m a professional animator here in New York. I do freelance for TV and independent film. I really wanted to make an independent film for myself. Having been here for 17 years, and being someone who doesn’t own a car, I have no choice but to do most of my errands by walking. I love walking the streets of New York City, but I spent most of my twenties here, and you accumulate a lot of catcalls and stories from friends about catcalls. And it really did bother me.

I remember talking to my mother on the phone about it, I was complaining to her, I was in my twenties, it had reached that critical mass. And she said, “enjoy it now, because when you get older, it goes away, and you might just miss it.” And you have to remember, this is a generation gap . My first impression was, absolutely not, that’s terrible. But I also kind of realized that when you grow up in a culture like this, you come to expect validation in negative ways. It becomes acceptable. And so I wanted to tell this like a parable. It’s a story about a woman who kind of buys into it. I know it’s not aspirational, as a lot of people who viewed the film wanted it to be. But I wanted it to be honest, I wanted to reach the people who, maybe they’re not conscious of it, but they kind of do rely on [catcalling] as a way of telling you that you’re okay. That yes, you are valuable. I thought about a lot of things. I did a lot of research on Nora Ephron.

Oh, she’s always a good choice. What works of Nora Ephron’s did you read?

She wrote that book, I Feel Bad About My Neck. I’m only 36. I started the film at 30. I wanted to get someone else’s opinion [about aging]. And I really liked what Ephron said about age in that book. She talked about how the neck was the part of the body that always gave away a woman’s age. And she thought about getting a facelift that would take care of the neck; celebrities do it all the time, most notably, Jane Fonda. But she found out what the procedure entails — you have to take your entire face and neck off and put it back on — and when she realized just how dangerous and invasive and horrifying the procedure was, she said, “I’m just going to wear a scarf or a turtleneck.”

I don’t think women are afraid of aging, but society tells us that we should stop. And I understand biologically that there are reasons men don’t catcall old ladies, but at the same time, I think, we’re such a visual culture and so much of what society tells us in terms of our value and worth, as soon as you reach a certain age, you get put on this pedestal and get knocked right off it. I had a conversation with the producer with the film Make Me Young: Youth Knows No Pain, an HBO documentary, and she was saying, once you reach your forties in Hollywood, you’re kind of no longer allowed to be in movies. There are always anomalies, but it’s hard to find films that talk about women past their, really, childbearing years. Past your forties, no one cares about what your life is like anymore. No one wants to know. I started to really think about how I could make a film that dealt with body acceptance, and how life is more than just how you look or how you feel about yourself being young. Who cares if you get older? Everyone ages at the same rate. We all do it, so why not celebrate it?

SIDEWALK_BOOBS_SML

CREDIT: CELIA BULLWINKEL

I was really struck by how, as soon as this girl hits puberty, she feels cool for all of a millisecond and then immediately hides her body in a hoodie. What determined her reactions to the way her body changed?

A lot of that stems from me. I never was a flaunty person, even during the years when girls really do like to exert their presence publicly. I kind of related to the girl of not being ready to grow up, trying to suppress it through baggy clothes. I would be surprised if anyone didn’t go through that phase, so it’s very relatable. And then she kind of realizes she’s attracting men, and she’s not really aware of what she has. That lack of self-awareness, a lot of teens have it, and that’s great, because it means you have your mind on a lot of other things. But to her it’s like, “What is going on? I just put a dress on today.” It’s like the responses to catcalls; just because a girl puts on a dress and nice shoes doesn’t mean she’s trying to attract men and she wants to have sex. Maybe it makes her feel happy, maybe she wants to be feminine. At least publicly, people think it’s an indication, when it’s really just a self-gratifying act.

As she gets older, she never really seems to stay in love with her appearance for very long.

When she becomes self-aware of what her body possesses publicly or culturally, she becomes so aware that she loses faith in what she is. She didn’t like [the attention] when she was young, and then she missed it. That’s where it ties in with my mother’s conversation. She didn’t like it, but she wonders where it went.

Can you talk a bit about animation? It seems to free you up in a lot of ways here.

I love cartooning animation. I love to use it, to exaggerate, I can show someone’s entire life in four minutes. One of the great things about animation is you can compress time, and it feels great. It doesn’t even, people don’t even notice that you just saw someone’s whole life go by. And of course, the breasts popping out and the butt popping out, going from pregnant to exhausted motherhood to overweight, it’s all something you can exaggerate. And the boobs sagging at the end, which is one of my favorites. People laugh at that scene, though some people really get upset by that. I think it hits a nerve: they connect to the woman at this point, and they don’t want to see what’s coming down the road.

SIDEWALK_01

CREDIT: CELIA BULLWINKEL/SIDEWALK

So you knew you wanted to tell an entire life. How did you decide what scenes to include? What moments are the most important to keep in this bare bones story of her growing up?

I called each stage a transition, and I wrote it down on paper, and I had almost thirty. I had to bring it down. I think, at this point, I’m down to under twenty. But I came up with a lot. And I had to make very important decisions about what the story was going to be about. A lot of people wanted to know about what happened to her husband and her son. I did have them more incorporated in the story, but then I realized, the story wasn’t about her relationship with her body anymore. What made it important was the message but in order to bring it down to the short format, I had to really stay the course to what the underlying message is. Male viewers, particularly, felt like they were slighted, when they felt the male characters weren’t portrayed enough, and some felt for the characters.

Sorry, I just have to say, the whole idea that men would complain about not being portrayed enough in your independent, four-minute animated short, that is just so laughable to me. Do they have any sense of what it feels like to be a girl watching full-length feature films?

So of all the things I learned from making “Sidewalk,” well, number one is, how well a film does in the festival circuit cannot serve as a prediction of how well it will play out online. It did okay in festivals, it won a couple of awards. It wasn’t a huge festival hit, but it became a huge hit on the internet. And once it’s up there, it doesn’t belong to you anymore. That’s the second thing that I learned. You can’t take it back and explain to people how it’s supposed to work. It is going to go through the prism of the individual, they’re going to see it how it pertains to their lives. The third thing I learned is that, some people will never understand the film. One of the major issues I noticed were men who only relate to characters of their own gender do not relate to “Sidewalk” at all. But that’s okay. Some of them even comment and say, “I don’t identify with any of this, and where are the men?” And I think that’s wonderful, because they just added themselves. The most rewarding thing about “Sidewalk” is, people actually opened a discussion about it. And men said it reminded them of what their wives were growing through, which I think is great. Some men would say, my mother never went through this, therefore this film is wrong. Which is interesting, because he’s seeing it through his perspective of his mother.

SIDEWALK_hit_dog

CREDIT: CELIA BULLWINKEL/SIDEWALK

Which stage did you struggle with the most? What was the hardest transition to depict?

The ending was definitely the hardest. Because I wanted to tell people how I felt about body acceptance and age, but I had over a dozen endings. And it ranged from positive and negative to hilarious to abstract, and finally when I came upon the ending, I knew I had a film. I knew I had it together. The second hardest was letting go of the husband and son. I kind of wrote them into the story, and I had to take them out, because for the format, and the length of the film, there wasn’t enough time to talk about anyone else.

You worked on “Sidewalk” for so many years. Did anything about how this girl evolved surprise you?

She’s a passive character. And I think that’s perfectly fine. I think we identify with passive characters, people who take what they’re given in life. She’s not a type A. I’m kind of a person who is really low key and mellow, and I wanted her to have the same demeanor. But she also doesn’t come off as someone who feels like she really got what she wanted in life, and part of it has to do with the mindset that she created for herself. And I wanted to show that, even if it takes you until the end of your life to change your outlook, change your mindset, about who you are, it’s never too late. You can learn to love yourself at any age in your life.

SIDEWALK_02

CREDIT: CELIA BULLWINKEL/SIDEWALK

Between the reception you’ve said you’re receiving for “Sidewalk” andthe huge response to that “10 Hours Walking as a Woman in New York City” video, it feels like we’re having this moment of heightened awareness and, sometimes, outrage about the way women are treated in public spaces. What do you think it is about that specific issue, within the broader realm of gender relations and sexism in general, that gets people so fired up?

First of all, I love the fact that it’s becoming a discussion. I feel like it’s all kind of coming about in the last few months. But I do believe that there’s something about a woman being in public, somehow it is culturally acceptable still, [that when] woman goes outside, she becomes open for public scrutiny. Whether you’re working at an office and your coworker decides to tell you how he would evaluate you on a scale of 1-10 of how you dress or look — that hasn’t happened to me, but my dental hygienist told me a story like that. It made me realize; it’s not about going outside, but going outside is where it happens the most. And what’s funny, the people who catcall are usually the men who are the most economically underserved. As one of my old roommates used to say, they’re always the people who are the most screwed over by the man. It’s a source of power. It’s a way of taking back something that they feel like they don’t have. And I’ve never had a man who made more money than me catcall me.

But the actual stats on street harassment tell a very different story: it happens across all lines of race, class, socioeconomic status. It’s not something that is limited to a “less empowered” group of people.

I do believe that men in high economic levels can catcall. But the ones that I’ve dealt with on a personal basis are people I feel are looking for an opportunity to (a) amuse their friends or (b) assert some kind of dominance. And the people who need to assert their dominance in such a kind of lowbrow way, I find, are people who really don’t feel like they have that much control over their lives… If they don’t feel like they have any power, why not feel better by exerting power over someone else?

Can you tell me more about the conversation you had with your mother? It sounds like it had this huge influence on you.

My mother is kind of a fierce creature in her own right, and she owned quite a bit of feminist literature. I found it in the basement when I was a teen. And that’s where you could say “Sidewalk” even began. In the first chapter of one of the books, this was 20 years ago, they’d done a poll and asked women, if you could be any age, what age would you be? And most said between 18 and 21. And one woman said, “I’d rather be 50, because I’m more free. People won’t look at me as a sexual object anymore, people will take me at face value, as a person.” And I thought that was kind of amazing. What’s amazing is that our sexuality is so tied in with who we are as people, that we feel like we lose ourselves. Especially women who know that they’re beautiful, they know they hit the genetic lottery, I think that when their beauty becomes such a large part of their identity, I think aging is very tough for them. It’s like a part of them dies. But my mother, I think she was trying to be supportive. She was almost trying to say, “hey, maybe instead of hating it, you should like it, because you know that it’s finite, it will go away.” But the fact that she would even suggest enjoying such negative attention from strangers, no less, from people who obviously don’t know you from anything other than how they perceive you that one particular day on the street, I thought that was so surprising.

What I find really shocking and disturbing is how quickly people start telling you that you’re “lucky” to look younger than you are. Like if you’re in your twenties, and you get carded at a bar, the idea is that you should “take it as a compliment” that someone thinks you look 19 years old. As if looking 25 is so horrible, you should be grateful people think you look like a teenager.

If people think that is old, they’re going to have a really hard time with life. You’re going to be older than 25 for most of your life. [I overheard] somebody saying once, “I’m turning 27, I’m so old,” and I know that they’re just doing it because it’s funny and they want sympathy and free drinks. But to me, calling yourself “old” before you hit 30, it’s not cute. It’s not endearing. You’re basically promoting the fear that you’ll lose your value. You’re like a car, as soon as you roll off the lot, you start depreciating in value.

When in your film do you think this girl is at her happiest? She never seems to stay happy and confident for very long.

I’m really giving myself away: she’s happiest when she establishes herself in the career. And a lot of people were upset about this, but as soon as she feels good about herself and things are going great career-wise, she meets someone and gets pregnant. And she can’t live for herself anymore; she has to live for someone else. I don’t show that she still has a job, but more or less –- and I know this isn’t true, but it’s based on my own phobias -– once you become a mother, you lose upward mobility in your career, because people know you can’t commit yourself and make it your number one priority.

And she’s also happiest in the beginning. She knows she’s going to grow up but it’s still an abstract concept. She sees the sign for “big girl clothes” and she thinks being a big girl is going to be great, it’s going to be so fun. She doesn’t realize how hard it is to grow up as a woman. So part of it is naivete, and midway through life, she kind of gets the hang of it, but as soon as she gets the hang of it, things change and she’s knocked off kilter.

SIDEWALK_03

CREDIT: CELIA BULLWINKEL/SIDEWALK

Is there a feeling you want people to take from “Sidewalk”? If someone watching the short were pregnant with a girl right now, should that person feel optimistic about the life ahead of that baby?

I think they should be happy for having a girl, because being a woman is really fun. I’m biased. But I think there’s just a lot of traps and nonsense that women have to get through in order to live a happy life. There’s one quote that really kept me going throughout making the film, by Francoise Sagan: “There is a certain age when a woman must be beautiful to be loved, and then there comes a time when she must be loved to be beautiful.”

To me, I find that body acceptance is important. Learning to love how your body is always changing, it’s an organic thing, it’s allowed to grow and expand and shrink and do amazing things like produce lives. And I really think that people who try to fight that, whose bodies are not in the realm of their control, I think [struggle]. I hope this film will help them realize that this is what your body is meant to do, and it’s okay. Everyone ages. We all do it, and why not do it together? But then there’s also a very social angle, which is, the anti-aging industry is growing rapidly, and I really wanted to make this film to have a more honest view of what aging really is. It does kind of scare up a lot of people’s fears of being less interesting, less important, forgotten, but that’s the point.

What would a version of “Sidewalk” about a boy look like?

I think someone really should make a boy version of “Sidewalk.” I can’t make that film. I feel like, “Sidewalk” is so personal, I don’t think it would be authentic if I were to make a boy version. I think that he would probably feel like he could take control of the world more than the woman feels like she can grab the world by the balls. But I think men have their own unique issues. I think women and men are on the same page when it comes to the anxiety with being perceived by the opposite sex. I think women are more visually scrutinized than men, socially, which is why women deal with it much more than men do. But even men are starting to wear cosmetics. Even men get procedures to make themselves look better. Men get manicures now. The only way forward, I think it’s awful, but it’s becoming an equal playing field of cosmetology and overpriced jeans that make your butt small. I think it would be wonderful to see what kind of social pressures a man feels.

“Sidewalk” took four years to make and was a fully self-funded film. I really believe that if you have something you want to say, whether or not you can get grant money, whether or not you have the time, because I found the time, I made time for “Sidewalk,” you should do it.

*****

 

Readers: I have mixed feelings about this. I want to ruminate on it before I say more. Feel free to give me your two though if you’re up for it.

Blog me.

Happy Saturday!

Linda: Really?  You really think if I was PrP too I would post the exact same thing on both sites? LOL.  No, but apparently great minds do think alike. :)

Lastly, greed over a great story is surfacing from my “loyal”(?) readers. With all this back and forth about who owns what, that appears on my blog, let me reiterate that all material posted on my blog becomes the sole property of my blog. If you want to reserve any proprietary rights don’t post it to my blog. I will prominently display this caveat on my blog from now on to remind those who may have forgotten this notice.

Gratefully your blog host,

michelle

Aka BABE: We all know what this means by now :)

If you love my blog and my writes, please make a donation via PayPal, credit card, or e-check, please click the “Donate” button below. (Please only donations from those readers within the United States. – International readers please see my “Donate” page)

Or if you would like to send a check via snail mail, please make checks payable to “Michelle Moquin”, and send to:

Michelle Moquin PO Box 29235 San Francisco, Ca. 94129

Thank you for your loyal support!

All content on this site are property of Michelle Moquin © copyright 2008-2014

me

“Though she be but little, she be fierce.” – William Shakespeare Midsummer Night’s Dream 

" Politics, god, Life, News, Music, Family, Personal, Travel, Random, Photography, Religion, Aliens, Art, Entertainment, Food, Books, Thoughts, Media, Culture, Love, Sex, Poetry, Prose, Friends, Technology, Humor, Health, Writing, Events, Movies, Sports, Video, Christianity, Atheist, Blogging, History, Work, Education, Business, Fashion, Barack Obama, People, Internet, Relationships, Faith, Photos, Videos, Hillary Clinton, School, Reviews, God, TV, Philosophy, Fun, Science, Environment, Design, The Page, Rants, Pictures, Church, Blog, Nature, Marketing, Television, Democrats, Parenting, Miscellaneous, Current Events, Film, Spirituality, Obama, Musings, Home, Human Rights, Society, Comedy, Me, Random Thoughts, Research, Government, Election 2008, Baseball, Opinion, Recipes, Children, Iraq, Funny, Women, Economics, America, Misc, Commentary, John McCain, Reflections, All, Celebrities, Inspiration, Lifestyle, Theology, Linux, Kids, Games, World, India, Literature, China, Ramblings, Fitness, Money, Review, War, Articles, Economy, Journal, Quotes, NBA, Crime, Anime, Islam, 2008, Stories, Prayer, Diary, Jesus, Buddha, Muslim, Israel, Europe, Links, Marriage, Fiction, American Idol, Software, Leadership, Pop culture, Rants, Video Games, Republicans, Updates, Political, Football, Healing, Blogs, Shopping, USA, Class, Matrix, Course, Work, Web 2.0, My Life, Psychology, Gay, Happiness, Advertising, Field Hockey, Hip-hop, sex, fucking, ass, Soccer, sox"

Posted in Entertainment & Laughter | 7 Comments »