Michelle Moquin's "A day in the life of…"

Creative Discussions, Inspiring Thoughts, Fun Adventures, Love & Laughter, Peaceful Travel, Hip Fashions, Cool People, Gastronomic Pleasures, Exotic Indulgences, Groovy Music, and more!

  • Hello!

    Welcome To My OUR Blog!


    Michelle Moquin's Facebook profile "Click here" to go to my FaceBook profile. Visit me!
  • Copyright Protected

    Protected by Copyscape Plagiarism Checker
  • Let Michelle Style YOU!

    I am a "Specialist in Styles" Personal Stylist. Check out my Style website to see how I can help you discover, define, and refine your unique style.
  • © Copyright 2008-2023

    All content on this site are property of Michelle Moquin © copyright 2008-2023. All material posted on my blog becomes the sole property of my blog. If you want to reserve any proprietary rights don't post it to my blog.
  • In Pursuit Of…

    Custom Search
  • Madaline Speaks

    For those of you interested in reading an Earthling Girl's Guide to a better Government, and a Greener world, check out the blog:
  • Contact Your Representatives and Senators Here!

    To send letters to your representatives about any issue of interest, Click here


    To send letters to your Senators about any issue of interest, Click here


    Get involved - Write your letters today!
  • On The Issues

    Don't be uninformed! Click here to see how every political leader on every issue voted.
  • Don’t Believe The Lies – Get The Facts

    FactCheck.org is a nonpartisan, nonprofit “consumer advocate” for voters that aims to reduce the level of deception and confusion in U.S. politics. They monitor the factual accuracy of what is said by major U.S. political players in the form of TV ads, debates, speeches, interviews and news releases. Their goal is to apply the best practices of both journalism and scholarship, and to increase public knowledge and understanding.

    Click here to get the facts.

    Pulitzer Prize Winner Politifact.com is another trusted site to get the facts. Click here to get the facts.

  • Who’s Paying Who?

    On The Issues is a nonpartisan guide to money's influence on U.S. elections and public policy.
  • Blog Rules of Conduct

    Rule #1: "The aliens can not reveal anything about anyone’s life that would not be known without the use of our technology. The exception being that if a reader has a question about his or her health and the assistance of alien technology would be necessary to answer that question.”

    Rule #2: "Aliens will not threaten humans and Humans will not threaten aliens."

    Rule #3:

    Posting Comments:

    When posting a comment in regards to any past or archived article, please reference the title and date of the article and post your comment on the present day to keep the conversation contemporary.

    NOTE: You do not need to add your e-mail address when posting a comment. Your real name, an alias, a moniker, initials...whatever ...even simply "anonymous" is all you need to add in the fields in order to post a comment.

    Thank you.

  • *********

    Yellow Pages for San Francisco, CA
  • Meta

  • Looking For A Personal Stylist?

    Michelle has designed and styled for the stars! She can be your "Specialist in Styles" Personal Stylist too. Check out Michelle's style website
  • Recent Posts

  • Michelle’s E-mail:

    E-mail me! ~~~~~~~~~~~~~~
  • Care To Twitter? Come Tweet Me!

  • Disclaimer: Adult Blog

    I DO NOT CENSOR COMMENTS POSTED TO THIS BLOG: Therefore this blog is not for the faint hearted, thin skinned, easily offended or the appointed people's moralist. If you feel that you may fit in any of those categories, please DO NOT read my blog or its comments. There are plenty of blogs that will fit your needs, find one. This warning also applies to those who post comments who would find it unpleasant or mentally injurious to receive an opposing opinion via a raw to vulgar delivery. I DO NOT censor comments posted here. If you post a comment, you are on notice that you may receive a comment in language or opinion that you will not approve of or that you feel is offensive. If that would bother you, DO NOT post on my blog.

    27Mar2011
  • Medical Disclaimer:

    I am not a doctor nor am I medically trained in any field. No one on this website is claiming to be a medical physician or claiming to be medically trained in any field. However, anyone can blog information about health articles, folk remedies, possible cures, possible treatments, etc that they have heard of on my blog. Please see your physician or a health care professional before heeding or using any medical information given on this blog. It is not intended to replace any medical advice given to you by your licensed medical professional. This blog is simply providing a medium for discussion on all matters concerning life. All opinions given are the sole responsibility of the person giving them. This blog does not make any claim to their truthfulness, honesty, or factuality because of their presence on my blog. Again, Please consult a health care professional before heeding any health information given here.

    27Mar2011
  • Legal Disclaimer:

    Michelle Moquin's "A Day In The Life Of..." publishes the opinions of expert authorities in many fields. But the use of these opinions is no substitute for legal, accounting, investment, medical and other professional services to suit your specific personal needs. Always consult a competent professional for answers to your specific questions.

    27Mar2011
  • Fair Use Notice Disclaimer

    This web site may contain copyrighted material the use of which has not always been specifically authorized by the copyright owner. We are making such material available in our efforts to advance the understanding of humanity's problems and hopefully to help find solutions for those problems. We believe this constitutes a 'fair use' of any such copyrighted material as provided for in section 107 of the US Copyright Law. In accordance with Title 17 U.S.C. Section 107, the material on this site is distributed without profit to those who have expressed a prior interest in receiving the included information for research and educational purposes. A click on a hyperlink is a request for information. However, if you wish to use copyrighted material from this site for purposes of your own that go beyond 'fair use', you must obtain permission from me. You can read more about "fair use' and US Copyright Law"at the"Legal Information Institute of Cornell Law School." This notice was modified from a similar notice at "Common Dreams."

Look who I ran into?!

Posted by Michelle Moquin on September 10th, 2016

Bookmark and Share

Good morning!

IMG_3628

Ok, I know publishing these pictures is usually something only republicans would do. The republican party has proven over and over that there is no low they won’t go to in order to win a point or election. They have no shame and apparently no empathy for the angsts of others.

I say the republicans, because although it is mainly the politicians of their party that resort to this type of despicable behavior, the obvious conclusion is they do it because their constituents reward them for it. So to you republicans who attempt your usual false equivalency arguments with “see the Democrats do it too,” I say NO, we are just retaliating in kind.

This may be too deep for your logic, but reacting to disgusting behavior in kind is not the same as initiating it in the first place. So…Let me put it to you in terms you will understand. Shooting someone that attempted to shoot you is NOT the equivalency of initiating the action of shooting someone. Got it?

Republicans have disgraced the Clinton family at every opportunity from body shaming tactics to accusing Hillary of murder. Trump also claimed Ted Cruz’s father was involved with the assassination of President Kennedy. And when questioned by Megyn Kelly about comments he made denigrating women, he didn’t deny that he made them. He reacted by attacking Kelly.

So…I’m going to be the Dem that has the warrior womb, and give this creep a little of his own medicine back. And I am happy to be the one to do it. Trump’s been doing this disgusting stuff for years beginning with the Obama birth certificate crap. To those who for whatever reason feel this is a tiny penis too far, I suggest you remind yourself that the republicans have rewarded this malicious, vilifying creature with the nomination for the office of POTUS.

It is not as if the republicans did not have candidates with the political, intellectual, economic, and foreign policy experience to choose from. Yet, they chose the idiot with the most vitriolic traits, a creature who has no low. If you have ever wondered how a Hitler could get in power, you are witnessing the how in your own time. I don’t know about you, but to me that says more about the people choosing than it does about the candidate chosen. Therefore any pretentious, moral, or ethical objections by any republicans will be treated with the concern their hypocrisy deserves.

The most common trait of bullies, is that they can’t handle receiving the disgusting shit they dish out so readily to others. So to you, “the Donald,”  you Lying Sack Of Shit, “How do you like it now?”

You like to go nasty. Here’s your triple dose back.

IMG_3621                  IMG_3622

Yes, it’s tiny. Though not like the hands, more like his tiny brain. 

Any comments? Of course you do. 

Blog me.

Oh…notice something else in the photos? Lol. A few of my “friends” decided to join me. :))

Happy Saturday! Peace out. 

CORRECTION: It was Ted Cruz’s father that Trump claimed was involved with  the assassination of President Kennedy, not Mark Rubio’s father, as stated previously.

Lastly, greed over a great story is surfacing from my “loyal”(?) readers. With all this back and forth about who owns what, that appears on my blog, let me reiterate that all material posted on my blog becomes the sole property of my blog. If you want to reserve any proprietary rights don’t post it to my blog. I will prominently display this caveat on my blog from now on to remind those who may have forgotten this notice.

Gratefully your blog host,

michelle

Aka BABE: We all know what this means by now :)

If you love my blog and my writes, please make a donation via PayPal, credit card, or e-check, please click the “Donate” button below. (Please only donations from those readers within the United States. – International readers please see my “Donate” page)

Or if you would like to send a check via snail mail, please make checks payable to “Michelle Moquin”, and send to:

Michelle Moquin PO Box 29235 San Francisco, Ca. 94129

Thank you for your loyal support!

All content on this site are property of Michelle Moquin © copyright 2008-2016

me

“Though she be but little, she be fierce.” – William Shakespeare Midsummer Night’s Dream 

" Politics, god, Life, News, Music, Family, Personal, Travel, Random, Photography, Religion, Aliens, Art, Entertainment, Food, Books, Thoughts, Media, Culture, Love, Sex, Poetry, Prose, Friends, Technology, Humor, Health, Writing, Events, Movies, Sports, Video, Christianity, Atheist, Blogging, History, Work, Education, Business, Fashion, Barack Obama, People, Internet, Relationships, Faith, Photos, Videos, Hillary Clinton, School, Reviews, God, TV, Philosophy, Fun, Science, Environment, Design, The Page, Rants, Pictures, Church, Blog, Nature, Marketing, Television, Democrats, Parenting, Miscellaneous, Current Events, Film, Spirituality, Obama, Musings, Home, Human Rights, Society, Comedy, Me, Random Thoughts, Research, Government, Election 2008, Baseball, Opinion, Recipes, Children, Iraq, Funny, Women, Economics, America, Misc, Commentary, John McCain, Reflections, All, Celebrities, Inspiration, Lifestyle, Theology, Linux, Kids, Games, World, India, Literature, China, Ramblings, Fitness, Money, Review, War, Articles, Economy, Journal, Quotes, NBA, Crime, Anime, Islam, 2008, Stories, Prayer, Diary, Jesus, Buddha, Muslim, Israel, Europe, Links, Marriage, Fiction, American Idol, Software, Leadership, Pop culture, Rants, Video Games, Republicans, Updates, Political, Football, Healing, Blogs, Shopping, USA, Class, Matrix, Course, Work, Web 2.0, My Life, Psychology, Gay, Happiness, Advertising, Field Hockey, Hip-hop, sex, fucking, ass, Soccer, sox"

Posted in Bitch Badinage, Entertainment & Laughter, Good Reads and Good See'ds, Lying Sacks Of Shit, Political Powwow | 82 Comments »

Flap Your Lips Friday

Posted by Michelle Moquin on September 9th, 2016

Bookmark and Share

Good morning! Ladies: Listen up because you need to know about this.

From Harvard Health Publications: 

Harvard Women’s Health Watch

What’s the story with Fosamax?

Recent reports have women wondering if they should stop taking this widely prescribed osteoporosis drug.

In 1995, the FDA approved alendronate (Fosamax) for the treatment of postmenopausal osteoporosis, a bone-weakening condition that affects more than eight million women and causes 1.5 million fractures each year in the United States. Fosamax increases bone mineral density and significantly reduces the risk of spine, hip, and wrist fractures in women with osteoporosis and in those with low bone density that doesn’t meet the criteria for osteoporosis (a condition called osteopenia).

Fractures are an important cause of disability and death in postmenopausal women. Hip fractures lead to hospitalization and, usually, surgery — and they often result in nursing home care. Only 40% of hip fracture patients ever regain their independence, and nearly 25% die within a year. Vertebral fractures can cause debilitating back pain, and they, too, increase the risk of premature death.

Fosamax belongs to a class of drugs called bisphosphonates, which work by slowing resorption, the breakdown phase of normal bone remodeling. Fosamax is the oldest of these drugs and has been used the most and studied the longest. We know, for example, that it improves bone density for at least 10 years. Most patients tolerate Fosamax well; its most common side effects are irritation of the esophagus and stomach ulcer.

In the past few years, reports have emerged linking bisphosphonates with osteonecrosis (bone death) of the jaw and atrial fibrillation. With respect to Fosamax, those concerns have largely been allayed: users rarely develop osteonecrosis of the jaw, and the evidence for a relationship with heart rhythm problems is conflicting. But now, new concerns have been raised by reports of unusual fractures of the thighbone (femur) in long-term Fosamax users. There are no evidence-based guidelines on how long patients can or should take Fosamax, but some women and their physicians are considering a drug holiday. Many of our own readers have written, asking if they should stop taking the drug.

What’s the evidence?

In 2008, researchers in Singapore published a report on 17 postmenopausal women, average age 66, who experienced fractures across the thighbone unprovoked by major trauma. All of the women had been taking Fosamax for an average of five years, and 13 of them had leg pain before the fracture developed. The researchers reported similar findings in a smaller study in 2007; they theorized that prolonged suppression of bone remodeling by Fosamax may have encouraged fracture-inducing microdamage to the bone.

Prompted by the Singapore findings, clinicians at New York’s Hospital for Special Surgery identified 70 patients who had suffered low-energy fractures between 2002 and 2007. (Low-energy fractures occur from a fall from standing height or less.) Twenty-five (36%) had been taking Fosamax. Of these, 20 had suffered a fracture across the femur, and 19 of those fractures occurred in patients who had been taking Fosamax the longest — on average, seven years. The researchers concluded that long-term Fosamax use is a significant risk factor for low-energy fractures of the femur.

The initial reports also drew letters to the editor of The New England Journal of Medicine, including evidence both supporting and refuting a link between bisphosphonates and nontraumatic fractures. The studies thus far have been small, retrospective analyses, and they haven’t taken into account other factors that could contribute to such fractures, including general ill health. But given what we know about the effects of bisphosphonates on bone remodeling, the findings seem plausible.

In the short term, slowing bone resorption increases bone density. But in the long run, it may impair new bone formation and reduce the bone’s ability to repair microscopic cracks from normal wear and tear. (There’s some evidence in animal studies that Fosamax can inhibit microdamage repair.) Over time, such microdamage might accumulate and cause a fracture. Also, while bone breakdown is suppressed, the mineralization process continues, potentially resulting in “hypermineralized” bone, which may be more brittle and less resilient to wear and tear. This is all largely speculative, as no studies have produced empirical evidence that such mechanisms actually lead to fractures.

Now what?

Merck, the manufacturer of Fosamax, says it will undertake further study of the drug’s effects on bone. And the FDA and Merck will continue monitoring for adverse events. In the meantime, it’s important not to overreact. Fosamax has a proven capacity to prevent fractures — and the disability and death that can accompany them. By 2010, according to the National Osteoporosis Foundation (NOF), as many as 12 million Americans will have osteoporosis, and over 40 million will have osteopenia (low bone mass). Most experts believe that when Fosamax is used appropriately, its benefits greatly outweigh the risks.

Clinicians diagnose osteoporosis by measuring bone mineral density with a technique known as dual-energy x-ray absorptiometry (DXA). DXA results are used to calculate a statistical measure called a T-score. Experts recommend that a woman with osteoporosis (defined by a T-score of –2.5 or below) should strongly consider drug treatment to reduce her fracture risk.

Women with osteopenia — a T-score between –1.0 and –2.5 — should consider other risk factors before deciding about drug therapy. The World Health Organization has developed the Fracture Risk Assessment Tool (FRAX), an online calculator that estimates an individual’s 10-year risk of having a hip fracture or other major fracture (available at www.nof.org andwww.shef.ac.uk/FRAX). The NOF suggests that a woman with osteopenia should consider drug treatment if the FRAX calculator says that her 10-year risk for a hip fracture is at least 3% — or her 10-year risk for any major fracture is at least 20%.

Currently, there’s no consensus on how long you should take a bisphosphonate medication. Until we know more, women taking Fosamax who have severe osteoporosis or a prior fracture should probably continue doing so indefinitely. But results from the Fracture Intervention Trial Long-term Extension (FLEX) study published in 2006 suggest that some women can eventually stop or take a break. In that study, women who had taken Fosamax for at least five years were randomly assigned to continue the drug or switch to a placebo for five more years. Those who discontinued Fosamax (the placebo takers) showed a gradual decline in bone density and a slight increase in the risk for spine fractures, but the rate of hip fracture, a far more serious injury, was the same in the two groups. (Women with severe osteoporosis — a T-score below –3.5 — were excluded from the study.)

What can you do?

As with any drug, don’t take Fosamax unless you’re sure you need to. If you’ve been taking it and are concerned about long-term effects, talk to your clinician about taking a break. Unfortunately, we have little solid evidence to guide us in this area. We know that bisphosphonates stay in bone for years, so it’s not clear that a “drug holiday” will lower your risk for possible long-term effects. If you decide to take a break, be sure to have your bone density tested after a year or two. If it has declined significantly, you can always resume bisphosphonate therapy.

Meanwhile, continue all the other measures that help protect and maintain bone density: take 1,200 to 1,500 milligrams of calcium and 800 IU of vitamin D every day; get 30 minutes of weight-bearing exercise at least three times a week; and if you smoke, do your best to stop.

 *****

 

Readers: Here is another instance of a drug company using the unknown public to experiment on. This drug was issued supposedly to prevent women from having brittle bones, but instead it makes the woman’s situation worse by making certain bones in her body so brittle they break without experiencing any trauma. If she had done nothing, her only concern would be falling down and breaking a bone.

Now that doesn’t even need to happen. Long term use of this drug causes a woman’s bones to break without her having to fall or experience any kind of trauma to her bones. The killer is, for those who have been taking it for a few years, stopping may not help because the drug remains in their systems for years, weakening their bones  year after year.

If you know someone who is on this drug, I hope you’ll pass it on. Thoughts? It’s Friday…start talkin’…

blog me.

Peace out. 

Lastly, greed over a great story is surfacing from my “loyal”(?) readers. With all this back and forth about who owns what, that appears on my blog, let me reiterate that all material posted on my blog becomes the sole property of my blog. If you want to reserve any proprietary rights don’t post it to my blog. I will prominently display this caveat on my blog from now on to remind those who may have forgotten this notice.

Gratefully your blog host,

michelle

Aka BABE: We all know what this means by now :)

If you love my blog and my writes, please make a donation via PayPal, credit card, or e-check, please click the “Donate” button below. (Please only donations from those readers within the United States. – International readers please see my “Donate” page)

Or if you would like to send a check via snail mail, please make checks payable to “Michelle Moquin”, and send to:

Michelle Moquin PO Box 29235 San Francisco, Ca. 94129

Thank you for your loyal support!

All content on this site are property of Michelle Moquin © copyright 2008-2016

me

“Though she be but little, she be fierce.” – William Shakespeare Midsummer Night’s Dream 

" Politics, god, Life, News, Music, Family, Personal, Travel, Random, Photography, Religion, Aliens, Art, Entertainment, Food, Books, Thoughts, Media, Culture, Love, Sex, Poetry, Prose, Friends, Technology, Humor, Health, Writing, Events, Movies, Sports, Video, Christianity, Atheist, Blogging, History, Work, Education, Business, Fashion, Barack Obama, People, Internet, Relationships, Faith, Photos, Videos, Hillary Clinton, School, Reviews, God, TV, Philosophy, Fun, Science, Environment, Design, The Page, Rants, Pictures, Church, Blog, Nature, Marketing, Television, Democrats, Parenting, Miscellaneous, Current Events, Film, Spirituality, Obama, Musings, Home, Human Rights, Society, Comedy, Me, Random Thoughts, Research, Government, Election 2008, Baseball, Opinion, Recipes, Children, Iraq, Funny, Women, Economics, America, Misc, Commentary, John McCain, Reflections, All, Celebrities, Inspiration, Lifestyle, Theology, Linux, Kids, Games, World, India, Literature, China, Ramblings, Fitness, Money, Review, War, Articles, Economy, Journal, Quotes, NBA, Crime, Anime, Islam, 2008, Stories, Prayer, Diary, Jesus, Buddha, Muslim, Israel, Europe, Links, Marriage, Fiction, American Idol, Software, Leadership, Pop culture, Rants, Video Games, Republicans, Updates, Political, Football, Healing, Blogs, Shopping, USA, Class, Matrix, Course, Work, Web 2.0, My Life, Psychology, Gay, Happiness, Advertising, Field Hockey, Hip-hop, sex, fucking, ass, Soccer, sox"

Posted in Health & Well Being | 34 Comments »

The Trump Files: Donald’s Nuclear Negotiating Fantasy

Posted by Michelle Moquin on September 8th, 2016

Bookmark and Share

Good morning!

Did you watch the Commander in Chief Forum last night? What did you think?

Here’s a few things I noticed. For one, Matt Lauer was all over Clinton by opening up the conversation telling Clinton that this wasn’t the forum to attack their opponent. Clinton didn’t “attack” Trump – she pointed out “facts” about him.  (Trump doesn’t speak factually. He just goes on and on about the plans he has but can’t seem to talk about them – ugh, maybe because he has none!)

And did you notice how Lauer gave Trump deference and didn’t ask Trump not to attack his opponent, Clinton? And then when Trump attacked Clinton, and Obama, and the generals in the military, Lauer didn’t stop him.

I also noticed Clinton made a big mistake when Lauer tossed her a softball.  He asked her why she voted for the war in Iraq and then changed her mind. Unfortunately, Clinton blew it there. She should’ve said what Trump has been saying all along. “Bush lied, and the Republican party knew it.”

All Clinton had to say was, “I was lied to just like the rest of the world – there were no weapons of mass destruction – Bush lied. Look at all the lives lost because of it.” But she didn’t and it was a big missed opportunity. She could’ve garnered some votes on that one – Too bad. Hopefully she’ll learn from it and next time nail the republican party.

Lastly, Lauer knew Trump lied about supporting the Iraq war (Trump says he opposed the war way before the invasion, {He’s such an LSOS} but facts say he didn’t.), but Lauer didn’t say a thing…he just moved on to the next question. Wha’at?! As the Huff Po stated, Lauer Cowers. Yes, he did. Lauer’s no different than the rest of the media: “…reporters have repeatedly let the Republican presidential candidate tell a revisionist version of his past stance without pushing back on the claim.” 

I’ve said all I want to say right now. No doubt you’ll all have more to add. Me? I’m going onto today’s topic.

Trump claims he knows more about ISIS than our military. Uh huh. He also thinks he knows everything about missiles. Right.

Here’s the write from The Trump Files on Mother Jones. The Trump files: A daily dose of telling episodes, strange but true stories, or curious scenes from the life of presumptive GOP nominee Donald Trump.

Donald’s Nuclear Negotiating Fantasy

The billionaire was once convinced he could cut a magnificent nuclear weapons deal with the Soviet Union.

In the 1980s, Donald Trump became a global symbol of wealth and success who was planning to build the tallest skyscraper in the world. But the one deal he really wanted to cut was an arms reduction treaty with the Soviet Union that would take nuclear missiles off the Cold War’s battlefield. It’s now clear that Trump knows quite literally nothing about nuclear weapons, but then he fantasized going toe-to-toe with the Russkies at the nuclear bargaining table.

“It’s something that somebody should do that knows how to negotiate and not the kind of representatives that I have seen in the past,” he told the Washington Post in 1984. “It would take an hour-and-a-half to learn everything there is to learn about missiles…I think I know most of it anyway.”

Three years later, growing even more alarmed about Libya and other rogue nations getting the bomb, he told author Ron Rosenbaum that he was indeed working with the Reagan White House on nukes. “I’m dealing at a very high level on this,” he said.

Trump was frightened about the spread of nuclear technology—he seemed at one point during the interview to suggest the United States should bomb France to keep it from selling nuclear know-how—and worried about the deal-making skills of American officials. “They have no smiles, no warmth; there’s no sense of them as people,” Trump complained. “Who the hell wants to talk to them? They don’t have the ability to go into a room and sell a deal. They’re not sellers in the positive sense.”

“I used to laugh when I thought back on Trump and me in [the 21 Club] talking nukes,” Rosenbaum wrote for Slate this year. “I’m not laughing anymore.”

*****

Readers: Your turn. Thoughts on this or that? Blog me.

Oh…I’m headed out of town. I’ll still be blogging but you won’t hear much more from me personally until I return.

Peace out. 

Lastly, greed over a great story is surfacing from my “loyal”(?) readers. With all this back and forth about who owns what, that appears on my blog, let me reiterate that all material posted on my blog becomes the sole property of my blog. If you want to reserve any proprietary rights don’t post it to my blog. I will prominently display this caveat on my blog from now on to remind those who may have forgotten this notice.

Gratefully your blog host,

michelle

Aka BABE: We all know what this means by now :)

If you love my blog and my writes, please make a donation via PayPal, credit card, or e-check, please click the “Donate” button below. (Please only donations from those readers within the United States. – International readers please see my “Donate” page)

Or if you would like to send a check via snail mail, please make checks payable to “Michelle Moquin”, and send to:

Michelle Moquin PO Box 29235 San Francisco, Ca. 94129

Thank you for your loyal support!

All content on this site are property of Michelle Moquin © copyright 2008-2016

me

“Though she be but little, she be fierce.” – William Shakespeare Midsummer Night’s Dream 

" Politics, god, Life, News, Music, Family, Personal, Travel, Random, Photography, Religion, Aliens, Art, Entertainment, Food, Books, Thoughts, Media, Culture, Love, Sex, Poetry, Prose, Friends, Technology, Humor, Health, Writing, Events, Movies, Sports, Video, Christianity, Atheist, Blogging, History, Work, Education, Business, Fashion, Barack Obama, People, Internet, Relationships, Faith, Photos, Videos, Hillary Clinton, School, Reviews, God, TV, Philosophy, Fun, Science, Environment, Design, The Page, Rants, Pictures, Church, Blog, Nature, Marketing, Television, Democrats, Parenting, Miscellaneous, Current Events, Film, Spirituality, Obama, Musings, Home, Human Rights, Society, Comedy, Me, Random Thoughts, Research, Government, Election 2008, Baseball, Opinion, Recipes, Children, Iraq, Funny, Women, Economics, America, Misc, Commentary, John McCain, Reflections, All, Celebrities, Inspiration, Lifestyle, Theology, Linux, Kids, Games, World, India, Literature, China, Ramblings, Fitness, Money, Review, War, Articles, Economy, Journal, Quotes, NBA, Crime, Anime, Islam, 2008, Stories, Prayer, Diary, Jesus, Buddha, Muslim, Israel, Europe, Links, Marriage, Fiction, American Idol, Software, Leadership, Pop culture, Rants, Video Games, Republicans, Updates, Political, Football, Healing, Blogs, Shopping, USA, Class, Matrix, Course, Work, Web 2.0, My Life, Psychology, Gay, Happiness, Advertising, Field Hockey, Hip-hop, sex, fucking, ass, Soccer, sox"

Posted in Lying Sacks Of Shit, Political Powwow | 61 Comments »

My Freedom Isn’t In Society

Posted by Michelle Moquin on September 7th, 2016

Bookmark and Share

…It’s In The Man I’m Trying To Be

Carla: Your post is still haunting my heart. The fact that I couldn’t find anything is so disturbing to me. I found this on Think Progress. It made me think of your story.

This is such a sad story of a young talented man who had so much to offer and so much going for him in his life. He was taken away…no, he was killed, and who knows if the truth will ever be revealed. Unfortunately this is the case for many who are at the mercy of these “special officers” who rule the grounds they walk.

The Mysterious Private Police Force That’s Killing People In The Nation’s Capital

1*KUpqSiSmOmF5vmfVU7XnoA

The last time Beverly Smith had a full conversation with her son, Alonzo, was October 30, 2015. It was a Friday, and even though the weekend had just begun, he was thrilled about the upcoming week. The 27-year-old, who worked with special needs students, had booked several gigs as a part-time portrait model.

When she received the news, Beverly couldn’t have known it would be the last time she’d share a joyful moment with her youngest child.

Early the next day, she sent Alonzo a standard text message about his plans for the weekend, and he responded as usual. But when she sent a second message later that night, she didn’t receive a reply. The following day, she shot off two more texts — both of which went unanswered. That’s when she knew something wasn’t right.

Beverly frantically called Alonzo several times, but the phone kept going straight to voicemail.

On Monday, November 2, she reached out twice — in the afternoon and evening — to no avail. Within minutes of the second try, two internal affairs officers from the Metropolitan Police Department (MPD) appeared in front of her house. One was holding a picture of a young black man.

As soon as Beverly opened the door, the officers asked if the man in the photo was her son.

“They said, ‘I’m sorry to inform you, but your son was in an altercation with two special police officers and he passed,’” Beverly said, sitting on her plush living room couch in Anacostia, a neighborhood in the southeast part of Washington, D.C. She had no idea what they meant at the time, and asked if Alonzo was stabbed or shot.

“They said, ‘No Ms. Smith. All we know is that he was in an altercation with two special police officers and he passed. But we want you to know, Ms. Smith, that we (MPD) didn’t have anything to do with it.’”

Screen Shot 2016-09-06 at 8.23.07 PM

Special police at Brookland Manor, Washington D.C. CREDIT: CARIMAH TOWNES

Special police officers like the two that killed Alonzo are not quite full police officers, but they’re more than security guards. They are a private police force, empowered to make arrests and carry guns. But because they work for private contractors and not public agencies, their actions are often shrouded in mystery.

Ten months after that conversation with the officers on her doorstep, Beverly has started to piece together a fragmented picture of how her son was killed. But there are many unanswered questions about what happened on November 1.

Witnesses told her family they heard a man running through the privately-owned Marbury Plaza apartments in southeast D.C., pleading for help. He was pounding on people’s doors, yelling, “They’re trying to kill me.”

Around 4 a.m., MPD officers were alerted about an assault. By the time they arrived, Smith’s body was splayed at the top of a stairwell, his head hanging over the ledge. He was shirtless, unconscious, and unable to breathe.

Videos captured on MPD body cameras offer a grainy version of what happened next. Special police officers handcuffed Smith and kneed him in the back, before an MPD officer directed them to make sure he was breathing. When they finally attempted CPR, an unidentified officer said, “All I know is that security had to subdue him, when he was under the influence of PCP.”

Smith was transported to a local hospital, where he died later that morning. Six weeks later, an autopsy report conducted by the city’s chief medical examiner ruled the death a homicide. According to the examiner, Smith’s body was covered in abrasions, chest contusions, and showed internal hemorrhaging in his neck and back. Ultimately, the report says he was killed by a “sudden cardiac arrest” and compression of the torso. Contradicting the special officers at the scene, the examiner concluded there was no PCP in his system, but the 27-year-old did suffer from “acute cocaine toxicity while restrained.” Beverly disputes that particular finding, and has since asked for an independent examination.

“They robbed me of the opportunity of feeling and touching my son’s warm body for the last time.”

On November 3, the MPD said it was investigating the incident, and a grand jury convened in December to determine whether or not the special officers should be charged. But authorities have been tight-lipped about their findings the entire time.

As the MPD remains mum, the private company that the special officers worked for, Blackout Investigations and Security Services, is equally quiet about the homicide.

Almost one year has passed since the fatal encounter with special officers, and aside from the autopsy results, Beverly is still missing crucial details about what happened. She doesn’t know why Alonzo was at the apartment complex. She doesn’t know the names of the special officers who apprehended her son, why they had done so in the first place, and how Alonzo sustained all of his injuries.

What she does know is that she never had a chance to say goodbye. Though Alonzo was still alive when they took him to the hospital, no one contacted Beverly until more than a day after his death. She was told the officers had no way to find her. To her, that remains one of the biggest injustices of all.

“That will be unforgivable. Because my son had his phone on him and they claimed they could not find me,” Beverly said. “They robbed me of the opportunity of feeling and touching my son’s warm body for the last time.”

Screen Shot 2016-09-06 at 8.26.13 PM

Alonzo had an incredible work ethic, always juggling at least two jobs, his mother said.

That drive manifested itself early in life. When he was five years old, living in Maryland with his mother, Alonzo expressed over and over that he wanted a job, Beverly recalled. Eventually, their maintenance man came up with one: repairing a doorknob he’d intentionally broken for Alonzo to fix.

“What was so funny was, he got up the next morning. I was still in the bed sleep. He got dressed all by himself, and he woke me up and said, ‘Ma, Ma! How do I look for my first day of work?’” Beverly said.

That eagerness to help was a trait Alonzo carried through adulthood. He attended Morgan State University, where he spent two years working on a degree in social work. He was forced to take a break, because he was living alone and needed to support himself financially. In the interim, he worked with young people with special needs at Accotink Academy in Virginia — a place where he felt he could truly make a difference in kids’ lives. He had struggled in junior high, and related to his students on a deep level.

“He always felt that he didn’t fit in. He didn’t fit the mold. He dressed real neat — things of that nature. The kids used to tease him on the way that he’d speak,” Beverly said. “He’d say, ‘Mom, those kids are just misunderstood.’’’

Screen Shot 2016-09-06 at 8.39.38 PM

In between jobs, he played flag football and wrote poems, some of which he published in a book called Lost Soul in 2013.

Before November, Beverly was tuned in to police brutality happening around the country, particularly after the death of Michael Brown. Yet she never thought she’d be one of the mothers seeking justice — and answers — because her child was killed by police.

Nationwide, it’s extremely difficult to get information from federal, state, and municipal police about any form of misconduct — especially extrajudicial killings. The criminal justice system is designed in such a way that police wrongdoing is nearly impossible to prove.

Time and time again officers who use any type of force lie about their actions to investigators and superiors, in order to avoid disciplinary action. Such was the case when Officer Jason Van Dyke claimed Laquan McDonald lunged at police with a knife in Chicago, when Officer Michael Slager accused a fleeing Walter Scott of reaching for his firearm in Charleston, and when Public Safety Trooper Brian Encinia lied about Sandra Bland assaulting him in Prairie View, Texas. Police accounts are hard to contradict if there aren’t recordings of what happened, and officers regularly turn off their cameras or destroy videos after an incident has occurred.

Procedural failures also complicate the fact-finding process. Oftentimes, officers aren’t interviewed by detectives right away, meaning they have time to come up with false accounts of what happened and manipulate investigations before they’ve even begun. In many cases, detectives stall to allow police departments to conduct their own probes first.

Still, most police departments are subject to public information laws that require them to turn over at least some records to anyone who wants them. Attorneys, investigators and journalists rely on this access to expose misconduct.

Special police officer activity is even harder to track. As is the case with the two involved in Smith’s homicide, official investigations are conducted behind closed doors. And because they technically work for private companies, special officers and their employers aren’t legally obligated to respond to public records requests.

Screen Shot 2016-09-06 at 8.43.08 PM

Beyond DC, a handful of cities and states contract with security companies to employ special police officers who face far less scrutiny than traditional law enforcement, even though they operate almost identically. These companies establish their own standards and procedures, disciplinary measures, and managerial discretion. They are then hired by local businesses, government agencies, schools, and developers who might want extra security in their buildings— many of which are occupied by poor residents of color.

Today, D.C. has 120 private companies that employ 16,580 law enforcement agents: 7,720 special officers along with 8,860 guards, stationed at apartment buildings, colleges, commercial buildings, and hospitals, compared to approximately 3,700 MPD officers in the city. Some are stationed in D.C. government buildings, including the Wilson Building, where the mayor and city council member’s offices are located. And 4,523 of those special officers are armed.

Even though they are hired by private companies, special officers are commissioned by the city government to work alongside but independently of the MPD.

The primary difference between the MPD’s officers and special officers is that the latter group’s authority is limited to the private properties they’re hired to protect, whereas the MPD has jurisdiction everywhere. In many ways, though, the line between MPD officers and special officers is a blurry one.

A General Order released by the MPD in 1993 says special officers function much like MPD officers in that they have the power to make arrests and carry firearms — privileges that private security guards aren’t afforded. Special officers are also allowed to use force on the properties they’re employed to oversee.

“You can’t just have an MPD officer just stationed in a building all day long. You can have a special police officer or security officer do that,” Helder Gil, a legislative analyst for the City Administrator’s office, told ThinkProgress. “So if you’ve got a situation where there’s a break-in at a building, a special police officer can arrest the individual for breaking into the building, [and] hold that individual until MPD officers arrive on scene.”

Before they operate in the field, special officers go through a background check by the MPD’s Security Officers Management Branch (SOMB).

“The problem is power. We don’t have the power to tell the police the way that they’re supposed to behave.”

With such a robust presence throughout the city, there are certainly times when special officers are able to protect civilians. For instance, in 2009, special officers subdued an anti-Semitic shooter at the Holocaust Museum, saving countless lives. One officer, Stephen T. Johns, was killed in the line of duty.

As for when special officers use force, the General Order states that they can be arrested and suspended “for any offence which would justify suspension of a member the [MPD]” — a determination made by the SOMB. Discipline falls under the jurisdiction of the companies they work for, but the MPD’s Office of Communications told ThinkProgress in an email that the MPD’s Internal Affairs Division and U.S. Attorney’s Office are responsible for investigating serious use-of-force incidents.

Since they operate on their own, gathering information about misconduct and special officer brutality can be even more difficult than probing government-run law enforcement agencies.

Perhaps the most well-known use-of-force incident besides Smith’s happened in September 2015. Special officers killed James McBride, a 74-year-old MedStar Washington Hospital Center patient who walked out of the facility without express permission. His death was also ruled a homicide, when the chief medical examiner discovered that McBride died from “blunt force injuries of neck, with cervical spinal cord transection and vertebral artery compression.”

Both officers involved in McBride’s death were indicted in less than four months.

Beyond the high-profile cases, however, information about special officers’ use of force throughout the city is extremely limited. What little information is available paints a picture of an unaccountable body of agents that frequently uses abusive tactics.

Screen Shot 2016-09-06 at 8.43.55 PM

To understand this dynamic, one only needs to visit Brookland Manor, an affordable housing complex made up of 535 units in Northeast D.C. The property owner, Mid-City Financial, wants to demolish and rebuild the property, and housing lawyers contend that it hired special officers to intimidate residents and force them to leave. Mid-City Financial did not respond to request for comment on these allegations.

Special police prevent residents from smoking outside, leaning on fences surrounding the apartment buildings, standing on grass and steps, and playing loud music, according to Vincent DeLaurentis of ONE DC, an organization dedicated to housing equity that works closely with the Washington Legal Clinic. If people are caught breaking the rules, they’re cited for infractions and threatened with eviction. Those who aren’t on the lease — including children and unwed domestic partners — are handed barring notices that prohibit them from walking on Brookland Manor property altogether.

“Every day it’s a different rule or something where they got to say something to us,” Neeka Sullivan, who’s lived at Brookland Manor for about nine years, told ThinkProgress.

In her time there, Sullivan has spoken to countless special officers and security personnel who’ve given her contradicting orders. Sometimes she’s allowed to sit on her porch — other times she’s not. One day she’s allowed to play with her grandchild in her building’s courtyard. The next day she’s told to move to the sidewalk, she said.

Screen Shot 2016-09-06 at 8.49.12 PM

Because the rules are arbitrary and the threat of eviction looms over them, people of all ages are scared of what the officers will do. Sullivan says kids run away, the second they see special police in the area. She’s also seen the officers “get fresh” with young girls, commenting on how they’re dressed and asking how old they are. When there is a real threat, the officers are reluctant to help and tell residents to call the police, she said.

Another resident with several children told ThinkProgress that she’s received 4–5 notices since a July 4th incident involving her son. When the young boy was playing with fireworks in front of their building, he was apprehended by special officers for being too loud. His mother was subsequently told to keep him under control or the entire family would be kicked out — a message sent to her multiple times.

While harassment seems to be the primary way that special officers target people living at Brookland Manor, residents say physical force is also used at the whim of people on patrol.

Gary Good, a 56-year-old tenant who uses a wheelchair told ThinkProgress that he’s personally been a victim of that violence on several occasions over the five years he’s lived in the apartment complex.

The first time, he said, was a Tuesday in June. He was sitting outside in his wheelchair, smoking a cigarette, but officers nearby believed he was smoking another substance. All of a sudden, he said, they walked up to him and threw him from his chair, onto the sidewalk.

Good said he wasn’t charged with a crime. But two days later, special officers attacked him again.

“The security guards came and for no reason, no reason at all, started harassing me, and threw me out of my chair, threw me on the ground, and maced my face, [and] called me ‘HIV,’” Good said. He bit one of the officers as they tried to force him to the ground, so he was handcuffed and reported to the MPD. “[The special officers] had me on the ground for maybe four hours before the police even came and got me and arrested me.”

He was taken to the police station and charged with assaulting an officer, although he wasn’t charged for an offense leading up to the brutal encounter. His court appearance is scheduled for next month.

With his case pending, Good is searching for justice. He filed a complaint and is trying to sue the officers for defamation of character. So far, though, nothing has been done. Good isn’t certain there will be a way to hold them accountable.

“We’re living in fear. We feel like we’re in prison, and the guards just walk and tell you what you can do and what you can’t do.”

In light of tenant grievances, ONE DC and attorney Will Merrifield of the Washington Legal Clinic recently launched a campaign to mobilize them and teach them what their rights are. The organizers are legally permitted to do so, but they too have been targeted by special officers on the property — told they’re trespassing and threatened with arrest.

Such an incident occurred on August 11, when Merrifield and ONE DC passed out fact sheets and details about an upcoming event to learn more about organizing. As advocates went door to door, two special officers approached them and said they were littering and loitering. Officers also shadowed the organizers, walking behind them as they walked into the buildings to talk to residents.

Still, the organizers’ treatment pales in comparison to what Brookland Manor residents encounter every single day.

“We’re living in fear. We feel like we’re in prison, and the guards just walk and tell you what you can do and what you can’t do,“ Sullivan said. “They’re trying to push us out the door.”

Screen Shot 2016-09-06 at 8.51.36 PM

Although they work for private entities, special police officers ultimately belong to a complex network of police in the nation’s capital that operates alongside the MPD, the city’s primary police force, Secret Service, Capitol Police, U.S. Park Police, the Metro Transit Police Department, the D.C. Protective Services Division, and a litany of other law enforcement agencies.

Even without these other agencies, MPD has an expansive presence in the district. In 2012, the Federal Bureau of Investigation (FBI) reported that D.C. has the most officers per resident out of every U.S. city with more than 50,000 people.

Though D.C. has experienced rapid gentrification for over a decade, with the black population free falling from 70 percent in 1970 to 49.5 percent in 2010, black residents are still targeted by police at alarming rates. They are disproportionately stopped and arrested, using what some locals refer to as “paramilitary tactics.” The majority of arrests are made for nonviolent offenses, and most occur in wards with black majorities, such as Ward 8, where Smith was killed.

This culture of policing has left many black people wary of law enforcement. A survey of 1,000 residents by the Community Preservation and Development Corporation revealed that one in five African Americans don’t feel safe around law enforcement, compared to 5 percent of white residents surveyed.

Several tenants of the housing project where Smith was killed told ThinkProgress that additional security is welcome. They fear break-ins and other criminal activity in the complex.

But Beverly and other activists think there’s a way to keep residents safe without terrorizing them.

“The problem is power. We don’t have the power to tell the police the way that they’re supposed to behave.”

As protests against police violence sweep the country, D.C. officers and lawmakers have expressed support for small improvements to the city’s police culture. In April 2015, Mayor Muriel Bowser announced that every MPD officer would be required to wear body cameras within 18 months — a decision that earned a tepid response from local activists fighting for reform. In July, ten council members proposed a “ceremonial” resolution to reform the MPD, vaguely asking for the department to be studied and for “necessary improvements to reduce incidences of police shootings and use of violence.”

After Smith and McBride’s deaths, lawmakers also proposed legislation targeting special officers — who aren’t legally obligated to adopt MPD reforms unless they are specifically ordered to so by a general order issued by the police chief.

Last December, Councilman Kenyon McDuffie proposed the Special Police Officer Enhanced Security Amendment Act of 2015, which would require special officers to complete pre-assignment search, seizure, arrest, and use of force training for 24 hours — as opposed to 16 — and 32 hours for emergency protocol training and terrorism readiness.

In June, Bowser proposed even more training, which will be considered by the Council in September. Under her plan, special police officers would have to undergo 80 hours of pre-assignment training and 24 hours of on-the-job training — more than twice the number of hours that’s required of them now.

The mayor and chief cited Smith’s death as the inspiration for reform. Indeed, the proposed training seems to specifically target the tactics that officers used on him.

Screen Shot 2016-09-06 at 8.53.07 PM

But many D.C. residents, including Beverly, are skeptical that officer training — which has also been proposed in places like Ferguson, Los Angeles, New Orleans, and Cleveland — will be enough to fix the problem.

Beverly belongs to a coalition of activists formed after Alonzo’s homicide, called the Pan-African Community Action (PACA), which argues that a drastic overhaul of the system is the only way to make real change.

More training doesn’t necessarily equate to better policing, argues Ben Woods, one of PACA’s cofounders. The problem, according to Woods, is the nature of modern-day policing itself.

“They’re doing exactly what they’re being trained to do,” he said.

That’s why community control of police is PACA’s ultimate goal. Down the line, the group wants residents in each ward to have the power to vote for or against the police forces in their community. A randomly-selected group would then sit on a civilian board to steer police policy.

Screen Shot 2016-09-06 at 8.54.24 PM

“We’re arguing that the main problem we have is not racist police,” Woods explained, during one of PACA’s informational meetings in Ward 8. “The problem is power. We don’t have the power to tell the police the way that they’re supposed to behave.”

If civilians have no authority, cops can keep killing people like Alonzo and get away with it.

“I want to say, ‘I’m paying your salary. This is what you’re gonna do if you’re going to patrol this neighborhood,’” Woods added. “‘If you’re not gonna do it, you’re gonna leave.’ Not just say that, I want to actually be able to fire them if they don’t do it.”

Even if the MPD were to fully embrace these community-based reforms, however, they still wouldn’t touch privatized police forces.

By law, companies are autonomous entities with legal authority to hire and fire their own employees. They aren’t beholden to the same rules and regulations that govern the public sector, so reforms to public officers wouldn’t stop them from employing additional security personnel. Preventing companies from using special officers in particular would require new corporate laws.

Under a community-control model, members of the board could potentially amend the General Order that gives them arrest, use of force, and firearm powers to assist the MPD.

Since day one, Alonzo has always been at the heart of PACA’s mission and work. The group launched the Justice 4 Zo campaign last year to demand accountability for the special officers involved, calling for the officers to be charged, a full explanation about what transpired on the morning of November 1, and more transparency among private police forces.

To Beverly, seeking justice for Alonzo is part and parcel of changing the status quo.

Screen Shot 2016-09-06 at 8.55.58 PM

Much like she didn’t see her son’s homicide coming, Beverly never saw herself as a community organizer. But educating others and pushing for social change has become a full-time job and helped her push through unrelenting grief.

”My son is on my mind from the time I get up ’til I go to bed,” she said. “The most important thing for me right now that keeps me from not losing my mind is actively being involved and fighting for justice for my son — talking about it, going on radio shows, rallies and marches and things of that nature.”

Alonzo motivates her work, but Beverly also feels a responsibility to help black people in general, due to the fact that they are disproportionately killed by law enforcement.

“Everything basically has changed. I’m just not the same person anymore. I guess they say it’s part of the grieving process,” she said.

When she’s not on the go, Beverly crochets and makes spiritual plates to stay busy. Despair tends to hit her hardest during those quiet, lonely moments. She’s struggled with deep depression, ever since Alonzo was killed, and is easily triggered — breaking down in public at random times.

Beverly also lives her life in a state of panic.

“Sometimes I’m up 24 hours, 48 hours ‘cause of the anxiety level,” she explained. “I’m always wondering, ‘Who are these special police officers? What happened?’ On top of grieving and losing my son, him being murdered — not knowing what happened — makes it harder.”

Until she finds the answers to her burning questions, she’ll never stop searching for them.

“I don’t look at it as a burden,” she said. “I look at it as a duty to fight for justice for my son and for others.”

💪🏽♀♥️

Readers: Once again, it looks like these “special officers” don’t have any accountability for their killings. Another black kid who will never reach his full potential because he was murdered. My heart goes out to Beverly Smith and all the other black people who lose their loved ones from brutal thugs. This time from officers who prey on people in communities who don’t have any power because they don’t have a say in how the officers should behave.

It’s infuriating and frustrating to me. And sad, so sad. For some reason this one has gotten to my emotions. Perhaps it is because of his profound poems that move me so, or his promising life full with potential that will never be realized, leaving so many missing out of what he would’ve shared with the world.

I feel helpless. My heart feels heavy. God knows how his mother must feel. I HOPE for her sake, Ms Smith stays strong in pursuing getting justice for her son and others like him.

Zen Lill: I guess we were on the same google path. I just noticed when I was catching up on reading that you found Fembot’s post at Snopes too. :)

Blog me.

Peace & Love: “Live, it, Give it.”

Lastly, greed over a great story is surfacing from my “loyal”(?) readers. With all this back and forth about who owns what, that appears on my blog, let me reiterate that all material posted on my blog becomes the sole property of my blog. If you want to reserve any proprietary rights don’t post it to my blog. I will prominently display this caveat on my blog from now on to remind those who may have forgotten this notice.

Gratefully your blog host,

michelle

Aka BABE: We all know what this means by now :)

If you love my blog and my writes, please make a donation via PayPal, credit card, or e-check, please click the “Donate” button below. (Please only donations from those readers within the United States. – International readers please see my “Donate” page)

Or if you would like to send a check via snail mail, please make checks payable to “Michelle Moquin”, and send to:

Michelle Moquin PO Box 29235 San Francisco, Ca. 94129

Thank you for your loyal support!

All content on this site are property of Michelle Moquin © copyright 2008-2016

me

“Though she be but little, she be fierce.” – William Shakespeare Midsummer Night’s Dream 

" Politics, god, Life, News, Music, Family, Personal, Travel, Random, Photography, Religion, Aliens, Art, Entertainment, Food, Books, Thoughts, Media, Culture, Love, Sex, Poetry, Prose, Friends, Technology, Humor, Health, Writing, Events, Movies, Sports, Video, Christianity, Atheist, Blogging, History, Work, Education, Business, Fashion, Barack Obama, People, Internet, Relationships, Faith, Photos, Videos, Hillary Clinton, School, Reviews, God, TV, Philosophy, Fun, Science, Environment, Design, The Page, Rants, Pictures, Church, Blog, Nature, Marketing, Television, Democrats, Parenting, Miscellaneous, Current Events, Film, Spirituality, Obama, Musings, Home, Human Rights, Society, Comedy, Me, Random Thoughts, Research, Government, Election 2008, Baseball, Opinion, Recipes, Children, Iraq, Funny, Women, Economics, America, Misc, Commentary, John McCain, Reflections, All, Celebrities, Inspiration, Lifestyle, Theology, Linux, Kids, Games, World, India, Literature, China, Ramblings, Fitness, Money, Review, War, Articles, Economy, Journal, Quotes, NBA, Crime, Anime, Islam, 2008, Stories, Prayer, Diary, Jesus, Buddha, Muslim, Israel, Europe, Links, Marriage, Fiction, American Idol, Software, Leadership, Pop culture, Rants, Video Games, Republicans, Updates, Political, Football, Healing, Blogs, Shopping, USA, Class, Matrix, Course, Work, Web 2.0, My Life, Psychology, Gay, Happiness, Advertising, Field Hockey, Hip-hop, sex, fucking, ass, Soccer, sox"

Posted in Human Rights and Equality | 17 Comments »

Team Trump

Posted by Michelle Moquin on September 6th, 2016

Bookmark and Share

Good morning!

I HOPE everyone had a wonderful holiday weekend.

I was asking the same question myself. You?

From the Huff Po:

Hey Does Anyone Find Roger Ailes’ Recent Career Trajectory Puzzling, Or Is It Just Me?

I don’t know if anyone noticed, but he went from being ousted at Fox News under scandal to advising a presidential campaign.

Roger Ailes, chairman and CEO of Fox News answers questions during panel discussion at Television Critics Association summer press tour in Pasadena

Over at Daily Intelligencer, Gabriel Sherman has a fresh account of the banishment of Roger Ailes from the Fox News Channel, focused mainly on the women at Fox who meticulously built their case against the infamous network head in response to years of sexual harassment. You can revisit many of the gory details of the case: the snide sexist comments, the way Ailes treated his female talent as objects for his on-demand titillations, and the retreat to intimidation whenever one of Ailes’ victims dared to stand up to him. All in all, it paints the picture of an ouster that was justly deserved.

Here’s an interesting side detail to this whole story, though. Ailes went from being forced out at Fox News under a grotesque, career-ending scandal to ― hey, let me double-check this … oh, yeah, here we go ― advising a presidential campaign.

That’s like … fffffucked up, man! I think that maybe more people should talk about this?

Of course, many people have noted that Ailes has ended up in the advisory orbit of GOP presidential candidate and sewage-poisoned log flume Donald Trump. One can’t help but notice this because, of late, the Trump campaign has seemingly made a mission of collecting many of the right wing’s more diabolical characters, “Pokemon Go”-style.

Trump traded up friend-to-dictators Paul Manafort for the dick-to-his-friends Steve Bannon, who apparently nurtured a rancid corporate culture of his own over at Breitbart News. More recently, Trump added Citizens United hatchet-man David Bossie to his camp as deputy campaign manager. They join ranks that include famed “dirty trickster” Roger Stone, trench-mouthed adviser Carl Paladino, and the perpetually hanging on hanger-on Corey Lewandowski, whose relationship to the campaign ― maybe he’s in, maybe he’s not ― seems to depend on the wind direction. (Recent acquisition Kellyanne Conway is the seasoned professional who’s been tasked with extracting a functioning, professional campaign from this rogues’ gallery ― that is, if she has any time left between all the occasions Ailes asks her to “give him a little twirl.”)

So, yeah, maybe it’s easy to lose a Roger Ailes in that sketchy wilderness, but one would think that the fact that Ailes got tossed from the news network he led to prominence after it came to light that he’d been routinely terrorizing his female employees might make it just a little bit harder. (Harder still, when you factor in the allegations he was using shareholder money for what amounted to prostitution, the “black box” espionage operation he set up within Fox, and the massive settlements he paid out to keep all of this quiet.)

Strangely however, the fact that Ailes’ workplace scandal ― the very thing that made it possible for him to advise the Trump campaign in a formal capacity in the first place ― doesn’t seem to come up all that often, and when it does, it never comes with any sort of accompanying comment noting that it’s really, really messed up that the guy went from his specific sort of tawdry downfall to the inner circle of a presidential campaign, or that this is the sort of hire that most presidential campaigns try to not make at this stage of the game.

The New York Times, in its initial report on Ailes’ involvement with the campaign, very quickly notes that Ailes was “ousted … over charges of sexual harassment.” But the same piece moves quickly to suggest that for Ailes, “being connected with Mr. Trump’s campaign could be a form of redemption after he was pushed out of the powerful network that he helped build.” Leaving aside the fact that the Trump campaign seems to the planet’s least likely repository of spiritual salvation, how would this work? It would seem that Ailes’ path to “redemption” would necessarily include a raft of apologies and the making of substantial restitution to the women he abused.

“Still,” writes the Times, “Mr. Ailes’s involvement is certain to stoke controversy.” Not if you suggest that his involvement might lead to redemption it won’t!

CNN’s Brian Stelter, pointing out the strange way the Trump campaign seemed to not want to make its embrace of Ailes known ― endeavoring to distinguish Ailes as an adviser to Trump, but not to the campaign ― notes Ailes’ ouster and provides the understatement: “The distinction is significant because Ailes is a subject of controversy.” I’ll say! And attendant to that controversy is the fact that Trump actually defended Ailes during the swirling scandal. “I can tell you that some of the women that are complaining,” said Trump, “I know how much he’s helped them.” Sure, sure.

“It makes a certain sense,” writes The Atlantic’s David Graham, “that ― as The New York Times reports ― Roger Ailes, the recently ousted Fox News chief, is advising Donald Trump ahead of the presidential debates.”

But, does it??

“Whatever his failings,” Graham writes, “Ailes knows his way around TV and salesmanship.”

I mean, the whole fact that he made a practice of sexually harassing his on-air talent maybe suggests that these skills aren’t as amazing a commodity to a campaign as one might have previously imagined. Moreover, I’m having a really difficult time picturing a conversation between Ailes and Trump in which Trump accepts the premise that Ailes knows more about how to perform on television than the candidate does.

By far the oddest story on the Ailes-Trump team-up comes from The Washington Post’s Callum Borchers, in a piece titled, “Why Donald Trump and Roger Ailes are so cagey about their relationship.” Based on that headline, you’d think that this explanation would be very quickly and capably rendered, because of the rather obvious reason they’d need to be so cagey.

Per Borchers:

Now, CBS News reports that Ailes participated in a debate prep session Sunday. If the TV titan is assisting Trump, why so cagey? Why wouldn’t the two men just say they are working together?

A few explanations come to mind.

Well, there’s the one explanation ― the one! ― that comes to mind, sits there in the mind, pecks at the mind, demanding attention from the mind, that will only finally get on up out of your mind and leave you alone when you acknowledge it. What are these “few explanations?”

  1. “These are media-savvy men who understand that restricting information keeps the press interested.”
  2. “Another possible reason is that denying basic, factual truths is just a thing Trump does. It doesn’t even have to be bad stuff, necessarily. He just seems to get a kick out of telling journalists that their accurate reporting is actually wrong.”
  3. “It’s also worth considering the possibility that Ailes is the one who wants to keep his work for Trump — however informal — on the down-low … On the other hand, Ailes’s jumping aboard the Trump Train could tarnish the accolades he and Fox News received early in the GOP primary for tough coverage.”

Callum! Bruh! Don’t overthink this! They are being “cagey” because Roger Ailes watched his career go up in flames after he sexually harassed a bunch of his employees and then Trump turned around and gave this scoundrel a safe harbor.

“At first glance, it seems silly for Trump and Ailes to be so secretive,” writes Borchers, “But the closer you look, the more it makes sense.”

Okay, in the first place, this piece actually fails to make sense of it. But more importantly, the whole arrangement is what looks, at best, “silly.”

Right now, the Trump campaign should be working to make inroads with women voters. Ailes’ presence on the campaign makes that harder. Right now, the Trump campaign wants to keep attention away from his own sketchy workplace behavior. Ailes presence on the campaign makes that harder. The Trump campaign may want to make more hay out of Bill Clinton’s various sexual pecadillos ― something Trump has been signaling all year that he’s prepared to do. Ailes’ presence on the campaign … well, I’m sure I don’t need to underscore this.

There’s really only one way in which Ailes joining the Trump campaign can possibly make good sense, and that is if what we know as “the Trump campaign” is now in transition from a legitimate presidential candidacy to ― which is perhaps the most credible theory of what Trump is up to. In that context, joining forces with the ousted Ailes makes sense. The two men might very well be able to construct some new media venture on the backs of their combined talent and the teeming fanbase that Trump has acquired on his presidential run. (”Roger Ailes presents the Trump News Network: the global leader in Title IX complaints!”)

Let us reiterate, for the record: Roger Ailes, a man who was forced from his job running the world’s most successful news channel due to the fact he was a serial sexual harasser, has straightaway gone to work as an adviser to a major party’s presidential campaign.

That’s altogether bonkers, right? We can agree on that, can’t we?

It’s just probably something worth mentioning, on occasion.

[POSTSCRIPT: Serendipitously, Slate’s Michelle Goldberg had many of the same questions that I did today. Know hope!]

?!?!?!?

Readers: You know the saying that goes something like:  ”Show me who you hang with, I’ll tell you who you are?” I think that applies here. Misogynists hanging with fellow misogynists.

On another note…Happy you all loved the video of our beloved FLOTUS, shakin’ it down for a very good cause. I know it was originally posted over a month ago but I had never seen it {and if I didn’t, I assumed many others didn’t as well}, and most importantly this urgent message needed more exposure. So yeah, I was delighted to post it in the blogosphere – I feel it’s always a good time to post a write in support of my ♀ sisters around the world.♀ Thanks for all the sweet praise. ♡

Carla: Yes, I read about the situation in Brazil with the Olympics. It’s really too bad. Such a happy time for most of the athletes but not so for many who live there. Happy you are both thriving. I won’t ask.

I’m aware of the environmental destruction. But murdering of children? I couldn’t find anything when I googled. I guess they’re keeping it out of the media. Horrific…just horrific. It’s a crazy world. Good to hear from you again.

Fembot: Thanks for bringing this to light. However, you might want to check your story source before you post. It sounded a bit unbelievable so I checked it out. I believe you got snookered. Snopes.com says it is false. Don’t feel bad; it happens to the best of us. I know your intentions were good. In this crazy world, I wouldn’t be surprised if it was true.

Still…I signed with Moveon.org, NOT to fight women for being prosecuted for breastfeeding, {Did you read it?} but because… Idaho is one of only two states that does not provide protection for a woman’s right to breastfeed her child anywhere she is able to be. Breastfeeding women are often discriminated against and harassed for trying to do the best thing for their children. We need to protect the rights of our mothers and babies and help support a strong breastfeeding relationship.

I think it’s super important that mothers are supported. As mothers they have a right and a duty to make sure that their babies are being fed when needed. And they should feel comfortable wherever they are, and free from being discriminated and harassed. Who can’t agree to that? Sign the petition. Thanks.

That’s it for me. Happy Tuesday!

The blog is open. Blog me. 

Peace out. 

Lastly, greed over a great story is surfacing from my “loyal”(?) readers. With all this back and forth about who owns what, that appears on my blog, let me reiterate that all material posted on my blog becomes the sole property of my blog. If you want to reserve any proprietary rights don’t post it to my blog. I will prominently display this caveat on my blog from now on to remind those who may have forgotten this notice.

Gratefully your blog host,

michelle

Aka BABE: We all know what this means by now :)

If you love my blog and my writes, please make a donation via PayPal, credit card, or e-check, please click the “Donate” button below. (Please only donations from those readers within the United States. – International readers please see my “Donate” page)

Or if you would like to send a check via snail mail, please make checks payable to “Michelle Moquin”, and send to:

Michelle Moquin PO Box 29235 San Francisco, Ca. 94129

Thank you for your loyal support!

All content on this site are property of Michelle Moquin © copyright 2008-2016

me

“Though she be but little, she be fierce.” – William Shakespeare Midsummer Night’s Dream 

" Politics, god, Life, News, Music, Family, Personal, Travel, Random, Photography, Religion, Aliens, Art, Entertainment, Food, Books, Thoughts, Media, Culture, Love, Sex, Poetry, Prose, Friends, Technology, Humor, Health, Writing, Events, Movies, Sports, Video, Christianity, Atheist, Blogging, History, Work, Education, Business, Fashion, Barack Obama, People, Internet, Relationships, Faith, Photos, Videos, Hillary Clinton, School, Reviews, God, TV, Philosophy, Fun, Science, Environment, Design, The Page, Rants, Pictures, Church, Blog, Nature, Marketing, Television, Democrats, Parenting, Miscellaneous, Current Events, Film, Spirituality, Obama, Musings, Home, Human Rights, Society, Comedy, Me, Random Thoughts, Research, Government, Election 2008, Baseball, Opinion, Recipes, Children, Iraq, Funny, Women, Economics, America, Misc, Commentary, John McCain, Reflections, All, Celebrities, Inspiration, Lifestyle, Theology, Linux, Kids, Games, World, India, Literature, China, Ramblings, Fitness, Money, Review, War, Articles, Economy, Journal, Quotes, NBA, Crime, Anime, Islam, 2008, Stories, Prayer, Diary, Jesus, Buddha, Muslim, Israel, Europe, Links, Marriage, Fiction, American Idol, Software, Leadership, Pop culture, Rants, Video Games, Republicans, Updates, Political, Football, Healing, Blogs, Shopping, USA, Class, Matrix, Course, Work, Web 2.0, My Life, Psychology, Gay, Happiness, Advertising, Field Hockey, Hip-hop, sex, fucking, ass, Soccer, sox"

Posted in Lying Sacks Of Shit, Political Powwow | 15 Comments »