For Neda
Posted by Michelle Moquin on 22nd June 2010
It was a year this past Sunday, July 20th 2009, that Neda Soltan was brutally killed in the streets of Iran. And it was one year ago today that I wrote about her. I can’t believe that one entire year has gone by already. It feels like it was not so long ago when I first heard of Neda, the Angel of Iran.
Her death became a symbol of rebellion; her face, a symbol of hope. Her tragic death quickly went viral: Within just a few hours the rest of the world got to witness her last moments of life on Youtube. It was a vivid image, one so brutal, and yet so peaceful and innocent, that I like many others, will never forget.
How ironic that her name, ‘Neda’ means ‘voice’ in Farsi. Neda was the ‘voice’ of Iran, and a symbol of rebellion and hope, then…and continues to be to this day.
And now one year later, on the anniversary of her death, we get to see the kind of girl that Neda was. What did she want in life? What did she believe in? What did she like to do? Why did she die?
I ask, ‘What has changed for women, for the people of Iran since Neda’s death?’
On July 20th, HBO aired ’For Neda’, as part of their Summer Documentary Series. I believe it is also airing this evening on HBO. I watched it on Youtube last night. For those of you who won’t be able to catch it on HBO, I am including the entire documentary here. I encourage you to watch it. It gives us a good peek into the life of Neda and the disturbing treatment of women in Iran.
Filmmaker Antony Thomas’ look at the life of Neda Agha-Soltan, who was shot and killed during protests in Iran last summer, when footage of her death went viral. HBO’s synopsis says that the production was done “without official approval and at great risk, [as] Iranian journalist Saeed Kamali Dehghan worked secretly inside Iran to locate and film interviews with Neda’s family for the first time.” The network calls the film “a portrait of a young woman whose ordinary desires for personal freedom and self-expression were confined by living in the Islamic Republic of Iran,” and notes that “[e]ven as a young girl, Neda strove to lead her life in opposition to the regime’s restrictive treatment of women”
I found this write on the Muslim Media Watch written by Diana that I thought you would also find interesting:
As I snuggled on the couch to watch HBO’s documentary on Neda Agha-Soltan, I knew this wasn’t the time for popcorn. The first images that splashed across the screen were Agha-Soltan’s infamous last moments, which haunted viewers around the world exactly a year ago. The tone of onlookers and loved ones was agonizing, screaming as they crowded around her body, placing their hands over the bullet hole in her chest. As blood began to gush from her mouth and nose, Agha-Soltan’s eyes remained open. It was only a few moments before she died, but the video burned a memory in the hearts of many that will perhaps last for years to come.
The images of Agha-Soltan’s last moments were perhaps the most impressing images of the brutality and violence that unfolded after last year’s Iranian elections. Cell phone cameras and digital cameras became the weapon of choice for many of Iran’s population. They wanted to show the world the injustice they were suffering at the hands of the Islamic Republic of Iran.
HBO’s documentary For Neda delves into the life of Agha-Soltan to answer the questions of who she was, what she stood for, and why she died. The documentary elicits the testimony of Agha-Soltan’s family and recognized names such as Azar Nafisi, author of Reading Lolita in Tehran, and Dr. Ali Ansari, Professor of Iranian history at University of St. Andrews. The familiar voice of Shohreh Aghdashloo, an Iranian actress, narrates Agha-Soltan’s tale of courage. (Note: the trailer below contains explicit images of her death)
For Neda provides a limited understanding of the socio-political landscape of Iran and elicits only the testimony and experiences of those with a particular angle. The story of Neda Agha-Soltan was used here to paint a particular picture of Iran seen from the eyes of a certain kind of woman–a woman like Agha-Soltan.
For Iranian women who neither look like Agha-Soltan nor held the same desires or religious or political values as she, the documentary may be marginalizing. For Iranian women who are not like “any girl, anywhere,” it sends the message that their stories are not valued enough to be told and the injustices they face are not worthy of international attention. The diverse political and religious opinions of Iran’s population make it highly unlikely that any one woman could be the “face of the revolution.”
Agha-Soltan was described in the documentary as “a free spirit that is confined by a regime that does not value these qualities in a woman.” She is portrayed as an ordinary girl who loved to dance, listen to music, read books, and who wanted to be loved. Aghdashloo narrates, “In so many ways, any girl, anywhere, but this wasn’t anywhere, this was the Islamic republic of Iran, where even the clothes you wear have a political meaning.”
In between narrated commentary on the politics and status of women in Iran, the documentary gives a look into the life of Agha-Soltan through the testimony of her immediate family. Her story was used as platform to speak about the general status of women in Iran: Googoosh, a superstar who sought asylum outside Iran, and Rudi Bakhtiar of the International Campaign for Human Rights in Iran give their testimonies of living in Iran post-revolution. Both women offer the same perspective on the treatment of women in Iran and echo the same sentiments about the regime.
Nafisi posits that women seem to be irreligious as a result of the Iranian regime’s hijacking of religion, which translated into government control over women’s clothing. This was unbearable for Agha-Soltan, whose mother points out that she refused to wear the chador in school. There is only one picture shown of Agha-Soltan wearing hijab, perhaps to garner sympathy by reinforcing this sentiment that she was like any other woman and had to abide by Iran’s dress code.
I wondered if Agha-Soltan were pictured wearing the chador, would viewers feel as though they could identify with her? Would she have amassed such support? Or would she have been like many other women who died that year: forgotten? What about other women who were killed during this time? Why weren’t their names and images splashed all over the media and celebrated internationally?
In the days of protesting that followed the elections, Agha-Soltan was approached by three Basij women who said to her, “Dear, don’t come out looking so beautiful… do us a favor and don’t come out because Basiji men target beautiful girls and they will shoot you.”
These disturbingly ominous words, expressed that men, feeling threatened–in this case by a woman’s beauty–place the responsibility of the destruction of religious values on women and therefore attempt to make women invisible or disappear in order to preserve religion and culture.
On, June 20, 2009, this is what happened. However, the attempt to make Agha-Soltan disappear or to make her invisible was to no avail after the video of her death surfaced. Agha-Soltan, a girl like “any girl,” became a martyr. Activists and photojournalists like Reza Deghati went to task making “Neda masks.” They were distributed to over 100 capital cities around the world and were worn by protesters chanting, “We are Neda!”
The video of her death was one among many shocking videos; but unlike the other videos, the video of Agha-Soltan’s death were widely used to garner public sympathy. HBO’s documentary leaves the impression that Agha-Soltan became “the face of the revolution” mainly because she was like any girl anywhere. Through her death, she was able to focus international attention on the violence in Iran and elicit a response from international leaders.
However, Neda Agha-Soltan only represents one of the many faces of Iranian women and of the revolution. Had this been another face, a different Iranian woman, the international response and HBO’s documentary may have been very different.
Readers: I really enjoyed this documentary. Neda has been the symbol of Iran, to me. She was the face that I thought of whenever I heard from the girls in Iran…whenever they got the opportunity to blog me. Her death was the image that reminded me just how strong women are, just how much women can endure, in spite of their daily living conditions, in spite of being valued as half of a man.
The most ‘basic freedoms’ that we American women would never even think about, are daily restrictions women are forced to live by. Can you ever imagine calling ‘the ability to wear make-up how you please, or the clothing of your choice’ a ‘basic freedom’?
I have a new image that I now see when I think of women in Iran, and really any woman who is forced to be and act a certain way. And that image is of women freeing themselves from their hijab, exposing their beauty in all ways, smiling and celebrating their attainment as a whole human, equal to men. I hope to see that day soon.
Comments? Blog me.
Zen Lill: I thought you would enjoy this little bit of fun. Got your message. I was out in the backyard enjoying the last few moments of summer solstice sunlight. Would love to hear what you come up with in your research. Keep us posted – thanks.
Peter: What I don’t understand is why you think I would prevent you from posting? Do you think I enjoy getting hell from my readers, accusing me of preventing them from commenting? Hell no. Even if I could prevent you from posting, which I can, why would I only to hear the wrath of readers such as yourself? I’m not into self-infliction. The only thing I inflict upon myself is pleasure. :) Got it? So, that being said, your statement is a bit illogical don’t ya think? And the accusing gets very old.
Please don’t take this personally. This is meant to be a message to all of my readers who may, and do, think the same ridiculous thoughts. Although I seriously doubt this will be the end of it.
Hamilton: Perhaps you can think on it and get back to me? :) I will look forward to it.
Oh…by the way, Peter, George and Simon: You will get more.
Peace out.
Lastly, greed over a great story is surfacing from my ‘loyal’(?) readers. With all this back and forth about who owns what, that appears on my blog, let me reiterate that all material posted on my blog becomes the sole property of my blog. If you want to reserve any proprietary rights don’t post it to my blog. I will prominently display this caveat on my blog from now on to remind those who may have forgotten this notice.
Gratefully your blog host,
michelle
Aka BABE: We all know what this means by now :)
If you love my blog and my writes, please make a donation via PayPal, credit card, or e-check, please click the ‘Donate’ button below. (Please only donations from those readers within the United States. – International readers please see my ‘Donate’ page)
Posted in Good Reads and Good See'ds, Human Rights and Equality, Love, Sex & Relationships, Political Powwow | 10 Comments »



