Good morning!
As the United States begins to tidy up its affairs in Afghanistan, I have a bad feeling about the women we’ll leave behind.
We’re already confronted with reports — and horrific images — of attacks on women and girls: noses and ears sliced off, acid-ravaged faces, beatings, whippings, honor killings. Just this month comes the story of 15-year-old Sahar Gul, tortured in a basement for months by her new husband and in-laws, apparently because she refused to become a prostitute.
Injuries and mutilations that shocked even the battle-hardened military surgeons are punishments for any number of affronts to patriarchal sensibilities — from fleeing an abusive husband to refusing a forced marriage to pursuing an education.
If these outrages continue to happen while we’re there, what happens when we’re not?
The brutalities that rivet world attention for a news cycle or two are extreme examples of a wide and ongoing problem. The rights organization Oxfam International reports that 87 percent of Afghan women have experienced physical, sexual or psychological violence, as well as forced marriage, which Amnesty International says account for 80 percent of all marriages. According to the UK-based charity, Womankind, more than half of all girls married are not yet 16.
The threat-level for females is elevated by a government that is pursuing a policy of reconciliation by courting of the same Taliban that waged a campaign of gender apartheid. President Hamid Karzai now calls them “our upset brothers.”
There are early indications that the government — even without the Taliban under roof — is uprooting the tendrils of progress of the past ten years.
The new constitution may guarantee the rights of women. But it also says nothing can contradict the principles of Islamic law — which is undefined and open to interpretation by whoever happens to be in power.
Abdul Hadi Arghandiwal, leader of the ideologically conservative Hizb-i-Islami faction, believes that women and men should not attend the same universities, and that women should not leave the home unless in the company of a male relative. A Time Magazine article quotes his feelings: “What we want in Afghanistan is Islamic rights, not Western rights.” He also happens to be the Minister of the Economy.
Recently passed by a Parliament we hoped would enforce constitutional protections is a law that allows husbands to withhold money and food from wives who refuse sex, limits female inheritance, curtails female custody in divorce, and denies women freedom of movement unless sanctioned by their families. The mandated 25 percent of Parliament seats held by women could do nothing to stop it — in part because many of the 68 women vote with the men who put them in power.
There are those who say that none of this means the days of wanton Taliban brutality and repression will return. The world is now watching.
As we toss the keys to a government duct taped together out of parts of convenience and already limiting female freedoms — suppose the all-out cultural attack on women resumes. What exactly could the world do other than watch? Perhaps a strongly worded statement.
Women could be beaten in the streets on live TV, and their suffering would never give cause to a return to the $300 million America spends every day in Afghanistan not to mention the prospect of losing more American lives.
Recent history is a lesson in the relativity of women’s rights. Russia’s occupation was ugly. But life for women under the Communist government was a modern high point. Reforms provided real political roles, economic opportunity and social freedoms greater than women have today.
All of that was swept away by the Taliban in the five short years between 1996 and 2001. Then it was restored piecemeal by Western occupation and investment over the past ten.
The clear lesson is that the safety and dignity of the country’s women are hostage to the beliefs of the men who carry the guns. We saw in Vietnam and, possibly in Iraq, the convenient futility of propping up a government and its military just long enough to get out of town. As we pack up our guns and go, who and what will pick up the ones we leave behind?
It’s possible that guarantees for women in the Afghan constitution will withstand the power vacuum in the wake of our departure. It’s possible that the Taliban as part of the government will think differently than the one that brutally repressed human rights, and was perfectly happy to sacrifice health, economy and modernity in the name of purity. It’s possible that the new government will be strong enough — and the army loyal enough — to allow the Taliban to join the government without consuming it.
For the sake of the long-suffering Afghan woman, let’s hope that all comes to pass — because there is little we can do but watch in horror if it doesn’t.
*******
Readers: We can’t forget about these women and girls. I am certainly not going to. And if I can support and help effect change, I certainly will do my best. I HOPE you will too.
Howie: Nicely stated.
Uma & Anonymous: I read this recently in a magazine: “When a woman steals your husband, there is no better revenge than to let her keep him.”
Ken: Thanks for the heads up on this. I use their service as well. But thankfully I am not a Zappos user. For those that are, I HOPE they heed the advice and protect their identities.
Guys: With respect to Obama’s singing…c’mon guys…loved hearing from the girls but where was your lovin’? Obama’s serenade of “Lets Stay Together” was to his supporters…all of his supporters, not just the girls. Speaking of…
…Social Butterfly: I apologize that I didn’t see your comment until after I posted yesterday. If I had I would’ve either given you a nod, or thanked you for the inspiration to the blog topic if I hadn’t found the topic myself.
Blog Biz: Please note that when I get up in the morning, from around 7:30 AM to 8:30 AM, I try to read all of the comments that I see posted (if I’m lucky), and I begin to blog by responding to comments that I want to address in my daily blog write. After that period I am either busy researching my topic for the day or writing it. I try to post around 9:00 AM which I have to admit I have not been doing as of late.
Therefore, if you post a comment from around 8:30 AM till when I actually post, It is highly likely that I did not read your comment. In fact if I am a day or so behind in reading the comments, I may not even read the comments from the most current day. And I rarely switch back and forth between writing/research and reading to keep up with any comments that come in after 8:30 AM. I may see that a slew of them have come in, and make a comment like “Hey, I see lots more comments came in this morning”, but I don’t always read them. So please do not take it personally if I don’t see you comment to give you a nod and acknowledge you. It is not something I did intentionally.
Holly: It is mind boggling but people still will. When you have no problem lying to your wife who you supposedly love, just what will you lie about to people who you really don’t care about?
Erica: Their actions are sickening. Would love to send Maddie their way, but it would be too easy, would resolve nothing. If the people don’t see that they are Lying Sacks of Shit and do something, to prevent the election of the great white hope, then they deserve to get what they want. Because if Obama isn’t elected in 2012, it will not be a pretty picture for anyone.
Peace out.
Lastly, greed over a great story is surfacing from my “loyal”(?) readers. With all this back and forth about who owns what, that appears on my blog, let me reiterate that all material posted on my blog becomes the sole property of my blog. If you want to reserve any proprietary rights don’t post it to my blog. I will prominently display this caveat on my blog from now on to remind those who may have forgotten this notice.
Gratefully your blog host,
michelle
Aka BABE: We all know what this means by now :)
If you love my blog and my writes, please make a donation via PayPal, credit card, or e-check, please click the “Donate” button below. (Please only donations from those readers within the United States. – International readers please see my “Donate” page)
Or if you would like to send a check via snail mail, please make checks payable to “Michelle Moquin”, and send to:
Michelle Moquin PO Box 29235 San Francisco, Ca. 94129
Thank you for your loyal support!
All content on this site are property of Michelle Moquin © copyright 2008-2012
“Though she be but little, she be fierce.” – William Shakespeare Midsummer Night’s Dream
" Politics, god, Life, News, Music, Family, Personal, Travel, Random, Photography, Religion, Aliens, Art, Entertainment, Food, Books, Thoughts, Media, Culture, Love, Sex, Poetry, Prose, Friends, Technology, Humor, Health, Writing, Events, Movies, Sports, Video, Christianity, Atheist, Blogging, History, Work, Education, Business, Fashion, Barack Obama, People, Internet, Relationships, Faith, Photos, Videos, Hillary Clinton, School, Reviews, God, TV, Philosophy, Fun, Science, Environment, Design, The Page, Rants, Pictures, Church, Blog, Nature, Marketing, Television, Democrats, Parenting, Miscellaneous, Current Events, Film, Spirituality, Obama, Musings, Home, Human Rights, Society, Comedy, Me, Random Thoughts, Research, Government, Election 2008, Baseball, Opinion, Recipes, Children, Iraq, Funny, Women, Economics, America, Misc, Commentary, John McCain, Reflections, All, Celebrities, Inspiration, Lifestyle, Theology, Linux, Kids, Games, World, India, Literature, China, Ramblings, Fitness, Money, Review, War, Articles, Economy, Journal, Quotes, NBA, Crime, Anime, Islam, 2008, Stories, Prayer, Diary, Jesus, Buddha, Muslim, Israel, Europe, Links, Marriage, Fiction, American Idol, Software, Leadership, Pop culture, Rants, Video Games, Republicans, Updates, Political, Football, Healing, Blogs, Shopping, USA, Class, Matrix, Course, Work, Web 2.0, My Life, Psychology, Gay, Happiness, Advertising, Field Hockey, Hip-hop, sex, fucking, ass, Soccer, sox"
