Money Matters
Posted by Michelle Moquin on August 6th, 2013
Good morning!
Tackling Tax Havens
By Akinyi Ochieng | July 31, 2013
Not many people enjoy paying taxes. But wholesale tax evasion, particularly in the developing world, can have devastating effects. Realizing this, former U.N. Secretary-General Kofi Annan, African Development Bank President Donald Kaberuka, U.K. Prime Minister David Cameron, and the U.N. High-Level Panel of Eminent Persons on the Post-2015 Development Agenda have all, in the last year alone, called for major global reforms to combat tax havens and illicit financial flows.
On June 17, leaders of the world’s most powerful nations gathered in Northern Ireland for the annual G-8 summit to discuss pressing global concerns, including the ongoing conflict in Syria, nuclear proliferation, and economic relations. With the United Kingdom holding this year’s G-8 presidency, Prime Minister Cameron set an agenda that prioritized the “three T’s”: trade, transparency, and tax. Tax evasion is a particularly hot topic in Britain, as approximately one-fifth of offshore tax havens across the world are British Crown dependencies or overseas territories.
As Europe struggles with sharp austerity measures and developing countries look to mobilize domestic resources for growth, it is no surprise that the three T’s have become a top concern worldwide. Developed and developing countries alike would like to capture the lost streams of revenue that both national and multinational corporations avoid paying because of the pervasive use of tax havens. Loopholes in international tax codes and outright criminality between corrupt local officials and multinationals create opportunities for individuals and corporations to avoid paying their fair share of taxes.
While tax evasion and money laundering via tax havens affect all nations, their impact on developing countries is especially damaging.According to the U.K.-based charity ActionAid, the use of tax havens in British Crown dependencies has led to tax avoidance amounting to $2.2 billion—a figure that ActionAid estimates could pay for one year’s worth of subsidized meals for every primary schoolchild in the country. In the Democratic Republic of the Congo, where the per-capita income is $272, deals between corporations and a handful of government officials cost the nation more than $1.3 billion from 2010 to 2012 due to a deliberate undervaluation of assets and sale to foreign investors.
Throughout Africa, corruption, particularly within the lucrative extractive industries, exacerbates tax evasion. Former South African President Thabo Mbeki, among many other African leaders, has been outspoken about stemming illicit financial flows from Africa. The Africa Progress Panel’s 2013 report found that “Africa loses more money through outflows than it gets in aid and foreign direct investment.” Although total illicit flows are obviously difficult to calculate, the U.N. Economic Commission for Africa estimates that, in total, Africa lost more than $854 billion in illicit financial flows between 1970 and 2008—a yearly average of $22 billion.
These figures are especially troubling because resource wealth plays a vital role in poverty alleviation and the promotion of inclusive growth. Yet reinvesting revenue from natural resources into developing countries remains impossible if funds are continually siphoned into faraway bank accounts. The United States and its allies in the developed world therefore have an obligation to provide technical and financial support to developing countries to aid in the pursuit of justice in combating illicit financial flows.
The Lough Erne Declaration
The typically dense language of G-8 summits does not make for light reading, but this year’s communiqué and joint declaration marked a rhetorical transition on international tax policy from the world’s top officials.
With the Lough Erne Declaration, a pledge to end corporate tax evasion by promoting fair taxes, G-8 leaders have made open commitments to increased transparency and open trade. The document states that “multinationals should report to authorities what tax they pay where” and advocates for greater disclosure of beneficiaries and an end to predatory fiscal policies of extractive-trading companies in conflict zones. The points outlined in the declaration are further enumerated in the G-8 communiqué, which charges each nation with the development of national action plans and promotes the use of an Open Data Charter, which will make government information public in an effort to promote transparency.
The Lough Erne Declaration comes on the heels of the OECD’s Convention on Mutual Administrative Assistance in Tax Matters and measures such as theExtractive Industries Transparency Initiative, but it is a disappointment in light of the more aggressive measures initially pushed by the United Kingdom. Prime Minister Cameron initially called for public registries of beneficial ownership that disclose information about people that control or benefit from a corporation through mechanisms such as receipt of income and voting rights. His proposals, however, were not well received by all members of the G-8, who instead opted for an individual-action-plan model. The G-8 agreed to automatic sharing of information among tax authorities across the world but declined to make the information public for fear of misuse or abuse.
The core principles enumerated in the Lough Erne Declaration are laudable, but given the lack of specifics, implementing them will remain difficult. Moreover, Russia, the host of the 2014 G-8 summit, has shown little interest in advocating for strong action on tax havens. Considering that Russian oligarchs rank among the major users of offshore tax havens, however, Russia’s hostility is unsurprising. Although the G-8 has promised to share information with tax authorities in developing countries, a lack of capacity on the part of tax authorities in developing countries and public scrutiny may compromise these efforts. Without concrete pledges of financial and technical assistance from the developed world, it remains unclear when the capacity-assistance programs will be implemented.
The role of the United States
The United States has long been relatively forward leaning in dealing with these issues. The Foreign and Corrupt Practices Act, first enacted in 1977, has been an important model for international tax policy. Until the act passed, U.S. companies were able to deduct bribes to foreign officials as legitimate business expenses on tax returns.
Given last month’s pledge by President Barack Obama to increase partnerships with sub-Saharan Africa by strengthening democratic institutions and promoting economic trade and investment, the principles of the Lough Erne Declaration should serve as a framework for U.S. foreign policy and help developing countries fulfill World Trade Organization transparency agreements.
Following the summit, the United States swiftly released an action plan calling for transparency of company ownership and control at home and abroad. This plan complements measures such as the U.S.-East African Community Trade and Investment Partnership, which is already working to end barriers to trade and investment on the African continent and promote transparency.
The action plan also includes measures calling for the creation of state-level registries that would be publicly available. Although the United States has been a global leader in combating tax evasion, these commitments would improve transparency in states such as Delaware, which has relatively lax tax policies.
Stricter enforcement of previously existing legislation will also help trace illicit financial flows. The transparency provisions of the 2010 Dodd-Frank Wall Street Reform and Consumer Protection Act mark progress in attempts to create greater transparency and accountability in the extractives industry. A recent case involving the American Petroleum Institute and the U.S. Securities and Exchange Commission, or SEC, however, has challenged the act. A federal judge recently struck down Section 1504 of the act, which required companies engaged in the oil, natural gas, or mineral industries to publicly disclose information about payments made to the U.S. and foreign governments.
Having such a key part of the legislation vacated is a huge disappointment after significant congressional efforts to aid the international community in the fight against corruption. Although Sen. Ben Cardin (D-MD), one of the authors of the transparency provisions in the Dodd-Frank Act, has been vocal in declaring that “Congress was clear in the letter and the spirit of the law that this information should be in the public domain,” Congress and the SEC need to take swift action to ensure that Section 1504 is implemented as was originally intended.
Although the U.S. government has taken some steps forward on the issue of tax evasion, additional progress is still needed at the federal and state levels. Because tax havens are often mutually beneficial to local governments and corporations, however, the impetus for change must come from both the public and private sector.
Conclusion
President Obama should continue to make the fight against tax evasion a priority on the international agenda by eliminating deliberate U.S. tax loopholes written into our tax code and sharing information on companies with tax authorities in developing countries. Corporations must pay their fair share of corporate taxes in nations where they make a profit to foster a culture of social responsibility. Developing nations cannot continue to hemorrhage funds due to lax tax laws in nations such as the United States.
As a global leader, the United States must continue to set a positive precedent in the international community by taking more-substantive action. A focus on the collection and monitoring of tax revenue is not only in our national interest but also has the potential to increase the resources available for development across the world.
Side note:
Offshore tax havens
Since 1998 the Organisation for Economic Co-operation and Development, or OECD, has usedseveral criteria to identify tax havens. The key criteria are:
- No or nominal tax on relevant income
- Lack of effective exchange of information
- Lack of transparency
- No substantial activities
Multinationals can avoid paying taxes by shifting their profits from high-tax to low-tax jurisdictions, a practice that is often legal due to some loopholes in international tax policy. This practice, however, has recently come under growing amounts of criticism.
Akinyi Ochieng is an intern with the National Security team at the Center for American Progress.
**********
Hmmm…it looks like no one was able to get in yesterday – wha’at’s up?
Blog me if you can. Peace out.
Lastly, greed over a great story is surfacing from my “loyal”(?) readers. With all this back and forth about who owns what, that appears on my blog, let me reiterate that all material posted on my blog becomes the sole property of my blog. If you want to reserve any proprietary rights don’t post it to my blog. I will prominently display this caveat on my blog from now on to remind those who may have forgotten this notice.
Gratefully your blog host,
michelle
Aka BABE: We all know what this means by now :)
If you love my blog and my writes, please make a donation via PayPal, credit card, or e-check, please click the “Donate” button below. (Please only donations from those readers within the United States. – International readers please see my “Donate” page)
Or if you would like to send a check via snail mail, please make checks payable to “Michelle Moquin”, and send to:
Michelle Moquin PO Box 29235 San Francisco, Ca. 94129
Thank you for your loyal support!
All content on this site are property of Michelle Moquin © copyright 2008-2012
“Though she be but little, she be fierce.” – William Shakespeare Midsummer Night’s Dream
" Politics, god, Life, News, Music, Family, Personal, Travel, Random, Photography, Religion, Aliens, Art, Entertainment, Food, Books, Thoughts, Media, Culture, Love, Sex, Poetry, Prose, Friends, Technology, Humor, Health, Writing, Events, Movies, Sports, Video, Christianity, Atheist, Blogging, History, Work, Education, Business, Fashion, Barack Obama, People, Internet, Relationships, Faith, Photos, Videos, Hillary Clinton, School, Reviews, God, TV, Philosophy, Fun, Science, Environment, Design, The Page, Rants, Pictures, Church, Blog, Nature, Marketing, Television, Democrats, Parenting, Miscellaneous, Current Events, Film, Spirituality, Obama, Musings, Home, Human Rights, Society, Comedy, Me, Random Thoughts, Research, Government, Election 2008, Baseball, Opinion, Recipes, Children, Iraq, Funny, Women, Economics, America, Misc, Commentary, John McCain, Reflections, All, Celebrities, Inspiration, Lifestyle, Theology, Linux, Kids, Games, World, India, Literature, China, Ramblings, Fitness, Money, Review, War, Articles, Economy, Journal, Quotes, NBA, Crime, Anime, Islam, 2008, Stories, Prayer, Diary, Jesus, Buddha, Muslim, Israel, Europe, Links, Marriage, Fiction, American Idol, Software, Leadership, Pop culture, Rants, Video Games, Republicans, Updates, Political, Football, Healing, Blogs, Shopping, USA, Class, Matrix, Course, Work, Web 2.0, My Life, Psychology, Gay, Happiness, Advertising, Field Hockey, Hip-hop, sex, fucking, ass, Soccer, sox"
August 7th, 2013 at 8:07 am
Who will stop the rich from getting richer at our expense?
August 7th, 2013 at 8:08 am
Howie, I hope you are coming back soon. I sure would like to know what all the UFO chatter is about.
August 7th, 2013 at 8:10 am
I know you guys off Island missed it so here’s the link to Miss World Guam 2013.
http://www.guampdn.com/article/20130801/ENTERTAINMENT09/308010003
August 7th, 2013 at 8:56 am
Hafa Adai
But once again there is a lack of accountability in Guam’s justice system. Motions to disqualify Superior Court of Guam Judge James L. Canto on grounds that he wasn’t impartial were dismissed because they were based on speculation and hearsay.
That’s just Bullshit!
August 7th, 2013 at 9:05 am
Why Walking Is the #1 Way to Exercise
Today, I will tell you why you unequivocally, irrefutably do not have to exercise like a maniac to achieve amazing results.
Why do I feel compelled to share this message? Because I’ve noticed that more and more people seem to be doing hard-core workouts these days.
I have several friends, for example, who have recently signed up for CrossFit or other “boot camp” style exercise programs.
There also seem to be more infomercials on TV for extreme workout regimens such as P90X, the program made famous by vice presidential candidate Paul Ryan last summer, and the INSANITY workout, which is so hard to do, its creators say, that it will “push you past your limits.”
Even on the TV show The Biggest Loser, the trainers have the contestants working out to the point that they’re literally falling off treadmills.
But is it really necessary to exert yourself in such an intense way to greatly improve your health and fitness? I think many people believe that the answer is yes—and for this reason, these people don’t exercise.
And that’s terrible!
Because in fact, the best exercise for most people is one that’s already quite familiar and quite enjoyable—and much less physically taxing than those sweat-till-you-puke workouts that some people are putting themselves through.
GET BACK TO BASICS
The exercise that I’m talking about is…walking! Look, I wouldn’t begrudge anyone his or her right to topple off a treadmill in exhaustion if that is what it takes to provide motivation.
But when I recently spoke with Mark Fenton, MS, an adjunct associate professor in the John Hancock Research Center on Physical Activity, Nutrition, and Obesity Prevention at the Tufts University School of Nutrition Science and Policy in Boston, author of two books on walking and the former host of the America’s Walking series on PBS television, I came away convinced that the simple activity of putting one foot in front of the other is the ideal exercise for most people.
Here’s why…
You’re less likely to feel pain or get hurt. The reason is that you’re operating within a very natural range of motion for your body.
“You’re not asking your muscles or joints to do anything that they’re not used to doing, and so the likelihood of soreness or injury is very low,” said Fenton. Plus, unlike running and other high-impact sports, walking is low-impact, so the load that you’re putting on your body’s joints when you walk is much less.
It’s convenient.
Walking is such a flexible activity, said Fenton. You can do it anytime and anywhere. You don’t need a partner or teammates, as you do with tennis, basketball or soccer. It’s also easy to fit walking into a busy schedule because you don’t have to do the entire workout at once.
“Unlike taking, say, a 30-minute fitness class, where you truly need to spend 30 consecutive minutes exercising, you don’t have to do 30 consecutive minutes of walking,” said Fenton. “You can break it up into three 10-minute walks and still get the benefit.”
It’s free.
Perhaps best of all, you don’t need to pay for a personal trainer, fancy equipment, a gym membership or anything else. You just need a comfortable pair of shoes.
It’s suitable for any fitness level. If the last time you broke a sweat was in high school gym class, then walking is the perfect workout for you. For inspiration, just look at Michael Moore, the documentary filmmaker who is famous for (among other things) his, well, potato-like look.
Even someone as overweight and out of shape as he is has been able to commit to walking—and has grown to love the activity. In fact, he shared on Facebook that he’s been walking 30 minutes a day, every day, since March 18 of last year, and that walking has had a healthy domino effect on his life, helping him sleep better, feel better and take better care of himself.
Walking is also great for people who are already moderately active. That’s because you can speed up your walks, walk uphill or walk for longer periods of time whenever you want to intensify the workout, Fenton pointed out.
What about people who are already quite active and fit—is walking good for them, too? Admittedly, if you’re already, say, an avid runner or tennis player, then a typical walk may not be enough of a workout to make you even fitter.
But that describes a small fraction of people, said Fenton, and even those people could benefit from about one day a week of gentle walking to give their muscles a break—especially in the early stages of training for a race or tournament, when doing too much too soon is a common cause of injury.
However, Fenton said, “Walking at high intensity is actually an effective workout for more fit individuals. For example, racewalkers cruising at six to 10 miles per hour—yes, a jogging pace for most people—burn as many calories as someone taking a jog.
And elite racewalkers have aerobic fitness levels comparable to elite runners. So walking truly can take your fitness to any level.”
You’re more likely to stick with it. For all of the reasons above!
Source: Mark Fenton, MS, adjunct associate professor in the John Hancock Research Center on Physical Activity, Nutrition and Obesity Prevention at the Gerald J. and Dorothy R. Friedman School of Nutrition Science and Policy of Tufts University, Boston, and author of Pedometer Walking: Stepping Your Way to Health, Weight Loss, and Fitness (Lyons Press).
He is a national public health, planning and transportation expert who advocates for and consults with local agencies to provide more bicycle- and pedestrian-friendly communities.
August 7th, 2013 at 9:07 am
The super rich rule the world. This is just a sham to make us think that something is being done.
August 7th, 2013 at 12:46 pm
You know, the easiest way to get rid of tax havens is to become a tax haven. Since businesses don’t really pay taxes (the costs are always passed on to their customers).
This is easy to do- end corporate taxation. The profits won’t just disappear into the mattresses at corporate headquarters. They will go back into the economy in higher wages, dividends, growth to shareholders, further investment, etc.
Again, it isn’t like they’re the ones paying the burden of the tax in the first place. The customers are, via higher prices. Firms use tax havens to avoid that cost so that they can price more competitively for their customers and make better profits for their shareholders.
You remove corporate taxation, and you become the tax haven, and that has a host of advantages.
August 7th, 2013 at 12:46 pm
Tax Havens’ “create opacity . . . undermine the effectiveness of regulation and . . . ensure that owners are unaccountable corrodes all faith in the market itself.”
Good conclusion! Moral bankruptcy on many levels . . .
June 4th, 2014 at 7:00 pm
cheap Flyers jerseys from china factory. free shipping for cheap Flyers jerseys from china paypal with lowest price and easy returns service.