Just Noticing: Observations of a blogger
Posted by Michelle Moquin on June 8th, 2014
Good morning!
Just noticing…
Yes…another one from Think Progress:
Why There’s No Such Thing As A Private Facebook Chat
If you think your messages to your Facebook friends are private, think again. The social network announced that it has plans to look at your personal conversations as a way to make more profits from targeted advertising.
Facebook has been a leader in data-mining, taking information from people’s profiles and studying their behavior to make money and improve the website. But its decision to delve into private content marks the next frontier for Big Data. Silicon Valley and big businesses alike have become increasingly reliant on data mining, which can predict election outcomes based on social media posts, or make a connection between what words people use and the weather.
In its quarterly investors conference call in late April, Facebook’s chief operations officer, Sheryl Sandberg, explained exactly why the company is going further to track your data: “Our goal is that every time you open News Feed, every time you look at Facebook, you see something, whether it’s from consumers or whether it’s from marketers, that really delights you, that you are genuinely happy to see.”
To do that, Facebook wants to take a look at your private messages. “Facebook historically has focused on friends and public content,” Facebook CEO Mark Zuckerberg said on the call. “Now, with Messenger and WhatsApp, we’re taking a couple of different approaches towards more private content as well.”
Your chats reveal more about you than you think
Private messaging has become an incredibly popular feature, which nearly every top social media app centers itself around. Snapchat, the picture-sharing app that automatically deletes pictures seconds after they’re sent, just added a one-on-one chat and video function similar to what Twitter and Google already have.
“People are making more intimate connections now than ever before just by chatting through a window on a screen,” Ramani Durvasula, PhD., a Los Angeles-based psychologist at California State University, Los Angeles told ThinkProgress.
Those private conversations are rife with details that may seem insignificant on the surface but provide valuable insight into a person: “What people share via a private chat and what they share in a status update are vastly different,” Durvasula said. That’s what makes personal conversations “the best place to get data because it’s uncensored.”
People are already generally uninhibited online, sharing everything from their emotional ups and downs, to live-tweeting childbirth. But what’s said one-on-one pulls back another layer, exposing what truly makes one tick — “The stressors people share, the intimacies, give insight to what people are most passionate about,” Durvasula said.
Private chats online also tell companies like Facebook how you use technology, what kinds of information you share on which platforms and with which audiences. “Some people use it much more for one-to-one communications than they would use the other parts of Facebook,” Augustin Chaintreau, assistant professor of computer science at Columbia University in New York, explains. For example, Facebook may be interested in seeing whether certain users prefer emailing or texting loved ones, and only use its Messenger app to keep up with more tangential relationships. Or the data could be used to tell whether someone was in distress or needed help, he added.
But there’s a risk in trying to piece together a profile of a person based on their online habits, Chaintreau said. “The risk is that there is a natural reason that people do different things in different places. You’re a different person, have different behaviors. The emotions will be different. Even if you’re very consistently presenting yourself [across the Web], you may or may not like a particular message presented on one platform or app versus the other because it doesn’t fit who you are [or what you're doing in that space].”
All of those pieces of conversations — telling a friend you went to the doctor Tuesday, where you stayed on vacation, the fight you had with your significant other — add up and paint a fuller picture of users, leading to better products and ads recommending clinics, hotels and relationship counselors, Durvasula said: “Everything you say, every character typed is being watched. So if you’re typing a [private] message at 1 a.m., that means you could get targeted for an Ambien ad.”
In the past, Facebook tracked what users didn’t post in status updates, and was able to determine which types of users self-censored the most.
Those are the kinds of details that give companies an advantage, Pamela Rutledge, PhD., director of the Media Psychology Research Center in Newport Beach, Calif., told ThinkProgress. “There’s monetary value in conversation. What do new moms worry about, and how does that change over the lifespan? So [as a company] you’re really stepping into the shoes of your customer. And what better way to do that then look through private conversations,” Rutledge said.
“People don’t realize what they’re putting out there,” Durvasula said. Almost everyone uses the Internet on the daily basis with more than 65 percent having a photo publicly posted online, according to a Pew study. Another one in two Web users readily have their email, birth date or old job posted publicly. Those numbers jump significantly when you look at teens’ use: Almost all teens use their real name, post their interests, birth dates and post pictures of themselves, Pew found. Over 70 percent have their school name and where they live.
And when it comes to personal conversations, even more could be revealed. “What if [a conversation] does reveal something about your medical or mental history? This could keep you from getting insurance or even a job.”
When private chats aren’t actually private
It’s common for tech companies, especially as they go public, to look for ways to make money through advertising. Twitter, which entered the stock market in 2013, recently bought its longtime data partner Gnipwith eyes for turning its user data into revenue. Since Zuckerberg took the company public in 2012, Facebook has been similarly ramping up its advertising efforts — running into privacy controversies along the way, including using users’ profile pictures without their permission to make the ads more relatable.
But the social network also has been strategically positioning itself to join the ranks of Google, which already reads your personal communications. In its privacy agreement, Google reserves the right to sift through users’ data as long as they’re logged in, including everything a person searches with Google.com, what videos they watch on YouTube, where users travel using Google Maps, and private chats and emails.
With widespread data collection and mining Google has run into legal trouble. The company has been dealing with several lawsuits regarding its email scanning, one of which accuses Google of reading children’s messages and tracking their Internet use through its education apps. Google is also waiting for the U.S. Supreme Court to decide whether collecting data through private, unencrypted Wi-Fi networks for Google Maps is legal.
Earlier this month, Facebook divorced its messaging function into a standalone app. People used to would send messages with their friends online within Facebook’s native app. The company has tweaked its chat function over the years, making it easier to navigate with features — like floating profile pictures to indicate pending messages on the home screen — that made new messages and conversations more prominent in the mobile app. But making Messenger its own app, which has a built-in camera for photo sharing and video messaging, helps Facebook better keep track of the data in those chats.
Facebook’s recent purchases — namely Instagram and WhatsApp — further exemplify the company’s commitment to personal messaging. Instagram, which Facebook bought just before it went public, added direct messaging to its app late last year, allowing users to privately trade photos, and adding to a wealth of data on every user. WhatsApp lets users send SMS messages practically for free to anyone who has the mobile app. The app isn’t very popular in the United States but has a half billion strong user base in Europe, India, Latin America and Africa, where Facebook is looking to expand. WhatsApp is expected to soon hit a billion users, making it a ripe source for digging into — not necessarily what people are saying — but what those millions of texts reveal about their habits and desires.
Facebook’s purchase of WhatsApp for $19 billion shows not only how serious the company is about private chats, but how much they’re worth.
The tipping point in the privacy debate
The reality is that it has become nearly impossible to keep your personal data from Internet companies. Google, for example, already collects millions of pieces of user data that rivals only Facebook which houses a complete network of friends, coworkers and family and their musings through statuses, link shares and picture uploads.
“We’re entering a social experiment where so many companies know so much about us and we’re in the dark,” Chaintreau said. People feel a familiarity with companies like Facebook that they use every day. “It’s almost as if they’re your friend.” But without being more transparent about what they’re doing with consumers’ data, that could change.
It’s a tradeoff: “If you want this convenient way to connect with 7 billion people, you have to give us your data,” Durvasula said. And people will generally go along with it: “A lot of people will give up a little bit of their privacy for the convenience, which can sometimes be helpful like Amazon’s ‘People who bought this also bought that’ feature,” Rutledge said. So the debate around privacy won’t be whether or not companies should be collecting such personal information, but what data customers let them collect.
Regardless of whether users see it as a big deal, Facebook’s private snooping may just push the privacy debate to the tipping point. Some people may say, “I don’t care that Facebook knows I like Chiquita bananas and Mercedes Benzes,” Durvasula said, or respond with more alarm, as Rutledge pointed out: “‘Oh my gosh they’re listening to my conversations with my husband!’”
“Most private conversations are about what you see in public anyway, you just feel they’re more appropriate for a limited audience,” Rutledge went on. But the bottom line is that having personal information in cyberspace slowly erodes true privacy, in part because companies like Facebook turn around and make money off it, said Durvasula, who advocates for not using Facebook.
“The real [responsibility] is not to get all fired up and get your pitchforks out, but to draw a line and ask do I have a choice,” Rutledge said. “There’s a burden on the individual to get educated, but there’s also a burden on the companies,” Rutledge said. “We’re not all lawyers, we’re not all IT guys,” the public needs to demand companies explain their data and privacy rights in plain English: “What are these things that I might not understand that I might not want,” Rutledge said.
The next frontier in the data wars
When Edward Snowden leaked documents detailing the U.S. National Security Agency’s dragnet, internationally-run phone surveillance program in 2013, it incited a public outcry, with Americans calling on Congress and President Obama to change how the country collected intelligence. The same concern applies when companies gather bits of your Internet activity.
“Anyone who knows a lot about you can exert a certain amount of power,” Rutledge said. And the amount of information that companies collect is likely going to increase.
It’s possible, Chaintreau adds, for technology like Google Glass to become as ubiquitous as the Internet. That will create a host of new sensory-based data that companies, or even the government, could use to tap into what you see and feel.
Privacy online has only recently become a major concern for most people. As identity theft and large-scale breaches become more common, Web users have started taking additional steps to try to minimize their digital imprint: Nearly 90 percent of online users clear their browser’s cookies, which can be used to track online activity, or delete old status updates, according to a Pew survey. More than half of people have taken steps to avoid being detected online by certain people, organizations or the government.
But despite those efforts, the sheer convenience and desire to stay connected tends to outweigh the loss of privacy.
“Instead of being purposely disconnected [from technology], you have to be more aware,” Chaintreau said. “People need to understand the economics behind their data. If people know how much it was worth maybe they would act differently,” Chaintreau said. Projects like this already exist. DataCoup is one that allows people to sell their information from Facebook, Google, YouTube and other outlets to prospective companies.
“Consumers are winning free services, which are cool,” Chaintreau explained, “but they’re not that expensive to run, and the companies are making millions off the personal data they collect.”
*****
Happy Sunday! It is a gorgeous one and I am out to enjoy it. I HOPE you are too!
Blog me.
Peace out.
Lastly, greed over a great story is surfacing from my “loyal”(?) readers. With all this back and forth about who owns what, that appears on my blog, let me reiterate that all material posted on my blog becomes the sole property of my blog. If you want to reserve any proprietary rights don’t post it to my blog. I will prominently display this caveat on my blog from now on to remind those who may have forgotten this notice.
Gratefully your blog host,
michelle
Aka BABE: We all know what this means by now :)
If you love my blog and my writes, please make a donation via PayPal, credit card, or e-check, please click the “Donate” button below. (Please only donations from those readers within the United States. – International readers please see my “Donate” page)
Or if you would like to send a check via snail mail, please make checks payable to “Michelle Moquin”, and send to:
Michelle Moquin PO Box 29235 San Francisco, Ca. 94129
Thank you for your loyal support!
All content on this site are property of Michelle Moquin © copyright 2008-2014
“Though she be but little, she be fierce.” – William Shakespeare Midsummer Night’s Dream
" Politics, god, Life, News, Music, Family, Personal, Travel, Random, Photography, Religion, Aliens, Art, Entertainment, Food, Books, Thoughts, Media, Culture, Love, Sex, Poetry, Prose, Friends, Technology, Humor, Health, Writing, Events, Movies, Sports, Video, Christianity, Atheist, Blogging, History, Work, Education, Business, Fashion, Barack Obama, People, Internet, Relationships, Faith, Photos, Videos, Hillary Clinton, School, Reviews, God, TV, Philosophy, Fun, Science, Environment, Design, The Page, Rants, Pictures, Church, Blog, Nature, Marketing, Television, Democrats, Parenting, Miscellaneous, Current Events, Film, Spirituality, Obama, Musings, Home, Human Rights, Society, Comedy, Me, Random Thoughts, Research, Government, Election 2008, Baseball, Opinion, Recipes, Children, Iraq, Funny, Women, Economics, America, Misc, Commentary, John McCain, Reflections, All, Celebrities, Inspiration, Lifestyle, Theology, Linux, Kids, Games, World, India, Literature, China, Ramblings, Fitness, Money, Review, War, Articles, Economy, Journal, Quotes, NBA, Crime, Anime, Islam, 2008, Stories, Prayer, Diary, Jesus, Buddha, Muslim, Israel, Europe, Links, Marriage, Fiction, American Idol, Software, Leadership, Pop culture, Rants, Video Games, Republicans, Updates, Political, Football, Healing, Blogs, Shopping, USA, Class, Matrix, Course, Work, Web 2.0, My Life, Psychology, Gay, Happiness, Advertising, Field Hockey, Hip-hop, sex, fucking, ass, Soccer, sox"
June 8th, 2014 at 9:41 pm
with that amount of users they just can’t help themselves anymore, all under the excuse of making money for the stockholders, its a monster raging kraken of a site that ain’t going anywhere good anytime soon, hopefully it will implode at some point .
June 8th, 2014 at 9:42 pm
The whole thing is out of control now! We have to as a people decide what we want and how important our privacy is. we can not count on big time $ makers to do it. We know how they will always vote..always..they have no choice, human nature dictates this level of selfishness.
Look at things like climate change and the need to deny it even existing, much less our own workings in our destruction..all because we are to selfish to change our ways..when a new tech begins to define who we are and it becomes the norm, it is near Impossible to set limits..we just don’t want to. Time to act is now!
June 8th, 2014 at 9:43 pm
Apple prevents ME from recording my own telephone conversations, but apparently not Facebook.
June 8th, 2014 at 9:44 pm
Don’t download the app.
June 8th, 2014 at 9:45 pm
Well, Facebook IS evil, so this makes perfect sense. Their business plan is finding out what your deepest, darkest secrets are and then selling you to advertisers.
June 8th, 2014 at 9:46 pm
This is just one of the MANY reasons I don’t have the FB app on my phone and never will.
June 8th, 2014 at 9:47 pm
I really don’t care what an app does as long as its not done deceptively. But, that being said, people’s lives are pretty much boring, and most TV shows are boring, so getting news about what boring person is watching what boring show on tv right now, probably because they are bored, just sounds like an exercise in extreme boredom.
June 8th, 2014 at 9:47 pm
FB is horrible and creepy. I can live without it.
June 8th, 2014 at 9:48 pm
What 4th amendment?
June 8th, 2014 at 9:49 pm
Marc#7, So it’s OK that a faceless multinational conglomerate is listening to your every move and storing the recordings of you forever!!!
June 8th, 2014 at 9:50 pm
Mic Lock app TM
June 8th, 2014 at 9:50 pm
Lets see, we cant identify background noise or conversations but they can identify background music or television. Yup, I think I got that. And totally suck it up in total belief
June 8th, 2014 at 9:51 pm
Regardless of what you might think, or how you use it, Facebook is not your friend.
June 8th, 2014 at 9:52 pm
Just go to you tube, find a MXC video or celebrity deathmatch and set your phone in front of it.
June 8th, 2014 at 9:54 pm
Thomas#9, the 4th amendment protects you against GOVERNMENT. corporations can do anything with the information people willingly give them.
June 8th, 2014 at 9:57 pm
The 4th amendment gets violated all the time. I’m not going to volunteer my info on FB.
June 8th, 2014 at 9:58 pm
Every time I think it might be worth it to get a Facebook account, Zuckerberg does some asshat thing or another and convinces me to stay far away.
June 8th, 2014 at 9:58 pm
Data mining and the s
June 8th, 2014 at 9:59 pm
Smartphones aren’t so smart anymore. . .seems like they’re. . . what’s the word. . . fuckin’ creepy. so glad I don’t have one.
June 8th, 2014 at 10:00 pm
Your new cell phones:
1) Give up your voice.
2) Give up your fingerprints
3) Provide a list of your contacts
4) Provide tracking of your whereabouts
5) Provide iris scans
6) Provide facial recognition (software now is being developed to identify both you and your friends in photos, including the reflections of people’s images in the eyes of those people you take a picture of!)
The only thing that’s missing is a DNA collector. (Probably in the works)
And this doesn’t include your private written or verbal thoughts on matters that are recorded and stored indefinitely.
ALL of these features can be tapped into by most apps, can be enabled without the user’s knowledge, and can be enabled when the user expressly disables the features (this includes your laptops and other devices too). When you turn GeoTagging off, do you really think it’s turned off when you take pictures on an app from one of those image sites?
Not only does your cell carrier have this info, the NSA does, and many of the private services you tap into. You’ve given your entire being to these firms.
People freely give up all this information, all your personal identifiable information. One day, if you want to be politically active, fight for a cause, or somehow irritate someone in power… don’t think that this info won’t be used in some manner to oppress you or intimidate you.
June 8th, 2014 at 10:01 pm
We need Facebook and the NSA to monitor our every written and spoken word, and even our thoughts, in order to keep us safe from the terrorists.
June 8th, 2014 at 10:02 pm
I was a long time user on Huffington Post over 2000 followers. I simply walked away when the FB and cell phone crap started.
June 8th, 2014 at 10:04 pm
I deleted my facebook app from my phone. I never use it anyway. My computer does not have a camera or a microphone to hack into.
June 8th, 2014 at 10:06 pm
Did they give up the permissions you gave when you deleted the app or do they still have that permission?
June 8th, 2014 at 10:08 pm
Huffington is an opportunist who saw a chance to make $$$ posing as a liberal.
June 8th, 2014 at 10:09 pm
That question#24 was directed to you Corey.
June 8th, 2014 at 10:15 pm
Disturbing…
but based on the ads that pop up when I google anything, it’s already been determined what I like and want to know about, it is creepy, but we’ve always given that info away by doing things that are convenient like using an ATM card for groceries, for example, I get coupons every trip for the items/brands I already buy, it’s targeted marketing and as creepy as that is I used to sell print advertising and we ran demographics and pyschographics to ‘target’ people then, so this isn’t unusual it’s just more invasive of our ‘privacy’ now with that device in your hand and on your person almost 24/7.
I’m only going to worry about it if they start popping up ads geared towards my private activities, then I’ll know just how screwed I am, pun intended.
Luv, Zen Lill
June 8th, 2014 at 10:18 pm
Facebook and your own email and texts certainly aren’t private in any way, I’m sure personal calls are recorded also. Who knows if the NSA doesn’t have a handle on every single regular commenter here, it could be a hotbed right here.
Just sayin’ – ZL
June 9th, 2014 at 3:18 am
I would think that without the app on my phone they don’t have a window into my mic
June 9th, 2014 at 3:19 am
The iPhone can be remote activated. Some talk that Security Services in The US also have the ability to activate your cellphone without your knowledge and listen to what is around you. The iPhone is apparently a wonderful tool for this.
Also, police departments now have access to mobile cellphone towers that hijack all the signals in the area so they can surreptitiously record any connection.
June 9th, 2014 at 3:24 am
Corey#30, I wouldn’t think that – I trust NOTHING they do….but I have no idea. I know they retain everything in every account even after they are ‘deleted’ and refuse to ever completely erase you from having been there. It’s like joining the mafia. ONce you are a member you can not get out.
June 9th, 2014 at 3:26 am
Zen Lill, That is very scary.
June 9th, 2014 at 3:28 am
Zen Lill#27&28, Very true. The only way that cannot happen is for you to take the battery out of your phone. It’s not just the iPhone that can be remotely activated to listen, nearly any cell phone.
June 9th, 2014 at 3:30 am
Zen Lill you can put your phone in a Faraday Cage. It can’t receive or transmit from there.
June 9th, 2014 at 3:31 am
What if you turn off the phone? Does that work?
June 9th, 2014 at 3:32 am
Social media was a great concept at first then like everything else capitalism fucks it up.
June 9th, 2014 at 3:33 am
Zen Lill, The invasion of privacy may have been worth it when the content on Facebook was new and exciting. Now you are subject to a degraded user experience so that they can increase post views for sponsors, and the only friends who post there use is as their personal food blog or an outlet for their conservative rage and stupidity.
June 9th, 2014 at 3:35 am
You’re a fool if you use facebook. all 1.2 billion of you.
June 9th, 2014 at 3:36 am
A fool and his privacy are soon parted?
June 9th, 2014 at 6:53 am
How convenient that you can’t pop the battery out of an iPhone also.
I sit on mine in my car so they can kiss my fine ass.
-ZL
June 9th, 2014 at 9:23 am
I’m certainly up for that Zen Lill.
June 9th, 2014 at 9:26 am
Zen Lill #40, this is my first post. I just have to say that having been privileged to a few of your hot summer photos, I am certain that the ass is fine. Although I am not affiliated with Apple, if the opportunity dose present itself, I will be happy to kiss your fine ass in their stead.
June 9th, 2014 at 9:29 am
Now why would a fine white woman like you want to sit on some shit from China when there is a healthy American white guy whose face you could sit on anytime you felt the urge?
June 9th, 2014 at 9:33 am
George,WN#43, Zen Lill is not a bigot so your face is not the only one available for her sitting pleasure. We russians know a thing or two about pleasing the woman who sits on ours.
June 9th, 2014 at 9:44 am
Zen Lill, if I thought you were serious I would invite you to visit me here on the Isla Margarita in Venezuela. I live very close to the Rattan Depot Plaza. You could stay with me or there.
And Si, the sitting is good with me, but the reclining brings so many more pleasures.
Sonrisas
Pedro
September 22nd, 2014 at 11:05 pm
What’s up friends, how is all, and what you want to say concerning this post, in my
view its truly amazing in favor of me.