Wonderful Women Of The World: Christine O’Donnell
Posted by Michelle Moquin on September 18th, 2010
NOT!!
This video was a segment from Rachel Maddow’s show on September 14th.
And if that isn’t enough, I pulled this video from the Daily Kos the other day:
Christine O’Donnell on Politically Incorrect in 1998 discussing Bill Clinton and “the truth” in the midst of the Lewinsky Scandal with Jasmine Guy and Eddie Izzard.
Here’s a little commentary in response to the above, also from the Daily Kos, on just where Ms. O’Donnell is today:
This take no prisoners, intolerant, inflexible position on so-called “honesty” is held by a person who at this time claimed to be a college graduate, but hadn’t yet paid her back tuition and received her degree, and who sued the Non-profit Right-Wing think tank where she worked for sexual discrimination, claiming they had a policy that “women should be subordinate to men”, while they argued that she was running her own for profit business on their time. She also sued them for lost wages, claiming they had denied her an opportunity to join a Master program Princeton when she hadn’t even been accepted to a Masters program at Princeton, and as I mentioned before – didn’t even have her Bachelors yet.
But she says people need to be “Honest always”? Really? This woman is a cold calculated Con Artist (like most money-grubbing Republican phonies from the Koch brothers to Rick Scott) she a semi-pro pseudo pundit who makes a living saying outrageous crap, it’s as if a mashup of Ann Coulter and Monica Goodling had just won the Republican Primary – and the sad part is that all this time on the edge of the spotlight has given her more chops than most people would expect.
I think we risk underestimating her, Sharon Angle, Joe Miller and Rand Paul at our dire peril. The majority of Republicans probably will rally around her, even as non-ideological policy wonks like Rove begin to peel away. The wheels are coming off the Mad Tea Party Train, and exactly how much damage it will do before finally burning out and crashing is anyones guess.
Readers: As I read the net and watch the news, I just think that our political candidates are getting a little too looney, and I’m talking mostly about the extreme right. Republicans weren’t this extreme 10 years ago, were they? Does losing control and losing your party kick in some gene that goes way extreme or is someone putting something in their water coolers?
This O’Donnel woman is crazy, and the media keeps giving her air time – Why? Because so many believe the stuff that comes out of her mouth. Where is our society headed? We’ve obsessed over movies about war, and murder, and now our society seems to obsessed with crazy candidates…extreme rights…the more extreme the better. Is anyone else feeling like this is theater? The scary thing is, this is real.
The only way we are going to be able to stop this madness is to get out and vote. The sane people need to stop these crazies, and it has to be done through our voices and in the form of voting.
Anyway, I am off to phone-bank to encourage people to vote. I HOPE that somewhere, you are joining me.
**********
SP…I mean ZL :) Thanks for your offer. Appreciated and will keep in mind. By the way, I would love to see you shake up some women as you stated – I think you should use that CEO mentality and go for it. Lastly, I HOPE your knees are recovering, and your toe as well.
Everyone have a great weekend!
Lastly, greed over a great story is surfacing from my “loyal”(?) readers. With all this back and forth about who owns what, that appears on my blog, let me reiterate that all material posted on my blog becomes the sole property of my blog. If you want to reserve any proprietary rights don’t post it to my blog. I will prominently display this caveat on my blog from now on to remind those who may have forgotten this notice.
Gratefully your blog host,
michelle
Aka BABE: We all know what this means by now :)
If you love my blog and my writes, please make a donation via PayPal, credit card, or e-check, please click the “Donate” button below. (Please only donations from those readers within the United States. – International readers please see my “Donate” page)
September 18th, 2010 at 1:36 pm
Natural Rx for Arthritis
Lydia Wilen
Joan Wilen
We have received several letters attesting to the effectiveness of this tea for arthritis pain…
Bring one-half cup of water to a boil. Add fresh ginger, cut into thin slices — you can use as much as you like — and let simmer for five minutes. Remove and discard the ginger.
Turn off the heat, and add one-quarter teaspoon of turmeric powder, one tablespoon of unflavored gelatin and one tablespoon of coconut oil.
Stir until the gelatin is dissolved, then add one-half to one cup of calcium-enriched orange juice. Drink this tea once or twice a day.
Personal interviewed Lydia Wilen and Joan Wilen, sisters who are folk-remedy experts based in New York City. The sisters are coauthors of many books, including Bottom Line’s Household Magic.
September 18th, 2010 at 1:40 pm
Michelle
Thank you for returning to the beautiful thing that got my day started or made it better when I got to work and saw it.
Those colored uglies you were closing out with had me flinching. A god given beautiful face like yours should never be jostled that way.
Clarence
September 18th, 2010 at 1:48 pm
Michelle, I think it is not most of our society that is obsessed with the murder movies and the likes of a Odonnell. It is the white male dominated press that is obsessed with the fact that a black man is now President.
They want to change that at any cost to the nation. My brothers are lurid with anger. They foam at the mouth and it is obvious they will support anyone who will give Obama a hard time.
I didn’t vote for him because I truly believe McCain to be the better candidate. In retrospect, I thank God that he won.
Listening to McCain flip flop on all his pretended values to get reelected said everything I needed to know about him. I will be voting for Obama the next time around.
Janice.
September 18th, 2010 at 1:51 pm
Zen Lill
I await your new portfolio. Please do not keep your adoring fans waiting too long.
Kenny
September 18th, 2010 at 1:54 pm
Why is it I couldn’t get in yesterday? I tried more than 6 times!
This favoritism to Zen Lill makes it look like she is not real. Or maybe you two co-write the blog.
All I know is that she doesn’t seem to have a problem making herself known while your other loyal fans struggle to post.
It is anybody’s guess if this will make it in.
Sara
September 18th, 2010 at 1:58 pm
Michelle, the men in Iran don’t deserve the help of Madaline. They are selfish brats that cry for their own inconveniences. But they expect us to risk our safety and lives along side of them with out expecting to be treated as equals when they the men get democracy.
Izzat
September 18th, 2010 at 2:28 pm
Why are americans so preoccupied with sex? You claim to be on the topic because you want to save souls. But watching that video says that Christine and the other girls not to mention the guy were discussing it because it was titillating to them.
Ursla
September 18th, 2010 at 2:30 pm
I agree with Sara. It seems that you and Zen Lill are a tandem pair on this blog. You write and she comments.
You never disagree with each other. So are you one and the same or in cahoots?
Not posting this will give me my answer.
Holden
September 18th, 2010 at 2:33 pm
Zen Lill
If masturbation is a sin, then beautiful women like yourself should not be allowed to publish pictures of yourselves.
We all know that men will masturbate to them. I am not ashamed to admit that some of your picture and I have had our moments
But as a devout Catholic, I am forgiven because I went to Confession. One priest asked to see the pictures. I gave him Michelle’s blog address.
He said that he would visit it before he declared it off limits.
Albert
September 18th, 2010 at 2:36 pm
Zen Lill
Sure, you know that you are beautiful. I mean unless you are brain dead when it comes to the standards men use to arrive at that conclusion when ogling a woman.
Why not admit it and move on from there? Like into the arena where you tell us what you are considering for your next publication.
Larry
September 18th, 2010 at 2:41 pm
All this talk about masturbation is nonsense. I masturbate whenever I feel like it. I have a very satisfying relationship with my boyfriend of 11 years and my cousin of 14.
I prefer my cousin and when I masturbate I do it to his image. But we are first cousins and hence we can not marry.
So we f**k on the sly and love each other everyday in misery. He says he will never marry, but accepts the fact that I will one day.
So we masturbate on the phone while looking at each other. Thank God for technology.
LeeAnn
September 18th, 2010 at 3:43 pm
Here is the first of many upcoming clips, with O’Donnell from way back, that Bill Maher will begin playing on his show…
http://www.huffingtonpost.com/2010/09/18/odonnell-witchcraft-politically-incorrect_n_722035.html
September 19th, 2010 at 6:53 am
Main Dude:
I’ve been trying to get in to comment on your post. Love it! You always know where the bodies are buried.
Karen
September 19th, 2010 at 7:05 am
Christine O’Donnell is another example of white men trying to remain in power by selecting women to run for office that will do whatever they tell them to do.
A woman that dumb has to have a few screws loose, or be a greedy as the man for self aggrandizement.
O’ Donnell comes from the pool of ignorant women who the republican party uses to gain or hold on to political power via the female vote.
They think that the female voter will vote for a candidate because she is a woman rather than because she is the best candidate.
The republican party is not interested in selecting a female candidate who can think for herself. They want one from the pool of women who are willing to follow behind the “wisdom” of their men.
That pool is undoubtably full of nuts like O’Donnell.
Sofia
September 19th, 2010 at 7:05 am
Main Dude you better be careful. The conspiracists will be claiming that you are a made up factor of Michelle’s blog. Some of my friends claim that you are secretly Zen Lill.
I say if you are, you got a sexy body.
Loni
September 19th, 2010 at 7:05 am
Yeah, “Main Dude aka Zen Lill”
I don’t think you are Michelle’s husband. I think you have been Zen Lill all along. Two crafty women who put together this blog.
There may be a husband, but I doubt that he even knows about the blog.
Daniel
September 19th, 2010 at 7:40 am
I am sexy, I do have a sexy body, and I am the husband. Like it or not, there I am…
September 19th, 2010 at 7:54 am
Hafa adai
It seems that the government is now going to do Deep-Core radiation test of Apra Harbor.
What exactly are we looking for in and around Guam’s waters?
September 19th, 2010 at 7:56 am
I am tired of the pharmaceutical industry drugging our kids. Who will defend them? This article makes it clear that something has to be done.
=====================
The worst diagnosis in America
Attention deficit hyperactivity disorder is already one of the most overdiagnosed conditions in the nation… and now, it’s easier than ever to see why.
A new study finds that nearly a million American kids may have been incorrectly diagnosed with ADHD–and given dangerous drugs to deal with it–when the only thing they’re guilty of is being younger and less mature than their classmates.
That’s because in most areas, children are compared to kids at the same school level. But when you consider that the youngest kid in any class can be nearly a year younger than the oldest, there are going to be some natural differences in maturity levels.
After all, at kindergarten age, that year is nearly a fifth of their entire lives.
So researchers looked at the data on ADHD diagnoses and found that the youngest kid in a kindergarten class is 60 percent more likely to be diagnosed with ADHD than the oldest.
Extrapolating their numbers, researchers say their study means 900,000 kids may have been misdiagnosed.
Even worse, these littlest ones were more likely to be taking meds, according to the study accepted for publication in the Journal of Health Economics.
The researchers agreed that it’s very likely that simple immaturity is being mistaken for ADHD. But is this really surprising? For a generation now, schools, parents and doctors have been pushing powerful, dangerous and addictive meds on kids for the simple crime of acting their age.
The truth is, most of the kids who are taking the powerful, mood-altering drugs given for attention disorders don’t need the drugs–because they don’t have the disorders.
Some are simply acting up, because that’s what kids do… while others are suffering the side effects of a nutritionally empty lifestyle.
Caffeine, cheese doodles and videogames–with no real food in the mix–can do a lot of damage to anyone. But to the still-developing brain of an adolescent, it can lead to the classic symptoms of ADHD.
If this sounds like your child or grandchild, he doesn’t need mental help or addictive drugs… just a better diet and healthier lifestyle.
And it wouldn’t hurt if he spent a little time outside, too.
========================
Helen
September 19th, 2010 at 8:21 am
church, which was giving away a car. I don’t drive, so I didn’t care about winning. Does my $1,000 qualify as a charitable deduction?
A: No — you get no deduction. Even though your intent was to donate $1,000 to your church because you don’t drive and didn’t care about winning the car, you still purchased a “chance to win” something that has a greater value than the amount you “donated.”
Charitable deductions may be taken only when the dollar amount donated exceeds the cash value of the prize.
Had you bought the raffle tickets and then given them back to the church, the $1,000 would likely qualify as a charitable donation and thus be deductible.
Our inside source: Barbara Weltman, Esq., an attorney based in Millwood, New York. http://www.barbaraweltman.com
September 19th, 2010 at 8:22 am
I bought $1,000 in raffle tickets to help out my church, which was giving away a car. I don’t drive, so I didn’t care about winning. Does my $1,000 qualify as a charitable deduction?
A: No — you get no deduction. Even though your intent was to donate $1,000 to your church because you don’t drive and didn’t care about winning the car, you still purchased a “chance to win” something that has a greater value than the amount you “donated.” Charitable deductions may be taken only when the dollar amount donated exceeds the cash value of the prize.
Had you bought the raffle tickets and then given them back to the church, the $1,000 would likely qualify as a charitable donation and thus be deductible.
Our inside source: Barbara Weltman, Esq., an attorney based in Millwood, New York. http://www.barbaraweltman.com