Michelle Moquin's "A day in the life of…"

Creative Discussions, Inspiring Thoughts, Fun Adventures, Love & Laughter, Peaceful Travel, Hip Fashions, Cool People, Gastronomic Pleasures, Exotic Indulgences, Groovy Music, and more!

  • Hello!

    Welcome To My OUR Blog!


    Michelle Moquin's Facebook profile "Click here" to go to my FaceBook profile. Visit me!
  • Copyright Protected

    Protected by Copyscape Plagiarism Checker
  • Let Michelle Style YOU!

    I am a "Specialist in Styles" Personal Stylist. Check out my Style website to see how I can help you discover, define, and refine your unique style.
  • © Copyright 2008-2023

    All content on this site are property of Michelle Moquin © copyright 2008-2023. All material posted on my blog becomes the sole property of my blog. If you want to reserve any proprietary rights don't post it to my blog.
  • In Pursuit Of…

    Custom Search
  • Madaline Speaks

    For those of you interested in reading an Earthling Girl's Guide to a better Government, and a Greener world, check out the blog:
  • Contact Your Representatives and Senators Here!

    To send letters to your representatives about any issue of interest, Click here


    To send letters to your Senators about any issue of interest, Click here


    Get involved - Write your letters today!
  • On The Issues

    Don't be uninformed! Click here to see how every political leader on every issue voted.
  • Don’t Believe The Lies – Get The Facts

    FactCheck.org is a nonpartisan, nonprofit “consumer advocate” for voters that aims to reduce the level of deception and confusion in U.S. politics. They monitor the factual accuracy of what is said by major U.S. political players in the form of TV ads, debates, speeches, interviews and news releases. Their goal is to apply the best practices of both journalism and scholarship, and to increase public knowledge and understanding.

    Click here to get the facts.

    Pulitzer Prize Winner Politifact.com is another trusted site to get the facts. Click here to get the facts.

  • Who’s Paying Who?

    On The Issues is a nonpartisan guide to money's influence on U.S. elections and public policy.
  • Blog Rules of Conduct

    Rule #1: "The aliens can not reveal anything about anyone’s life that would not be known without the use of our technology. The exception being that if a reader has a question about his or her health and the assistance of alien technology would be necessary to answer that question.”

    Rule #2: "Aliens will not threaten humans and Humans will not threaten aliens."

    Rule #3:

    Posting Comments:

    When posting a comment in regards to any past or archived article, please reference the title and date of the article and post your comment on the present day to keep the conversation contemporary.

    NOTE: You do not need to add your e-mail address when posting a comment. Your real name, an alias, a moniker, initials...whatever ...even simply "anonymous" is all you need to add in the fields in order to post a comment.

    Thank you.

  • *********

    Yellow Pages for San Francisco, CA
  • Meta

  • Looking For A Personal Stylist?

    Michelle has designed and styled for the stars! She can be your "Specialist in Styles" Personal Stylist too. Check out Michelle's style website
  • Recent Posts

  • Michelle’s E-mail:

    E-mail me! ~~~~~~~~~~~~~~
  • Care To Twitter? Come Tweet Me!

  • Disclaimer: Adult Blog

    I DO NOT CENSOR COMMENTS POSTED TO THIS BLOG: Therefore this blog is not for the faint hearted, thin skinned, easily offended or the appointed people's moralist. If you feel that you may fit in any of those categories, please DO NOT read my blog or its comments. There are plenty of blogs that will fit your needs, find one. This warning also applies to those who post comments who would find it unpleasant or mentally injurious to receive an opposing opinion via a raw to vulgar delivery. I DO NOT censor comments posted here. If you post a comment, you are on notice that you may receive a comment in language or opinion that you will not approve of or that you feel is offensive. If that would bother you, DO NOT post on my blog.

    27Mar2011
  • Medical Disclaimer:

    I am not a doctor nor am I medically trained in any field. No one on this website is claiming to be a medical physician or claiming to be medically trained in any field. However, anyone can blog information about health articles, folk remedies, possible cures, possible treatments, etc that they have heard of on my blog. Please see your physician or a health care professional before heeding or using any medical information given on this blog. It is not intended to replace any medical advice given to you by your licensed medical professional. This blog is simply providing a medium for discussion on all matters concerning life. All opinions given are the sole responsibility of the person giving them. This blog does not make any claim to their truthfulness, honesty, or factuality because of their presence on my blog. Again, Please consult a health care professional before heeding any health information given here.

    27Mar2011
  • Legal Disclaimer:

    Michelle Moquin's "A Day In The Life Of..." publishes the opinions of expert authorities in many fields. But the use of these opinions is no substitute for legal, accounting, investment, medical and other professional services to suit your specific personal needs. Always consult a competent professional for answers to your specific questions.

    27Mar2011
  • Fair Use Notice Disclaimer

    This web site may contain copyrighted material the use of which has not always been specifically authorized by the copyright owner. We are making such material available in our efforts to advance the understanding of humanity's problems and hopefully to help find solutions for those problems. We believe this constitutes a 'fair use' of any such copyrighted material as provided for in section 107 of the US Copyright Law. In accordance with Title 17 U.S.C. Section 107, the material on this site is distributed without profit to those who have expressed a prior interest in receiving the included information for research and educational purposes. A click on a hyperlink is a request for information. However, if you wish to use copyrighted material from this site for purposes of your own that go beyond 'fair use', you must obtain permission from me. You can read more about "fair use' and US Copyright Law"at the"Legal Information Institute of Cornell Law School." This notice was modified from a similar notice at "Common Dreams."

Archive for the 'Health & Well Being' Category

surfing the web anonymously

Posted by Michelle Moquin on 19th April 2011


Bookmark and Share

Good morning!

Perhaps this information might be useful to some of my readers out there.

Q: Is there a way to surf the Web anonymously so that the sites I visit don’t know that I have been there?

A: There are ways to surf anonymously, although there is no guarantee that what you do won’t be seen. Here are two options…

An anonymizer hides information that is coming from the user’s computer. It often is used by government agencies and corporations — it can make communication seem to come from an entirely different place. A company called Anonymizer (www.Anonymizer.com) is a major provider of this type of service for $80 a year.

Onion routing is another method of disguising the origin of most Internet activity. It can be complicated, making it more appropriate for advanced users. You can use onion routing for free through www.TorProject.org.

Our inside source: Randolph Hock, PhD, a former reference librarian and now a seminar and workshop provider and operator of Online Strategies, Vienna, Virginia. www.OnStrat.com.

**********

Anonymous: I know it’s late but thank you, and a good day to you as well.

Just wondering about Just wondering: Evidently it would not have been very hard if you had just asked it. I didn’t see a question asking me anything. Nothing. Now I’m annoyed. Dru asked: “What is wrong with answering the question? I would like to know when Anonz came in to.” (sic)  But, JW about JW: I didn’t see your question.

If you are asking how long Anonz has been on my blog, ask the question. I’ll repeat your comment to me: “How hard could it be to have just answered the question?” My answer is the same as above, “It would not have been very hard if you had just asked it.”

How to answer a question you never asked? “I have no fucking idea.”

Now…to answer the question you never asked: ”I have no fucking idea either. Read the archives. I enjoy my readers, and I’m grateful for them being here, but I have enough to do that deals with my blog than keep a running track of every person’s first time entry onto my blog.”

Does that answer your question? Oh that’s right…Zen Lill answered it. I HOPE you’re satisfied now. My suggestion? Next time try to be a little clearer in asking for what you want, before you give me wrath for not getting what you didn’t ask for in the first place. Is your head spinning or did you get that?

Howie: Thinking in the “now” keeps me sane. I used to have a tendency to dwell on the past and get anxious about the future. Again, your write was so interesting. And a Happy Passover to you et al.

Anonymous: Now that…is simply lovely.

Readers: Blog archives dated before January 17th 2008 are no longer available for viewing.

PEACE OUT.

Lastly, greed over a great story is surfacing from my “loyal”(?) readers. With all this back and forth about who owns what, that appears on my blog, let me reiterate that all material posted on my blog becomes the sole property of my blog. If you want to reserve any proprietary rights don’t post it to my blog. I will prominently display this caveat on my blog from now on to remind those who may have forgotten this notice.

Gratefully your blog host,

michelle

Aka BABE: We all know what this means by now :)

If you love my blog and my writes, please make a donation via PayPal, credit card, or e-check, please click the “Donate” button below. (Please only donations from those readers within the United States. – International readers please see my “Donate” page)

Or if you would like to send a check via snail mail, please make checks payable to “Michelle Moquin”, and send to:

Michelle Moquin PO Box 29235 San Francisco, Ca. 94129

Thank you for your loyal support!

All content on this site are property of Michelle Moquin © copyright 2008-2011

" Politics, god, Life, News, Music, Family, Personal, Travel, Random, Photography, Religion, Aliens, Art, Entertainment, Food, Books, Thoughts, Media, Culture, Love, Sex, Poetry, Prose, Friends, Technology, Humor, Health, Writing, Events, Movies, Sports, Video, Christianity, Atheist, Blogging, History, Work, Education, Business, Fashion, Barack Obama, People, Internet, Relationships, Faith, Photos, Videos, Hillary Clinton, School, Reviews, God, TV, Philosophy, Fun, Science, Environment, Design, The Page, Rants, Pictures, Church, Blog, Nature, Marketing, Television, Democrats, Parenting, Miscellaneous, Current Events, Film, Spirituality, Obama, Musings, Home, Human Rights, Society, Comedy, Me, Random Thoughts, Research, Government, Election 2008, Baseball, Opinion, Recipes, Children, Iraq, Funny, Women, Economics, America, Misc, Commentary, John McCain, Reflections, All, Celebrities, Inspiration, Lifestyle, Theology, Linux, Kids, Games, World, India, Literature, China, Ramblings, Fitness, Money, Review, War, Articles, Economy, Journal, Quotes, NBA, Crime, Anime, Islam, 2008, Stories, Prayer, Diary, Jesus, Buddha, Muslim, Israel, Europe, Links, Marriage, Fiction, American Idol, Software, Leadership, Pop culture, Rants, Video Games, Republicans, Updates, Political, Football, Healing, Blogs, Shopping, USA, Class, Matrix, Course, Work, Web 2.0, My Life, Psychology, Gay, Happiness, Advertising, Field Hockey, Hip-hop, sex, fucking, ass, Soccer, sox"

Posted in Health & Well Being | 17 Comments »

Swagapalooza hosts events for “most followed” bloggers

Posted by Michelle Moquin on 14th April 2011


Bookmark and Share

Good morning!

A few weeks ago I received the following e-mail:

Michelle,

I wanted to invite you to Swagapalooza (www.swagapalooza.com), the first invitation-only event for the most-followed bloggers and twitter users from around the country. 100 of the most-followed bloggers and tweeters are coming to learn about new and interesting products. I’d love to have you attend the event, which takes place the evening of April 12th. We have an excellent lineup of presentations, including talks by the creators of:

TwoDegrees – For every nutrition bar you buy, they give a nutrition pack to a hungry child.
Saboteur Man – The world’s first tailored waterproof blazer.
Transcendent Man – A documentary film about the life and ideas of Ray Kurzweil
Boom Boom! Revolution – A card game you play by performing ‘underground acts of guerilla goodness’.
Grubwith.us – Eat with awesome people!

If you’re able to come then please fill out the RSVP form below.
Feel free to call if you have any questions, and I hope to see you there!

******

How exciting! I knew my blog was popular, but I had no idea that it was in the top 100 most followed! – How cool is that? So…of course not being able to resist the invitation to mingle with a bunch of fellow bloggers, (and why would I?) and judge some of the latest and greatest new products…I RSVP’d “Yes – I would love to come!” The event was from 6-9 PM Tuesday night at the DNA Lounge in San Francisco.

Doug and I had plans already that night in the later part of the evening (One of Doug’s Facebook friends is a singer in a rap band, and was playing at 1015, San Francisco, and he so kindly sent us a few tickets inviting us to see him do his thing), so attending Swagapalooza in the early evening worked out perfect.

We arrived at the DNA Lounge a little after 6:00 PM, fashionably late, not on purpose. It was a windy evening but the small line to get in went very quickly.

While chatting away this young man came up and handed everyone a loaf of bread. On the side of the bag was written “Sour Flour”. For those of you who don’t live in San Francisco or the Bay Area, Sourdough bread is a fave to the San Francisco locals, not to mention a nice departure gift for tourists to take with them on their way back home.

Okay so you’re probably thinking, “Big deal. A loaf of bread.” Ah…but this wasn’t an ordinary loaf. This bread was just removed from the oven steaming hot. I don’t know about you, but whole wheat sourdough, fresh out of the oven, steaming hot in my little fingers, was just what I needed to satisfy my hunger. Next…an icy cold beer.

And that’s exactly what we got. After signing in and proudly displaying my blog name on my chest, Doug and I took our drink tickets, got an ice cold beer, some finger food, and mingled with the bloggers and tweeters.

Around 7:00 PM we all took our seats ready to hear all about these exciting new products. Let me preface that yes, the point of the evening was to get bloggers and tweeters to learn about the products…to judge the products, and HOPEfully be excited enough to blog and tweet about them.

So…Let me be completely transparent. I need to disclose that although we were not paid to brag about the swag on our blogs, each of us were given swag bags of all of the products for free. So yes, I will be talking about these products, not all but some, and not because I received them for free but because some of these products were damn cool. And I have to admit, I was quite excited to receive them then,  and I am excited to brag by blogging about them now. Note: If I didn’t take a liking to the product, I won’t be blogging and bragging about it, regardless that I got it for free.

But first…before I get into the swing of telling you about the swag, I have to say that during these product presentations, something cool, and something not so cool was happening. Each presenter presented his product on stage. And on the stage was a monitor that was the size of a large screen television. The cool thing was that during the presentations, the tweeters tweeted about the products so that not only did their followers get to hear first hand about these products, but we got to visually see what was being tweeted in live time, which I thought was a very fun idea.

Now I think it’s perfectly fine for tweeters to tweet their thoughts about any particular product – whether they thought it was a viable product or not. But what was not cool was when some tweeters started tweeting remarking on the looks of a particular presenter, or making fun of the product in a mean spirited way. One tweeter even tweeted referring to a man’s “size”. It was so distracting and rude.

I felt embarrassed and bad that these tweeters subjected these presenters to acts of such a rude and inconsiderate nature. When one of these tasteless tweets rolled across the screen some people would laugh and the laughter would steal the scene. And the presenter, although he could not see the tweets, was left feeling as if he was on the outside of an inside joke. One presenter used those exact words, and sadly, he was exactly right.

Thankfully, the rude tweets only happened a few times, but happening even once was one too many, in my opinion. And for those that were subjected to the rudeness, they were gracious enough to roll with it. And thankfully the bad manners of the tweeters didn’t overpower the positiveness of the evening.

That being said, I HOPE that I didn’t make it sound like the event was a downer because overall the evening was very fun, the products innovative, and the presenters exciting and inspiring. I thoroughly enjoyed myself, and it seemed most others did too. But I just had to bring up the rudeness because it was present too. Additionally, you can bet that I will be giving this exact feedback to Swagapalooza, as I feel it is worth a mention, in HOPEs this will deter this nasty behavior the next time around.

Now…onto the fun stuff.  Just what was in this fab swag bag? Well let me tell you…it was everything listed above in the e-mail and more! Here’s a few of my faves:

TwoDegrees – For every nutrition bar you buy, they give a nutrition pack to a hungry child.

I love the concept of this company. If you’ve ever heard of Tom’s Shoes, this is the food version of the foot. Buy 1, 1 is given. For a couple of bucks, you purchase a TwoDegrees nutrition bar and one hungry child will get a nutrition pack. All the bars are made locally out of local ingredients, however not organic. – I tasted the chocolate peanut (with Quinoa, chia and millet) and it was delicious. Their mission: To feed 200 million hungry children, one child at a time.” So…how about buying a bar or two…or?

Saboteur Man - The world’s first tailored waterproof blazer

Cool. You’re out having fun, someone spills a drink on you and it just rolls right off. Worth $650 bucks? I don’t know. But getting one of their men’s French-cuff shirts for free was pretty sweet, I thought. I snagged a small size –  Love a nice tailored man’s shirt on me. Doug will look so handsome in his too. PS: I haven’t tried it on for fit, nor have I even felt the cotton. But when I do and if I love it, I’ll be sure to tell you.

Flings Bins – Pop-up Recycle Bin

If it’s for the environment, I like it already.

New Flings Pop-Up Bins make trash and recycling easier in your home, at events, parties or on the go. These decorative, portable containers arrive flat for easy storage and pop open in an instant. All Flings Bins have a 13-gallon capacity and feature an easy-to-use drawstring closure. And each Flings Recycle Bin saves 60 cans or bottles from the landfill. Try Flings Pop-Up Bins at your next gathering, big game day party or just around home.

Transcendent Man – A documentary film about the life and ideas of Ray Kurzweil

I’m only blogging this because didn’t somebody, one of my readers, post a comment about this? I don’t remember. Well…I now own the DVD. When I watch it, I’ll blog about it if I think it’s worth it.

Boom Boom! Revolution - A card game you play by performing ‘underground acts of guerilla goodness’.

This was one of my most favorite freebies! No more counting on random acts of kindness. We all know that things happen when intention is the driving force. But sometimes we all need a little inspiration…a little reminder to be kinder. After all random acts are…well…random.

These cards are the answer to intentional acts of kindness, spreading guerilla goodness wherever you go. This is how the cards work:

Original Deck:
Revolutionary acts for work, friends & home!

As cards carrying members of the Boom Boom Revolution! you will perform 26 revolutionary acts of  guerilla goodness in your every day life, spreading kindness in your workplace and home, as well as your greater community. Each time you complete a card, you post your experience on the website and then give the card away for someone else to play. The card’s unique ID number enables you to follow your Boom Boom! Card’s journey on the website’s map and witness all the goodness they’ve inspired!

Kit Includes:
- 26 Boom Boom! Cards designed for busy adults who want to make a difference
- Boom Boom! sticky note pad
- Handy carrying sack to keep it all in

Check out their other card kits: “family deck”, “teen deck” and the “green deck”. ( I got this one and I am so excited to start spreading some green guerilla goodness.)

And lastly, I must not forget to give kudos to “Sour Flour” the bread company for providing a little warmth in my hands and comfort food in my tummy.

Yes, writing a daily blog may not pay me, but there are some perks. That’s it. I’m done bragging. Comments? Thoughts? Blog me.

Lastly, greed over a great story is surfacing from my “loyal”(?) readers. With all this back and forth about who owns what, that appears on my blog, let me reiterate that all material posted on my blog becomes the sole property of my blog. If you want to reserve any proprietary rights don’t post it to my blog. I will prominently display this caveat on my blog from now on to remind those who may have forgotten this notice.

Gratefully your blog host,

michelle

Aka BABE: We all know what this means by now :)

If you love my blog and my writes, please make a donation via PayPal, credit card, or e-check, please click the “Donate” button below. (Please only donations from those readers within the United States. – International readers please see my “Donate” page)

Or if you would like to send a check via snail mail, please make checks payable to “Michelle Moquin”, and send to:

Michelle Moquin PO Box 29235 San Francisco, Ca. 94129

Thank you for your loyal support!

For archives dated before January 17, 2008 click on my Blogroll:

or click here: “A Day in the life of…”

All content on this site are property of Michelle Moquin © copyright 2008-2011

" Politics, god, Life, News, Music, Family, Personal, Travel, Random, Photography, Religion, Aliens, Art, Entertainment, Food, Books, Thoughts, Media, Culture, Love, Sex, Poetry, Prose, Friends, Technology, Humor, Health, Writing, Events, Movies, Sports, Video, Christianity, Atheist, Blogging, History, Work, Education, Business, Fashion, Barack Obama, People, Internet, Relationships, Faith, Photos, Videos, Hillary Clinton, School, Reviews, God, TV, Philosophy, Fun, Science, Environment, Design, The Page, Rants, Pictures, Church, Blog, Nature, Marketing, Television, Democrats, Parenting, Miscellaneous, Current Events, Film, Spirituality, Obama, Musings, Home, Human Rights, Society, Comedy, Me, Random Thoughts, Research, Government, Election 2008, Baseball, Opinion, Recipes, Children, Iraq, Funny, Women, Economics, America, Misc, Commentary, John McCain, Reflections, All, Celebrities, Inspiration, Lifestyle, Theology, Linux, Kids, Games, World, India, Literature, China, Ramblings, Fitness, Money, Review, War, Articles, Economy, Journal, Quotes, NBA, Crime, Anime, Islam, 2008, Stories, Prayer, Diary, Jesus, Buddha, Muslim, Israel, Europe, Links, Marriage, Fiction, American Idol, Software, Leadership, Pop culture, Rants, Video Games, Republicans, Updates, Political, Football, Healing, Blogs, Shopping, USA, Class, Matrix, Course, Work, Web 2.0, My Life, Psychology, Gay, Happiness, Advertising, Field Hockey, Hip-hop, sex, fucking, ass, Soccer, sox"

Posted in Entertainment & Laughter, Health & Well Being, Long Live Planet Earth! | 16 Comments »

Liberty, Mississippi: An oxymoron, for many

Posted by Michelle Moquin on 11th April 2011


Bookmark and Share

Good morning everyone.

I saw this last might on 60 Minutes and it seemed apropos to post it this morning in light of the discussions happening here. For those of you who enjoy reading I posted the text. For those of you who prefer visuals or sound so that you can continue to listen while making your breakfast or lunch, click here for the video.

Cold case: The murder of Louis Allen

Steve Kroft investigates the civil rights era killing of Louis Allen in a Mississippi town

(CBS News) Five years ago, the FBI announced that it was reopening more than 100 unsolved murder cases from the civil rights era of the 1950s and 60s. The goal of the “Cold Case Initiative” was to try and mete out justice in what seemed to be racially motivated killings that were never prosecuted.

Not many 50-year-old cold cases ever get solved – memories fade, evidence is lost, witnesses and suspects die or disappear. But that’s not the case in the death of Louis allen, a mostly forgotten, but historically significant murder that helped bring thousands of white college students to Mississippi in the Freedom Summer of 1964.

Reporting on an unsolved murder
Forty seven years after the murder of Louis Allen, “60 Minutes” goes to Liberty, Miss. in search of his killer.

The murder is still unsolved, but the case has never quite gone away, because the chief suspect is very much alive and walking the streets of a town called Liberty.

Liberty, Miss. is a small rural logging town not far from the Louisiana border. The FBI believes that some people there have been keeping a dark secret for nearly 50 years, from one of the ugliest periods in the state’s history.

It was a time when civil rights activists were beaten and arrested, when state, and local politics were controlled by all-white citizens’ councils, and when people like Louis Allen were murdered in cold blood and without redress.

Cynthia Deitle, a 15-year veteran of the FBI’s civil rights division, was, until a few weeks ago, in charge of the Cold Case Initiative. She keeps a photo of Allen on her desk.

Asked why, she told “60 Minutes” correspondent Steve Kroft, “The case bothers me. I feel like we failed, and not just the FBI, but law enforcement.”

Of the 100 unsolved racially motivated murders she has been charged with investigating, none has been more promising or frustrating than Allen’s.

“Somebody knows something. Some husband came home with bloody clothing. Someone got drunk in a bar and said what he was doing last night. Someone knows something,” Deitle said.

But in the early 1960s, people in and around Liberty knew to keep their mouths shut. A violent chapter of the Ku Klux Klan used cross burnings, abductions and murder to enforce the doctrine of white supremacy and to intimidate the black population, most of which lived in shacks with no electricity or plumbing, and were not allowed to vote.

Civil rights leaders like Robert Moses, who came south to help them register, were frequently the target of violence.

“Liberty was not a place that I liked to go,” Moses remembered.

Asked why, he told Kroft, “Because it was a place where you weren’t safe if you were doing voter registration work.”

It was in Liberty that Moses met Louis Allen, a rough-hewn World War II veteran who walked proud and was not afraid to stand up for himself. He ran a small timber business, was one of the few blacks in Liberty to own his own land, and always wore a hat, which he considered a sign of self-respect.

He was not the type to seek out trouble – Robert Moses says it found him.

“He was at the wrong place at the wrong time. He saw something that happened and he was deeply disturbed and affected by that. And so he had a basic life decision to make,” Moses explained.

On Sept. 25, 1961, Allen was walking past an old cotton gin when he saw something that likely got him killed.

Allen witnessed a powerful state legislator by the name of E.H. Hurst shoot and kill an unarmed black man named Herbert Lee. Allen told his friends and family that he and other eyewitnesses had been pressured into lying about the shooting, and to saying that it was self-defense. Later, Allen decided that he needed to tell the truth.

One of the people Allen told it to was Julian Bond, who was trying to register black voters in Mississippi for the Student Nonviolent Coordinating Committee. He would later become a legendary civil rights leader.

“This was not a self-defense action by the state representative. This was out and out murder. That’s all it was. But Louis Allen agreed to lie about that,” Bond said.

Asked why he thinks Allen lied about it, Bond said, “He lied because he was in fear of his life. If he had implicated a powerful white man in a murder of a black man, that he was risking his life.”

“Did you encourage him to tell the truth?” Kroft asked.

“I tried to encourage him to tell the truth, but you know, it was like saying, ‘Why don’t you volunteer to be killed?’” Bond replied.

But Allen’s wife would later testify that “his conscience was clipping him” and he decided to tell FBI agents and the U.S. Commission on Civil Rights what really happened at the cotton gin. A document from FBI files says, “Allen changed his story” and “expressed fear that he might be killed.”

He asked for protection, but none was provided. Almost immediately, word began circulating in Liberty that Allen was prepared to change his testimony.

“He was threatened as a result of the fact that he was going to change his statement and that he did change his statement,” Deitle said.

She said the FBI was notified of those threats.

Asked if the bureau did anything, Deitle said, “Yes. We referred that to local law enforcement authorities.”

“It’s certainly possible to conclude that local law enforcement people were the ones behind the threats?” Kroft asked.

“There is a theory out there that that speaks to that. Yes,” she replied.

In fact, it has been the prevailing theory for some time, although the FBI cannot officially confirm it. There is a 1961 reference in the FBI file to a report that “Allen was to be killed and the local sheriff was involved in the plot to kill him.”

And “60 Minutes” found a 1962 letter from Robert Moses to Assistant Attorney General John Doar, alleging the same thing: “They’re after him in Amite [County],” it says, and makes reference to “a plot by the sheriff and seven other men.”

“He was afraid of the sheriff’s department,” Kroft remarked.

“I think he was, yes,” Deitle said.

“And I think he was afraid of the Klan, although they seemed to be sort of the same thing in Liberty at this time,” Kroft remarked.

“I’m not sure I can say that,” she replied.

Julian Bond was less circumspect: “The law enforcement, you suspected they were members. If you wanted to be a mayor, a city councilman, a county commissioner, the sheriff, if you wanted to be on the legislature, you had to have some connection with the Klan.”

And in the Amite County Sheriff’s Department, the person with the best connection was Deputy Sheriff Daniel Jones. His father was the “Exalted Cyclops” of the local Klan, and Jones himself, according to an FBI document “60 Minutes” found, was suspected of being a Klan member.

Jones, who is alive and still resides in Liberty, was recently visited by FBI agents who wanted him to take a lie detector test.

“What was he like?” Kroft asked Louis Allen’s son, Hank.

“Well, mean,” he replied.

Hank Allen was 17 years old when his father was killed and he remembers Jones as his main tormentor. He says he watched Jones harass and repeatedly arrest his father on trumped-up charges, and one night beat him outside their home.

“And he had handcuffed him, told him he was under arrest. So Daddy asked for his hat. Told Daddy, ‘No, you can’t go get your hat.’ Daddy said, ‘Well, my son is on the porch, can he bring me my hat?’ He drawed back, he took a flashlight, and he struck my daddy, and broke his jawbone. Handcuffed,” Hank Allen told Kroft.

When he got out of jail, Louis Allen did something that was unheard of for a black man in Mississippi: he went to the FBI and lodged a complaint against Deputy Sheriff Jones and testified before a federal grand jury.

The case was thrown out, and the situation in Liberty continued to deteriorate.

“They stopped sellin’ Daddy gas in the town. They stopped buyin’ his logs. They just more or less just tried to black ball him,” Hank Allen remembered.

“It got to the point, the harassment and just him not being able to survive in Liberty that he decided to leave and to go work in another state. And it’s the night before he is due to leave that he is killed,” Cynthia Deitle explained.

Allen was ambushed on a cold night in January 1964, after getting out of his truck to open the cattle gate that led to his property. His son, Hank, was the one who found him.

“I didn’t know why he would park the truck in the middle of the driveway and leave it like that. And I climbed up in the truck. The headlights was real dim. And when I went to step down out the truck, I stepped on something. And that’s when I stepped on my daddy’s hand. He was lying up under the truck,” Hank Allen remembered.

He was killed with two blasts of deer shot to the head. The investigating officer was none other than the newly-elected sheriff, Daniel Jones, who Hank said made it clear to the family, why his father had been murdered.

“He told my mom that if Louis had just shut his mouth, that he wouldn’t be layin’ there on the ground. He wouldn’t be dead,” Hank Allen said.

Asked if he thinks Sheriff Jones did it, Hank Allen told Kroft, “Yes, indeed. By all means. If he didn’t do it, he was the entrepreneur of it.”

Jones told the newspapers he was unable to find a single clue.

“How would you characterize the investigation that Sheriff Jones conducted?” Kroft asked Deitle.

“He did not develop any fingerprints, any physical evidence and he never developed any suspects,” she replied.

“Not a great investigation,” Kroft remarked.

“Probably could have done more,” she replied.

And the same might be said about the FBI at the time: it had limited jurisdiction over civil rights murders and little inclination to investigate them. In fact, it’s not clear that anyone investigated Allen’s murder until 1994, when Plater Robinson, a historian at the Southern Institute at Tulane University, began digging into it.

“From day one in Liberty, people told me that Daniel Jones and a colored man killed Louis Allen,” Robinson said.

Robinson has spent 17 years combing through archives and tracking down people to interview. One of them was an elderly preacher named Alfred Knox. Knox told Robinson in a 1998 tape-recorded conversation that his son-in-law, Archie Weatherspoon, was with Sheriff Daniel Jones when Allen was murdered.
“My son-in-law went with him,” Knox said in the recorded interview.

“To kill Louis Allen?” Robinson asked.

“To kill Louis Allen,” Knox said. “He didn’t know where he was goin’ till he got in the car. And he said ‘Would you pull the trigger? Would you shoot him?’ He said, ‘No, I ain’t gonna do it.’ That what my son-in-law said. ‘I ain’t gonna shoot him. You come out here to kill him, you kill him.’ So he killed him.”

Both Knox and his son-in-law took their stories to the grave. But Robinson says the answer to who killed Allen can still be found in Liberty. “A lot of people are dead. But there are still a number of significant people still alive,” he told Kroft.

“Like who, besides Sheriff Jones?” Kroft asked.

“Well, Charles Ravencraft, he lives down the road. And he’s quite healthy,” Robinson said.

We found Ravencraft at the Liberty Drug Store presiding over a coffee klatch of old-timers, some of whom were around when Allen was murdered.

“People in this area, they just don’t do much talking,” Ravencraft told Kroft.

For years, Ravencraft was sergeant-at-arms of the Mississippi legislature. And at the time of Allen’s murder, he was vice president of the “Americans for the Preservation of the White Race” in Liberty, a front group for the Ku Klux Klan.

Asked if the Klan was present in the area, Ravencraft told Kroft, “Sure. They were here.”

“Were any of you guys in it?” Kroft asked.

‘It wouldn’t have been a Klan if you don’t tell everybody what your business was,” Ravencraft said.

Ravencraft indicated that he hadn’t lost much sleep over Allen’s murder, and told us he had no idea who killed him. “No I don’t. He lived a lot longer than I thought he’d a lived. That’s the kinda fella he was, he was a little overbearing. I don’t think that civil rights had anything to do with it,” he told Kroft.

Winbourne Sullivan wasn’t around when Allen was killed, but he ran the Liberty Drug Store for 36 years. “I think there are people who know what happened and who did it, but they’re not willin’ to talk about it. And they won’t talk about it. You’ll never find out,” he said.

They told us they don’t see much of former Sheriff Daniel Jones these days. He spends most of his time on his property, just off the state highway.

We decided to approach him with our cameras concealed, on the off-chance he might give something up. After waiting for a half-an-hour on the porch, he rolled up in an all-terrain vehicle with his wife.

“My name is Steve Kroft. We’re from ’60 Minutes’ in New York. We’re down here working on a story, on an old case of yours, and was wondering if you’d have some time to talk to us about?” Kroft asked.

“No, sir, I don’t believe so,” Jones replied.

“You don’t think so?” Kroft asked.

“No, sir,” Jones said.

“The Louis Allen case?” Kroft asked.

“Yeah, I know what you’re talking about,” Jones replied.

ones was polite and cordial, said he didn’t want to talk, but he kept on talking.
“There was some bad blood between you and Louis, right?” Kroft asked.

“There was not no bad blood between us. Apparently, I’m talking more than I need to, but the truth sometimes has a way of slipping out if you try to keep it covered up,” Jones said.

When asked if he was in the Klan, Jones told Kroft, “Well, I won’t answer that. I take the Fifth on that. “

Jones confirmed that the FBI had already been there asking some of the same questions.

“I told you I don’t care to discuss it, and you just keep coming with your educated approach,” Jones told Kroft.

“No, it’s not my educated approach. Look, you haven’t told me to get off your property. Just answer me one last question,” Kroft said.

“Okay, be sure it’s the last one,” Jones said.

“Can you look me in the eye and say you weren’t involved in it?” Kroft asked.

“No sir, I wasn’t involved in it,” Jones said.

“Well, you know, sheriff, you could clear this up with a lie detector test,” Kroft pointed out.

“Well, then it ain’t gonna get cleared up,” Jones said.

“The theory that Sheriff Jones killed Louis Allen has been in the public domain for quite some time. The FBI would be remiss in our duties if we did not pursue that theory,” Cynthia Deitle told Kroft.

And it’s still just a theory – a circumstantial case based on motive, suspicions, hearsay and the words of dead people. There’s no forensic evidence, no murder weapon, no eyewitnesses and only one FBI agent working the case, part-time.

At a town hall meeting in nearby Baton Rouge, Deitle tried to shake out some new leads and enlist journalists, activists and students to help the FBI solve the murder. But there were some in the audience who still mistrust the FBI and think the “Cold Case Initiative” is little more than public relations.

“There’s been nothin’ did. There’s been not one arrest, there’s been all kind of investigations made. And I hate to say things like this. Because the FBI is the only help I got,” Hank Allen told the crowd.

Asked if the FBI should be doing more, Julian Bond told Kroft, “Of course they should be doing more. You know, thank God for these people who are doing it. But we can’t turn law enforcement over to journalists. We can’t turn it over to academics. We can’t depend on some guy at Tulane to tell us who’s killing people in Mississippi. Come on!”

“Why are you relying on reporters and professors? This is the most powerful law enforcement agency in the country. You have subpoena power,” Kroft pointed out.

“We do. We have resources that we could bring to bear on any case,” Deitle said.

“Why don’t you bring ‘em?” Kroft asked.

“They have been. But I’ve learned in these cases that a witness, a family member may be more comfortable talking to you then she would be talking to me,” she replied.

For Hank Allen, the time to solve his father’s killing was 47 years ago.

He believes the people who know what happened – black and white – would rather forget it now and that the wall of silence and the passage of time have granted immunity to those he thinks are responsible.

“Here’s a guy, goes on livin’ his normal life, enjoyin’ life. But they feel as though we’re doin’ somethin’ wrong by sayin’ somethin’ about the murder. In other words, ‘You should be quiet about that. That was in the past.’ Well, it’s still in my present, and in my future. I have to look at this every day,” he told Kroft.

Got a tip or information about the Louis Allen case or any other civil rights era cold case? Send us an e-mail at 60m@cbsnews.com.

**********

Readers: As I read this story all can think is this is just a day in the life of a black person living in Liberty, Mississippi at a time when a black person had no rights. Liberty, Mississippi – so much for being free.

This particular man feared for his life, just because he saw someone kill a man and wanted to do the right thing, when everyone else wanted him to shut up and forget it.

And when it was known that he was planning on doing the right thing, he feared for his life; and no one protected him. There was even a plot to kill him…to silence him, all for wanting to tell the truth.

He was harrassed, arrested on trumped-up charges, and beaten.  And when he went to the FBI and lodged a complaint against the perpetrator and testified before a federal grand jury, they threw the case out. It got so bad that he even had to leave the town he lived in to get work to support his family.

This is just one story of one black man. Murder or not, many others could tell a similar story of their lives being threatened, harassed and living in fear on a daily basis. And it is probably more typical for that time than we’d like to think, or for some, than they’d like to remember.

And for some, as noted in the story, they simply have the privilege to live their lives, as if nothing happened, as if they did nothing wrong.

The last paragraph says it all and is so worth repeating:

“Here’s a guy, goes on livin’ his normal life, enjoyin’ life. But they feel as though we’re doin’ somethin’ wrong by sayin’ somethin’ about the murder. In other words, ‘You should be quiet about that. That was in the past.’ Well, it’s still in my present, and in my future. I have to look at this every day,” he told Kroft.

No, many of us didn’t commit the atrocities that our ancestors did, but that is no excuse. Racism is still in the present, and sitting around on this present day and doing nothing about it, “looking the other way” as Paula pointed out, ignoring the racist remarks, and racist actions, and racist rules, and refusing to see how “justice” is really for “Just us”, is just as bad when you know it isn’t right.

Speaking of…

Paula: Wow. I wish that book had been introduced to me 20 years ago. I look forward to getting it. I would love to see the real portrait of AH. I have seen a few portraits of Alexander Dumas and there was only one that I found where he looked even close to being represented as the a black man that he is.

With respect to the rest of your write, I enjoyed your “two cents”. Keep it coming.

Lisa: Click here to buy the book.

Robert: Thanks for your addition to the topic. With respect to the “supreme court’: Noted and I agree. :)

Out of time. – the time is now yours. Blog me.

Lastly, greed over a great story is surfacing from my “loyal”(?) readers. With all this back and forth about who owns what, that appears on my blog, let me reiterate that all material posted on my blog becomes the sole property of my blog. If you want to reserve any proprietary rights don’t post it to my blog. I will prominently display this caveat on my blog from now on to remind those who may have forgotten this notice.

Gratefully your blog host,

michelle

Aka BABE: We all know what this means by now :)

If you love my blog and my writes, please make a donation via PayPal, credit card, or e-check, please click the “Donate” button below. (Please only donations from those readers within the United States. – International readers please see my “Donate” page)

Or if you would like to send a check via snail mail, please make checks payable to “Michelle Moquin”, and send to:

Michelle Moquin PO Box 29235 San Francisco, Ca. 94129

Thank you for your loyal support!

For archives dated before January 17, 2008 click on my Blogroll:

or click here: “A Day in the life of…”

All content on this site are property of Michelle Moquin © copyright 2008-2011

" Politics, god, Life, News, Music, Family, Personal, Travel, Random, Photography, Religion, Aliens, Art, Entertainment, Food, Books, Thoughts, Media, Culture, Love, Sex, Poetry, Prose, Friends, Technology, Humor, Health, Writing, Events, Movies, Sports, Video, Christianity, Atheist, Blogging, History, Work, Education, Business, Fashion, Barack Obama, People, Internet, Relationships, Faith, Photos, Videos, Hillary Clinton, School, Reviews, God, TV, Philosophy, Fun, Science, Environment, Design, The Page, Rants, Pictures, Church, Blog, Nature, Marketing, Television, Democrats, Parenting, Miscellaneous, Current Events, Film, Spirituality, Obama, Musings, Home, Human Rights, Society, Comedy, Me, Random Thoughts, Research, Government, Election 2008, Baseball, Opinion, Recipes, Children, Iraq, Funny, Women, Economics, America, Misc, Commentary, John McCain, Reflections, All, Celebrities, Inspiration, Lifestyle, Theology, Linux, Kids, Games, World, India, Literature, China, Ramblings, Fitness, Money, Review, War, Articles, Economy, Journal, Quotes, NBA, Crime, Anime, Islam, 2008, Stories, Prayer, Diary, Jesus, Buddha, Muslim, Israel, Europe, Links, Marriage, Fiction, American Idol, Software, Leadership, Pop culture, Rants, Video Games, Republicans, Updates, Political, Football, Healing, Blogs, Shopping, USA, Class, Matrix, Course, Work, Web 2.0, My Life, Psychology, Gay, Happiness, Advertising, Field Hockey, Hip-hop, sex, fucking, ass, Soccer, sox"

Posted in Health & Well Being, Human Rights and Equality, Political Powwow | 23 Comments »

Just Noticing: Observations of a blogger

Posted by Michelle Moquin on 10th April 2011


Bookmark and Share

I’m still stuck on the John Thompson case, my topic from the past two days. Not only because I find it so disgusting that the Supreme Court would make such a decision, but then as I kept reading about this case, I discovered more that I wanted to share. Hence my today’s topic of…Just Noticing: Observations of a blogger:

“Just noticing…”

  • …there are no deterrents to these prosecutors who withhold evidence. “If they get caught withholding evidence, nothing happens to them.” (Nick Trenticosta, who worked on Thompson’s case as director of the Louisiana Capital Defense Project) (Corrected 4/10, 10:48 AM)
  • Fully a quarter of the men sentenced to death during Connick’s tenure (District Attorney Harry Connick Sr. retired in 2003, from a 28-year reign of Orleans Parish) have had their convictions overturned—each time because of evidence that cast doubt on their guilt, but was hidden from the defense by prosecutors.
  • …that attorney Connick claims that the Thompson case was an isolated one, stating that, “We follow the rules. We have an ongoing and continuing obligation to turn over exculpatory evidence and we do.” However the truth is “Harry Connick used to give awards to prosecutors for successfully convicting people.” Connick, Trenticosta said, created a culture where convictions were won “at any cost.”

Readers: Here’s a write from “Mother Jones” back in October of 2010 before the Supreme Court decision. This is where I “just noticed” the points stated above.

14 Years on Death Row. $14 Million in Damages?

The model electric chair sitting on the desk of the New Orleans prosecutor Jim Williams seemed like a classic piece of Southern Gothic. But for John Thompson, it was all too real. “Seated” in the electric chair were photographs of five African American men that the Orleans Parish District Attorney’s office had proudly sent to death row. Thompson’s picture was dead center. The meaning was pretty clear, he recalls: “They were trying to kill me.”

Thompson spent 14 years on death row-until, with his appeals exhausted and execution just weeks away, his lawyers discovered evidence that they say the prosecution had deliberately hidden. Based on the new evidence, he was granted a retrial and exonerated. So was another of the men in the pictures. Of the remaining three, one was granted a new trial, while two others had their sentences commuted to life in prison.

To many criminal justice advocates, the prosecutor’s morbid desk ornament has become an emblem of the 28-year reign of Orleans Parish District Attorney Harry Connick Sr., the father of the singer and a Louisiana icon-and crooner-in his own right. (Kennedy assassination buffs also know Connick as the man who attempted to suppress the files from his predecessor Jim Garrison’s investigation, immortalized in Oliver Stone’s JFK). Fully a quarter of the men sentenced to death during Connick’s tenure (he retired in 2003) have had their convictions overturned-each time because of evidence that cast doubt on their guilt, but was hidden from the defense by prosecutors.

Now, the Supreme Court is about to weigh in on what the DA’s office owes to Thompson for his 14 years on death row. On Wednesday, two days into the Court’s new session, Thompson will be in Washington, watching oral arguments in Connick v. Thompson. Representatives of the New Orleans D.A.’s office will argue that the court should overturn the unprecedented damages awarded to him by a New Orleans jury: $1 million for each year he spent on death row.

Thompson’s story-complete with deathbed revelations and last-minute stays of execution-is compelling enough that Matt Damon and Ben Affleck at one time had plans to make it into a feature film, in which they would play his lawyers. (The project is currently in limbo.) There’s also a new book out on Thompson’s experience, called Killing Time. But the implications of Connick v. Thompson reach far beyond John Thompson’s life and even beyond New Orleans. The justices’ decision in the case will determine how far a district attorney’s office can be held responsible for the conduct of prosecutors.

John Thompson, who goes by JT, is now 48. The steady, intense gaze behind his wire-rimmed glasses matches his calm, measured speech, but flashes of anger break through from time to time. He was a 22-year-old father of two when he was convicted of murdering a white New Orleans hotel executive. Because three weeks prior he had been convicted of attempted armed robbery-a crime in which he also claimed innocence-JT was advised not to testify on his own behalf at his murder trial. The jury found him guilty and sentenced him to death, based in part on the “aggravating factor” of his armed robbery conviction.

In 1985, JT arrived on death row at the notorious Louisiana State Penitentiary at Angola and set about the business of trying to survive. He was helped by his faith and by his friendship with the members of the Angola 3-three former Black Panthers who had been placed in solitary confinement. “I was like babysitted by them. They took me on like a big son or something,” he told us. “Who I am now was molded by them.”

Like many condemned inmates, Thompson wrote many letters to attorneys and received mostly rejections-about a hundred, he says. Then help came through the Capital Defense Project at Loyola University in New Orleans. In 1998, lawyers from the project began working on his case, together with two pro bono attorneys, Michael Banks and Gordon Cooney, from Morgan, Lewis & Bockius, a venerable old Philadelphia firm that has become a huge international powerhouse in corporate law.

Thompson’s lawyers stuck with his case through 11 years of appeals and seven execution dates. But in 1999, the Supreme Court rejected their appeal, and they had to tell their client that the process had been exhausted. An eighth execution date was set for the following month.

“We had to get back into court,” said Nick Trenticosta, who worked on JT’s case as director of the Louisiana Capital Defense Project (now renamed the Center for Equal Justice). “So we got an investigator and she was able to spend days at the police department going through all kinds of old records.” Finally, the researcher found an explosive set of documents: The state had analyzed blood found on a pair of pants worn by one of the victims of the armed robbery, blood believed to be the perpetrator’s. The blood type was B. Thompson’s was O.

But the story got even more complicated: Upon learning of the attorneys’ discovery, another former New Orleans prosecutor, Mike Riehlmann, came forward with an astounding tale: Five years earlier, he said, his colleague Gerry Deegan, who was a junior assistant DA on the Thompson case, had told him that he’d hidden the test results and taken the pants from the evidence room. Riehlmann signed an affidavit, and JT’s convictions began to unravel.

The attorneys moved for a stay of execution; eventually the Louisiana Supreme Court vacated the robbery conviction, and a state district court changed his death sentence to life in prison because the aggravating factor was no longer present. Four years later, his murder conviction-which had been based entirely on testimony from witnesses who got cash or plea bargains for their testimony-was overturned as well. At his retrial in 2003, the jury took 35 minutes to find him not guilty. After 18 years, JT was a free man.

“They all try to portray it as rogue prosecutor; a fluke. But Harry Connick used to give awards to prosecutors for successfully convicting people.”
At the time, district attorney Connick told the Associated Press that the Thompson case was an isolated one. “We follow the rules,” Connick said. “We have an ongoing and continuing obligation to turn over exculpatory evidence and we do.” Not so, says Trenticosta. “They all try to portray it as rogue prosecutor; a fluke,” he says, but “Harry Connick used to give awards to prosecutors for successfully convicting people.” Connick, Trenticosta said, created a culture where convictions were won “at any cost.”

Findings by the Innocence Project of New Orleans back up that assessment. In a 2008 report, the Project reviewed the record of Connick’s 28-year-tenure, and found that the practice of suppressing evidence was so prevalent that it could be called “a legacy in New Orleans”:

According to available records, favorable evidence was withheld from 9 of the 36 (25%) men sentenced to death in Orleans Parish from 1973-2002. Four of those men were eventually exonerated… In other words, one in every four men sent to death row by the New Orleans District Attorney’s office from 1973-2002 was convicted after evidence that could have cast doubt on their guilt was withheld from them at trial. Four men, about 11%, were completely innocent.

One of those innocent men was 16-year-old Shareef Cousin, sent to death row for murder in 1995. He stayed there until the prosecutor in the case was shown to have both encouraged witnesses to lie on the stand and withheld a videotape that proved Cousin was playing basketball at the time of the murder.

Dan Bright was sentenced for murder in 1996. Attorneys later discovered a statement from the FBI, suppressed by prosecutors at the time of Bright’s trial, indicating that a confidential informant had identified another man as the killer. “These guys were perpetrating a fraud on the public,” the forewoman of Bright’s jury told New Orleans City Business, “and let me sentence an innocent man to death.”

Yet there have been few, if any, consequences for prosecutors. In 2005, a prosecutor in the Cousin case was found guilty of withholding evidence; the Louisiana State Supreme Court gave him a three month suspension, then suspended that sentence. Jim Williams, the prosecutor with the electric chair on his desk, is now in private practice. Thompson’s prosecutor, Gerry Deegan, died of cancer. Mike Riehlmann, who sat on the deathbed confession, was briefly suspended by the Louisiana Supreme Court for doing so; he is now a defense attorney. Harry Connick Sr. is comfortably retired.

What angers Thompson, he said after his exoneration, is that “nobody in the prosecutor’s office ever faces charges, nobody has to pay. A slap on the wrist for ‘malfeasance’ and then they’re back at work doing the same old thing.” Nick Trenticosta agrees. “As it stands, there are no deterrents to these prosecutors,” he says. “If they get caught withholding evidence so what? Nothing happens to them.”

So with the help of his lawyers, Thompson has sought to exact retribution through a different route. In 2005, he sued Connick, Williams, current district attorney Leon Cannizzaro, and the office of the DA. The state refused to settle the case, so it went to a jury, which awarded JT a record $14 million in damages. The state of Louisiana quickly appealed the verdict, which it claims will bankrupt the DA’s office. State and federal appeals courts ruled in Thompson’s favor, up to the federal Fifth Circuit Court of Appeals, at which point the state appealed again. Last spring, the US Supreme Court agreed to hear Connick v. Thompson in its fall session.

According to the brief filed by Thompson’s lawyers, the Court will have to decide whether “the district attorney was deliberately indifferent to the need to train, monitor, or supervise his prosecutors” about what’s known as the Brady rule-their obligation to hand over evidence favorable to the defense. But Connick v. Thompson could determine what kind of recourse defendants have when their Brady rights are violated. Individual prosecutors already enjoy immunity from lawsuits in most instances; if it overturns Thompson’s award, the Court might effectively give immunity to DA offices as well.

It’s not surprising, then, that Connick v. Thompson has brought in a slew of amicus briefs in support of Thompson’s position from civil libertarians. “If Connick wins on the ground that the DA’s office is not responsible when its prosecutors withhold evidence, then it will be impossible to recover damages” in such cases, says Katie Schwartzmann, legal director of the ACLU of Louisiana, which has filed an amicus brief.

In Louisiana, exonerated prisoners are released with nothing more than $10 and a bus ticket. To change that, Thompson has founded Resurrection After Exoneration.
Because the Court is only considering the Thompson case, and not the full record of the Orleans Parish DA’s office, it may also find that there is insufficient proof of negligence. “If Connick wins on the ground that one incident is not enough to establish the office’s liability-although we think there was more of a record than that in this case-then future litigation will be difficult but not impossible,” says Schwartzmann.

So while the stakes in this case are high for John Thompson, they are higher still for the next person to be tried and convicted by a prosecutor who is hiding evidence. A ruling in Connick’s favor could deny that person any recourse.

Thompson is already thinking about that next innocent man.

When he was freed from prison, he said, he was more fortunate than most. “I had a wife, I had a house, I had a job” as an assistant at the Center for Equal Justice, working with clients on death row. “I had a solid foundation…Most guys did not have that. Guys were coming home struggling.” In Louisiana, exonerated prisoners are released with nothing more than $10 and a bus ticket. To change that, Thompson has founded Resurrection After Exoneration, a group that tries to provide support for the wrongfully convicted.

At first, RAE focused on providing job skills. Then, JT told us, “I decided to have living quarters-a residential area where they live for 6 months to get readjusted to society. Downstairs we have computers, workshops. We try to bring in as much education as we can.” Thompson also wants RAE to represent the “voice of innocence”-to be a place where the exonerated “can tell their stories. It’s amazing how powerful these stories are.”

Should he ever get his $14 million, he says, he will use part of it to fund the organization.

*********

Notice that the author thought that Supreme Court Justice would do the right thing.

What did you “just notice”? Blog me.

PEACE OUT.

Lastly, greed over a great story is surfacing from my “loyal”(?) readers. With all this back and forth about who owns what, that appears on my blog, let me reiterate that all material posted on my blog becomes the sole property of my blog. If you want to reserve any proprietary rights don’t post it to my blog. I will prominently display this caveat on my blog from now on to remind those who may have forgotten this notice.

Gratefully your blog host,

michelle

Aka BABE: We all know what this means by now :)

If you love my blog and my writes, please make a donation via PayPal, credit card, or e-check, please click the “Donate” button below. (Please only donations from those readers within the United States. – International readers please see my “Donate” page)

Or if you would like to send a check via snail mail, please make checks payable to “Michelle Moquin”, and send to:

Michelle Moquin PO Box 29235 San Francisco, Ca. 94129

Thank you for your loyal support!

For archives dated before January 17, 2008 click on my Blogroll:

or click here: “A Day in the life of…”

All content on this site are property of Michelle Moquin © copyright 2008-2011

" Politics, god, Life, News, Music, Family, Personal, Travel, Random, Photography, Religion, Aliens, Art, Entertainment, Food, Books, Thoughts, Media, Culture, Love, Sex, Poetry, Prose, Friends, Technology, Humor, Health, Writing, Events, Movies, Sports, Video, Christianity, Atheist, Blogging, History, Work, Education, Business, Fashion, Barack Obama, People, Internet, Relationships, Faith, Photos, Videos, Hillary Clinton, School, Reviews, God, TV, Philosophy, Fun, Science, Environment, Design, The Page, Rants, Pictures, Church, Blog, Nature, Marketing, Television, Democrats, Parenting, Miscellaneous, Current Events, Film, Spirituality, Obama, Musings, Home, Human Rights, Society, Comedy, Me, Random Thoughts, Research, Government, Election 2008, Baseball, Opinion, Recipes, Children, Iraq, Funny, Women, Economics, America, Misc, Commentary, John McCain, Reflections, All, Celebrities, Inspiration, Lifestyle, Theology, Linux, Kids, Games, World, India, Literature, China, Ramblings, Fitness, Money, Review, War, Articles, Economy, Journal, Quotes, NBA, Crime, Anime, Islam, 2008, Stories, Prayer, Diary, Jesus, Buddha, Muslim, Israel, Europe, Links, Marriage, Fiction, American Idol, Software, Leadership, Pop culture, Rants, Video Games, Republicans, Updates, Political, Football, Healing, Blogs, Shopping, USA, Class, Matrix, Course, Work, Web 2.0, My Life, Psychology, Gay, Happiness, Advertising, Field Hockey, Hip-hop, sex, fucking, ass, Soccer, sox"

Posted in Health & Well Being, Human Rights and Equality | 5 Comments »

the sick, corrupt, and dirty details of absolute power

Posted by Michelle Moquin on 9th April 2011


Bookmark and Share

Here’s what I promised.

Cruel but Not Unusual

Clarence Thomas writes one of the meanest Supreme Court decisions ever.

In 1985, John Thompson was convicted of murder in Louisiana. Having already been convicted in a separate armed robbery case, he opted not to testify on his own behalf in his murder trial. He was sentenced to death and spent 18 years in prison—14 of them isolated on death row—and watched as seven executions were planned for him. Several weeks before an execution scheduled for May 1999, Thompson’s private investigators learned that prosecutors had failed to turn over evidence that would have cleared him at his robbery trial. This evidence included the fact that the main informant against him had received a reward from the victim’s family, that the eyewitness identification done at the time described someone who looked nothing like him, and that a blood sample taken from the crime scene did not match Thompson’s blood type.

In 1963, in Brady v. Maryland, the Supreme Court held that prosecutors must turn over to the defense any evidence that would tend to prove a defendant’s innocence. Failure to do so is a violation of the defendant’s constitutional rights. Yet the four prosecutors in Thompson’s case managed to keep secret the fact that they had hidden exculpatory evidence for 20 years. Were it not for Thompson’s investigators, he would have been executed for a murder he did not commit.

Both of Thompson’s convictions were overturned. When he was retried on the murder charges, a jury acquitted him after 35 minutes. He sued the former Louisiana district attorney for Orleans Parish, Harry Connick Sr. (yes, his dad) for failing to train his prosecutors about their legal obligation to turn over exculpatory evidence to the defense. A jury awarded Thompson $14 million for this civil rights violation, one for every year he spent wrongfully incarcerated. The district court judge added another $1 million in attorneys’ fees. A panel of the 5th Circuit Court of Appeals upheld the verdict. An equally divided 5th Circuit, sitting en banc, affirmed again.

But this week, writing on behalf of the five conservatives on the Supreme Court and in his first majority opinion of the term, Justice Clarence Thomas tossed out the verdict, finding that the district attorney can’t be responsible for the single act of a lone prosecutor. The Thomas opinion is an extraordinary piece of workmanship, matched only by Justice Antonin Scalia’s concurring opinion, in which he takes a few extra whacks at Justice Ruth Bader Ginsburg’s dissent. (Ginsburg was so bothered by the majority decision that she read her dissent from the bench for the first time this term.) Both Thomas and Scalia have produced what can only be described as a master class in human apathy. Their disregard for the facts of Thompson’s thrashed life and near-death emerges as a moral flat line. Scalia opens his concurrence with a swipe at Ginsburg’s “lengthy excavation of the trial record” and states that “the question presented for our review is whether a municipality is liable for a single Brady violation by one of its prosecutors.” But only by willfully ignoring that entire trial record can he and Thomas reduce the entire constitutional question to a single misdeed by a single bad actor.

Both parties to this case have long agreed that an injustice had been done. Connick himself conceded that there had been a Brady violation, yet Scalia finds none. Everyone else concedes that egregious mistakes were made. Scalia struggles to rehabilitate them all.

One of the reasons the truth came to light after 20 years is that Gerry Deegan, a junior assistant D.A. on the Thompson case, confessed as he lay dying of cancer that he had withheld the crime lab test results and removed a blood sample from the evidence room. The prosecutor to whom Deegan confessed said nothing about this for five years. While Scalia pins the wrongdoing on a single “miscreant prosecutor,” Ginsburg correctly notes that “no fewer than five prosecutors” were involved in railroading Thompson. She adds that they “did so despite multiple opportunities, spanning nearly two decades, to set the record straight.” While Thomas states the question as having to do with a “singleBrady violation,” Ginsburg is quick to point out that there was far more than just a misplaced blood sample at issue: Thompson was turned in by someone seeking a reward, but prosecutors failed to turn over tapes of that conversation. The eyewitness identification of the killer didn’t match Thompson, but was never shared with defense counsel. The blood evidence was enough to prove a Brady violation, but it was the tip of the iceberg.

In the 10 years preceding Thompson’s trial, Thomas acknowledges, “Louisiana courts had overturned four convictions because of Brady violations by prosecutors in Connick’s office.” Yet somehow this doesn’t add up to a pattern of Brady violations in the office, because the evidence in those other cases wasn’t blood or crime lab evidence. Huh? He then inexplicably asserts that young prosecutors needn’t be trained on Brady violations because they learned everything in law school.

Scalia and Thomas are at pains to say that Connick was not aware of or responsible for his subordinates’ unconstitutional conduct, except—as Ginsburg points out—that Connick acknowledged that he misunderstood Brady,acknowledged that his prosecutors “were coming fresh out of law school,” acknowledged he didn’t know whether they had Brady training, and acknowledged that he himself had ‘stopped reading law books … and looking at opinions’ when he was first elected District Attorney in 1974.” And Connick also conceded that holding his underlings to the highest Brady standards would “make [his] job more difficult.” As Bennett Gershman and Joel Cohen point out, the jury had “considerable evidence that both Connick and prosecutors in his office were ignorant of the constitutional rules regarding disclosure of exculpatory evidence; they were ignorant of the rules regarding disclosure of scientific evidence; there was no training, or continuing education, and no procedures to monitor compliance with evidentiary requirements; prosecutors did not review police files; and shockingly, Connick himself had been indicted by federal prosecutors for suppressing a lab report of the kind hidden from Thompson.”

It’s not just that a jury, a judge, and the 5th Circuit Court of Appeals found that Connick knew his staff was undertrained and he failed to fix it. It’s that it’s almost impossible, on reviewing all of the evidence, to conclude anything else. Nobody is suggesting that the legal issue here is simple or that there aren’t meaningful consequences to creating liability for district attorneys who fail to train their subordinates in Brady compliance. But those aren’t the opinions that Thomas and Scalia produced. Their effort instead was to sift and resift the facts until the injury done to Thompson can be pinned on a single bad actor, acting in bad faith. It’s a long, sad, uphill trek.

Beyond that, there is no suggestion in either opinion that this is a hard question or a close call or even a hint of regret at their conclusion. There is only certainty that the jury, the appeals court, and above all Ginsburg got it completely wrong in believing that someone should be held responsible for the outrages suffered by John Thompson. If there is empathy for anyone in evidence here, it’s for the overworked and overzealous district attorneys.

It’s left to Ginsburg to acknowledge that the costs of immunizing Connick from any wrongdoing is as high as the cost of opening him to it: “The prosecutorial concealment Thompson encountered … is bound to be repeated unless municipal agencies bear responsibility—made tangible by §1983 liability—for adequately conveying what Brady requires and for monitoring staff compliance.” As Scott Lemieux points out, by all-but-immunizing Connick for the conduct of his subordinates, the court has created a perfect Catch-22, since the courts already give prosecutors absolute immunity for their actions as prosecutors (though they may still be liable for their conduct as administrators or investigators). By immunizing their bosses as well, the court has guaranteed that nobody can be held responsible for even the most shocking civil rights violations.

I don’t think that the failure at the court is one of empathy. I don’t ask that Thomas or Scalia shed a tear for an innocent man who almost went to his death because of deceptive prosecutors. And, frankly, Ginsburg’s dissent—while powerful—is no less Vulcan in tone than their opinions. But this case is of a piece with prior decisions in which Thomas and Scalia have staked out positions that revel in the hyper-technical and deliberately callous. It was, after all, Scalia who wrote in 2009 that “this court has never held that the Constitution forbids the execution of a convicted defendant who had a full and fair trial but is later able to convince a habeas court that he is ‘actually’ innocent.” It was Thomas who wrote that a prisoner who was slammed to a concrete floor and punched and kicked by a guard after asking for a grievance form had no constitutional claim.

The law awards no extra points for being pitiless and scornful. There is rarely a reason to be pitiless and scornful, certainly in a case of an innocent man who was nearly executed. It leads one to wonder whether Thomas and Scalia sometimes are just because they can be.

**********

And this is our Supreme Court “Just us” system. Comments? Thoughts? Rants? Blog me.

AH: Wow. Talk about a conspiracy. And the fact that so many people, not to mention countries, kept it a secret is astounding. I can see not much has changed. Your statement, “The fear was that if Lincoln could put the country back on its feet, he would run and be elected for even a third term,” proves that even back then those that oppose were willing to risk the loss of their country to be successful in their agenda. The racists opposed a black man as president then, just as they do today.

With respect to the rest of your chronicle, I was glued to my computer, hanging on every word. I am not shocked but I am left somewhat speechless. Amazing how our history books etc.,  reflect nothing like this.

As readers have said here before, history is told and depicted how people in power want us to remember it. It is not necessarily the truth. The truth that we are supposed to believe is all in the power of the hands of those who write the written word, and have the power to spread it widely.  Thank for sharing. I HOPE you, Bita and Adam are well.

Paula: Your comments were such an interesting addition to AH’s. Thanks for sharing too. However, it seems there are more than just “two” presidents with black ancestry. There is a little book by J.A. Rogers called “The Five Negro Presidents”, that has come across my plate.

Readers: I expected to hear more from you with respect to AH’s story. Here’s a excerpt from an article written about this little 18-page book mentioned above:

Obama Would Be the Sixth Black President, At Least!

About a year ago, a Rastafarian guy I worked with who had a lot of optimism about Obama and, to me, an unrealistic expectation that an Obama presidency would be “revolutionary,” made a statement that piqued my curiosity. In the middle of speaking on what was shaping up to be the Obama versus Hilary primary farce, he said:

“Of course, people talking about Barack being the first black president have it wrong. He’d be the sixth one, at least!”

I’d never heard such a thing before, and I’ve heard lots of things. I’ve even had, in past iterations of my personality, great pride in having heard and read about quite a few things most people of my age don’t know. But this was the first time I’d heard about other black presidents, so I asked him about it.

My Rasta colleague responded with surprise. “Really? I figured you knew about that? There have been a few presidents with black ancestry. Thomas Jefferson was one, I forget the others. Alexander Hamilton, one of the other Founding Fathers, was part black, too. You ever been to his house up in Harlem? Any way, The Five Black Presidents, I think that’s the book. You should track that down.”

Cut to earlier this week. I’m in Brooklyn to check out a viewing of John Carpenter’s They Live, and I stop into a bookstore in the neighborhood. I’m browsing around the shelves when I come across a thin pamphlet that sets me abuzz.

A tiny pink covered, zine-sized affair with a picture of Warren Harding on the front and, just below him, a well-dressed man with an Afro: The Five Negro Presidents U.S.A. by J.A. Rogers. (Rogers is himself, a fascinating man, a self-taught scholar born in Jamaica who interviewed Marcus Garvey and attended the coronation of Hailie Selassie during the course of his life.)

Also known by the name The Five Negro Presidents According to What White People Said They Were, the tiny book first came out in 1965, a year before Rogers, a fascinating, noble-minded autodidact, passed on.  It gives an account of four presidents, plus a fifth that Rogers does not name. The four presidents Rogers mentions are Warren Harding, Thomas Jefferson, Andrew Jackson, and Abraham Lincoln. All of these men were, while they were alive, suspected of having black ancestry, something that was publicized and/or used against them by political opponents in their lifetimes even if these events have been whitewashed (pun definitely intended) from the history most of us learned during our youthful schooling.

Interesting huh? To read the rest of the write, click here.

PEACE OUT.

Lastly, greed over a great story is surfacing from my “loyal”(?) readers. With all this back and forth about who owns what, that appears on my blog, let me reiterate that all material posted on my blog becomes the sole property of my blog. If you want to reserve any proprietary rights don’t post it to my blog. I will prominently display this caveat on my blog from now on to remind those who may have forgotten this notice.

Gratefully your blog host,

michelle

Aka BABE: We all know what this means by now :)

If you love my blog and my writes, please make a donation via PayPal, credit card, or e-check, please click the “Donate” button below. (Please only donations from those readers within the United States. – International readers please see my “Donate” page)

Or if you would like to send a check via snail mail, please make checks payable to “Michelle Moquin”, and send to:

Michelle Moquin PO Box 29235 San Francisco, Ca. 94129

Thank you for your loyal support!

For archives dated before January 17, 2008 click on my Blogroll:

or click here: “A Day in the life of…”

All content on this site are property of Michelle Moquin © copyright 2008-2011

" Politics, god, Life, News, Music, Family, Personal, Travel, Random, Photography, Religion, Aliens, Art, Entertainment, Food, Books, Thoughts, Media, Culture, Love, Sex, Poetry, Prose, Friends, Technology, Humor, Health, Writing, Events, Movies, Sports, Video, Christianity, Atheist, Blogging, History, Work, Education, Business, Fashion, Barack Obama, People, Internet, Relationships, Faith, Photos, Videos, Hillary Clinton, School, Reviews, God, TV, Philosophy, Fun, Science, Environment, Design, The Page, Rants, Pictures, Church, Blog, Nature, Marketing, Television, Democrats, Parenting, Miscellaneous, Current Events, Film, Spirituality, Obama, Musings, Home, Human Rights, Society, Comedy, Me, Random Thoughts, Research, Government, Election 2008, Baseball, Opinion, Recipes, Children, Iraq, Funny, Women, Economics, America, Misc, Commentary, John McCain, Reflections, All, Celebrities, Inspiration, Lifestyle, Theology, Linux, Kids, Games, World, India, Literature, China, Ramblings, Fitness, Money, Review, War, Articles, Economy, Journal, Quotes, NBA, Crime, Anime, Islam, 2008, Stories, Prayer, Diary, Jesus, Buddha, Muslim, Israel, Europe, Links, Marriage, Fiction, American Idol, Software, Leadership, Pop culture, Rants, Video Games, Republicans, Updates, Political, Football, Healing, Blogs, Shopping, USA, Class, Matrix, Course, Work, Web 2.0, My Life, Psychology, Gay, Happiness, Advertising, Field Hockey, Hip-hop, sex, fucking, ass, Soccer, sox"

Posted in Health & Well Being, Human Rights and Equality, Political Powwow | 15 Comments »