Money Matters
Posted by Michelle Moquin on September 15th, 2014
Good morning!
From the Huff Po.
Seniors Forced Into Poverty As Education Department Demands Payment
The Education Department is demanding so much money from seniors with defaulted student loans that it’s forcing tens of thousands of them into poverty, according to agovernment audit.
At least 22,000 Americans aged 65 and older had a part of their Social Security benefits garnished last year to the point that their monthly benefits were below federal poverty thresholds, according to the Government Accountability Office.
Education Department-initiated collections on defaulted federal student loans left at least another 83,000 Americans aged 64 and younger with poverty-level Social Security payments, GAO data show. Federal auditors cautioned that the number of Americans forced to accept poverty-level benefits because of past defaults on federal student loans are surely higher.
More than half, or 54 percent, of federal student loans held by borrowers at least 75 years old are in default, according to the federal watchdog. About 27 percent of loans held by borrowers aged 65 to 74 are in default. Among borrowers aged 50 to 64, 19 percent of their loans are in default. The Education Department generally defines a default as being at least 360 days past due.
As unpaid student debt approaches $1.3 trillion, the federal watchdog’s findings underscore the consequences of increased student debt burdens and the risk they’ll wreak havoc on households in the coming years if U.S. workers continue to see little increase in their paychecks, the economy barely grows, and the Education Department’s contractors keep borrowers in the dark on repayment options.
“This GAO report strikes me as a kind of canary in a coal mine,” Sen. Richard Blumenthal (D-Conn.) said Wednesday during a hearing prompted by the report held by the Senate Special Committee on Aging. “What it says to me is, look at this narrow slice of the Baby Boom generation that now has debt [and] look at its impact … which is, if anything, more pernicious and insidious than it is for younger people.
“This age group is not only affected in more serious ways, but it is also going to grow,” Blumenthal continued. “In other words, this report says: Look out, the cliff is ahead, or the avalanche, [or] maybe it’s a tsunami, of older student debt.”
Struggling borrowers are rarely able to discharge federal student loans by declaring bankruptcy. As a result, federal auditors noted, their student debts follow them into retirement.
As the increase in average college tuitions outpaces federal borrowing limits for undergraduates, more parents are taking out federal student loans to pay for their children’s education. But GAO auditors said the vast majority of loan balances held by older Americans is for their own educations. Among borrowers aged 50 to 64, about 73 percent of their federal student loan debt was for their own schooling. For borrowers aged 65 and older, more than 82 percent of their debts was for their own education.
Some 40 million Americans have student debt, according to the Federal Reserve and the Education Department. The average recipient of federal student loans owed 28 percent more in 2013 than in 2007, after adjusting for inflation, according to Education Department data.
Meanwhile, the typical holder of a bachelor’s degree working full time experienced a 0.08 percent decrease in weekly earnings during that same period. Among workers with advanced degrees, median wages increased just 0.02 percent, according to figures from the U.S. Bureau of Labor Statistics.
With student loan debt rising and inflation-adjusted wages falling, borrowers with student loans are reducing their spending to make their loan payments, according toa Federal Reserve survey. Nearly half of Americans said they had to curb their spending last year in order to make monthly payments on student loans.
Some 35 percent of survey respondents who are paying back student loans said they had to reduce their spending by “a little” over the past year to keep up with student debt payments. Another 11 percent said they had to cut back their spending by “a lot.”
With consumer spending powering much of the economy, any reduction in household expenditures is likely to dampen growth.
Some 12 percent of federal student loans held by borrowers aged 25 to 49 were in default, according to the GAO.
“One out of every eight student loans held by this group is in default,” said Charles Jeszeck, director of education, workforce, and income security issues at the GAO. “That’s a lot of loans!”
Rising student loan debt also risks leaving Americans with less money for their retirement, as ever bigger chunks of workers’ paychecks are devoted to repaying education loans.
“The presence of student loan debt for those nearing retirement can also affect retirement security as it may keep individuals from saving for retirement,” Jeszeck’s team said in their report.
According to the GAO, student debt already is affecting older Americans’ financial security.
Nearly 155,000 Americans had their Social Security benefits reduced last year as a result of past defaults on their federal student loans, a five-fold increase from the 31,000 borrowers whose benefits were cut in 2002. Of the 155,000 borrowers in 2013, about 36,000 of them were at least 65 years old, according to the GAO.
Part of the reason why the Education Department is putting older Americans into poverty is federal law. Existing rules governing Social Security garnishment specify that the federal government cannot seize more than 15 percent of monthly benefits or take anything that would leave Americans with checks of less than $750.
But the rules, crafted in the late 1990s, have not been adjusted for inflation. The $750 limit was above the poverty level in 1998. Had policymakers raised the garnishment level to keep up with inflation, the level last year would have been $1,073, according to the accountability office. Defaulted federal student loan borrowers with monthly checks below that limit wouldn’t have had their benefits garnished.
The Education Department refers defaulted borrowers for Social Security garnishments after the department’s collection agencies fail to recoup on the soured debt. Earlier this month, the National Consumer Law Center criticized the department for effectively turning a blind eye to allegations that its debt collectors routinely misled distressed borrowers or provided them false information.
Last year, Education Department-initiated collections of Social Security benefits caused Americans to receive $150 million less than they otherwise would have absent garnishment. The average borrower lost more than $130 every month. The average recipient of old age, survivor and disability insurance, or Social Security, received about $1,182 a month last year, according to the Social Security Administration.
The problem is likely to get worse, the GAO cautioned.
“As the baby boomers continue to move into retirement, the number of older Americans with defaulted loans will only continue to increase. This creates the potential for an unpleasant surprise for some, as their benefits are offset and they face the possibility of a less secure retirement.”
The Education Department is demanding so much money from seniors with defaulted student loans that it’s forcing tens of thousands of them into poverty, according to agovernment audit.
At least 22,000 Americans aged 65 and older had a part of their Social Security benefits garnished last year to the point that their monthly benefits were below federal poverty thresholds, according to the Government Accountability Office.
Education Department-initiated collections on defaulted federal student loans left at least another 83,000 Americans aged 64 and younger with poverty-level Social Security payments, GAO data show. Federal auditors cautioned that the number of Americans forced to accept poverty-level benefits because of past defaults on federal student loans are surely higher.
More than half, or 54 percent, of federal student loans held by borrowers at least 75 years old are in default, according to the federal watchdog. About 27 percent of loans held by borrowers aged 65 to 74 are in default. Among borrowers aged 50 to 64, 19 percent of their loans are in default. The Education Department generally defines a default as being at least 360 days past due.
As unpaid student debt approaches $1.3 trillion, the federal watchdog’s findings underscore the consequences of increased student debt burdens and the risk they’ll wreak havoc on households in the coming years if U.S. workers continue to see little increase in their paychecks, the economy barely grows, and the Education Department’s contractors keep borrowers in the dark on repayment options.
“This GAO report strikes me as a kind of canary in a coal mine,” Sen. Richard Blumenthal (D-Conn.) said Wednesday during a hearing prompted by the report held by the Senate Special Committee on Aging. “What it says to me is, look at this narrow slice of the Baby Boom generation that now has debt [and] look at its impact … which is, if anything, more pernicious and insidious than it is for younger people.
“This age group is not only affected in more serious ways, but it is also going to grow,” Blumenthal continued. “In other words, this report says: Look out, the cliff is ahead, or the avalanche, [or] maybe it’s a tsunami, of older student debt.”
Struggling borrowers are rarely able to discharge federal student loans by declaring bankruptcy. As a result, federal auditors noted, their student debts follow them into retirement.
As the increase in average college tuitions outpaces federal borrowing limits for undergraduates, more parents are taking out federal student loans to pay for their children’s education. But GAO auditors said the vast majority of loan balances held by older Americans is for their own educations. Among borrowers aged 50 to 64, about 73 percent of their federal student loan debt was for their own schooling. For borrowers aged 65 and older, more than 82 percent of their debts was for their own education.
Some 40 million Americans have student debt, according to the Federal Reserve and the Education Department. The average recipient of federal student loans owed 28 percent more in 2013 than in 2007, after adjusting for inflation, according to Education Department data.
Meanwhile, the typical holder of a bachelor’s degree working full time experienced a 0.08 percent decrease in weekly earnings during that same period. Among workers with advanced degrees, median wages increased just 0.02 percent, according to figures from the U.S. Bureau of Labor Statistics.
With student loan debt rising and inflation-adjusted wages falling, borrowers with student loans are reducing their spending to make their loan payments, according to a Federal Reserve survey. Nearly half of Americans said they had to curb their spending last year in order to make monthly payments on student loans.
Some 35 percent of survey respondents who are paying back student loans said they had to reduce their spending by “a little” over the past year to keep up with student debt payments. Another 11 percent said they had to cut back their spending by “a lot.”
With consumer spending powering much of the economy, any reduction in household expenditures is likely to dampen growth.
Some 12 percent of federal student loans held by borrowers aged 25 to 49 were in default, according to the GAO.
“One out of every eight student loans held by this group is in default,” said Charles Jeszeck, director of education, workforce, and income security issues at the GAO. “That’s a lot of loans!”
Rising student loan debt also risks leaving Americans with less money for their retirement, as ever bigger chunks of workers’ paychecks are devoted to repaying education loans.
“The presence of student loan debt for those nearing retirement can also affect retirement security as it may keep individuals from saving for retirement,” Jeszeck’s team said in their report.
According to the GAO, student debt already is affecting older Americans’ financial security.
Nearly 155,000 Americans had their Social Security benefits reduced last year as a result of past defaults on their federal student loans, a five-fold increase from the 31,000 borrowers whose benefits were cut in 2002. Of the 155,000 borrowers in 2013, about 36,000 of them were at least 65 years old, according to the GAO.
Part of the reason why the Education Department is putting older Americans into poverty is federal law. Existing rules governing Social Security garnishment specify that the federal government cannot seize more than 15 percent of monthly benefits or take anything that would leave Americans with checks of less than $750.
But the rules, crafted in the late 1990s, have not been adjusted for inflation. The $750 limit was above the poverty level in 1998. Had policymakers raised the garnishment level to keep up with inflation, the level last year would have been $1,073, according to the accountability office. Defaulted federal student loan borrowers with monthly checks below that limit wouldn’t have had their benefits garnished.
The Education Department refers defaulted borrowers for Social Security garnishments after the department’s collection agencies fail to recoup on the soured debt. Earlier this month, the National Consumer Law Center criticized the department for effectively turning a blind eye to allegations that its debt collectors routinely misled distressed borrowers or provided them false information.
Last year, Education Department-initiated collections of Social Security benefits caused Americans to receive $150 million less than they otherwise would have absent garnishment. The average borrower lost more than $130 every month. The average recipient of old age, survivor and disability insurance, or Social Security, received about $1,182 a month last year, according to the Social Security Administration.
The problem is likely to get worse, the GAO cautioned.
“As the baby boomers continue to move into retirement, the number of older Americans with defaulted loans will only continue to increase. This creates the potential for an unpleasant surprise for some, as their benefits are offset and they face the possibility of a less secure retirement.”
*****
Readers: Whether it’s the loans taken out by the Baby Boomers or their kids, it’s a mess. Instead of lowering student loan rates, they’re making money on Americans…and that is simply criminal. It only makes it more challenging for Baby Boomer parents in the retirement years, as well as their kids, to pay off these loans. Plus we have student loan debt rising, add in the fact that loans are at higher rates + inflation-adjusted wages are falling – it isn’t exactly a recipe for success.
These kids are getting left with lots of high rate debt (their own) and possibly having to take care of their impoverished parents because of their loan debt, when they should be focusing on their careers, living their own lives, and starting their own families.
You can thank the repubs Back in June of this year for blocking Senator Elizabeth Warren’s student loan refinancing bill. (I blogged about this back then.) As usual, the repubs are protecting the wealthiest Americans from having to pay higher taxes, instead of supporting our youth who are our future, and the elderly in their retirement years.
Thoughts? Rants? What should be done? Blog me.
Thanks Owen: I’m pretty partial to them myself. :) Seriously, though, I do have a little help.
Tucker, George, Xena: My pleasure. I thought it was pretty awesome too.
Jay: Spectacular!
Peace & Love…
Lastly, greed over a great story is surfacing from my “loyal”(?) readers. With all this back and forth about who owns what, that appears on my blog, let me reiterate that all material posted on my blog becomes the sole property of my blog. If you want to reserve any proprietary rights don’t post it to my blog. I will prominently display this caveat on my blog from now on to remind those who may have forgotten this notice.
Gratefully your blog host,
michelle
Aka BABE: We all know what this means by now :)
If you love my blog and my writes, please make a donation via PayPal, credit card, or e-check, please click the “Donate” button below. (Please only donations from those readers within the United States. – International readers please see my “Donate” page)
Or if you would like to send a check via snail mail, please make checks payable to “Michelle Moquin”, and send to:
Michelle Moquin PO Box 29235 San Francisco, Ca. 94129
Thank you for your loyal support!
All content on this site are property of Michelle Moquin © copyright 2008-2014
“Though she be but little, she be fierce.” – William Shakespeare Midsummer Night’s Dream
" Politics, god, Life, News, Music, Family, Personal, Travel, Random, Photography, Religion, Aliens, Art, Entertainment, Food, Books, Thoughts, Media, Culture, Love, Sex, Poetry, Prose, Friends, Technology, Humor, Health, Writing, Events, Movies, Sports, Video, Christianity, Atheist, Blogging, History, Work, Education, Business, Fashion, Barack Obama, People, Internet, Relationships, Faith, Photos, Videos, Hillary Clinton, School, Reviews, God, TV, Philosophy, Fun, Science, Environment, Design, The Page, Rants, Pictures, Church, Blog, Nature, Marketing, Television, Democrats, Parenting, Miscellaneous, Current Events, Film, Spirituality, Obama, Musings, Home, Human Rights, Society, Comedy, Me, Random Thoughts, Research, Government, Election 2008, Baseball, Opinion, Recipes, Children, Iraq, Funny, Women, Economics, America, Misc, Commentary, John McCain, Reflections, All, Celebrities, Inspiration, Lifestyle, Theology, Linux, Kids, Games, World, India, Literature, China, Ramblings, Fitness, Money, Review, War, Articles, Economy, Journal, Quotes, NBA, Crime, Anime, Islam, 2008, Stories, Prayer, Diary, Jesus, Buddha, Muslim, Israel, Europe, Links, Marriage, Fiction, American Idol, Software, Leadership, Pop culture, Rants, Video Games, Republicans, Updates, Political, Football, Healing, Blogs, Shopping, USA, Class, Matrix, Course, Work, Web 2.0, My Life, Psychology, Gay, Happiness, Advertising, Field Hockey, Hip-hop, sex, fucking, ass, Soccer, sox"




September 15th, 2014 at 11:33 am
How many of them are now republicans declaring that the rest of us just want something for nothing, do you think?
September 15th, 2014 at 11:55 am
The article title is a bit misleading. These people didn’t pay their debts to the US govt, and now the US govt is taking out their cut as the US govt is paying them their retirement funds which were saved by them by the US govt.
This would be the same if they owed unpaid taxes. The only thing newsworthy is that these people actually believed they would get away with deferring their debt onto everyone else for their entire lives, but didn’t get away with it.
September 15th, 2014 at 11:56 am
Expect to see more of this.
September 15th, 2014 at 11:56 am
Serves them right for wanting to have a life.
September 15th, 2014 at 11:57 am
Uriah#2, US govt is paying them their retirement funds which were saved by them by the US govt.
I get what your trying to say as whole in your post (and I agree, they have a debt they need to pay), but the government didn’t save any money for them. It was all spent on other things.
September 15th, 2014 at 11:58 am
If you go into default with student loan debt, the debtor garnishes your wages. It’s pretty odd to suggest that someone was trying to cheat debtors by stopping payment on student loans just so they could pay them with social security benefits. Obviously they couldn’t pay their student debt before they retired and can’t pay it now, either.
September 15th, 2014 at 11:59 am
Mary#3,
Frankly, education debt is going to be minor compared to all the other factors forcing seniors into poverty over the next 50 years.
State of the art in retirement withdrawal planning is to withdraw and invest such that there is a 10% chance of running out of money before you die. And that’s just for the people who have enough saved.
Longevity Risk, and with it senior poverty, is an iceberg on the horizon. Anybody who is looking can see it plainly and ominously, but few care to look.
September 15th, 2014 at 12:01 pm
Mary#3, I’m biased, but I’m more interested in getting this economy growing and prosperous so that the young may be sufficiently employed to raise the next generation and to be able to save for their own old age.
I’m 29 and my wife is 36 we have no savings, suffering from no and under employment. We have 2 kids that are going to be forced into failing public schools. The old have had their day. Make way for us.
September 15th, 2014 at 12:12 pm
Howie, it seems that some earthlings may know that the American pilot is alive and they want him back. I hear we (earthlings) are putting together a formidable force in that area of the Pacific.
——————————
A large US military exercise involving 19 ships, more than 200 aircraft and about 18,000 troops has begun on and around Guam.
The US Naval base at Orote Peninsula, Guam
The Marianas Variety reports the the biennial joint training military exercise is focussed on intergrating US military forces is scheduled to take place over the next eight days.
The newspaper says troops will practice searching for submarines, stopping suspect vessels at sea, and will provide an opportunity to use a new missile defence system that was recently set up on Guam following threats from North Korea.
———————————
I guess you can add to that threats from “aliens” since I doubt we would need “…19 ships, more than 200 aircraft and about 18,000 troops…” to kick North Korea’s ass.
September 15th, 2014 at 5:20 pm
“No means yes if you know how to spot it.” That’s what Rush Limbaugh said today on his radio program in a segment about Ohio State University’s new sexual assault policy.1
Rush has made countless appalling and sexist remarks in the past, but actively encouraging his male listeners to sexually assault women who have rejected their advances is not just unacceptable, it’s downright dangerous.
All of Rush Limbaugh’s advertisers are complicit in this sexist attack on women by continuing to keep the program on the air with their dollars – and they need to immediately end their sponsorship or be held accountable.
In 2012, after Rush called Georgetown Law student Sandra Fluke “a slut” and “a prostitute,” CREDO activists pressured major advertisers to drop Rush’s show. It was a huge blow to Rush Limbaugh, the radio stations he works with, and the profitability of his show. But other advertisers are still continuing their support.
Rush’s repugnant statement this week is nothing short of an attempt to justify rape – and it could be the last straw that persuades his remaining advertisers to stop supporting his outrageous and sexist attacks on women.
September 16th, 2014 at 7:58 am
Credo, I hope your right, I’m going to look up his current sponsors now…they’ll get on my email list. Thanks for the dumbass (Rush) update.
- ZL