Just Noticing: “Observations of a Blogger”
Posted by Michelle Moquin on October 19th, 2014
Good morning!
I am in the fashion business and haven’t written about style in a very along time. This write caught my eye. From NPR:
Just noticing…
Sagging Pants And The Long History Of ‘Dangerous’ Street Fashion
Plenty of fashions adopted by young people get under the skin of adults, but the opposition to sagging often has the feel of a moral panic.
Mary Sue Rich finally had enough.
The council member from Ocala, Fla., was tired of seeing the young people in her town wearing their pants low and sagging, and successfully pushed to prohibit the style on city-owned property. It became law in July. Violators face a $500 fine or up to six months in jail.
“I’m just tired of looking at young men’s underwear, it’s just disrespectful,” Rich said. “I think it would make [people who wear sagging pants] respect themselves, and I would wager 9 out of 10 of them don’t have jobs.”
The rationale behind the ban enacted last year in Wildwood, N.J., was similar. “I’m not trying to be the fashion police, but personally I find it offensive when a guy’s butt is hanging out,” said Ernest Troiana, the town’s mayor, after he announced that his city would very much be policing fashion.
Pikeville, Tenn., switched it up a little: Officials there said they were doing so in part because of health concerns related to the “improper gait” of the saggers. Themayor even pointed to a study from a Dr. Mark Oliver Mansbach of the National American Medical Association that supposedly found that around 8 in 10 saggers suffered from sexual problems like premature ejaculation. One problem: Neither Mark Oliver Mansbach nor NAMA actually exist; the much-referenced study was an April Fools’ joke.
This isn’t merely the hobbyhorse of small-town politicos — no less a figure than President Obama has weighed in on sagging. “Brothers should pull up their pants,” he told MTV a few years ago. “That doesn’t mean you have to pass a law … but that doesn’t mean folks can’t have some sense and some respect for other people. And, you know, some people might not want to see your underwear — I’m one of them.”
For sagging’s many detractors, kids wearing their pants below the waist — or below the butt cheeks, in the case of the look’s most fervent adherents — has doubled as a reliable shorthand for a constellation of social ills ostensibly befalling or propagated by young black men. A dangerous lack of self-respect. An embrace of gang and prison culture. Another harbinger of cultural decline. Those are all things that people say about hip-hop, which helped popularize the sagging aesthetic. And if those are the presumed stakes, it’s hardly any wonder why opposition to sagging sometimes has the feel of a full-on moral panic.
Such is the apoplexy around the styles that many of the most vocal proponents of sagging bans are people who might otherwise be wary of putting young black men into unnecessary contact with the criminal justice system. When Jefferson Parish, La., banned sagging last year, the move got a big cosign from the head of the nearby chapter of the NAACP. ”There is nothing positive about people wearing saggy pants,” he told a local TV station. (The national NAACP, it should be noted, has fought back against bans like these.) And a group called the Black Mental Health Alliance of Massachusetts began airing public service announcements in Boston last year that pointedly used the threat of arrest as deterrent. “Our community and our people are tired of these kids walking around like this,” Omar Reid, one of the initiative’s leaders, told the Boston Globe.
There’s certainly nothing novel about adults thinking that young people’s fashions are distasteful — indeed, that’s often kind of the point. Full disclosure time: Like an awful lot of people in my generational cohort, I used to sag. Here’s what I’ll say about that: Everyone who thought he was cool as a teenager and reaches his 30s will look back at photos of himself from high school and cringe mightily. But that isn’t specific to sagging, of course. Like goth dress, it freaks out old people, and then most of its practitioners move on to other things. The difference is that the anxieties around something like goth dress don’t get codified into laws that threaten jail time.
There’s another argument against sagging, which you can see in this video that’s part of the “Pull Up Your Pants Challenge,” that tries to appeal to respectability and pragmatism: Black kids should jettison the look if only to avoid agitating unnecessary suspicion from police and strangers.
But if history is any indication, that suspicion has proven to be pretty sticky, and it’s attached itself to a bunch of different styles — hoodies, construction boots, do-rags.
Sagging, though, has been a uniquely long-lived source of agita.
The Murky Genesis Of Saggy Pants
Los Angeles police officer Victor Vinson was talking to an audience of local parents, warning them about the lure of street gangs. He told them how they might recognize if their own kids had come under the thrall of gangs. The biggest tell, he said, was their sagging pants.
“Kids today are dressing for death,” Vinson said.
That sentiment sounds a lot like the feelings of Mary Sue Rich, the Ocala, Fla., council member. But Vinson is quoted in a Los Angeles Times article from way back in 1988, one of the earliest mentions of the trend in the press. It’s a reminder that people have been fretting about sagging for nearly three decades.
The world has changed a lot since then. Los Angeles in 1988 really was a violent place, especially compared with today, and much of that violence was gang-related. Hip-hop hadn’t become a staple of mainstream music yet. Fashion has changed, too, as people have moved to more contoured, fitted clothing. Sagging has tracked with that: the huge, baggy jeans of the 1990s have been replaced withskinny jeans and pants today. (Unless, you know, you’re Michael Jordan.)
But let’s back up a bit. The most familiar origin myth for sagging goes something like this: Convicts prohibited from wearing belts often wore sagging prison-issued uniforms, and they carried that look with them once they were back on the outside. Another story goes that some prisoners would wear their pants low to let other inmates know they were sexually available. Both have been tentpoles of “scared straight” arguments against sagging for a long time. Um, literally so in the case of the latter.
“You want to walk around looking like a criminal? Pull up your damn pants!”
“You know that in jail that look meant you wanted to have sex with other prisoners? Pull up your damn pants!”
But it’s murky as to how true this be.
“I don’t think we can definitively say that sagging began in prisons,” said Tanisha C. Ford, a historian at the University of Massachusetts at Amherst who researches fashion.
An entry about sagging’s genesis on Snopes, the online dictionary of urban legends, says the trend did in fact originate in prison, but the article doesn’t link to its sources.
Consider the many other fashions that once carried the stigma of imprisonment that have migrated to the outside world. It’s probably not an accident that the mainstreaming of tattoos and body art have coincided with the explosion of the American incarceral state.
Whatever the origins, people have actively courted that connection by positioning themselves against mainstream American ideas of propriety through their dress. But when that fashion itself goes mainstream, what counts as oppositional requires some occasional recalibrating.
It’s highly possible, then, that sagging might still be a thing all these decades later because it hasn’t lost its unique ability to rankle.
When ‘Hoodlums’ Wore Suit Jackets
But all this drama around young brown kids, baggy clothes and crime goes back much further than hip-hop and street gangs. In the 1930s, black and Mexican-American men in California began rocking big, oversize suit jackets, and pants that tapered down at their ankles: zoot suits.
Young men were stripped of their clothes and badly beaten as policemen scoured the streets in Los Angeles for zoot-suited young men they blamed for petty crime.
Harold P. Matosian/AP
Ford, the fashion historian, said the look was born out of improvisation, since many of those kids couldn’t afford tailors. “A lot of kids would just go to the thrift store to buy those suits, and then get their mom or their aunts to taper the pants,” she said.
But Luis Alvarez, a historian at University of California, San Diego who wrote a book on that period called The Power of the Zoot, said that just like the origins of sagging, the genesis of the zoot suit is pretty murky. “Some might argue that [people started wearing it because] it looked better when they were spinning girls around the dance floor,” he said. “I argued with a guy who said they got it from [Clark Gable] in Gone with the Windbecause he was sort of wearing a baggy suit in that movie.”
What isn’t in doubt, he said, is that the look was spread by black jazz musicians as they traveled around the country.
Today, those zoot suits are synonymous with Jazz Age and World War II-era cool. But back then, they were seen as the wardrobe of black and Mexican-American delinquents and gang members. Zoot suiters’ opponents — and there were lots — saw them as harbingers of a moral decline. In his book, Alvarez cites a 1943Washington Post article that was typical of the way the trend was covered in big-city newspapers. The language in it sounds an awful lot like the speech Officer Vinson would give those Los Angeles parents decades later on the dangers posed by saggers.
“Chief features are the broad felt hat, the long key chain, the pocket knife of a certain size and shape, worn in the vest pocket by boys, in the stocking by girls, the whisky flask of peculiar shape to fit into the girl’s bosoms, the men’s haircut of increasing density and length at the neck — all of which paraphernalia has symbolic and secret meanings for the initiates. In some places, the wearing of the uniform by the whole gang is a danger signal, indicating a predetermine plan for concerted action and attack.”
In 1943, Noe Vasquez and Joe Vasquez — both 18 years old but not relatives — told Los Angeles police that they were roughed up by sailors who tore their zoot suit-style clothes. And even after all that? Swag.
“The style is linked to jazz music, it’s linked to urban spaces, it’s linked to a criminal underworld — gambling and numbers-running,” Ford said. And those crimes were associated with blacks and Latinos.
Alvarez wrote that “[z]oot syle came to represent what was morally and politically deficient with the home front during World War II — violence, drinking, premarital sex, and the threat of street attacks.” That distaste for the clothes and the culture associated with it persisted even though a good number of the people in the military and war industry were themselves zoot suiters.
As the war ramped up, Americans were, uh, tightening their belts. (My bad, y’all.) There were strict rations put on textiles and fabrics, which angered zoot suit opponents even more — those baggy, bulky threads weren’t just criminal, but an affront to the nation’s war goals.
“In ’42 and ’43 it becomes a flashpoint for ideas that were larger than just youth style,” Alvarez told me. “This is when it becomes the platform for arguments about who is or who isn’t American.”
That anger exploded into violence in Los Angeles when bands of white servicemen — joined by hundreds of police officers — left their posts to search for young black and Mexican-American men dressed in that style to beat up. People were pulled from streetcars and pummeled by crowds. They were bludgeoned in the streets. The violence went on for more than four days.
“These kids wearing those outfits were stripped by sailors and LAPD and their suits were burned in the street,” Ford said. But the anti-zoot marauders were hardly picky; people who weren’t wearing zoot suits were jumped, too.
Similar but smaller paroxysms of violence would unfold in other big cities across the country as zoot suiters clashed with the police and angry whites. When things calmed down, the Zoot Suit Riots became a kind of national scandal, with both left-leaning folks and conservatives arguing that they might have been part of a plot to sow disunity on the domestic front.
Dangerous Fashion Goes Mainstream
The war ended. Fashion moved on. Ford said that as time went on, looks like dashikis and Afros would come to take on their own aura of black menace, although the threat in those style choices was more about fears of militancy and political unrest than street crime.
“We look at the Afro and the dashikis … as part of iconography of the 1970s, but we don’t remember how controversial and political those were,” she said. Some historically black colleges like Hampton University once placed bans on Afros, and the hairstyle was verboten in Cuba and Tanzania.
Untethered from their contemporary messiness, though, those looks have folded into mainstream life. Afros used to scandalize white folks and older black people alike. Today college-educated women post their ”big chop” pics to Facebook, Instagram or the countless blogs dedicated to natural hair, and they’re greeted with affirmation and cosigns.
And zoot suits? Ford joked that the “Steve Harvey suits” that were the preferred dressed-up look for millionaire athletes looked a whole lot like the zoot suits of the World War II era. “You’d see these huge, 6-8 basketball players walking with the big, long suit jackets,” she said. (I’ve been looking for any excuse to link to this draft night photo of Jalen Rose. Thank you, Dr. Ford.)
You might still see teenagers rocking them, too. “Nowadays I can’t go a week or two in May or June without driving past some kids wearing zoot suits to their prom,” Alvarez said.
I wondered if sagging was likely to ever make that same transition into ordinariness. “Once historians go and tell the story of the late 20th century — which we haven’t done yet — there’s a way that sagging and hoodies and t-shirts will be revered as markers of a particular era,” Ford told me. She said that the hoodie and sagging pants look might even become the way we remember the youth resistance of our time. But, she said, “it’s definitely still going to be tied to [ideas of] criminality.”
Alvarez said zoot suits and sagging share much of the same DNA: They were ways that people made statements about their relationships to other people and their circumstances.
“[For the wearers,] it’s a mechanism to reclaim dignity that’s been taken away from them,” he said.
A lot of people would roll their eyes and shake their fists if you told them that there was anything dignifying about sagging pants, I said.
“Youth culture, in general, is not always decipherable to those outside of the inner circle,” Alvarez responded. “In many ways, our dress and our vocabulary and our vernacular becomes powerful because [outsiders] can’t understand it.”
*****
Readers: Amazing that we can get laws passed prohibiting “sagging pants,” because they are considered “disrespectful” to some, but we can’t seem to get laws passed about men that are “disrespectful” to women walking the streets. Something is majorly wrong with this “logic.”
With respect to the strictly fashion part of this write, I can tell you I am not a fan of the “sagging pant.” But obviously some women are because men wear them and women go out with the men that wear them. Not me. Never.
In my opinion, the only way we can really have an influence over the men, really boys (Would real men be caught dead wearing these?), to stop wearing their pants that way is if women say something and demand that the men they are dating not wear those when they go out…or ever. They look horrible. Believe me, if women refuse to date men dressed like that, men will stop. But women, put up with it. Or like it for whatever reason. Really? Do women really like that look? If you do, let me know – blog me.
Women for the most part, enjoy looking nice and want to look nice when they go out. I am alsways disappointed when I see a woman who has made an effort to look nice, out with a man and he looks like he hasn’t made any effort. FYI: “Saggy pants” in my mind, is also conidered no effort. I love it when a man wants to look good for his lady.
In fact, I am working with a man who is a husband of one of my clients. During our first meeting he confessed to me that he felt that he has been letting his wife down for years by not dressing well, and wants to up his game so that she can feel good when they go out. I loved that. Granted, he’s not wearing “sagging pants” but you get the point. I wish more men thought like that.
I love getting dressed up for a night in the city. I love getting dressed up. Period. And I am so disappointed when I see a woman dressing her best, putting out all the effort and you can tell the guy didn’t give his outfit a second thought. Whether you know it or care about it or not, your style is making a statement. Did you read the above write, what statement “sagging pants” are making? I doubt many guys want to make that kind of statement with their style, but whether you know it or not, you are. Pull them pants up! I don’t want to look at your underwear.
Let me tell you, I work with many men, and if you’re a guy out looking to get an edge over the competition in any arena, pull up your pants, dress well, be mindful of the statement your style is making, dress on purpose not by default…because most men out there don’t. Losing the “sagging pants” are just part of it, but a huge step if you’re one wearing them.
What are your thoughts about the “sagging pant?” What else are you just noticing in street fashion?
Thoughts? Blog me.
Lastly, greed over a great story is surfacing from my “loyal”(?) readers. With all this back and forth about who owns what, that appears on my blog, let me reiterate that all material posted on my blog becomes the sole property of my blog. If you want to reserve any proprietary rights don’t post it to my blog. I will prominently display this caveat on my blog from now on to remind those who may have forgotten this notice.
Gratefully your blog host,
michelle
Aka BABE: We all know what this means by now :)
If you love my blog and my writes, please make a donation via PayPal, credit card, or e-check, please click the “Donate” button below. (Please only donations from those readers within the United States. – International readers please see my “Donate” page)
Or if you would like to send a check via snail mail, please make checks payable to “Michelle Moquin”, and send to:
Michelle Moquin PO Box 29235 San Francisco, Ca. 94129
Thank you for your loyal support!
All content on this site are property of Michelle Moquin © copyright 2008-2014
“Though she be but little, she be fierce.” – William Shakespeare Midsummer Night’s Dream
" Politics, god, Life, News, Music, Family, Personal, Travel, Random, Photography, Religion, Aliens, Art, Entertainment, Food, Books, Thoughts, Media, Culture, Love, Sex, Poetry, Prose, Friends, Technology, Humor, Health, Writing, Events, Movies, Sports, Video, Christianity, Atheist, Blogging, History, Work, Education, Business, Fashion, Barack Obama, People, Internet, Relationships, Faith, Photos, Videos, Hillary Clinton, School, Reviews, God, TV, Philosophy, Fun, Science, Environment, Design, The Page, Rants, Pictures, Church, Blog, Nature, Marketing, Television, Democrats, Parenting, Miscellaneous, Current Events, Film, Spirituality, Obama, Musings, Home, Human Rights, Society, Comedy, Me, Random Thoughts, Research, Government, Election 2008, Baseball, Opinion, Recipes, Children, Iraq, Funny, Women, Economics, America, Misc, Commentary, John McCain, Reflections, All, Celebrities, Inspiration, Lifestyle, Theology, Linux, Kids, Games, World, India, Literature, China, Ramblings, Fitness, Money, Review, War, Articles, Economy, Journal, Quotes, NBA, Crime, Anime, Islam, 2008, Stories, Prayer, Diary, Jesus, Buddha, Muslim, Israel, Europe, Links, Marriage, Fiction, American Idol, Software, Leadership, Pop culture, Rants, Video Games, Republicans, Updates, Political, Football, Healing, Blogs, Shopping, USA, Class, Matrix, Course, Work, Web 2.0, My Life, Psychology, Gay, Happiness, Advertising, Field Hockey, Hip-hop, sex, fucking, ass, Soccer, sox"
October 19th, 2014 at 12:28 pm
The only thing “wrong” wth that loge is that we women allow men to get away with it.
Go to the polls bitches and vote the bastards out.
October 19th, 2014 at 12:30 pm
You are right on both accounts Michelle. Men only think of themselves for the most part so of course they don’t care about what is disrespectful to women.
And Geez WTF do women see attractive about a man with his ass out?
October 19th, 2014 at 2:16 pm
I prefer bun hugging pants myself. not drooping drawers, it’s an awful look and it’d definitely be a deal breaker!
From strictly fashion and law about only this…maybe a few steep fines might get them to step up their attire game. It is trashy looking on anyone and that paired with a hoodie is a total turn off.
Luv, Zen Lill
October 19th, 2014 at 2:50 pm
I have sent dates home who came to pick me up looking like he was on his way to a hang out with the boys.
Men who don’t take the time to look decent when taking their lady out, are losers
October 19th, 2014 at 2:53 pm
I agree with you Zen Lill, But it it takes a fine to make a man pull his pants up, what does that say about us ladies that accept dates with droopy drawers like that?
October 19th, 2014 at 6:40 pm
Nancy,
I’m with Caroline … just say no.
I don’t wear a dress and get picked up by anyone wearing droopy drawers, hats on backward (or forward) and all that that shows no thought, nope … I like to suggest places that would infer a nicer dress ‘code’ anyway. It’s one thing to go hiking and wear that attire, it’s another if we’re heading out and Mr Man is underdressed.
- ZL
October 19th, 2014 at 7:11 pm
Zen Lill, you are a lady. Any gentleman should be excited to have your arm. If he comes dressed for anything but an outing with a lady, then he should be sent packing.
October 19th, 2014 at 7:27 pm
Zen Lill, Linda is incognito presently. We tried your email address it didn’t work. Could you repost it?
October 19th, 2014 at 7:41 pm
My sister’s boyfriend wears his pants off his ass. My father says he isn’t a nigger so why does a decent white lad copy dumb niggers. He finally had enough last weekend and sent the idiot home.
My idiot sister isn’t speaking to our father. Mother says she is staying out of it. The rest of the family just laughs at Clair. The guy will wear his pants off his ass on the way to Church. He is 23 and she is 23. One would think that one of them would have grown up by now.
October 19th, 2014 at 8:00 pm
I see so many of my friends who date guys who wear their pants off their ass that I think it must be some illness. Julian, my boyfriend asked me if it would bother me if he tried it. I told him that it was alright with me as long as he tried it with some other girl.
He laughed and said he was only joking because he couldn’t see the pull it had. I don’t know why a man would want to spend the day pulling his pants up.
October 19th, 2014 at 8:13 pm
Let’s be honest. Most of these boys are gay wannabes. They are the kind that get drunk to get fucked by a man. They secretly love showing off their ass to other men, especially gay men.
October 19th, 2014 at 8:19 pm
Linda’s friend it is (take our spaces and I’m doing it this way so you don’t misspell it)
Zen Lilli questions @ aol.com – it works…
-ZL
October 19th, 2014 at 8:19 pm
Calvin, I think you have something. A lot of this is just advertising. The women aren’t aware they are dating men on the Down-low.
October 19th, 2014 at 8:21 pm
Thank you for the compliment, Dwayne
October 20th, 2014 at 7:21 am
White males who are bigots will use any excuse to practice their bigotry upon OTWS. The Zoot suite attacks were just another example of that.
One can hardly compare showing your ass to the public with wearing a Zoot suit.
October 20th, 2014 at 7:26 am
The Holocaust, Zoot Suit Riots and Blackface were all points in our human, specifically western, history that were charged with ethnocentric xenophobic hateful bigotry.
It was white power used against OTWs in the most hateful way.
The holocaust was an attempted genocide of a significant segment of the European population.
The Zoot Suit Riots were a series of riots that broke out due to differences amongst Amerikan youth, sailors, and marines. The difference was the color of their skins.
Blackface is an offensive stereotyped caricature of African Americans.
October 20th, 2014 at 7:31 am
Despite the brutality of white men going into Mexican-American neighborhoods to beat and strip latinos who were wearing Zoot Suits, most press coverage was sympathetic to the servicemen.
It is not different today. When white thugs with badges beat or kill OTWs, if it even gets in the news the press coverage is usually sympathetic to the white bastards.
October 20th, 2014 at 7:41 am
The seed for the young OTWs finding the only family they know in gang membership was sown decades ago ago by unintelligent educational measures, by discriminatory social and economic practices, by provincial smugness and self-assigned “racial” superiority.
Today we reap the whirlwind in youth whose greatest crime was to be born into an environment which, through various kinds and degrees of social ostracism and prejudicial economic subjugation, made them a caste apart, fair prey to the cancer of gangsterism.
The crimes of these youths should be appropriately punished, yes. But what of the society which is an accessory before and after the fact?
Even a disease as fatal as ebola is met with deliberate racist treatment of the patient if he is an OTW. The fact that not treating him fairly could expose the country doesn’t break through the racism.
White racism will destroy the country and their press will ignore the root cause of the destruction as it refuses to acknowledge that if the Texas Presbyterian hospital had not responded to the medical treatment of Duncan racially, the disease who have been contained within the hospital environment.
October 20th, 2014 at 7:46 am
White America controls history so well that they make musicals about the allowing white marines and sailors to come into our neighborhoods and beat and kill us.
It is not unlike the way they portray the American Indian in their westerns. Savages to be killed at will by white men.
Most white people are clueless to the destruction their racism does to OTWs. They are so raped up in their entitlements they couldn’t care less.
October 20th, 2014 at 7:55 am
Michelle the Zoot Suit Riots were instigated by white bigots to give police the go ahead to enter our communities and do whatever they wanted to do to us.
There never was any real tension between Mexican-Amerians and whites. Whites were uncomfortable that we were venturing out of established ghettos and daring to mingle among them.
The Zoot Suit gave us a sense of belonging to something. That scared and pissed off white folk so they made the Zoot Suit a symbol of crime and hatred of white people so the mind set of white people would be to look the other way when a person wearing a Zoot Suit was brutally attacked or murdered.
No different from today when politicians use the face of a black criminal to imply that blacks are terrorizing whites.
October 20th, 2014 at 8:00 am
Michelle I have been reading your blog for 6 years. This is my first comment. Thank you for including the Zoot Suit in your article about the wearing of pants that expose the ass of the wearer.
One shows the ignorants of the wearer the other shows the ignorance of those that can be prompted to accept the attack upon a choice of clothing as an excuse to attack the wearer physically.
It also shows that unless we OTWs continue to be vigilant, white racism can arise to justify any criminal behavior by their men and the police.
October 20th, 2014 at 8:16 am
To some of us the Zoot Suit was a badge of rebellion against white racism. I wore Zoot look with a short skirt, dark lipstick and platform shoes.
It had nothing to do with being in a gang. But I was singled out by whites at every opportunity to be attacked vocally or physically.
I wish I had had the courage of Alycedale and killed some of the bastards. But perhaps then, the law would have just murdered me and my three wonderful kids would not have been born.
My eldest daughter is a judge, I tell her every day not to be persuaded that the law is color blind when she makes her judgements because no white judge acts as if it is.
My youngest daughter is in medical research. She laments the way a few companies control what drugs are developed or selected for research. Her chief complaint is that research into a drug depends on who the disease presents the greatest danger to.
The ones that get the biggest research grants are those drugs that will help white males, white females and then the rest of us.
Then she adds that even for white males the research is mainly for a drug that they will have to take for the rest of their life rather than one that will cure the disease.
My only son is a politician who has sold out to be one of the kiss ass latinos for money. He is a republican who is a professional politician. He preys upon the people for the money rich white people give him to keep his people in poverty.
I tell my girls how I remember my Zoot Suit days fondly outside of the encounters I had with those white people who knew they could exercise their prejudices against me with impunity.
October 20th, 2014 at 8:26 am
It doesn’t take much for white people to be stampeded into attacking an OTW for one thing or another. All the calculating racist need do is tell them their lives or money is in danger of being lost.
This is one fearful race. I pass for a white girl and I hear the disgusting racist attitudes in their conversations. We have OTW friends, but when we are alone together we “white” girls let our hair down and stereotype the lot of them.
IIt’s a white thing that enables them to be herded like sheep and directed to accept any atrocity white racists wish to visit upon any OTW.
It’s the reason most white women vote to support whatever a crazy white male politician says. Most white women like the men feel threatened when their entitlement seems to be slipping towards having to share the opportunities America offers with OTWs.
My white “girlfriends” are so different when we are out with our OTW girlfriends. One wouldn’t know they had a racist bone in their body.
I have never been in a latino group of ladies who switched to racist attitudes when their white friends were not in our presence.
I guess that’s just a white thing.
October 20th, 2014 at 8:27 am
Zen Lill#12, thank you. I will get it to her as soon as possible.
October 20th, 2014 at 8:29 am
The ass showing pants would be an excuse to practice racism by whites if so many whites weren’t wearing them too.
October 20th, 2014 at 8:39 am
Fashion houses picked up on the trend immediately.Adidas, Nike, Reebok, FUBU, Tommy Hilfiger and even Calvin Klein all rushed to get a piece of the hip-hop money pile.
Their target of course was American youth, and specifically, white American youth. Urban fashion was seen as cutting edge, rough, sexy, and cool, and who doesn’t want to be all that?
October 20th, 2014 at 8:51 am
I’m sorry to disagree with you Michelle. Yes, I agree that a woman who goes out with a man who would show his ass to the world when on a date with her should be sent home if not to her never-see-again pile, but I strongly disagree with laws against the practice. It will be just another excuse for whites to racially profile OTWs.
There are no laws against plumbers showing their ass when they bend over or whale tail.
There are no laws against women who decide to wear bras out for their morning runs, there are no laws requiring women to wear bras and in fact, New York allows women to go topless if they choose, and has allowed it for some time.
The ACLU contends that laws against sagging will lead to racial profiling, giving police yet another excuse to detain and harass young men of color for no other reason than their baggy boxers are exposed. This is precisely why we should all care to see sagging laws defeated or repealed.
Stay vigilant Michelle!. The white boy is ever poised to use whatever is available to profile, terrorize and murder OTW males.
October 20th, 2014 at 8:53 am
Calvin#11, What is most infuriating about the rumor of how sagging started is how quickly people are willing to buy into the belief that homosexuality had anything to do with it.
While it may fit a certain political narrative that black fashion is somehow the result of sexual deviance, the truth is that fashion choices by youth in America, particularly youth of color, are more inspired by the political statements they are making, and a declaration of a desire for freedom and a statement of defiance for cultural norms.
October 20th, 2014 at 8:55 am
I see these laws as just another means incarcerating OTWs, especially black males.
“a few uncomfortable truths: that more young black males are arrested and incarcerated (1 in 15 black males are incarcerated at some point in their lives while 1 in 106 white males are incarcerated) for longer lengths of time (because prosecutors are more likely to charge men of color with charges that require minimum sentences), repeatedly (the recidivism rate for black males is three times that of white males), and that we as a country take poor care of the people we incarcerate.”
October 20th, 2014 at 9:15 am
Linda’s Friend: Please relay to Linda that her friend Al wishes her all the best and has been concerned for this “sweetie” of a young lady. Thank you so much. Do you have a name you could share or would you prefer to remain anonymous? Bye-Bye.
Al
October 20th, 2014 at 10:05 am
Look out folks another place claiming to be prepared for ebola. Guam is making its claim.
=========================
“Guam – Public Health is working with other Government of Guam agencies, military, federal government, the private sector, healthcare providers, ports of entry, and other organizations to ensure all agencies are prepared to deal with Ebola should it find its way to the island.
According to Guam Memorial Hospital administrator Joseph Verga they stand ready to respond if need be. He told KUAM News, “The hospital is very well prepared to identify and isolate very quickly a potential Ebola case as any other potential communicable diseases we have a plan that we practice that we review regularly and in response to Ebola, and this has been evolving in the mainland as well we have a new assessment tool in place so anyone coming into the ER should be prepared to be assessed for Ebola symptom otology and anyone presenting Ebola like symptoms will be very quickly quarantined. We have three in the emergency rooms isolation rooms and another 13 actually throughout the hospital for a total of 16. And these are negative pressure rooms although Ebola virus is not transmitted through the air its transmitted through contact so you don’t really need a special negative pressure room to isolated someone from Ebola what you need is protective equipment and gear and we have over 600 protective packs in the ER right now we have mobiles to transport patients and we’ve been drilling Ebola protocols over the last several week.”
Verga stresses however the chances of Ebola in Guam are quite remote. Meanwhile as part of the hospital annual infection control training set for this week, they’ve added an exhibit related to the Ebola virus. We should also add Public Health has additional isolation rooms at the northern and southern public health centers. As well GFD and Public Health have personal protective equipment available to healthcare providers and first responders, and Guam Fire has a HAZMAT team ready to deploy.
October 20th, 2014 at 10:08 am
@Al#30. I will send your good wishes to her. She had asked that I find a way to communicate with you.
I intend to pass on information for you to be able to contact her through Zen Lill.
Thanks for your concern
October 21st, 2014 at 9:02 am
[…] Adolfo, Juanita, Sophia…et al: Right on. Thanks for taking the time to comment on the rest of the write that I personally didn’t address. […]