Michelle Moquin's "A day in the life of…"

Creative Discussions, Inspiring Thoughts, Fun Adventures, Love & Laughter, Peaceful Travel, Hip Fashions, Cool People, Gastronomic Pleasures, Exotic Indulgences, Groovy Music, and more!

  • Hello!

    Welcome To My OUR Blog!


    Michelle Moquin's Facebook profile "Click here" to go to my FaceBook profile. Visit me!
  • Copyright Protected

    Protected by Copyscape Plagiarism Checker
  • Let Michelle Style YOU!

    I am a "Specialist in Styles" Personal Stylist. Check out my Style website to see how I can help you discover, define, and refine your unique style.
  • © Copyright 2008-2023

    All content on this site are property of Michelle Moquin © copyright 2008-2023. All material posted on my blog becomes the sole property of my blog. If you want to reserve any proprietary rights don't post it to my blog.
  • In Pursuit Of…

    Custom Search
  • Madaline Speaks

    For those of you interested in reading an Earthling Girl's Guide to a better Government, and a Greener world, check out the blog:
  • Contact Your Representatives and Senators Here!

    To send letters to your representatives about any issue of interest, Click here


    To send letters to your Senators about any issue of interest, Click here


    Get involved - Write your letters today!
  • On The Issues

    Don't be uninformed! Click here to see how every political leader on every issue voted.
  • Don’t Believe The Lies – Get The Facts

    FactCheck.org is a nonpartisan, nonprofit “consumer advocate” for voters that aims to reduce the level of deception and confusion in U.S. politics. They monitor the factual accuracy of what is said by major U.S. political players in the form of TV ads, debates, speeches, interviews and news releases. Their goal is to apply the best practices of both journalism and scholarship, and to increase public knowledge and understanding.

    Click here to get the facts.

    Pulitzer Prize Winner Politifact.com is another trusted site to get the facts. Click here to get the facts.

  • Who’s Paying Who?

    On The Issues is a nonpartisan guide to money's influence on U.S. elections and public policy.
  • Blog Rules of Conduct

    Rule #1: "The aliens can not reveal anything about anyone’s life that would not be known without the use of our technology. The exception being that if a reader has a question about his or her health and the assistance of alien technology would be necessary to answer that question.”

    Rule #2: "Aliens will not threaten humans and Humans will not threaten aliens."

    Rule #3:

    Posting Comments:

    When posting a comment in regards to any past or archived article, please reference the title and date of the article and post your comment on the present day to keep the conversation contemporary.

    NOTE: You do not need to add your e-mail address when posting a comment. Your real name, an alias, a moniker, initials...whatever ...even simply "anonymous" is all you need to add in the fields in order to post a comment.

    Thank you.

  • *********

    Yellow Pages for San Francisco, CA
  • Meta

  • Looking For A Personal Stylist?

    Michelle has designed and styled for the stars! She can be your "Specialist in Styles" Personal Stylist too. Check out Michelle's style website
  • Recent Posts

  • Michelle’s E-mail:

    E-mail me! ~~~~~~~~~~~~~~
  • Care To Twitter? Come Tweet Me!

  • Disclaimer: Adult Blog

    I DO NOT CENSOR COMMENTS POSTED TO THIS BLOG: Therefore this blog is not for the faint hearted, thin skinned, easily offended or the appointed people's moralist. If you feel that you may fit in any of those categories, please DO NOT read my blog or its comments. There are plenty of blogs that will fit your needs, find one. This warning also applies to those who post comments who would find it unpleasant or mentally injurious to receive an opposing opinion via a raw to vulgar delivery. I DO NOT censor comments posted here. If you post a comment, you are on notice that you may receive a comment in language or opinion that you will not approve of or that you feel is offensive. If that would bother you, DO NOT post on my blog.

    27Mar2011
  • Medical Disclaimer:

    I am not a doctor nor am I medically trained in any field. No one on this website is claiming to be a medical physician or claiming to be medically trained in any field. However, anyone can blog information about health articles, folk remedies, possible cures, possible treatments, etc that they have heard of on my blog. Please see your physician or a health care professional before heeding or using any medical information given on this blog. It is not intended to replace any medical advice given to you by your licensed medical professional. This blog is simply providing a medium for discussion on all matters concerning life. All opinions given are the sole responsibility of the person giving them. This blog does not make any claim to their truthfulness, honesty, or factuality because of their presence on my blog. Again, Please consult a health care professional before heeding any health information given here.

    27Mar2011
  • Legal Disclaimer:

    Michelle Moquin's "A Day In The Life Of..." publishes the opinions of expert authorities in many fields. But the use of these opinions is no substitute for legal, accounting, investment, medical and other professional services to suit your specific personal needs. Always consult a competent professional for answers to your specific questions.

    27Mar2011
  • Fair Use Notice Disclaimer

    This web site may contain copyrighted material the use of which has not always been specifically authorized by the copyright owner. We are making such material available in our efforts to advance the understanding of humanity's problems and hopefully to help find solutions for those problems. We believe this constitutes a 'fair use' of any such copyrighted material as provided for in section 107 of the US Copyright Law. In accordance with Title 17 U.S.C. Section 107, the material on this site is distributed without profit to those who have expressed a prior interest in receiving the included information for research and educational purposes. A click on a hyperlink is a request for information. However, if you wish to use copyrighted material from this site for purposes of your own that go beyond 'fair use', you must obtain permission from me. You can read more about "fair use' and US Copyright Law"at the"Legal Information Institute of Cornell Law School." This notice was modified from a similar notice at "Common Dreams."

Archive for the 'Wonderful Women Of The World' Category

Goodbye Ms. Angelou

Posted by Michelle Moquin on 29th May 2014

Bookmark and Share

Good morning!

Maya Angelou passed away yesterday. She was an amazing beautiful Wonderful Woman Of The World. May she rest in peace.

From the Wash Po.

Maya Angelou, writer and poet, dies at age 86

Maya Angelou, a child of the Jim Crow South who rose to international prominence as a writer known for her frank chronicles of personal history and a performer instantly identified by her regal presence and rich, honeyed voice, died May 28 at her home in Winston-Salem, N.C. She was 86.

Her literary agent, Helen Brann, confirmed the death but said she did not know the cause. Ms. Angelou had heart ailments and had been in declining health for years.

She established her literary reputation in 1970 with “I Know Why the Caged Bird Sings,” a memoir detailing the racism and abuse she endured during her harrowing childhood.From her desperate early years, Ms. Angelou gradually moved into nightclub dancing and from there began a career in the arts that spanned more than 60 years. She sang cabaret and calypso, danced with Alvin Ailey, acted on Broadway, directed for film and television and wrote more than 30 books, including poetry, essays and, responding to the public’s appetite for her life story, six autobiographies.She won three Grammy Awards for spoken-word recordings of her poetry and prose and was invited by President-elect Bill Clinton to read an original poem at his first inauguration in 1993, making her the second poet, after Robert Frost, to be so honored.

The poem she read, “On the Pulse of Morning,” spoke of a hope that the country’s diverse people would find new unity after chapters in U.S. history of oppression and division.

“Lift up your eyes upon /The day breaking for you,” she said as the nation watched. “Give birth again /To the dream.”

In 2011, President Obama presented her with the Presidential Medal of Freedom, the nation’s highest civilian honor. In a statement Wednesday, Obama described Ms. Angelou as “a truly phenomenal woman” and his sister Maya’s namesake. “A childhood of suffering and abuse actually drove her to stop speaking – but the voice she found helped generations of Americans find their rainbow amidst the clouds, and inspired the rest of us to be our best selves,” Obama said.

It was her story of personal transformation in “I Know Why the Caged Bird Sings” that launched Ms. Angelou’s career and brought her wide recognition as a symbol of strength overcoming struggle.

“She brought an understanding of the dilemmas and dangers and exhilarations of black womanhood more to the fore than almost any autobiographer before her time,” said Arnold Rampersad, a literary critic and professor emeritus of English at Stanford University. “She challenged assumptions about what was possible for a poor black girl from the South, and she emerged as a figure of courage, honesty and grace.”

The idea for “I Know Why the Caged Bird Sings” arose during conversations with friends, including James Baldwin, whom she met in Paris. Ms. Angelou initially resisted the suggestion that she write her story, giving in only after an editor goaded her by suggesting that writing autobiography as literature was too difficult for anyone to do well.

“I Know Why the Caged Bird Sings” focused on growing up in her grandmother’s care in segregated Stamps, Ark., and on her rape by her mother’s boyfriend at age 7, “a breaking and entering when even the senses are torn apart.”

After she spoke her attacker’s name, he was found kicked to death in a lot behind a slaughterhouse. Convinced that her voice had the power to kill, she fell nearly silent for nearly five years. She spoke only to her beloved older brother, Bailey.

“I had to stop talking,” she wrote. “I walked into rooms where people were laughing, their voices hitting the walls like stones, and I simply stood still — in the midst of a riot of sound. After a minute or two, silence would rush into the room from its hiding place because I had eaten up all the sounds.”

The book, which came at the leading edge of a renaissance in literature by black female writers such as Toni Morrison and Alice Walker, traces the young Ms. Angelou’s effort to recover her voice and a sense of control over her body and her life, beginning with her recitation of “A Tale of Two Cities” at the behest of a family friend.

Enduringly popular, “I Know Why the Caged Bird Sings” has been translated into 17 languages, sold more than 1 million copies and still appears on high school and college reading lists.

“There isn’t any easy, which is to say false line in the book,” wrote the novelist Ward Just in a Washington Post review. “It is not propaganda nor a history of the blacks, nor, most blessedly, sociology. It is one woman, Maya Angelou, writing about her life and times and writing from a talent so strong as to make each part of it immediate, direct, devastating and — oddly — beautiful.”

Ms. Angelou produced five subsequent autobiographical volumes, avoiding distractions during her writing days by retreating to hotel rooms, where she removed art from the walls. She often arrived before dawn — dictionary, thesaurus and bottle of dry sherry in tow — and wrote longhand on yellow legal pads.

None of her poetry or prose brought the same acclaim as “I Know Why the Caged Bird Sings,” but critics praised her ability to weave street talk with literary references and the rhythm of church hymns. But in some sense, Ms. Angelou existed in a realm untouched by criticism. She developed a devoted group of readers who adored her and were drawn to her poems, which featured accessible rhymes and themes of cultivating love, conquering injustice and speaking out of silence.

“You may write me down in history /With your bitter, twisted lies,” reads a poem in her 1978 collection, “And Still I Rise.” “You may trod me in the very dirt /But still, like dust, I’ll rise.”

In 2002, she lent her name and verse to a line of Hallmark greeting cards, table runners and other products. “I want my work read,” she told The Post at the time.

Her ability to reach a mass audience, including people who did not consider themselves poetry readers, set her apart. A fixture on the lecture circuit and a popular guest on Oprah Winfrey’s talk show, her personal story became a platform for her message of renewal and hope.

“If God put the rainbows right in the clouds themselves, each one of us in the direst and dullest and most dreaded and dreary moments can see a possibility of hope,” she said in a speech at a conference at Weber State University in Utah in 1997. “Each one of us has the chance to be a rainbow in somebody’s cloud.”

Maya Angelou was born Marguerite Ann Johnson on April 4, 1928, in St. Louis to Bailey Johnson, a dietitian, and Vivian Johnson, a card dealer and boardinghouse proprietor. Her parents divorced when she was 3, and they sent her to Arkansas with her brother Bailey — “the greatest person in my world,” she wrote, who called her “My,” “Mine,” and finally “Maya.”

In 1940, she and Bailey moved to California to live with their mother. Ms. Angelou, who had discovered Shakespeare (“my first white love”) as a child in Stamps, graduated from Mission High School in San Francisco and took evening drama and dance classes. Concerned she might be a lesbian and wanting to prove she was “normal,” she propositioned a young man who lived up the street. After that one encounter, she became pregnant at age 16 with Clyde “Guy” Johnson, her only child.

In addition to her son, survivors include two grandchildren and two great-grandchildren.

She spent the next several years bouncing between jobs, scraping by first as a streetcar conductor and cook who read the Russians — Dostoevsky, Turgenev, Chekhov — in her free time. She said she also fell in love with a man who worked as a pimp, which led her to prostitution and then a stint as a madam.

She tried to join the Women’s Army Corps but was rejected because the California Labor School, where she had taken dance classes, appeared on the House Un-American Activities Committee list of organizations with communist sympathies. Ever more desperate, she sold stolen clothes and flirted with drugs until a friend who was a heroin addict forced her to watch him shoot up.

“He slouched, nodding, his mouth open and the saliva sliding down his chin as slowly as the blood had flowed down his arm,” she wrote in “Gather Together in My Name” (1974), the second volume of her autobiography. It was a turning point — the underworld revealed. “I had walked the precipice and seen it all; and at the critical moment, one man’s generosity pushed me safely away from the edge.”

In the early 1950s, she married Tosh Angelos, a Greek American sailor. They divorced several years later, but it was during their marriage that she landed a dancing and singing gig at San Francisco’s famed Purple Onion nightclub and first used the name Angelou — a version of Angelos.

In the mid-1950s, she toured 22 countries in Europe and Africa with a State Department production of the Gershwin folk opera “Porgy and Bess,” acted off-Broadway and released her first album of songs, “Miss Calypso.” She chronicled this blossoming of her performance career in “Singin’ and Swingin’ and Gettin’ Merry Like Christmas” (1976), the third volume of her autobiography.

Ms. Angelou’s interest in writing grew from song lyrics to short stories, and, with the encouragement of John Oliver Killens, a friend and black novelist, she moved to New York City in 1959 to join the Harlem Writers Guild. Members of the Guild critiqued her writing and offered advice: “Write each sentence over and over again,” she recalled in “The Heart of a Woman” (1981) the fourth installment of her autobiography, “until it seems you’ve used every combination possible, then write it again.”

In New York, Ms. Angelou was exposed to civil rights leaders, among them Bayard Rustin of the Rev. Martin Luther King Jr.’s Southern Christian Leadership Conference. She helped organize and performed in the “Cabaret for Freedom,” an off-Broadway musical revenue and benefit for that organization, and performed in Jean Genet’s “The Blacks,” also off-Broadway, about everyday confrontations between whites and blacks. In 1960, Ms. Angelou replaced Rustin as the northern coordinator for the conference.

She married a South African civil rights activist, Vusumzi Make, and they moved to Cairo, where she worked as an editor at an English-language newsweekly. The couple divorced soon after, but Ms. Angelou stayed in Africa with her son, working as a teacher and writer in Ghana.

The West African country had won its independence from England five years earlier, in 1957, and its Pan-Africanist president, Kwame Nkrumah, invited African Americans to move there. Ms. Angelou became part of a group of black intellectuals who answered that call.

“We knew that we were mostly unwanted in the land of our birth and saw promise on our ancestral continent,” she wrote in “All God’s Children Need Traveling Shoes” (1986), her fifth autobiography.

Soon after returning to California in 1966, she wrote “Black, Blues, Black,” a 10-part television series about the role of African culture in the United States, and served as a lecturer at the University of California at Los Angeles. She chronicled this period, including the assassinations of King and Malcolm X, in “A Song Flung Up to Heaven” (2002), her final installment of her memoir and one that comes full circle, ending as a younger Ms. Angelou sits down to write the first lines of “I Know Why the Caged Bird Sings.”

After the critical and commercial success of “I Know Why the Caged Bird Sings,” Ms. Angelou published her first volume of poetry, “Just Give Me a Cool Drink of Water ’fore I Diiie,” in 1971. The following year, she wrote the screenplay for the film “Georgia, Georgia,” about a black woman (played by Diana Sands) murdered for taking a white photographer as a lover.

In 1973, Ms. Angelou married Paul du Feu, a carpenter, and they lived together in Berkeley, Calif., until their divorce eight years later.

“I have lost good men — or men I might have been able to turn into good men — because I have no middle passage,” she told People in 1982. “I know that I’m not the easiest person to live with.”

Du Feu was remodeling homes while Ms. Angelou wrote, directed for film and television, and acted. She was nominated for a Tony Award for her Broadway performance in “Look Away” (1973), a two-woman play about the friendship between first lady Mary Todd Lincoln (played by Geraldine Page) and Ms. Angelou’s character, Elizabeth Keckley. In the TV series “Roots” (1977), she played Kunta Kinte’s grandmother.

In 1981, Ms. Angelou was appointed a lifetime member of the faculty at Wake Forest University in Winston-Salem. She continued to write, and her works included cookbooks and children’s books. In her many public speaking obligations, often at college commencements, she presented herself as a wise elder whose life was evidence of how far it is possible to travel.

“See me now, black, female, American and Southern,” she said in a 1990 speech to students at Centenary College in Louisiana. “See me and see yourselves. What can’t you do?”

5 Things About Maya Angelou That Most People Won’t Talk About

AP836280664931-638x425

1. Angelou was a close associate with Malcolm X prior to his assassination and had plans to start a new effort with him to advance African-American rights. According to Angelou, she intended to jump-start the Organization of African-American Unity with Malcolm X. The two intended to vocalize the issues plaguing black people in the U.S. to the United Nations, with the hope that the international body would assist in their struggle.

2. Angelou was a leader of the Southern Christian Leadership Conference (SCLC). SCLC, an organization founded by Martin Luther King which preached nonviolence, was instrumental in arranging protests and voter registration drives. Before becoming a member, she arranged the Cabaret for Freedom, a five-week show that raised money for the organization. After the play’s success, she was asked by Bayard Rustin to become the Northern Coordinator of the SCLC, and was instrumental in fundraising and promoting the organization’s mission.

3. Angelou supported Cuban leader Fidel Castro, despite his rivalry with U.S. leaders. She once wrote, “Of course, Castro never had called himself white, so he was O.K. from the git. Anyhow, America hated Russians, and as black people often said, ‘Wasn’t no Communist country that put my grandpappa in slavery. Wasn’t no Communist lynched my poppa or raped my mamma.’” Her commentary aligned with Pan-Africanism and anti-colonial sentiments, according to which people of color — particularly those in the African Diaspora — identified their struggles as part of one larger, systemic fight.

4. Angelou was a staunch advocate for marriage equality. Angelou personally called New York state Senator Shirley Huntley (D) to voice her support of same-sex marriage, which the the state was considering and the Senator opposed. During the call she said, “To love someone takes a lot of courage,” she said. “So how much more is one challenged when the love is of the same sex and the laws say, ‘I forbid you from loving this person’?” Huntley ended up voting for the measure.

5. Angelou made a strong moral case for action to recover the kidnapped Nigerian school girls. Angelou never lost her commitment to social justice. Earlier this month she tweeted about the kidnapped girls in Nigeria.

*R*I*P*Ms.*A*N*G*E*L*O*

Blog me.

Peace & love…

Lastly, greed over a great story is surfacing from my “loyal”(?) readers. With all this back and forth about who owns what, that appears on my blog, let me reiterate that all material posted on my blog becomes the sole property of my blog. If you want to reserve any proprietary rights don’t post it to my blog. I will prominently display this caveat on my blog from now on to remind those who may have forgotten this notice.

Gratefully your blog host,

michelle

Aka BABE: We all know what this means by now :)

If you love my blog and my writes, please make a donation via PayPal, credit card, or e-check, please click the “Donate” button below. (Please only donations from those readers within the United States. – International readers please see my “Donate” page)

Or if you would like to send a check via snail mail, please make checks payable to “Michelle Moquin”, and send to:

Michelle Moquin PO Box 29235 San Francisco, Ca. 94129

Thank you for your loyal support!

All content on this site are property of Michelle Moquin © copyright 2008-2014

“Though she be but little, she be fierce.” – William Shakespeare Midsummer Night’s Dream 

" Politics, god, Life, News, Music, Family, Personal, Travel, Random, Photography, Religion, Aliens, Art, Entertainment, Food, Books, Thoughts, Media, Culture, Love, Sex, Poetry, Prose, Friends, Technology, Humor, Health, Writing, Events, Movies, Sports, Video, Christianity, Atheist, Blogging, History, Work, Education, Business, Fashion, Barack Obama, People, Internet, Relationships, Faith, Photos, Videos, Hillary Clinton, School, Reviews, God, TV, Philosophy, Fun, Science, Environment, Design, The Page, Rants, Pictures, Church, Blog, Nature, Marketing, Television, Democrats, Parenting, Miscellaneous, Current Events, Film, Spirituality, Obama, Musings, Home, Human Rights, Society, Comedy, Me, Random Thoughts, Research, Government, Election 2008, Baseball, Opinion, Recipes, Children, Iraq, Funny, Women, Economics, America, Misc, Commentary, John McCain, Reflections, All, Celebrities, Inspiration, Lifestyle, Theology, Linux, Kids, Games, World, India, Literature, China, Ramblings, Fitness, Money, Review, War, Articles, Economy, Journal, Quotes, NBA, Crime, Anime, Islam, 2008, Stories, Prayer, Diary, Jesus, Buddha, Muslim, Israel, Europe, Links, Marriage, Fiction, American Idol, Software, Leadership, Pop culture, Rants, Video Games, Republicans, Updates, Political, Football, Healing, Blogs, Shopping, USA, Class, Matrix, Course, Work, Web 2.0, My Life, Psychology, Gay, Happiness, Advertising, Field Hockey, Hip-hop, sex, fucking, ass, Soccer, sox"

Posted in Good Reads and Good See'ds, Style, Wonderful Women Of The World | 16 Comments »

Wonderful Women Of The World

Posted by Michelle Moquin on 24th May 2014

Bookmark and Share

Good morning!

Fashion is my thing. What we clothe ourselves with says a lot about us. Supporting women and girls is also my thing. How we treat them says a lot about humanity.

Unfortunately, women and girls aren’t treated so good throughout this planet. (And I am being kind here.) So when my two passions converge into something beautiful and amazing, I take notice, and I give credit where credit is due.

I was perusing Vogue Magazine again, and I came across another write, where another Wonderful Woman Of The World, was featured –  this time, using fashion to help young girls.

Phoebe Dahl, through her charitable clothing line “Faircloth & Supply,” helps young girls in Nepal avoid being victims of Sex trafficking by enabling them to be able to get an education. For every item of her clothing line sold, Dahl donates uniforms to young girls where “education is often out of reach for children whose families can’t afford requisite school attire.”

“If girls can’t get an education they’re considered worthless, and their parents often sell them to sex traffickers,” according to Dahl in the May Vogue article ‘One For One’. “We give them two uniforms, so they can go to school and choose a trade – like farming or sewing – and at the end of the course, we give them a microloan to start their business.”

According to tinyhandsinternational.org, “In Nepal an estimated 10,000-15,000 girls are trafficked across the border where they are sold into Indian brothels and forced to become prostitutes.”

The article (which can be found here http://www.tinyhandsinternational.org/human-trafficking/sex-trafficking-nepal) also said that these girls are expected to have sex with 40 or more clients a day. They are beaten or tortured if they try to run or protest.

This was taken from Dahl’s website:

WHAT WE DO…
For each item sold by Faircloth Supply, one school uniform is donated to a girl in Nepal. Through our partnership with General Welfare Pratisthan (GWP), the girls receiving these uniforms are enabled to attend school and achieve the education they rightfully deserve.
The Faircloth Supply team made its first visit to the GWP headquarters in Nepal’s capital of Kathmandu this past March of 2014.  We met with the incredible team behind GWP and their Executive Director, Mahesh Dev Bhattarai, who acted as both our guide and educator, teaching us about the Nepali culture and customs. GWP’s mission is to create an organized, self-reliant society, free of the social and economic disparities symptomatic of gender inequality. In pursuit of this goal, GWP has made providing education opportunities to girls one of its top priorities.There’s a gentle, understated quality of compassion present in the nation’s character.  From sublime landscape to humble homes, Nepal is nothing if not welcoming.  And yet, given the country’s natural earnestness and beauty, the mistreatment of women throughout Nepali culture is an even more distressing pill to swallow.

When viewing the country’s rich and colorful beauty alongside the extent to which women are mistreated and undervalued in their society, the contrast is stark.  There are currently 67 million children who aren’t in school, and over 50% are girls.  As a founding member of GWP, Mahesh stresses schooling as a key to empowering Nepali women in the community and breaking a cycle of discrimination that has been endured by generations of women before them.
For a young girl in Nepal, the benefits of education are for more than just academic. Girls who receive education are less vulnerable to HIV infection, human trafficking and other forms of social & economic exploitation. They’re more likely to marry later & raise children who will attend school themselves, and go on to contribute positively to their family’s economic well-being.  Long term, GWP’s work aims to build a natural infrastructure that will reduce poverty amongst the marginal population, lower incidents of gender-related violence and the amount of girls taken into sex trafficking, and improve existing health conditions among women. It’s a long and ambitious list, and none of it can be achieved without providing education to girls in even the most impoverished communities throughout Nepal.
GWP programs have impacted over 900 girls and their families, and their reach is growing. The foundation is actively working in 20 districts in Nepal and has reached more than 500,000 beneficiaries through its outreach programs that focus on income generation, health improvement, education, and the environment.
 Mahesh and his team of teachers and mentors are pioneering programs at women’s health’s clinics as well – implementing STD/HIV/AIDS prevention programs in Kathmandu and the five surrounding districts.

*****

Readers: Dahl has come up with a way to help girls not only get an education but boost their local economies in the process. Awesome. What other solutions can you come up with? Blog me.

Oh…before I go, a big congratulations to Dahl and her partner Ruby Rose on their engagement! Love this sweet picture.

Rose and Dahl

 

If you’re headed out of town or just stickin’ around, I HOPE you have a fabulous Memorial Day Weekend!

Peace & Love.

Lastly, greed over a great story is surfacing from my “loyal”(?) readers. With all this back and forth about who owns what, that appears on my blog, let me reiterate that all material posted on my blog becomes the sole property of my blog. If you want to reserve any proprietary rights don’t post it to my blog. I will prominently display this caveat on my blog from now on to remind those who may have forgotten this notice.

Gratefully your blog host,

michelle

Aka BABE: We all know what this means by now :)

If you love my blog and my writes, please make a donation via PayPal, credit card, or e-check, please click the “Donate” button below. (Please only donations from those readers within the United States. – International readers please see my “Donate” page)

Or if you would like to send a check via snail mail, please make checks payable to “Michelle Moquin”, and send to:

Michelle Moquin PO Box 29235 San Francisco, Ca. 94129

Thank you for your loyal support!

All content on this site are property of Michelle Moquin © copyright 2008-2014

“Though she be but little, she be fierce.” – William Shakespeare Midsummer Night’s Dream 

" Politics, god, Life, News, Music, Family, Personal, Travel, Random, Photography, Religion, Aliens, Art, Entertainment, Food, Books, Thoughts, Media, Culture, Love, Sex, Poetry, Prose, Friends, Technology, Humor, Health, Writing, Events, Movies, Sports, Video, Christianity, Atheist, Blogging, History, Work, Education, Business, Fashion, Barack Obama, People, Internet, Relationships, Faith, Photos, Videos, Hillary Clinton, School, Reviews, God, TV, Philosophy, Fun, Science, Environment, Design, The Page, Rants, Pictures, Church, Blog, Nature, Marketing, Television, Democrats, Parenting, Miscellaneous, Current Events, Film, Spirituality, Obama, Musings, Home, Human Rights, Society, Comedy, Me, Random Thoughts, Research, Government, Election 2008, Baseball, Opinion, Recipes, Children, Iraq, Funny, Women, Economics, America, Misc, Commentary, John McCain, Reflections, All, Celebrities, Inspiration, Lifestyle, Theology, Linux, Kids, Games, World, India, Literature, China, Ramblings, Fitness, Money, Review, War, Articles, Economy, Journal, Quotes, NBA, Crime, Anime, Islam, 2008, Stories, Prayer, Diary, Jesus, Buddha, Muslim, Israel, Europe, Links, Marriage, Fiction, American Idol, Software, Leadership, Pop culture, Rants, Video Games, Republicans, Updates, Political, Football, Healing, Blogs, Shopping, USA, Class, Matrix, Course, Work, Web 2.0, My Life, Psychology, Gay, Happiness, Advertising, Field Hockey, Hip-hop, sex, fucking, ass, Soccer, sox"

Posted in Good Reads and Good See'ds, Health & Well Being, Style, Wonderful Women Of The World | 10 Comments »

Wonderful Women Of The World

Posted by Michelle Moquin on 21st May 2014


Bookmark and Share

Good morning!

Michelle Obama hardly ever gets written up enough for what she does as an amazing woman and FLOTUS. So when I find something written about FLOTUS besides her chic fashion sense (Which I do enjoy! But c’mon she has so much more to offer us, if we just can just get the opportunity to read and listen.), I get excited.

Michelle Obama, a Wonderful Woman Of The World, gave a wonderful warm, heartfelt, honest, living-in-the-real-world speech, when she spoke to graduating students on Senior Appreciation Day in Topeka, Kansas, celebrating the 60th anniversary of the landmark Brown v Board of Education Supreme Court decision.

So, just what is the landmark Brown v Board? Here’s the write from the L.A. Times. I was not familiar with all of the details, and perhaps you aren’t either:

Brown vs. Board of Education: Here’s what happened in 1954 courtroom

EDITOR’S NOTE: On May 17, 1954, a hushed crowd of spectators packed the Supreme Court, awaiting word on Brown vs. Board of Education, a combination of five lawsuits brought by the NAACP’s legal arm to challenge racial segregation in public schools. The high court decided unanimously that “separate but equal” education denied black children their constitutional right to equal protection under the law, effectively removing a cornerstone that propped up Jim Crow, or state-sanctioned segregation of the races.

Associated Press reporter Herb Altschull chronicled the decision and what it meant for segregation, which in 1954 permeated many aspects of American life. Using the style and language of journalists of his era, including a reference to Asians as “Orientals,” Altschull captured the uncertainty hanging over a society on the brink of seismic change. Here is Altschull’s compelling report. 

The Supreme Court ruled today that the states of the nation do not have the right to separate Negro and white pupils in different public schools.

By a unanimous 9-0 vote, the high court held that such segregation of the races is unconstitutional.

Chief Justice Warren read the historic decision to a packed but hushed gallery of spectators nearly two years after Negro residents of four states and the District of Columbia went before the court to challenge the principle of segregation.

The ruling does not end segregation at once. Further hearings were set for this fall to decide how and when to end the practice of segregation. Thus a lengthy delay is likely before the decision is carried out.

Dean Acheson, secretary of State under former President Harry Truman, was in the courtroom to hear the ruling. He called it “great and statesmanlike.”

Atty. Gen. [Herbert] Brownell was also present. He declined comment immediately. Brownell and the Eisenhower administration, like Truman’s, opposed segregation.

For years 17 Southern and “border” states have imposed compulsory segregation on approximately two-thirds of the nation’s Negroes. Officials of some states already are on record as saying they will close the schools rather than permit them to be operated with Negro and white pupils in the same classrooms.

In its decision, the high court struck down the long-standing “separate but equal” doctrine first laid down by the Supreme Court in 1896 when it maintained that segregation was all right if equal facilities were made available for Negroes and whites.

Here is the heart of today’s decision as it deals with this hotly controverted doctrine:

“We come then to the question presented: Does segregation of children in public schools solely on the basis of race, even though the physical facilities and other ‘tangible’ factors may be equal, deprive the children of the minority group of equal education opportunities?”

“We believe that it does.”

James C. Hagerty, presidential press secretary, told a news conference the White House would have no comment at this time. He noted that Warren’s opinion said formulation of specific decrees must await later hearings.

Gov. Herman Talmadge, one of the most outspoken supporters of segregation, hit back from Atlanta that the court’s decision had reduced the constitution to “a mere scrap of paper.”

“It has blatantly ignored all law and precedent and usurped from the Congress and the people the power to amend the Constitution and from the Congress the authority to make the laws of the land,” Talmadge said.

Thurgood Marshall, Negro attorney from New York who had argued the case against segregation last December, said he was highly pleased that the decision was unanimous and that the language used was unequivocal.

“Once the decision is made public to the South as well as to the North,” Marshall said, “The people will get together for the first time and work this thing out.”

He said he was not in any way fearful lest the final decree nibble away at the principles in the decision. Marshall said, too, he believes the people of the South will abide by the ruling. “The people of the South are just as law abiding as any other good citizens,” he said.

Marshall is a special counsel for the National Association for the Advancement of Colored People, which has spearheaded the drive against segregation. He said NAACP people will meet this week to discuss “what we are going to do.”

Today’s decision was the first major ruling of the Supreme Court since Warren became chief justice last October, succeeding the late Fred Vinson.

The court confined its ruling to the question of the segregation of Negro public school pupils, but it obviously is applicable to the exclusion from public schools of any minority group — Orientals, Mexicans, Puerto Ricans and so on.

Today’s decision was the latest in a series of court rulings wiping out legal restrictions on Negroes.

In previous cases the Supreme Court had:

1. Ruled that colleges must admit Negroes to study professional courses not open to them in Negro colleges.

2. Ruled that Negroes may not be excluded from train and bus coaches operated in interstate travel.

3. Ruled that Negroes may not be barred from eating in restaurants in the District of Columbia.

The “separate but equal” doctrine was set forth in a 7-1 decision on May 18, 1896, in a case involving Homer Adolph Plessy, who was part Negro.

Plessy boarded a train for a ride from New Orleans to Covington, La., and took a seat in a coach assigned to white passengers in violation of a Louisiana law which required segregation of whites and Negroes on trains.

The conductor asked Plessy to leave the white coach but he refused. A policeman arrested Plessy and took him to jail in New Orleans.

That set off a vigorous legal battle in which the Louisiana Supreme Court eventually upheld the state law. Plessy appealed to the Supreme Court of the United States and the decision went against him.

Justice Henry Billings Brown, who wrote that decision, said the Louisiana law was not in conflict with the U.S. Constitution since Plessy was not refused the right to ride in trains so long as he stayed in a coach restricted to Negroes.

Thus grew up the philosophy of “separate but equal” facilities. Warren, in today’s decision, wrote that the Plessy case involved transportation, not public schools. Inasmuch as he called special attention to the distinction, it is apparent that the court is not now dismissing all forms of segregation.

Warren said that when the 14th Amendment was enacted, “education of Negroes was almost nonexistent, and practically all of the race were illiterate. In fact, any education of Negroes was forbidden by law in some states.”

“Today, in contrast, many Negroes have achieved outstanding success in the arts and sciences as well as in the business and professional world.”

Warren noted that in the early 1870s when cases dealing with segregation first went to the Supreme Court, “compulsory education was virtually unknown” and that for this reason the question of school segregation was unimportant.

After the 1896 decision, Warren wrote, American courts began using it as a basis for decisions on all matters dealing with separation of Negroes and whites.

But it was not until the present cases were brought before the court, Warren said, that the “separate but equal” doctrine was challenged insofar as it might deal with public school education.

Warren noted that the lower courts, in finding against Negro appellants on the basis of the 1896 decision, maintained that the Negro and white schools involved had, in fact, been equalized “with respect to buildings, curricula, qualifications and salaries of teachers and other ‘tangible’ factors.”

But, the Chief Justice said, “our decision. cannot turn on merely a comparison of these tangible factors in the Negro and white schools involved in each of the cases. We must look instead to the effect of segregation itself on public education.”

The Warren opinion recalled that in an earlier decision dealing with the question of whether Negroes should be admitted to graduate courses in segregated universities, the court had said this:

“To separate them (Negroes) from others of similar age and qualifications solely because of their race generates a feeling of inferiority as to their status in the community that may affect their hearts and minds in a way unlikely ever to be undone.”

Reaction from Capitol Hill was swift and in some cases strongly critical.

Sen. [Richard] Russell of Georgia, leader of Southern Democrats in the Senate, termed the decision “a flagrant abuse of judicial power.” He said questions like that of segregation should be decided by the lawmakers, not the courts.

Other Southerners were plainly unhappy, but they did not go so far as Russell. Sen. [Marion Price] Daniel (D-Texas) said the verdict was “disappointing” and that he couldn’t see how the court could arrive at such a decision.

Sen. [Allen J.] Ellender (D-La.) said, “I am of course very much disappointed by this. But I don’t want to criticize the Supreme Court. It is bound to have a very great effect until we readjust ourselves to it.”

He said there would be “violent repercussions” if enforcement were ordered too quickly.

Rep. [Kenneth B.] Keating (R-NY), a strong backer of civil rights legislation, said “There is no doubt about the soundness of the court’s decision.”

Gov. William B. Umstead of North Carolina said in a statement put out by his office that he was “terribly disappointed.”

J.M. Hinton, South Carolina conference president of the National Association for the Advancement of Colored People (NAACP), said:

“Christianity and democracy have been given a great place in America through the elimination of segregation in public school and communism has lost a talking point.”

The appeals from the four states – Kansas, Delaware, Virginia and South Carolina – challenged the legality of segregation on the ground that it violated the 14th Amendment to the Constitution. The District of Columbia complaint alleged violation of the 5th Amendment.

The 14th Amendment, put through shortly after the end of the Civil War, was designed to reinforce the rights of the newly freed slaves. It said that no state may deprive any person of due process or equal rights under the law.

The 5th Amendment gives all persons involved in court cases dealing with federal matters the right to due process of law.

Actually, the court did not decide the question purely on the basis of these amendments.

Warren wrote that the court “cannot turn the clock back” to the enactment of the 14th Amendment in 1868 or the imposing of the “separate but equal” doctrine in 1896.

“We must consider public education,” Warren wrote, “In the light of its full development and its present place in American life throughout the nation. “

“Only in this way can it be determined if segregation in public schools deprives these plaintiffs of the equal protection of the laws.”

“Today, education is perhaps the most important function of state and local governments… It is the very foundation of good citizenship… In these days it is doubtful that any child may reasonably be expected to succeed in life if he is denied the opportunity of an education.”

“Such an opportunity where the state has undertaken to provide it, is a right which must be made available to all on equal terms.”

The court minced no words in applying the “equal rights” section of the 14th Amendment to the issue of school segregation. It said:

“We hold that the plaintiffs and others similarly situated for whom the action has been brought are, by reason of the segregation complained of, deprived of the equal protection of the laws guaranteed by the 14th Amendment.”

It disposed of the “due process” section in this way:

“This disposition makes unnecessary any discussion whether such segregation also violates the due process clause…”

That was for the cases of the four states. But in the District of Columbia case, the court applied the due process provisions of the 5th Amendment, saying:

“We hold that racial segregation in the public schools of the District of Columbia is a denial of the due process of law guaranteed by the 5th Amendment to the Constitution.”

Warren’s opinion noted that enforcement of the court ruling raised “problems of considerable complexity.”

It was for this reason that the court ordered further arguments in the fall. Brownell and the attorneys general of all states where segregation is now permitted were invited to take part, so that appropriate decrees can be worked out.

Briefs must be filed by Oct. 1.

The decision was made public in a highly unusual manner. Normally, copies of Supreme Court rulings are given to reporters simultaneously with the start of their reading from the bench.

In this case, no copies were given out until after Warren had finished reading the opinion. Thus it was not until he was well into it was the full import of the court’s decision known— that segregation had been ruled unconstitutional.

No reason was announced for this departure from the usual practice.

The court had weighed the issues for a long time. The first arguments on the cases were held in December 1952. Rearguments were heard in December 1953, after the Eisenhower Administration took over.

And...I posted the video, so you could watch her full speech. It is 20 minutes but so worth it.  Powerful and moving.

 First Lady Michelle Obama Addresses Senior Appreciation Day

Readers: What an awesome speech. I am so moved. I love the way Michelle Obama puts the power into the hands of the young to bring about change. I HOPE they take it on.

Thoughts? Blog me.

Peace & love…to all.

Lastly, greed over a great story is surfacing from my “loyal”(?) readers. With all this back and forth about who owns what, that appears on my blog, let me reiterate that all material posted on my blog becomes the sole property of my blog. If you want to reserve any proprietary rights don’t post it to my blog. I will prominently display this caveat on my blog from now on to remind those who may have forgotten this notice.

Gratefully your blog host,

michelle

Aka BABE: We all know what this means by now :)

If you love my blog and my writes, please make a donation via PayPal, credit card, or e-check, please click the “Donate” button below. (Please only donations from those readers within the United States. – International readers please see my “Donate” page)

Or if you would like to send a check via snail mail, please make checks payable to “Michelle Moquin”, and send to:

Michelle Moquin PO Box 29235 San Francisco, Ca. 94129

Thank you for your loyal support!

All content on this site are property of Michelle Moquin © copyright 2008-2014

“Though she be but little, she be fierce.” – William Shakespeare Midsummer Night’s Dream 

" Politics, god, Life, News, Music, Family, Personal, Travel, Random, Photography, Religion, Aliens, Art, Entertainment, Food, Books, Thoughts, Media, Culture, Love, Sex, Poetry, Prose, Friends, Technology, Humor, Health, Writing, Events, Movies, Sports, Video, Christianity, Atheist, Blogging, History, Work, Education, Business, Fashion, Barack Obama, People, Internet, Relationships, Faith, Photos, Videos, Hillary Clinton, School, Reviews, God, TV, Philosophy, Fun, Science, Environment, Design, The Page, Rants, Pictures, Church, Blog, Nature, Marketing, Television, Democrats, Parenting, Miscellaneous, Current Events, Film, Spirituality, Obama, Musings, Home, Human Rights, Society, Comedy, Me, Random Thoughts, Research, Government, Election 2008, Baseball, Opinion, Recipes, Children, Iraq, Funny, Women, Economics, America, Misc, Commentary, John McCain, Reflections, All, Celebrities, Inspiration, Lifestyle, Theology, Linux, Kids, Games, World, India, Literature, China, Ramblings, Fitness, Money, Review, War, Articles, Economy, Journal, Quotes, NBA, Crime, Anime, Islam, 2008, Stories, Prayer, Diary, Jesus, Buddha, Muslim, Israel, Europe, Links, Marriage, Fiction, American Idol, Software, Leadership, Pop culture, Rants, Video Games, Republicans, Updates, Political, Football, Healing, Blogs, Shopping, USA, Class, Matrix, Course, Work, Web 2.0, My Life, Psychology, Gay, Happiness, Advertising, Field Hockey, Hip-hop, sex, fucking, ass, Soccer, sox"

Posted in Health & Well Being, Human Rights and Equality, Political Powwow, Wonderful Women Of The World | 11 Comments »

Wonderful Women Of The World.

Posted by Michelle Moquin on 17th May 2014

Bookmark and Share

Good morning!

Any girl who creates programs and teaches philanthropy (Stanford University), and convinces billionaires to donate much of their earnings to support social causes, is considered a Wonderful Woman of the World in my book. Especially if one of those billionaires is Zuckerberg. Anything good that keeps him from pushing his money to influence the repub party.

Reading Vogue magazine ( Yes, there are some good articles in this magazine besides, how to look chic), I discovered this write.

When Facebook and Twitter Give Back: A New Philanthropy Guru and Her Silicon Valley Mission

 img-holdingtechsupport_18302860287.jpg_article_singleimage

Philanthropy guru Laura Arrillaga-Andreessen is guiding the titans of Silicon Valley to new heights of charitable giving.

One day in the summer of 2011, Brian Chesky, cofounder of the residence-sharing company Airbnb, paid a visit to the Atherton, California, home of venture capitalist Marc Andreessen. The two sat by the pool discussing whether Andreessen’s firm should lead the start-up’s next round of funding. Chesky, who was not yet 30 and had gone from maxed-out credit cards to more money than he knew what to do with, mentioned that he was interested in philanthropy. “I’ve got someone for you to meet,” Andreessen said. “My wife, Laura.”

They were introduced at the Allen & Co. media-and-technology power retreat in Sun Valley, Idaho. “I have a bit of a reputation there for cornering people to talk with them about philanthropy,” says Laura Arrillaga-Andreessen, who hit it off with Chesky right away. Afterward, she visited Airbnb’s San Francisco headquarters and argued that philanthropy should be fundamental to the company’s mission.

The visit struck a chord. Airbnb’s engineers developed a tool to match people who want to donate shelter with those left homeless by natural disasters like Hurricane Sandy. The company also embarked on what’s become an annual community-service project in which all Airbnb’s employees may volunteer to spend a workday cleaning up parks and schools in San Francisco. To Arrillaga-Andreessen—a Stanford lecturer who has become a philanthropy guru in Silicon Valley—it is gospel that a young, idealistic workforce wants to create social good as much as it wants perks like free meals and dry cleaning. “She’s unconstrained in her view of what’s possible in the world,” says Chesky, who intends to announce philanthropic plans of his own later this year. “Other people try to find reasons things can’t happen. Laura tries to find ways that they can.”

With gold-rush fortunes being made up and down Silicon Valley, the face of philanthropy in America is changing. The list of top gifts compiled by The Chronicle of Philanthropy, while still crowded with bequests and old East Coast families, is now punctuated by West Coast entrepreneurs and people in their 40s or younger. Arrillaga-Andreessen is the one persuading this new generation of tech tycoons to give their riches away. Look behind several of the most meaningful philanthropic gestures of recent years and you’ll find her pulling the strings. She has Chesky’s ear. She’s guided the giving of Twitter cofounder Jack Dorsey and Facebook’s Mark Zuckerberg and his wife, Priscilla Chan; she’s close friends with Steve Jobs’s widow, Laurene Powell Jobs, another serious player in philanthropic circles. A typical evening in the Valley finds her and Anne Wojcicki, cofounder of the DNA-testing company 23andMe, conspiring over drinks about how to change the world—and gossiping about sitting next to Kevin Spacey at a black-tie dinner.

“Laura has an uncanny ability to walk alongside entrepreneurs and say, ‘OK—what’s next?’ ” Powell Jobs says. “ ‘How will you link your passion and your intellect to make an even greater impact in the world?’ She does this with charm, charisma, and just the right touch of persuasion.”

Laura’s persuasive charm is on full display when I meet her for coffee in the lobby of the Rosewood hotel in Menlo Park, California. Willowy and ethereal, she is dressed in a Gucci motorcycle jacket, an Alexander McQueen dress, tiger-striped tights, and thigh-high suede Robert Clergerie boots. Around her neck are two Tiffany crosses she always wears, one a gift from her husband (“my beloved”), the other a reminder of her late mother. After settling into a seat by the fireplace, she tells me she is preparing to break it to Marc that she wants to cancel their vacation to Hawaii. “I haven’t told my beloved yet,” she says. “But what I really want to do is work.” Among her occupations: teaching undergraduate and business school classes, running Stanford’s Center on Philanthropy and Civil Society, and heading a philanthropic-innovation lab called the Laura Arrillaga-Andreessen Foundation.

Her best-selling 2011 book, Giving 2.0, distills her research and thinking. People at all income levels derive satisfaction and meaning from donating time or money, she argues. Any expression of generosity should be accompanied by an embrace of the same risk-taking ethos and analytic rigor that drives start-up culture. “Moving from Giving 1.0 to Giving 2.0 is a transition from being reactive to being proactive, from emotionally based giving to strategically based, from isolated to collaborative,” she tells me. “So it’s not so much about what you give but about mitigating the risks of time, of money, of whatever portfolio of assets you’re choosing to invest.”

Her ideas have taken on added urgency since conflict between the have-littles and the have-everythings burst into the open around the Bay Area. On several occasions this winter, San Francisco activists have blocked the path of private shuttle buses that ferry tech workers to Apple and Google. The protests aimed to demonstrate that tech workers exist in a privileged bubble, untouched by the social problems of the community at large. “Some citizens of San Francisco still see Google as extracting value, and we need to change that,” says Marc Benioff, the cofounder of the software giant Salesforce.com. In 2010 he gave $100 million to build the new UCSF children’s hospital. “That’s why Laura’s work is so important. Tech companies and entrepreneurs need to be looked at as allies and not adversaries in the effort to make the world a better place.”

It was Arrillaga-Andreessen who advised Mark Zuckerberg and Priscilla Chan—relatively recent converts to philanthropy—on their $100 million gift to education in the city of Newark, New Jersey, in 2010. Since then, Zuckerberg and Chan have become the country’s largest charitable donors, giving $1 billion to the Silicon Valley Community Foundation, which supports social causes in the Bay Area. “Laura helped us create a framework of how to evaluate different opportunities and how to choose the ones that were actually meaningful to us,” Chan says. “She taught me how to hone in and focus on certain changes in the world we wanted to see happen—and empowered me to say no to things that weren’t going to help us in our core mission.”

Laura and her husband have become close friends with the Zuckerbergs, who come over for regular movie nights—usually pizza and a thriller chosen by Marc. She has also grown close to Zuckerberg’s friend and fellow Facebook founder Dustin Moskovitz, who at 29 has also become serious about giving away much of his estimated $6 billion net worth. Moskovitz’s wife, Cari Tuna, a former Wall Street Journal reporter, has taken Arrillaga-Andreessen’s Stanford course. The couple’s new foundation, Good Ventures, applies Laura’s ideas on evaluation and institutional effectiveness. Unusual in the world of philanthropy, it highlights its own mistakes.

Catching the attention of young billionaires isn’t hard. Laura has an ease and informality—and her flowing strawberry-blonde hair and gray-green eyes give her the look of a Pre-Raphaelite maiden. She also stands out in a place most people come to from somewhere else; she’s a true “daughter of the Valley,” as Powell Jobs puts it. Her father, John Arrillaga, Sr., is a commercial real estate developer responsible for much of Silicon Valley’s physical infrastructure. Hers was a normal, even “humble,” childhood, she says—“one pair of pajamas, one jacket from the Sears catalog, one hour of TV on weekend mornings.” The house she was raised in was a Mission-style single-story ranch—ordinary for Palo Alto. Her first car was a $750 used Honda. She says she had no idea that her parents were wealthy until junior year of high school, when her father could no longer keep his name off the Forbes 400 list, and the story got picked up by the local paper. Philanthropy, she learned, was a family tradition. Her father, who grew up poor outside Los Angeles and attributes his success to a basketball scholarship to Stanford, began with a two-figure contribution to the university when he graduated in 1960. In 2013, he gave $151 million. The family’s name is on six buildings around campus.

Laura struggled with dyslexia as a girl and compensated by developing outsize interpersonal skills. She now calls it a gift. “I learned not to sleep much and to develop an amazing memory and absorb information in a different way than other people,” she says. “I wouldn’t trade it for anything.” Another compensating mechanism, instilled by her father, was to be furiously detail-focused and goal-oriented. She writes two-, five-, and ten-year strategic plans for everything.

Three weeks after Laura was accepted to Stanford Graduate School of Business in 1994, her mother, Frances—never a smoker—was diagnosed with lung cancer. She was 52. Instead of starting school, Laura moved back home. “My mother was my best friend and soul mate,” she says. “We were inseparable. She and I did everything together.” Frances had committed her life to community-service organizations and founded two of them herself; when she died, 20 months after her diagnosis, her daughter was deeply changed. Instead of launching a start-up, Laura turned her focus to effective giving.

She met Andreessen at a New Year’s Eve dinner in 2005 hosted by their mutual friend Greg Waldorf (who, appropriately enough, became CEO of the matchmaking site eHarmony soon after). “Marc and I talked to nobody else for the next six hours straight,” she says. She, of course, wanted to know about his interest in philanthropy, and the fact that he sat on the board of Stanford Hospital passed her test. Eight months later, they were married.

The two have much in common, including a good deal of charming eccentricity. She takes her own coffee—Taster’s Choice hazelnut-flavored instant—wherever she goes. Both have had the same favorite restaurant for years: the plastic-menu diner chain Hobee’s, where Andreessen has permanently reserved a table. They display their affection unabashedly in public. “My partner Ben [Horowitz] will tell you that I was an unhappy, grumpy, irascible character before I met Laura,” Andreessen says. “My life was pretty different.”

Laura persuaded the six partners in the venture capital firm her husband and Horowitz founded in 2009—one of the Valley’s most successful and connected—to donate 50 percent of what they earn to charity. With early investments in companies like Instagram, Groupon, Zynga, and Pinterest, that amount is likely to figure in the billions.

“She was influential in how we should think and talk about it, how it will add meaning to the things we’re doing,” says Horowitz. “A lot of it was about how to make Silicon Valley a better place to build a company. She was very good at expanding that idea and saying there are a lot of people here who aren’t in these tech companies—the people who are taking care of kids, who are cutting grass. What did we think of their contributions to what we did? She made it seem ridiculous that we wouldn’t have a pledge like that—to get six guys to give away half their money.”

Laura’s other great love is modern art: She was recently flagged in tabloid captions as Kim Kardashian’s “philanthropist pal” when the two had a private tour of the James Turrell exhibition at the Los Angeles County Museum of Art. An art-history major at Stanford, she collects work by American artists from the fifties, sixties, and seventies: Jasper Johns, Robert Rauschenberg, Ad Reinhardt, Robert Ryman, and Agnes Martin, six of whose poetic, monochromatic paintings she and her husband own.

One of her closest friends is Pace Gallery president Marc Glimcher. The two visit museums, galleries, and art fairs together in New York and London. “She’s the kind of collector that dealers dream about,” he says. “She has real expertise, and she collects in depth. It’s not about ticking off a box. It’s about getting deep in there with what the artists are doing at the highest level.

“The art world can be debilitatingly cynical these days—you can really lose hope about what you’re doing,” Glimcher continues. “I have to say, Laura has played a big part in turning that around for me, restoring the idea that what you’re doing has real meaning.”

There are many of these “Laura changed my life” stories, not just from her husband and friends but also from former students. Several work in her office. When we arrive after breakfast, she greets everyone with a hug. “We completely blur the lines between personal and professional, and I love each one of our team members like a family member,” she says. She begins a meeting by handing out books as holiday gifts and reading a Billy Collins poem aloud. Then she serves a lunch she made herself: an avocado-and-orange salad, an organic green salad, and grilled chicken. She provides career advice for dozens of her alumni, who constitute a network of social entrepreneurs at innovative nonprofits like Kiva, Ashoka, Anjna, GuideStar, GiveWell, and Google.org, as well as the California-based Hewlett, Gordon and Betty Moore, and George Lucas Educational foundations. Still mostly in their 20s, her idealistic graduates are passionate about changing the world through philanthropy, and changing philanthropy through technology.

Over lunch, her former students discuss the use of drones for climate-change monitoring and an open-source disaster-relief model developed by the data-visualization start-up Ushahidi. One, Alexander Berger, talks excitedly about the organization GiveDirectly’s use of mobile payments to recipients in Kenya.

“What seems so powerful to me about this model is that you have the personal engagement that drives two-thirds of giving,” Laura says.

Berger enthusiastically agrees and imagines the way the model might evolve. “You can double a family’s income for $200, and they can send a text thanking you. It’s like donor crack.”

Afterward, Laura invites me for a walk around Stanford. It is a bright, cold day, and she looks like a rock star, or a very chic witch, in aviator sunglasses, a Rick Owens blistered-leather jacket, Givenchy motorcycle boots over suede leggings, and a Saint Laurent hat—all black. She shows me her favorite buildings, many of them erected by her father.

After about an hour, we end up in front of the Frances C. Arrillaga Alumni Center, a building donated in memory of her mother. She shows me the garden in back, where she and Andreessen were married in a small ceremony.

The memories of her mother are still fresh, and there’s a catch in her voice as she talks about her. “She was an extraordinary advocate for those in the community who had no voice of their own,” she says. The months she spent caring for her have remained present in her mind. “It was the greatest privilege of my life,” she says. “That was the first time that I lived completely outside of myself, completely in service of another human being. Once I’d experienced the powerful, just overwhelming beauty of living in service, I knew that I could live no other way.”

*****

Readers: If you want to find out more on Arrillaga-Andreessen, and her mission, visit her websiteAs Arrillaga-Andreessen states, “A philanthropist is anyone who gives anything—time, money, experience, skills or networks—in any amount to create a better world.”

What do you contribute to create a better world? Whether your impacting one life or many, it’s all important. Blog me.

Howie: Thank you. It’s good to know you have our backs.

Alycedale: Happy to hear you are doing extraordinarily well. And I stand corrected. Yes, no doubt when a man is trying to put his hands on you without consent you are an insane man hating bitch. I know I would be too.

Ingrid: Sorry you had to go through that and glad that you got your due justice. As far as the wife, in my opinion, she should’ve thanked you. One can only imagine how many other women you saved from rape from this sick sorry ass husband of hers.

In my opinion, any woman who has been put in the horrific situation of being raped and was able to kill the bastard, is a Wonderful Woman Of The World. Because once a man rapes and gets away with it, he will most likely rape again. And a dead man won’t have the chance to harm another woman, ever. I HOPE I am never faced with having to defend myself like that, but if I am, there is no way he is getting away alive.

Peace out. 

Lastly, greed over a great story is surfacing from my “loyal”(?) readers. With all this back and forth about who owns what, that appears on my blog, let me reiterate that all material posted on my blog becomes the sole property of my blog. If you want to reserve any proprietary rights don’t post it to my blog. I will prominently display this caveat on my blog from now on to remind those who may have forgotten this notice.

Gratefully your blog host,

michelle

Aka BABE: We all know what this means by now :)

If you love my blog and my writes, please make a donation via PayPal, credit card, or e-check, please click the “Donate” button below. (Please only donations from those readers within the United States. – International readers please see my “Donate” page)

Or if you would like to send a check via snail mail, please make checks payable to “Michelle Moquin”, and send to:

Michelle Moquin PO Box 29235 San Francisco, Ca. 94129

Thank you for your loyal support!

All content on this site are property of Michelle Moquin © copyright 2008-2014

“Though she be but little, she be fierce.” – William Shakespeare Midsummer Night’s Dream 

" Politics, god, Life, News, Music, Family, Personal, Travel, Random, Photography, Religion, Aliens, Art, Entertainment, Food, Books, Thoughts, Media, Culture, Love, Sex, Poetry, Prose, Friends, Technology, Humor, Health, Writing, Events, Movies, Sports, Video, Christianity, Atheist, Blogging, History, Work, Education, Business, Fashion, Barack Obama, People, Internet, Relationships, Faith, Photos, Videos, Hillary Clinton, School, Reviews, God, TV, Philosophy, Fun, Science, Environment, Design, The Page, Rants, Pictures, Church, Blog, Nature, Marketing, Television, Democrats, Parenting, Miscellaneous, Current Events, Film, Spirituality, Obama, Musings, Home, Human Rights, Society, Comedy, Me, Random Thoughts, Research, Government, Election 2008, Baseball, Opinion, Recipes, Children, Iraq, Funny, Women, Economics, America, Misc, Commentary, John McCain, Reflections, All, Celebrities, Inspiration, Lifestyle, Theology, Linux, Kids, Games, World, India, Literature, China, Ramblings, Fitness, Money, Review, War, Articles, Economy, Journal, Quotes, NBA, Crime, Anime, Islam, 2008, Stories, Prayer, Diary, Jesus, Buddha, Muslim, Israel, Europe, Links, Marriage, Fiction, American Idol, Software, Leadership, Pop culture, Rants, Video Games, Republicans, Updates, Political, Football, Healing, Blogs, Shopping, USA, Class, Matrix, Course, Work, Web 2.0, My Life, Psychology, Gay, Happiness, Advertising, Field Hockey, Hip-hop, sex, fucking, ass, Soccer, sox"

Posted in Wonderful Women Of The World | 13 Comments »

Happy Mother’s Day!

Posted by Michelle Moquin on 11th May 2014


Bookmark and Share

Good morning!

The modern mother is not all about bouquets and brunch. The modern mother wants something more. Here’s the write from the TIME:

What Mothers Really Want for Mother’s Day

 Sandwich generation moms need flexible work schedules and family leave policies more than they need cards, flowers and jewelry.

Last year, Mother’s Day spending on brunches, jewelry, salon appointments, flowers and greeting cards topped $20 billion, according to the National Retail Federation. And no doubt retailers hope to meet that amount this year too. Brands like American Greetings and Kay Jewelers, a Mother’s Day advertising regular, portray the holiday, and therefore motherhood, as an event for young women doted on by attentive husbands and young children[took out the video ref since that wasn’t an example of mothers being doted on]. But for many, both the holiday and the reality are as much about being a mother as they are about having, and caring for, their own mothers. And mothers taking care of mothers need more than mimosas and manicures to cope with life in the sandwich generation.

Last year, I started the day having breakfast at home with my family. I then drove more than an hour with my kids to visit my mother, while my husband headed out to visit his. I spent the afternoon with my elderly parents, providing lunch and a cake and doing a few odd jobs for them at their home. I returned home after six to start the Sunday night routine: showers, stray homework assignments and stressing about the impending workweek. I went to bed that night feeling a mixture of emotions: grateful for another year with my mother, guilty for wanting the day to myself, overwhelmed by all that my parents needed and I couldn’t give them in a five-hour visit and, as always, exhausted.

Based on data from the National Alliance for Caregiving, the AARPand Pew Research, I’m pretty much an average caregiver in the sandwich generation: female, married, late 40s, a living parent or parents age 65 or older, at least one dependent child and feeling pressed for time. Luckily for me, because I’m also among the 40% of women who serve as primary breadwinners for their household, I won’t experience the same career and financial setbacks that many caregivers do—at least I hope.

The Census Bureau reports there are 39.6 million eldercare providersin the U.S., and the majority of them are women. According to theNational Alliance for Caregiving and the AARP, 70% of them suffer work-related difficulties as a result of their caregiving roles, with female caregivers in particular at risk of financial hardship. That’s because many women report changing their work arrangements to accommodate their caregiving duties by switching to a less demanding job, taking time off or quitting altogether. I know I’ve considered it. But as a result of women making career changes to accommodate their caregiving responsibilities, they are more likely to lose job-related benefits and suffer lost wages. In fact, a study from MetLife and the National Alliance for Caregiving calculated women lose an estimated $324,044 in wages due to caregiving. Often, a working mother’s time out of the office during her childbearing years is compounded by the time she takes off later to care for her parents. With one in three American women already living in poverty or on the brink, it’s imperative we find a way to support these working mothers and daughters.

So while brunches and spa treatments are certainly welcome on Sunday, May 11, a more meaningful way to honor mothers is to recognize their multifaceted roles as parents, adult children and breadwinners, and to advocate for workplace solutions such as flexible schedules and family leave policies, and access to financial and career planning tools. That’s how we keep mothers at work: allow their mothers to age with dignity and raise the next generation of compassionate caregivers. And what mother wouldn’t want that on Mother’s Day?

Liz O’Donnell is the author of the book Mogul, Mom & Maid: the Balancing Act of the Modern Woman and founder of Hello Ladies, named one of the top 100 websites for women byForbes and a Best of the Net by Working Mother Magazine.

♥♥♥

Readers: Is this write speaking to you? What do you want on Mother’s Day?

Blog me. Happy Mother’s Day to all the moms (aka: Wonderful Women Of The World) out there! xox

Peace & Love…

Lastly, greed over a great story is surfacing from my “loyal”(?) readers. With all this back and forth about who owns what, that appears on my blog, let me reiterate that all material posted on my blog becomes the sole property of my blog. If you want to reserve any proprietary rights don’t post it to my blog. I will prominently display this caveat on my blog from now on to remind those who may have forgotten this notice.

Gratefully your blog host,

michelle

Aka BABE: We all know what this means by now :)

If you love my blog and my writes, please make a donation via PayPal, credit card, or e-check, please click the “Donate” button below. (Please only donations from those readers within the United States. – International readers please see my “Donate” page)

Or if you would like to send a check via snail mail, please make checks payable to “Michelle Moquin”, and send to:

Michelle Moquin PO Box 29235 San Francisco, Ca. 94129

Thank you for your loyal support!

All content on this site are property of Michelle Moquin © copyright 2008-2014

“Though she be but little, she be fierce.” – William Shakespeare Midsummer Night’s Dream 

" Politics, god, Life, News, Music, Family, Personal, Travel, Random, Photography, Religion, Aliens, Art, Entertainment, Food, Books, Thoughts, Media, Culture, Love, Sex, Poetry, Prose, Friends, Technology, Humor, Health, Writing, Events, Movies, Sports, Video, Christianity, Atheist, Blogging, History, Work, Education, Business, Fashion, Barack Obama, People, Internet, Relationships, Faith, Photos, Videos, Hillary Clinton, School, Reviews, God, TV, Philosophy, Fun, Science, Environment, Design, The Page, Rants, Pictures, Church, Blog, Nature, Marketing, Television, Democrats, Parenting, Miscellaneous, Current Events, Film, Spirituality, Obama, Musings, Home, Human Rights, Society, Comedy, Me, Random Thoughts, Research, Government, Election 2008, Baseball, Opinion, Recipes, Children, Iraq, Funny, Women, Economics, America, Misc, Commentary, John McCain, Reflections, All, Celebrities, Inspiration, Lifestyle, Theology, Linux, Kids, Games, World, India, Literature, China, Ramblings, Fitness, Money, Review, War, Articles, Economy, Journal, Quotes, NBA, Crime, Anime, Islam, 2008, Stories, Prayer, Diary, Jesus, Buddha, Muslim, Israel, Europe, Links, Marriage, Fiction, American Idol, Software, Leadership, Pop culture, Rants, Video Games, Republicans, Updates, Political, Football, Healing, Blogs, Shopping, USA, Class, Matrix, Course, Work, Web 2.0, My Life, Psychology, Gay, Happiness, Advertising, Field Hockey, Hip-hop, sex, fucking, ass, Soccer, sox"

Posted in Wonderful Women Of The World | 17 Comments »